Categories
31 Days to More Effective Compliance Programs

Day 17 | Managing your third parties


The building blocks of any compliance program lay the foundations for a best practices compliance program. For instance, in the life cycle management of third parties, most compliance practitioners understand the need for a business justification, questionnaire, due diligence, evaluation and compliance terms and conditions in contracts. However, as many companies mature in their compliance programs, the issue of third-party management becomes more important. It is also the one where the rubber meets the road of operationalizing compliance. It is also an area the DOJ specifically articulated in the 2019 Evaluation that companies need to consider.

The key is to have a strategic approach to how you structure and manage your third-party relationships. This may mean more closely partnering with your third parties to help manage the anti-corruption compliance risk. It would certainly lead towards enabling your company to control risk while optimizing the performance of your third parties.

Amalgamate third-parties but have fallbacks. It is incumbent to consolidate your third-party relationships to a smaller number to more fully operationalize your compliance program. This will make the entire third-party lifecycle easier to manage. From the compliance perspective, you may want to have a primary and secondary third-party that you work with in a service line or geographic area to retain this redundancy.

Monitor any subcontracted work. If your direct contracting party has the right or will need to subcontract some work out, you need to have visibility into this from the compliance perspective. You will need to require and monitor that your direct third-party relationship has your approved compliance terms and conditions in their contracts with their subcontractors.

Legal Protections. This is where your compliance terms and conditions will come into play. Consider a full indemnity if your third-party violates the FCPA and your company is dragged into an investigation because of the third-party’s actions. Another important clause is that any FCPA violation is a material breach of contract. This means that you can legally, under the terms of the contract, terminate it immediately, with no requirement for notice and cure. Finally, you need a clause that requires your third-party to cooperate in any compliance investigation. This means cooperation with you and your designated investigation team, but it may also mean cooperation with U.S. governmental authorities as well.

Keep track of your third parties’ financial stability. This is one area that is not usually discussed in the compliance arena around third parties, but it seems almost self-evident. You can certainly imagine the disruption that could occur if your prime third-party supplier in a country or region went bankrupt; but in the compliance realm there is another untoward red flag that is raised in such circumstances. Those third parties under financial pressure may be more easily persuaded to engage in bribery and corruption than third parties that stand on a more solid financial footing.

Formalize incentives for third-party performance. One of the key elements for any third-party contract is the compensation issue. If the commission rate is too high, it could create a very large pool of money that could be used to pay bribes.

Auditing third parties. Critical to any best practices compliance program and an important tool in operationalizing your compliance program, this is a key manner in which a company can manage the third-party relationship after the contract is signed and one which the government will expect you to engage in going forward.

Three key takeaways:

  1. Have a strategic approach to third-party risk management.
  2. Rank third parties based upon a variety of factors including compliance and business performance, length of relationship, benchmarking metrics and KPIs for ongoing monitoring and auditing.
  3. Managing the relationship is where the real work begins.
Categories
Daily Compliance News

January 17, 2020, the What’s Your Plan edition


In today’s edition of the Daily Compliance News:

  • Judge overseeing PG&E bankruptcy wants to see the plan. (Bloomberg)
  • ENI skates. (Reuters)
  • Mets official blasts MLB whistleblower. (com)
  • China pushes belt and road. Are you ready? (NYT)
Categories
This Week in FCPA

Episode 188 – the Say it Ain’t So edition

Jay and I are back to consider some of the top compliance articles and stories which caught our eye this week. Of course, we look into the MLB sign-stealing scandal which has embroiled the Houston Astros, may embroil the Boston Red Sox and let to the Mets firing their newest manager before he managed one game.

  1. MLB lays down the hammer on the Astros. Are the Red Sox next? Tom’s multipart series, Part 1, Part 2and Part 3. His cognitive dissonance is explored in the FCPA Blog.
  2. Mike Volkov says its time to move from reactive to proactive compliance, in a 3-part series on Corrruption Crime and Compliance. Part 1, Part 2 and Part 3
  3. What do DOJ changes mean for the compliance practitioner? Jay explores in his CCI
  4. What is the SEC Enforcement Network? Verity Winship explains in NYU’s Compliance and Enforcement Blog.
  5. Will the Fraud Section now refocus on commodities trading cases? Aitan Goelman in NYU’s Compliance and Enforcement Blog.
  6. What are Red Flags? Gini Dietrich explains in Spin Sucks. Harry Cassin says look out for expensive watches, in the FCPA Blog.
  7. Corporate governance and behavioral ethics, all in the Harvard Law Review on Corporate Governance.
  8. The trouble with transparency. Vera Cherepanova explains in the FCPA Blog.
  9. How Queen informs your compliance program (Hint: Pressure). Matt Kelly, the coolest guy in compliance in Radical Compliance.
  10. On the Compliance Podcast Network, Tom continues his 31 Days to a More Effective Compliance Program series.This week saw the following offerings: Day 13 reviews institutional justice ; Day 14considers risk assessments; Day 15 looks at evaluating a risk assessment; Day 16 details the 3rd party risk management process; Day 17 explains how to manage a 3rd Note 31 Days to a More Effective Compliance Program now has its own iTunes channel. If you want to binge out and listen to only these episodes, click here.

Tom Fox is the Compliance Evangelist and can be reached at tfox@tfoxlaw.com. Jay Rosen is Mr. Monitor and can be reached at jrosen@affiliatedmonitors.com.