Categories
Blog

ESG and Compliance – The Materiality Assessment

Every compliance professional should be aware of what a risk assessment is and its importance in any compliance program. Numerous regulatory frameworks state it be the key foundational mechanism to identifying corporate risk for any corporate compliance program. However, in the Environmental, Social and Governance (ESG) world, you need to understand the material ESG matters for your organization. This transforms a risk assessment into a ‘Materiality Assessment’, which is the starting point from which you manage your non-financial risks and opportunities.
A systematic materiality assessment helps determine which topics should be considered in business or sustainability strategy development, in performance measurement and in reporting. A materiality assessment is the starting point for an overall sustainability framework. It clarifies the strategic focus, helps define suitable goals and KPIs, and sets the framework for internal and external communication.
In a materiality assessment, potentially relevant topics are evaluated from different perspectives to gain a comprehensive picture of the expectations of your business and its impact on society and the environment. According to SustainServ, some “topics must be deliberately left out in order to focus on the most relevant areas. This allows you to ensure long-term business success, meet stakeholder expectations and contribute to sustainable development. Through the exchange with your stakeholders, you not only gather insight into their needs and expectations vis-à-vis your company but also strengthen your relationships.”
KPMG, in their 2017 paper entitled “Environmental, social and governance (ESG) materiality assessment”, said, “to be valuable and credible, the development of ESG reporting practices depends on an holistic approach to your material ESG matters, and not merely the extraction (and in some cases extrapolation) of historic ESG data within your organisation.”
However, KPMG sees the materiality assessment as broader in context and believes that it “should be used as a strategic business tool, with implications beyond corporate responsibility (CR) or sustainability reporting.” This is because it provides an “opportunity to apply a sustainability lens to business risk, opportunity, trend-spotting and enterprise risk management processes. Rather than creating a separate, isolated process, leading companies embed sustainability thinking within existing processes.”
KPMG believes the benefits can broad and varied including the following:

  • Ensuring business strategy takes into account significant social and environmental topics, and the management of sustainability issues is embedded in wider business processes.
  • Identifying trends on the horizon, such as water scarcity or changing weather patterns, that could significantly impact your company’s ability to create value in the long-term.
  • Prioritizing your resources for the sustainability issues that matter most to your business and stakeholders, so you can focus time and money on the most important topics, and on collecting relevant data.
  • Highlighting areas where you need to manage and monitor risks that are important but not currently addressed.
  • Identifying the areas of interest to the most important stakeholders, enabling you to report concise information that gives a meaningful picture of progress to those who need it.
  • Helping to identify where your company is creating, or reducing, value for society.

Antea Group believes that materiality assessments should be viewed as “formal exercises aimed at engaging stakeholders to find out how important specific environmental, social and governance (ESG) issues are to them. The insights gained can then be used to guide strategy and communication, and help you tell a more meaningful sustainability story.” They provide a seven step approach to conducting a materiality assessment.

