Jonathan Armstrong and Tom Fox return for another episode of Life with GDPR. In this episode, dissect the case of the Smart TV and considers its implications for de minimis cases brought under GDPR. Some of the issues we consider include:
1. What were the underlying facts of the case?
2. Was the case filed in the correct court (High Court)? If not, why not?
3. What was the court’s ruling?
4. What is the viability of a de minimums claim going forward?
5. When dealing with data protection infringement compensation claims, look to cases from other jurisdictions.
6. No matter how seemingly trivial, organizations should be prepared for them and manage them with care.
Resources
Check out the Cordery Compliance, client alert on this topic, click here. For more information on Cordery Compliance, go their website here. Also check out the GDPR Navigator, one of the top resources for GDPR Compliance by clicking here.
