Categories
ComplianceLIVE

ComplianceLIVE Episode 1: 5 Lines of Service


In the first Compliance Line Episode,  Cailyn, Amanda, and Chris discuss unique uses for a compliance hotline or webform.
Listen to the episode now:

Check out more episodes and full episode videos at ComplianceLine.com, and don’t forget to subscribe on your favorite podcast platform!

Categories
ComplianceLIVE

ComplianceLIVE Episode 2: Sanction Horror Stories ll


Amanda, Karan, and Will are going to CHILL YOU TO THE BONE with three terrifying tales of sanction screening gone wrong!
Listen to the episode now:

Check out more episodes and full episode videos at ComplianceLine.com, and don’t forget to subscribe on your favorite podcast platform!

 

Categories
Great Women in Compliance

Michelle Shapiro, Part 2 on the Private Practice Angle

Welcome to the Great Women in Compliance Podcast, co-hosted by Lisa Fine and Mary Shirley. Today, Mary concludes her two-part episode with Michelle Shapiro, a partner at the law firm of Arent Fox.  Michelle is a career white collar criminal defense attorney who has spent nearly 20 years representing individuals and companies through all phases of investigations and criminal proceedings by federal and state prosecutors and regulators, related to myriad high-stakes issues, such as alleged corruption; insider trading; money laundering; tax, health care, securities and accounting fraud; anti-trust violations; and cyber and other crimes. She also conducts internal investigations of potential misconduct by corporate officers, employees, and agents, including multifaceted transnational investigations for Fortune 500 companies.
Mary speaks with Michelle Shapiro, a partner at Arent Fox about her Compliance experience from the perspective of external counsel.  Episode Two with Michelle opens with interesting insights from Michelle based on her experience volunteering on the WomenLEAD Committee and Diversity and Inclusion Committee at a previous law firm. She shares details of the success stories of those committees which is timely information for anyone thinking about setting up similar committees in their own workplace.  The conversation to asks us to think beyond a token gesture initiative in these areas and consider what companies can do to show that they are truly invested in the advancement of women leaders and valuing diversity and inclusion.
Mary asks Michelle to draw on some of her benchmarking oversight (one of the aspects of working in consultancy that Mary really misses is getting insight into what several other companies are doing firsthand) and share developments she has observed of companies evolving their due diligence program.
To wrap up the episode Mary and Michelle talk about a couple of the key things they look out for when conducting investigations across borders.
Listen in to this episode where Michelle turns the tables on Mary and throws in some surprise questions of her own!
If you enjoy this episode or the podcast generally, please rate our podcast in your favorite podcast player where you can find part one of this discussion with Michelle and all of our other episodes.
Join the Great Women in Compliance community on LinkedIn here.

Categories
Daily Compliance News

November 6, 2019, the ‘What Race Are You’? edition

In today’s edition of Daily Compliance News:

  • How should you handle whistleblower allegations? (FT)
  • “What race are you”? (NYT)
  • Vale CEO called whistleblower ‘a cancer’. (WSJ)
  • FACEBOOK goes all caps. Is it just making online noise? (Washington Post)
Categories
Compliance Into the Weeds

Episode 147-Secondhand Whistleblower Report

Compliance into the Weeds is the only weekly podcast which takes a deep dive into a compliance related topic, literally going into the weeds to more fully explore a subject. In this episode, Matt Kelly and I go into the weeds on a recent academic paper by Stubben and Welch entitled, Are Secondhand Whistleblowing Reports More Credible. The authors reviewed data from the Navex Global data base of 2 million whistleblower reports from more than 1,000 companies from 2004 through 2017.  Their findings have significant implications for CCO, GCs and Boards of Directors.
Some of the highlights include:

  • Why is this the first international podcast of Compliance Into the Weeds?
  • What are the key differences between a first-hand whistleblower report and a secondhand report?
  • Why are over 47% more second-hand reports substantiated than first-hand reports?
  • Why do first-hand reports tend to be about actions against a person and secondhand reports be about things which happened to the organization?
  • What are the implications for triage/investigations of first and secondhand reports?
  • Is confirmation bias at work here?

For additional reading see the following:
Matt’s blog post, Study-Second Hand Reports More Reliable, on Radical Compliance.
Stubben and Welch, Are Secondhand Internal Whistleblowing Reports Credible?