Categories
31 Days to More Effective Compliance Programs

Day 27 | Pre-acquisition due diligence in mergers and acquisitions


A company that does not perform adequate due diligence prior to a merger or acquisition may face both legal and business risks. Perhaps most commonly, inadequate due diligence can allow a course of bribery to continue – with all the attendant harms to a business’s profitability and reputation, as well as potential civil and criminal liability. While most compliance practitioners have been long aware of the requirement in the post-acquisition context, the 2012 FCPA Guidance focused many compliance practitioners of the need to engage in robust pre-acquisition due diligence.
This was expanded again in the 2017 Evaluation but the 2019 Guidance made even more clear the need for a robust compliance presence in the pre-acquisition phase. It stated, “A well-designed compliance program should include comprehensive due diligence of any acquisition targets.  Pre-M&A due diligence enables the acquiring company to evaluate more accurately each target’s value and negotiate for the costs of any corruption or misconduct to be borne by the target.  Flawed or incomplete due diligence can allow misconduct to continue at the target company, causing resulting harm to a business’s profitability and reputation and risking civil and criminal liability.
Three key takeaways:

  1. The results of your pre-acquisition due diligence will inform your post-acquisition integration and remediation going forward.
  2. Periodically review your M&A due diligence protocol.
  3. If red flags appear in pre-acquisition due diligence, they should be cleared.

 

Categories
Why a Duck

A Night at the Opera, Part 1 and 2019 Compliance Year in Review


From Vaudeville to the Silver Screen to the Small Screen, the Marx Brothers made an impact wherever people found them. Now Tom Fox and Mike Volkov have wedded their love of the Marx Brothers with their passion for compliance and bring them into the boardroom to help explain and explore the sometimes-chaotic world of governance, risk-management, ethics and compliance. In this episode they begin a three-part series where they discuss the movie A Night at the Opera and how it informs the 2019 in Compliance, FCPA enforcement actions and Compliance into 2020 and beyond.  In this episode we review the year in compliance. Highlights from the podcast include:

  1. Why do many people consider A Night at the Opera the greatest of all Marx Brothers movies? What makes it AFI 100 worthy?
  2. What were some of the key regulatory pronouncements in 2019?
  3. How do the OFAC Compliance Framework and Anti-Trust Division Guidance inform ABC compliance?
  4. Why were the enforcement numbers so great in 2019?
  5. How did the role of compliance professionals strengthen in 2019?
  6. How successful was the DOJ in trying individuals in 2019?

Resources
Mike Volkov-A Record Year in Enforcement and Compliance

Categories
Daily Compliance News

January 27, 2020, the No Morals edition


In today’s edition of the Daily Compliance News:

  • How lack of morals helped fuel opioid crisis. (FT)
  • How UnderArmor lost its mojo. (NYT
  • How Western companies can help to fight corruption. (NYT)
  • Corruption through currency manipulation. (FT)
Categories
FCPA Compliance Report

Philip Urofsky on the Shearman & Sterling 2020 FCPA Digest


In the Episode, I visit with Philip Urofsky, partner at Shearman & Sterling, Editor-in-Chief of the firm’s most excellent FCPA Digest. We visit about the firm’s 2020 FCPA Digest, Recent Trends and Patterns in the  Enforcement of the FCPA and consider some of the highlights from the report. We also take a deep dive into the issue of agency under the FCPA, which was a major legal issue in the Hoskins trial and an ongoing debate on the issue of parent-subsidiary liability under the FCPA. Some of the highlights include:

  1. Enforcement actions and strategies seen in 2019. What did the numbers tell us?
  2. What were some of the perennial statutory issues address and litigated in 2019? Did the DOJ adequately address the issue of parent-subsidiary liability? Do the Barclays and Deutsche Bank enforcement actions end the question of whether a job for a child or relative can be a ‘thing of value’ under the FCPA?
  3. What is the significance you seen in the Criminal Division’s 2019 Guidance?
  4. Is the ‘inability to pay’ a codification of existing DOJ practice or something new?
  5. What is the significance of the Och-Ziff restitution case?
  6. What were some of the key developments in the UK around Bribery Act prosecutions and enforcement actions?

Resources
To download a copy of the Shearman & Sterling 2020 FCPA Digest, Recent Trends and Patterns in the Enforcement of the FCPA click here.
To use the fully searchable Shearman & Sterling FCPA digest, click here.