  1. Identify internal and external stakeholders. You should start by creating a list of relevant stakeholder groups, then identify key contacts within each who can provide a meaningful perspective on your company’s sustainability strategy.
  2. Conduct some initial stakeholder outreach. After you have identified the key stakeholders, reach out to them and seek their participation. You should “Keep your pitch as concise as possible without leaving out essential details. Your objective should be to express to the participant group why their unique insights are valuable and how their insights will be used to inform your company’s sustainability strategy and business practices.”
  3. Identify and prioritize what you want to measure. Next, “determine what sustainability indicators to measure so you actually get the insights you want and need.” They break down these sustainability indicators into:
    1. Economic – This would include issues such as “revenue, profit and company turnover.”
    2. Social – Here you should consider such areas as “labor statistics, human rights, consumer issues and community impact.”
    3. Environmental – This area would include overall carbon footprint, water stewardship, greenhouse gas emissions and waste management.
  4. Design your materiality survey. Just as with risk assessments, materiality assessments should be formal, structured engagements with stakeholders. Make the survey user friendly and equally straightforward to analyze. They suggest, asking “stakeholders to rate the importance and impact of each indicator you identify on a numerical scale, such as 1-5 or 1-10. This will give you quantitative data that can be analyzed and explained visually. Leave additional space for written insights and comments to enhance the results you receive.”
  5. Launch your survey and start collecting insights. Here you should “reach back out to your stakeholders and provide them with the link to the survey and a deadline…When the deadline approaches, reach back out to those who have yet to complete the survey to remind them of the deadline.”
  6. Analysis. As with a risk assessment you have to interpret and analyze the results. Create a forced ranking for your survey results to understand what issues are most important to each stakeholder group. Group the data together to find commonalities and anomalies as well. Map out graphs to visually portray trends, observations, the commonalities and anomalies. They suggest the “end result should be a formal matrix graph that plots how each indicator ranks in significance relative to stakeholder influence.”
  7. Into action. Here they suggest sharing your results and insights with your stakeholders and those outside the organization as well. It can be done in a “formal sustainability report or summary, but then can be shared more widely through other channels, such as the company website or media releases.” (For a great example of this check out the Bank of America Materiality Report here.)

Antea Group ends by stating, “Sharing your materiality assessment results can serve as a starting point for continuing the conversation and maintaining engagement with your sustainability initiatives. Welcome feedback from all stakeholders who view your materiality assessment results so that you can keep the conversation flowing after the assessment is complete. In addition, incorporate your findings into your overall sustainability strategy so you can create communications plans for each group, and more effectively tell your company’s sustainability story.”
The steps laid out herein should be both familiar and comfortable for every compliance professional. As you move into a greater role in your organization around ESG you will be ready to begin the process, with a materiality assessment.

Categories
Compliance Kitchen

AML in Japan


The Kitchen reviews the 2021 report issued by the Financial Action Task Force on AML measures in Japan.

Categories
Daily Compliance News

September 20, 2021 the Move to the Cloud edition


In today’s edition of Daily Compliance News:

  • Wells Fargo moves to the cloud. (WSJ)
  • World Bank China-rigging scandal rattles investors. (WSJ)
  • IMF chief denies undue influence. (NYT)
  • Trump Administration corruption at EPA alleged. (The Intercept)
Categories
The ESG Report

Supply Chain and ESG in the Baltics with Jonathan Armstrong


 
Jonathan Armstrong, Partner at Cordery Compliance, joins Tom Fox on this episode of the ESG Report to discuss important supply chain issues in the EU and Baltic regions. They talk about how legislation has evolved and the importance of looking at ESG risks with a holistic view. 
 

 
Evolution of Due Diligence Legislation
“What have you seen legislative-wise around supply chain due diligence from that part of the EU?” Tom asks Jonathan. He responds that he and his team have done major work in modern slavery and supply chain due diligence in the EU and Baltics. There has been region-wide legislation, as well as country-specific legislation, he comments. Tom asks how this plays into an overall ESG framework. Jonathan remarks, “I think there’s almost three forces at play. There’s the legislative changes; there’s corporations trying to do ESG well and be regarded as good corporate citizens; and then there are potentially consumers voting with their feet as well … by not buying those products.” Consumers in the fashion and apparel industries particularly, ‘vote with their feet’ by refusing to buy from companies with bad ESG practices.
 
A Holistic Approach
Tom comments that a regulatory framework as well as taking a holistic approach to supply chain management would lead more companies to put processes into place to comply with the law, which would ultimately lead to more efficient supply chain procedures. Jonathan agrees. Companies who do ESG well assess supply chain risks holistically, he points out. In particular, they look at where and with whom their suppliers transact business. Although some countries are prone to higher risk, it’s not as cut and dry as labeling those countries bad and others good. He shares an example of a UK manufacturer who brought slave labor from Asia to the UK. “He just imported the problem,” Jonathan says. His UK retailers felt good about buying locally, but unknowingly was still supporting child labor. 
 
