The story begins with a respected banker, Alexander Holder, who comes to Sherlock Holmes for help. Holder tells Holmes that he was entrusted by a client with a precious artifact, the Beryl Coronet, which is studded with valuable jewels. Holder, fearing the artifact might get stolen, took it home and locked it in his safe.
The following morning, Holder finds the coronet damaged, and three beryls are missing. Holder immediately suspects his son Arthur, as he was found with the artifact in the middle of the night in a frantic state. Although he claims innocence, Arthur refuses to provide any alibi. Holder, devastated and confused, seeks Holmes’ help in solving the mystery.
After examining the scene, Holmes infers that the intruder was an amateur. He notices footprints that lead to and from a garden window. Holmes suspects Arthur’s cousin, Mary, after discovering that she had been out walking late that night and received a sizable payment from a mysterious source.
Holmes eventually identifies the true culprit as Sir George Burnwell, a man of questionable character who had been romantically involved with Mary. Mary had been paying Burnwell to keep quiet about their relationship, using money she received from pawning her own jewelry.
Holmes manages to recover the stolen jewels from a pawnbroker. It is revealed that Arthur was indeed innocent and had taken the blame to protect Mary, whom he loved. The story concludes with Holder expressing relief at the solution, but also sorrow that Mary had been led astray by Burnwell.
Compliance Lessons
Due Diligence: The plot revolves around a precious beryl coronet that is partially stolen. The owner, Mr. Holder, fails to exercise due diligence in securing the coronet, leading to the theft. This highlights the importance of thorough risk assessment and due diligence in compliance, particularly regarding asset security.
Confidentiality: The coronet is a state secret. Its value is immense, and it is given to Holder to be used as a security against a loan. This underscores the importance of safeguarding sensitive or proprietary information and the responsibility individuals and organizations have in maintaining confidentiality.
Insider Threat: The theft is carried out by a trusted individual within the household. This reflects real-world scenarios where individuals within an organization pose significant risks. It’s crucial to establish systems that can detect and prevent insider threats.
Crisis Preparation: Holder makes an immediate decision to approach Sherlock Holmes when the theft is discovered. This can be related to the crisis training that should be followed when a breach or issue is detected within an organization, including notifying the relevant authorities or consulting professionals to handle the situation. You should game out and plan your cyber breach responses.
Trust and Transparency: The conclusion of the story reveals a complex web of familial relationships and a severe lack of trust and transparency within the Holder household. This emphasizes the significance of fostering a culture of openness, trust, and transparency within an organization. Honest communication and transparency can prevent misunderstandings and miscommunication that might lead to non-compliance issues.
Unintended Consequences: The impulsiveness and rash decisions of characters in the story lead to unintended consequences, such as Arthur’s unjust imprisonment. This is a reminder that organizations must think through the potential outcomes of their actions, especially with regards to compliance and regulatory matters, to avoid unexpected negative impacts.
Resource
The New Annotated Sherlock Holmes
