Categories
Blog

Will I Come Home From School Alive?

Starting today, every schoolchild in Texas will have to ask “Mom, will I come home from school alive today?” Every child whose parent is a schoolteacher will have to ask “Mom, will you come home alive today?” In all my years of primary and secondary school, I never had to say these things, let alone even think them. Now because of the policies and continued inaction of the government of the state of Texas, we have to do so.

Uvalde is 60 miles from my hometown of Kerrville. It is the county seat of the next county over from Kerr County. My parents were teachers, my mother taught elementary school for 30 years and my father was a professor for 25 years. So, this one hits very close to home, literally.

Monday saw one of the worst massacres ever of a schoolhouse. 21 total dead, including 19 children under the age of 10, were killed at the Robb Elementary School in Uvalde. Why were they murdered? We will never know the answer to that question. What we do know is that the perpetrator, Salvador Ramos, who turned 18 on May 16, bought not one but two AR-15 rifles and over 350 rounds of ammunition the day after his birthday. He shot his grandmother, posted on Facebook about it and then went out hunting.

What has been the response of Texas government officials? It starts with a prayer for the dead. Government Abbott says Texas is praying for you. I suppose he is also praying for no more school massacres under his gubernatorial watch but since that did not work for the Santa Fe High School in 2018, in which eight students and two teachers were killed, I doubt its effectiveness. Of course, his similar prayers did not work after the church massacres where 26 parishioners were massacred in the First Baptist Church in Sutherland Springs Texas in 2017. Nor did his prayers work after the shopping massacre in El Paso in 2019 where 23 people were killed and 26 more were injured when Patrick Crusius, a 21-year-old from Allen, Texas, allegedly opened fire with an AK-47-style assault weapon at the Walmart located near the Cielo Vista Mall on the east side of El Paso.

I guess attending school is now added to the list of going to church and shopping as things that can get you killed in Texas.

What has Governor Abbott done substantively after all of these massacres? Nothing, zero, zilch, nada; as in a big fat goose egg. His Democratic rival, Beto O’Rourke confronted Abbott at a Press Conference saying,“You are doing nothing. You are offering up nothing. You said this was not predictable. This was totally predictable when you choose not to do anything.” As O’Rourke was being escorted out of the Press Conference, he turned and confronted Abbott with ““This is on you until you choose to do something different,” O’Rourke said. “This will continue to happen. Somebody needs to stand up for the children of this state or they will be continue to be killed just like they were killed in Uvalde yesterday.””

What Abbot has said consistently is that it is not the fault of the gun manufacturers but that we need to better with the “mental health” of Texans. What Abbot has done about mental health in Texas? As reported by NBC News, “in April he slashed $211 million from the department that oversees mental health programs.” How bad is mental health care in Texas? “Texas ranked last out of all 50 states and the District of Columbia for overall access to mental health care, according to the 2021 State of Mental Health in America report.” Does that sound like someone who actually cares about the ‘mental health’ of Texans?

What else did Abbott do after the Uvalde massacre? Attended a fund-raiser. I guess raising money for a political campaign is more important than the mental health of Texans.

As for the idiotic Lt. Governor of Texas, the Honorable Dan Patrick, his response is best summed up by the attitude that the only thing that stops a bad guys with a gun is a good guy with a gun. Unfortunately, it does not work that way. Not only had the Uvalde School District substantially increased its security budget after the Santa Fe massacre, there were good guys with guns at the elementary school. The Houston Chronicle reported “that the school security officer outside was armed and that initial reports said he and Ramos exchanged gunfire.” Moreover, as “Ramos entered the school, two Uvalde police officers exchanged fire with him, and were wounded, according to Olivarez. Ramos went into a classroom and began to kill.”