Not Easy to Fix
“It isn’t an easy problem to fix,” Jonathan tells Tom. “But that doesn’t mean that we shouldn’t try and have in place clear expectations of our suppliers.” Due diligence and training are important in addressing these issues. Jonathan comments that confusing legislation – the voluntary Modern Slavery Register in the UK is a prime example – is adding to the problem instead of resolving it. Companies have differing opinions about their responsibility to report, and some even have instigated litigation to oppose reporting. Overall, he says, “There is a real need for transparency, and there’s also a need for corporations to invest more in doing the right thing and evidence that doing, rather than just saying they are doing the right thing.”
 
Resources
Jonathan Armstrong on LinkedIn | Twitter
Cordery Compliance 
Articles on modern slavery and supply chain management
 
 

Categories
FCPA Compliance Report

Randy Sorrels-A New Law Firm

In this Episode of the FCPA Compliance Report, I am joined by Randy Sorrels, an old colleague in the legal practice from Houston. Randy is also a former President of the State Bar of Texas. He also started a new law firm with his wife Alex at the height of the pandemic. He visits about his new law firm, his innovative use of social media and real commitment to bringing diversity to his practice.

Highlights of this podcast include:

  1. Professional background and what he learned at his prior firms.
  2. A confluence of events led to his open The Sorrels Law Firm.
  3. Hiring talent that is not only diverse racially but also diverse in professional backgrounds beyond law.
  4. Trying cases during a pandemic.
  5. Practicing law as a trial lawyer in 2021.
  6. Innovative use of social media to publicize the new law firm.
  7. The importance of the State Bar of Texas.
  8. What SealPT meant to the both of us.

For more information on The Sorrels Law Firm, check out their website here. Check out Randy’s profile here.

