Author: admin

Categories
Life with GDPR

Life With GDPR: Episode 23- Looking into the 2019 Crystal Ball

In this episode, I visit with Jonathan Armstrong consider some of his predictions for the rest of 2019. Even if these predictions do not become fully formed, you should consider them in light of your data privacy/data protection policies and protocols. Some of the issues and highlights are:

  1. Drones-what are the GDPR implications.
  2. The number of data breach notifications under GDPR. Through the end of January there were over 42,000 in the EU alone.
  3. Will AI and self-driving cars follow the rules on safe driving standards, or will there be new rules for the road?
  4. What will be the effects of data, big data and AI in elections going forward? What will be the fallout from Cambridge Analytica going forward?
  5. How will businesses respond to the industrialization of internet crime? What happens when there is a Zero-Day exploit?
  6. Cybersecurity insurance. Will standard insurance rules and regulations apply, or will new policy language be drafted for such coverage?

For more information on Cordery Compliance, go their website here. Also check out the GDPR Navigator, one of the top resources for GDPR Compliance by clicking here.

Categories
Daily Compliance News

Daily Compliance News: March 21, 2019-the Google spanked edition

MARCH 21, 2019 BY TOM FOX


In today’s edition of Daily Compliance News:

  • Chuck Pearson pleads guilty. (com)
  • USC goes after the students fraudulently admitted. (NPR)
  • EU spank Google to the tune of $1.5bn for anti-trust violations. (Financial Times)
  • Bayer stock plummets. (Washington Post)
Categories
FCPA Compliance Report

MTS Foreign Corrupt Practices Act Enforcement Action: Part III – Missed Red Flags and Overridden Controls

In a stunning resolution to one of the longest running bribery, corruption and money-laundering sagas on the international stage, the Department of Justice and Securities Exchange Commission both announced settlement of a Foreign Corrupt Practices Act (FCPA) enforcement action against the Russian telecom company, Mobile TeleSystems PJSC (MTS). This podcast continues a five-part series will examine the background facts of the case, provide a detailed review of the bribery schemes involved, the compliance failures of MTS and its actions during the investigation which contributed to the size of the penalty, the individual criminal prosecutions brought by the Department of Justice as a part of this action and the key lessons learned by the compliance practitioner. In this Part 3, I discuss the failures in the MTS compliance regime, the override of internal controls and local business unit management actions which facilitated the bribery schemes.
The schemes involved:
a. Purchase of entities controlled by or through Karimova;
b. Purchase of telecom licenses at inflated prices; and
c. Fraudulent charitable donations.
The documents which are the subject of this series are:
  1. MTS Deferred Prosecution Agreement (DPA);
  2. MTS Criminal Information (MTS Information);
  3. SEC Cease and Desist Order (Order);
  4. Karimova and Akhmedov Indictment (Indictment);
  5. Kolorit Dizayn Ink LLC Plea Agreement (Plea Agreement); and
  6. Kolorit Dizayn Ink Information (Kolorit Information);
  7. DOJ Press Release and
  8. SEC Press Release.
Categories
Compliance Into the Weeds

Compliance into the Weeds: Episode 115-Regulatory Capture and Regulatory Approval at the FAA

Compliance into the Weeds is the only weekly podcast which takes a deep dive into a compliance related topic, literally going into the weeds to more fully explore a subject. In this episode, Matt Kelly (the coolest guy in compliance) and I take a deep dive into the circumstances around the FAA approval process regarding the Boeing 737 MAX in the context of the crash in Ethiopia.We consider regulatory capture and what it might mean for US leadership in the aviation industry worldwide.

Some of the highlights include:

  • What was the process by which the plane was approved by the FAA?
  • How did the Boeing CEO persuade President Trump to prevent the FAA from grounding the Boeing fleet during the investigation process?
  • Why did the Ethiopian government send the plane’s black box to France, rather than the US, for analysis?
  • How did the US lose the world’s leadership in aviation safety?
  • Where was Boeing’s compliance function during all of this?
  • What are the lessons for the compliance practitioner?

For additional reading, see articles discussed in this podcast:

  1. In the Seattle Times, Flawed analysis, failed oversight: How Boeing, FAA certified the suspect 737 MAX flight control system, by Dominick Gates
  2. In the Wall Street Journal, Prosecutors, Transportation Department Scrutinize Development of Boeing’s 737 MAXby Andrew Tangel, Andy Pasztor and Robert Wall
  3. In Slate.com, Where Did Boeing Go Wrong? by Jeff Wise.
Categories
Daily Compliance News

Daily Compliance News: March 20, 2019-the Risky Business edition

MARCH 20, 2019 BY TOM FOX


In today’s edition of Daily Compliance News:

  • Cambridge Analytica cover up? (The Daily Beast)
  • SEC ‘stunned’ Musk violated court order. (Bloomberg)
  • Japanese Olympic Committee head resigns amid bribery scandal. (Fox Sports)
  • It’s risky business to loan money to Donald Trump. (New York Times)
Categories
FCPA Compliance Report

MTS Foreign Corrupt Practices Act Enforcement Action: Part II-the Bribery Schemes