The buffon Texas Attorney General, Ken Paxton, went in a different direction, saying there should only be one point of ingress into a school. Paxton has sadly forgotten the purpose of doors in schools, they are not only there to let students in; more importantly doors exist to let students out. Over 100 years ago, some 115 women burned to death at the Triangle Fire in NYC because the doors were locked shut to keep the workers safe. Can you imagine what would happen if there was a fire at an elementary school and all the doors except one were locked shut?

What does all this mean for Texas? It means that as the state with “more guns per capita than any other state,” Texas is “awash in weapons.” Lori Post, director of the Buehler Center for Health Policy and Economics at the Northwestern University School of Medicine, was quoted in the NBC News article stating, “After the tragic 2019 mass shooting in El Paso, the governor signed several bills to curb mass shootings; unfortunately, most of those bills involved arming the public to stop mass shooters.”

About the only thing you can say with certainty about Governor Abbott is that he is Keynoting the National Rifle Association (NRA) Convention in Houston this weekend.

Categories
Innovation in Compliance

Exiger’s Fight to Secure Supply Chains: Spotlight on The Defense Industrial Base


Welcome to a podcast series on the fight to secure Supply Chains through cross-industry innovation. Exiger sponsors this series. In this series, we will explore the ongoing efforts of Exiger to lead the discussion and enhancement of Supply Chain Risk Management.
Over this series, I visit with Erika Peters, Senior Vice President and Global Head of Third Party & Supply Chain Risk Management;  Tim Stone, Senior Director, Supply Chain Risk Management for Exiger Federal Solutions; Kim Lee, Director who focuses on risk and compliance; Nick Wildgoose, a Consultant at Exiger; Skyler Chi, Director and Deputy Head of Supply Chain and Third-Party Risk Management;  Andrew Lehmann, Associate Director at Exiger; Jennifer Nestor, Vice President at Exiger, Americas and Public Sector; Theresa Campobasso, Senior Director for Defense Programs; Dan Banes President of Commercial Technology, and Mark Henderson, Director of Solution Design Lead.
In this episode 4, we discuss Supply Chain issues in the defense industrial base (DIB) with Jennifer Nestor and Theresa Campobasso. Highlights of this podcast include:
·      The DIB’s role in Supply Chain Security;
·      What has changed for the DIB regarding Supply Chain Risk Management; and
·      How the DIB responds to the government-led changes in Supply Chain standards.

Resources

Jennifer Nestor Profile

Theresa Campobasso Profile

Exiger Website

Exiger’s Supply Chain Explorer

Categories
Life with GDPR

André Paris on the Brazilian GDPR


Tom Fox returns for another episode of Life with GDPR. This week, Jonathan Armstrong is on assignment, so we are joined by our colleague André Paris, a Brazilian Privacy and Compliance Consultant, Professor, and Lawyer. Andre is the author of the book “Ethics and Transparency – A Path to Compliance.” He is a specialist in building a Corporate Culture based on Ethics, Transparency, and Respect, with experience in Corporate Risk Analysis and Management and Protecting Corporate Reputation and Crisis Management. He is also an enthusiast of building a more ethical and transparent business environment.
In this episode, we take up the Brazilian national GDPR-like data privacy law.  Some of the issues we consider include:
1.     What is Brazilian law?
2.     Who does it apply to?
3.     What does a compliance program look like?

 Resources

Check out Andre’s book, ETHICS & TRANSPARENCY: A Path To Compliance.

André Paris on LinkedIn

Categories
Daily Compliance News

May 26, 2022 the Domestic Corruption Edition


In today’s edition of Daily Compliance News:

  • FTC fines Twitter $150MM. (NPR)
  • Shocking sanitary conditions at shut down baby formula plant. (NYT)
  • Illinois corruption probe yields secret recordings. (The Center Square)
  • Disney drawn into Anaheim corruption probe. (WSJ)
Categories
Blog