Categories
Blog

ESG and Compliance: Policies and Procedures

This week I will be considering the role compliance and a Chief Compliance Officer (CCO) should play in a corporate Environmental, Sustainable and Governance (ESG) program. Over this series, I will explore how the StoneTurn Group, LLP (StoneTurn) ESG Framework provides a structure through which any compliance professional can create an organization necessary for an ESG program. Today we take up ESG policies and procedures.
There are numerous reasons to put some serious work into your ESG policies and procedures. They are certainly a first line of defense when stakeholders coming knocking. Having ESG policies and procedures that outline responsibilities for compliance within the company, detail proper internal controls, auditing practices, and documentation policies are critical for public companies under ESG regulatory scrutiny. The Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) and other regulators will take a strong view against a company that does not have well thought out and articulated ESG policies and procedures; all of which are systematically reviewed and updated. Moreover, having policies written out and signed by employees provides what some consider the most vital layer of communication and acts as an internal control. Together with a signed acknowledgement, these documents can serve as evidentiary support if a future issue arises. In other words, the “Document, Document, and Document” mantra applies just as strongly to this area of anti-corruption compliance.
Additionally, a company’s ESG policies provide a basic set of guidelines for employees and others to follow. ESG policies should give general prescriptions and should be supplemented by more specific procedures. By establishing what is and what is not acceptable behavior, a company helps mitigate the risks posed by employees who might not always make the right ESG choices.
Bryan J. Sillaman and Alexandra Poe, Hughes Hubbard & Reed LLP, in an article entitled Five Steps to Establishing a Corporate ESG Policy for the Present Moment, suggested that an organization should focus their ESG policies and procedures that are “applicable generally with respect to your industry and then with greater specificity to the conditions, operations and geographic footprint of your particular company.” In the area of Environmental, that could mean your organization’s “contribution to climate change, including energy use (such as its carbon footprint and use of clean energy), waste management, pollution, resource conservation, impact to habitats and environmental remediation.” From there you could consider if your organization has opportunities to promote positive change, in reducing “energy loads, expanding organic food production, or adopting technologies that repair environmental damage.” Moreover, with the passage of the Germany Supply Chain Act and other legislation such as the UK Anti-Slavery Act, both regulators and investors “want to see companies consider their own operations and impacts arising from your supply chain.”
In the prong of Sustainability, what are your policies and procedures around conduct that affects your organization’s relationship with human communities, from employees to customers and local communities where the company operates? Obviously, social justice is a key component, but it quickly expands out to working conditions, whether a state will provide basic social and healthcare services and employ health and safety. From there it can include such disparate topics as “childcare, education, equal opportunity, pay equity, financial inclusion, job creation and social justice. Companies that make products that have the potential to harm people, like guns, toxic materials, alcohol and other addictive substances, have special considerations in this regard.” But all companies must justify having physical operations in geographic locations which will not protect employees from mass shootings or even pandemic related threats such as Covid-19 to the Delta Variant.
In the area of Governance, compliance continues to play a key role. Here consider your organization’s policies and procedures “relating to regulatory compliance and the conduct of
officers and directors and the expectations of integrity set at the top of the organization.” The concerns are as varied as ranging from “accurate and transparent financial reporting, to executive compensation practices, diversity and inclusion, and avoidance of conflicts of interest, sexual harassment and corrupt practices.” Governance policies and procedures should also evaluate the “composition of a board of directors or executive teams, to assess whether representatives to those bodies are well suited to address concerns of all stakeholders and potential ESG risks.”
Cowen Inc. incorporated all of these concepts into its corporate ESG Statement. In the area of Environmental, Cowen states:
Cowen recognizes that the world faces environmental challenges and is committed to promoting a healthy environment. As an organization that engages in the global financial markets, we believe that our business can and should do things to promote a positive influence in matters that improve the world.
In the area of Sustainability, Cowen states:
At Cowen, we pride ourselves in the long-standing culture of respect and empathy for our employees and the community at-large. 
We employ a fair pay practice which ensures that Cowen’s pay practice is competitive with the market for the same or similar jobs, qualifications and experience. 
We believe that diversity and inclusion strategies are the catalyst for success and innovation in the workplace. We believe that differing opinions and lived experiences are valuable and serve to support our business overall. 
Wellness, both physical and financial, is the cornerstone of our employee benefit programs. Our… programs, such as emergency back-up elder/child care, subsidized health club membership and flexible work arrangements, help employees balance work, life and family matters more effectively. 
We also work to create partnerships with vendors that share a commitment to sustainability. Vendors engaged in providing products and services to Cowen are expected to act in a manner that is consistent with our Code of Business Conduct and Ethics. During vendor evaluations, Cowen takes the appropriate steps to ensure ethical business practices, labor and human rights, vendor diversification and inclusion, environmental stewardship, management systems and governance are considered. 
We intend to further improve our social impact across our organization and within the greater community. 
In the area of Governance, Cowen states:
Strong governance, ethical business practices and prudent risk management are critical ingredients to Cowen’s achievement of its goal for long-term value creation for shareholders and driving sustainability.
 Corporate governance guidelines assist the Board in the exercise of its responsibilities and to promote the effective functioning of the Board and its committees. The Board’s goal is to oversee and direct management in building long-term value for the Company’s stockholders. In addition, the Board’s goal is to assure the strength, integrity and vitality of the Company for its customers, clients, employees and the communities in which it operates. 
Cowen’s Code of Business Conduct and Ethics, which applies to all officers, employees and members of the Board, serves as the foundation for high standards of integrity and ethics, the deterrence of wrongdoing and the promotion of compliance with applicable regulations.
The Board and executive management are ultimately responsible for the review and oversight of risk at Cowen. They are supported by a risk management framework which includes committees, departments and systems which monitor, manage and report on market, liquidity and operational risk.
 As we expand our ESG initiative, we will seek ways to further optimize our governance process.
Clearly a compliance function has a large role in filling out the policies and procedures to implement these statements.