In a stunning resolution to one of the longest running bribery, corruption and money-laundering sagas on the international stage, the Department of Justice and Securities Exchange Commission both announced settlement of a Foreign Corrupt Practices Act (FCPA) enforcement action against the Russian telecom company, Mobile TeleSystems PJSC (MTS). This podcast continues a five-part series will examine the background facts of the case, provide a detailed review of the bribery schemes involved, the compliance failures of MTS and its actions during the investigation which contributed to the size of the penalty, the individual criminal prosecutions brought by the Department of Justice as a part of this action and the key lessons learned by the compliance practitioner. In this Part 2, I consider the bribery schemes used by MTS to pay the bribes and Karimova to receive the bribe payments.
The documents which are the subject of this series are:
  1. MTS Deferred Prosecution Agreement (DPA);
  2. MTS Criminal Information (MTS Information);
  3. SEC Cease and Desist Order (Order);
  4. Karimova and Akhmedov Indictment (Indictment);
  5. Kolorit Dizayn Ink LLC Plea Agreement (Plea Agreement); and
  6. Kolorit Dizayn Ink Information (Kolorit Information);
  7. DOJ Press Release and
  8. SEC Press Release.
For additional reading see the blog post, “MTS FCPA Settlement and Karimova Indictment: Part II – The Bribery Schemes“
Categories
Innovation in Compliance

Nimble and Strategic Compliance with Patrick Conroy

On this episode of the Innovation in Compliance Podcast, we have Patrick Conroy, RegTech Leader and Managing Director at ACA Technology. What does ACA do, what technologies and solutions do they offer, and how can you leverage them to make your compliance programs more strategic, nimble, and proactive?

Professional background
Patrick shares how he got his start in financial services, to working at the largest global banks in the world, and honing his skills as a compliance practitioner and embracing technology. Through that lens, he started building compliance services and looking at different emerging technologies, as well as focusing on RegTech at the firm.
ACA products and services
ACA’s solutions are derived from subject matter expertise with tech enablement around it, to help firms develop and architect their overall compliance programs. They focus across a few different verticals: compliance risk, advisory consulting, managed services, education and training, and technology solutions. Patrick goes into detail about each of these verticals, outlining the specific programs, support, and services they offer for each of them.
ComplianceAlpha and Compliance ELF
Compliance Alpha is ACA’s centralized platform which helps firms mitigate their risks through the efficiencies of synergies, as well as scale the workflows while keeping everything harmonized and transparent at the organizational level.
Within the platform are the Compliance ELF, the code of ethics, personal trading, and employee compliance management modules. This moves the actual doing and operationalization of compliance to the front lines at the employee level, where they’re inputting and capturing the data that can later be used by compliance professionals, the board of directors, or senior management in more of an oversight role.
All in all, the ComplianceAlpha allows organizations to have the tools at their fingertips to hone in on what’s really important — like detecting fraudulent behavior and mitigating overall firm risks — so they can become a lot more nimble, strategic, and proactive.
Resources
Patrick Conroy | ACA Compliance Group| 6 Ways to Stay Ahead of Financial Regulators with RegTech
Categories
Daily Compliance News

Daily Compliance News: March 19, 2019-the filling out my bracket edition

MARCH 19, 2019 BY TOM FOX


In today’s edition of Daily Compliance News:

Categories
FCPA Compliance Report

MTS Foreign Corrupt Practices Act Enforcement Action: Part I-Introduction


In a stunning resolution to one of the longest running bribery, corruption and money-laundering sagas on the international stage, the Department of Justice and Securities Exchange Commission both announced settlement of a Foreign Corrupt Practices Act (FCPA) enforcement action against the Russian telecom company, Mobile TeleSystems PJSC (MTS). The FCPA enforcement action came in at $850 million which makes it Number 3 in the Top 10 of all-time FCPA settlements. This podcast opens a multi-part series will examine the background facts of the case, provide a detailed review of the bribery schemes involved, the compliance failures of MTS and its actions during the investigation which contributed to the size of the penalty, the individual criminal prosecutions brought by the Department of Justice as a part of this action and the key lessons learned by the compliance practitioner. In this Part 1, I begin with a review of the background facts, the parties and players and the fine and penalty of the MTS Foreign Corrupt Practices Act enforcement action.
The enforcement action was the third involving the same individual from the same country. That individual was Gulnara Karimova, the daughter of the former President of Uzbekistan. If that name sounds familiar to compliance professionals it is because she was also involved in the receipt of bribes paid in two other Top 10 FCPA enforcement actions; VimpelCom (now VEON Ltd.) and Telia Company AB. Contemporaneously with FCPA enforcement action involving MTS, there was a criminal indictment filed against Karimova and Bekhzod Akhmedov, a former MTS executive based in Uzbekistan. Akhmedov was charged with violating the FCPA for paying bribes to or for the benefit of Karimova and Karimova was charged she with laundering the money received as bribes.
The documents which are the subject of this series are:

  1. MTS Deferred Prosecution Agreement (DPA);
  2. MTS Criminal Information (MTS Information);
  3. SEC Cease and Desist Order (Order);
  4. Karimova and Akhmedov Indictment (Indictment);
  5. Kolorit Dizayn Ink LLC Plea Agreement (Plea Agreement); and
  6. Kolorit Dizayn Ink Information (Kolorit Information);
  7. DOJ Press Release and
  8. SEC Press Release.

For additional reading see the blog post, “MTS FCPA Settlement and Karimova Indictment: Part I-Introduction“.

Categories
FCPA Compliance Report

FCPA Compliance Report-Episode 422, Vera Cherepanova

In this episode I visit with Vera Cherepanova author of the book, “Compliance Program of an Organisation”. We visit about her recent article on the FCPA Blog and its implications. Some of the highlights from the podcast include:

  1. Cherepanova’s unique professional background.
  2. What led to her to pen the recent article in the FCPA Blog, “Who’s to blame? The bad apple or the barrel?”
  3. What are the differences in the ‘situation perspective’ and the ‘personality perspective’?
  4. How do group dynamics inform corporate decision making?
  5. How can a compliance program be designed to prevent nefarious group think which might lead to bribery and corruption?
  6. Why is the myth of the rogue employee just that, a myth?

Resources:
FCPA Blog post “Who’s to blame? The bad apple or the barrel?”
Studio Etica website
LinkedIn Profile