Exiger’s Fight to Secure Supply Chains: Spotlight on Defense Industrial Base

Welcome to a blog post series on Exiger’s fight to secure supply chains, sponsored by Exiger LLC. In this series, we explore the ongoing efforts of Exiger to lead the discussion and enhancement of Supply Chain Risk Management. In Episode 4, I visit with Jennifer Nestor, Vice President, Americas and Public Sector, and Theresa Campobasso, Senior Director for Defense Programs. We discuss supply chain issues in the defense industry.
We began with the role of the supply chain in the Defense Industrial Base (DIB). Nestor said, “the DIB is different from other sectors for several reasons, but two stand out. The first will be the unique relationship this sector has with national security missions. The DIB’s role includes defense research and development, production, delivery, and maintenance of military weapons systems, sensors, and other critical technology. This direct impact on US National Security means that the resilience and stability of the DIB and its supply chain are critical to ensuring US economic security and military technological superiority. Moreover, unlike other sectors, the US Defense Community’s ability to protect our nation rests greatly on the DIBs’ risk management efforts to fortify their supply chain, software, and hardware products. The second differentiator is the high rates of foreign adversary targeting that DIB companies experience as opposed to typical commercial organizations. This means that foreign intelligence actors like nation-states, organizations, or individuals employ aggressive actions like foreign investment, M&A activity, espionage, and supply chain and cyber operations to access the US critical infrastructure to steal sensitive information and disrupt our supply chains.”
We then turned to what is new for the supply chain in this area. The heightened pressure on supply chain security, specifically the higher regulatory standards related to supply chain due diligence, the increasing complexity of global supply chains, and, most importantly, the growing availability of data to support SCRM deep into the sub-tier supply chain. Nestor believes that the only way the DIB can ensure they support the Department of Defense’s (DOD) acquisition strategy is by investing in AI technology to map their supply chains and relationships throughout their programs. You can review both direct and indirect exposure to goods and materials from foreign adversaries and nation-state actors by performing supply chain illuminations. This allows you to map the sub-tier supply chain and provides insights regarding risks like counterfeit parts, IP compromise, and critical technology theft.
Campobasso noted an increase in executive orders and regulations over the last several years to address much-needed supply chain security reforms. Interestingly, many of these proposed higher standards put the responsibility on the DIB to prove and demonstrate this level of supply chain transparency and risk management. She cited the example of the “Uyghur Forced Labor Prevention Act, which requires vendors doing business with the government to establish evidence that goods are not the product of forced labor. Another example is the Feb 2022 DOD action plan to secure Defense-Critical Supply Chains.”
The DIB has responded to both these initiatives and challenges. Many large DIBs have moved to acquire an enterprise solution that gives them transparency and actionable intelligence beyond the first tier. Nestor said, “we are seeing the increased emphasis on risk management, and the DIBs are bringing large groups of often 20+ stakeholders to evaluate SCRM capabilities.” Moreover, this “cross-functional collaboration challenges both pre-sale and post-sale to gain consensus and determine how to manage the data and continuous monitoring, mitigate the risks and truly operationalize this increased capability.” Interestingly, the “DIB is also figuring out how to share the SCRM information with their sub-tier suppliers to drive accountability and how best to influence at that level.”
We conclude by considering how the DIB responds to this heightened level of risk insights. A truly effective SCRM solution is more comprehensive than just sanctions or watchlist checks. Campobasso noted that Exiger has a long history of assisting the Defense community to uncover hidden risks, helping to manage those risks, and making supply chains more transparent and secure, mainly through technological innovation and solutions. Specifically, the TRADES framework enables DIBs to measure SCRM program progress over time to ensure appropriate Return on Investment (ROI). Nestor concluded that there is still some organizational change resistance to these innovations. However, she believes that the key is to involve as many key stakeholders across the business and bring consensus to your project.
Join us tomorrow, where we will spotlight the energy sector.
Resources
Jennifer Nestor Profile
Theresa Campobasso Profile
Exiger Website
Exiger’s Supply Chain Explorer