Categories
Sunday Book Review

September 19, 2021, the 2021 Booker edition


In today’s edition of Sunday Book Review:

  • The Promise by Damon Galgut.
  • No One is Talking About This by Patricia Lockwood.
  • Bewilderment by Richard Powers.
  • Through our Enemies’ Eyes by Michael Scheuer.
  • The Great Circle by Maggie Shipstead.
  • The Fortune Men by Nadifa Mohamed.
  • The Passage North by Anuk Arudpragasam.
Categories
Daily Compliance News

September 18, 2021 the Sorry Rudy edition


In today’s edition of Daily Compliance News:

  • Court denies Giuliani request to withhold documents. (WSJ)
  • Companies grapple with the Covid vaccine mandate. (WSJ)
  • IMF chief denies undue influence. (NYT)
  • Treasury to tackle ransomware. (WaPo)
Categories
Compliance Kitchen

EU and Dual Use Sanctions


The EU issued its new and updated dual use items export regulations and The Kitchen took a look at the main points.

Categories
This Week in FCPA

Episode 269 – the Focus on the SEC edition


Jay is once again traveling this week so we are joined by Professor Karen Woody as special guest co-host. I know you will enjoy her comments on this special Focus on the SEC edition.

Stories

1.     Coinbase v. the SEC. Andrew Ross Sorkin previews in NYT Dealbook. Francine McKenna takes a deep dive in The Dig (sub req’d) Gary Gensler testifies before Congress, Paul Keiran in the WSJ.
2.     Why compliance should lead ESG. Kyle Brasseur  in Compliance Week (sub req’d)
3.     Another cheating scandal at KPMG. Matt Kelly on Radical Compliance. Leadership
4.     Leadership lessons from the fall of Kabul. Sandra Erez in CCI.
5.     What are the Big 3 issues from this year’s proxy season? Eric Knox, Sehrish Siddiqui and David Venturella in CCI.
6.     How large a problem is corporate recidivism? Dick Cassin in the FCPA Blog.
7.     The Great Resignation and meaningful work. Brett Beasley in Notre Dame’s Deloitte Center for Ethical Leadership.
8.     Boeing safety woes hit the Boardroom. Wachtel Lipton lawyers in Harvard Law School Forum on Corporate Governance.
9.     On the intersection of culture and corporation reputation. Mike Volkov in Corruption Crime and Compliance.
10.  Learned Hand on leadership and humility. Jeff Kaplan in the Conflict of Interests blog.

Podcasts and Events

11.  CCI surveying stress in compliance. Henry Kronk in CCI. Take the survey here
12.  On Innovation in Compliance, Tom has run a 6-part special podcast series on Looking Back on 9/11, sponsored by Affiliated Monitors. In this series he will visit with professionals from a variety of compliance perspectives who will discuss how 9/11 changed our profession, including three who were in NYC during the attacks. Hear thoughts and reflections from Gabe HidalgoJuan ZarateAlex DillEric FeldmanScott Moritz and John Lee Dumas.
13.  Are you exasperated? Then check out the latest offering from the Compliance Podcast Network, F*ing Argentina. In this podcast series co-hosts Tom Fox and Gregg Greenberg, author of F* Argentina explore the current American psyche of being overworked, over leveraged, overtired and overwhelmed. Find out about modern America’s exasperation with well…exasperation. In Episode 1, the dreaded Parent Meeting night at your child’s elementary school.
14.  Ethisphere’s World Most Ethical Company awards for 2022 are open for submission. For more information on the Application Process, click here.
15.  Breaking News features The Compliance Handbook, 2nd edition. Check out the Breaking News feature here. Purchase The Compliance Handbook, 2nd edition here.
Tom Fox is the Voice of Compliance and can be reached at tfox@tfoxlaw.com.