Categories
FCPA Compliance Report

Emerging Issues in Healthcare Compliance and Monitoring-Episode 1–Focus on Opioid Prescribing – Regulatory and Liability Risks

In this special five-part podcast series, sponsored by Affiliated Monitors, Inc., I visit with AMI Managing Director Jesse Caplan on emerging issues in healthcare compliance and monitoring. Healthcare provider organizations and practices face many different types of potential regulatory and liability risks – in this first episode we focus on the risks posed by opioid prescribing. We consider the some of the following issues: 

What are the risks to providers and health care organizations from opioid prescribing? 

  1. Policymakers and the healthcare industry are trying to address the opioid crisis in a number of different ways. One of those ways is to focus on the prescribing of opioids, with the goal of significantly reducing the number of people who are prescribed opioids and become addicted or who divert legally prescribed drugs. 
  2. Health care providers who engage in inappropriate opioid prescribing are increasingly subject to discipline by professional medical boards. They face restrictions on their licenses to practice, and in certain cases, have had their licenses suspended or revoked. 
  3. Where patients are harmed, providers face civil medical malpractice liability.
  4. And in the most egregious cases, providers have been prosecuted criminally, either under the federal Controlled Substances Act or state criminal laws. 

What has been the response of the Department of Justice? 

  1. The Department of Justice (DOJ), both in Washington and in individual United States Attorney’s Offices, have become more aggressive at identifying providers with problematic or suspicious opioid prescribing records.
  2. For example, in 2017, then Attorney General Jeff Sessions announced the formation of the Opioid Fraud and Abuse Detection Unit.In his announcement the Attorney General stated DOJ would use data analytics to identify physicians who are writing opioid prescriptions at a rate that exceeds other physicians, and how many of a doctor’s patients died within 60-days of an opioid prescription.
  3. In 2018, US Attorneys in Massachusetts and Georgia sent warning letters to physicians who had relatively high opioid prescribing histories, or physicians who may have had a patient die from an overdose, or who died for any reason within two-months of being prescribed opioids.
  4. In the letters in Massachusetts, the US Attorney reminded the physicians that prescribing opioids without a legitimate medical purpose or in excessive amounts is illegal. Of course, this begs the question:  for physicians who genuinely care about their patients and are trying to treat real chronic pain, how do they ensure they are prescribing for a legitimate medical purpose or diagnosis where opioid treatment is both indicated and appropriate?  What dosages or number of pills is “an excessive amount” that could put the physician at legal jeopardy?  

What are legislators and regulators doing to address the opioid crisis? 

  1. The crisis has resulted in new laws and regulations addressing hospital staffing, their discharge and treatment processes, limits on the quantity and dosages of opioids that can be prescribed, and mandated use of state Prescription Drug Monitoring Program databases (PDMPs).   
  2. Just this February, CMS issued a letter to all Medicare providers with what they call their “roadmap”, focusing on “preventing new cases of opioid-ise disorder,” “treating patients with opioid use disorders,” and “using data to target prevention and treatment activities.” 
  3. As a result of this evolving legal environment, individual physicians and physician extenders, group practices, hospitals, and even insurance companies who are increasingly employing physicians, face significant regulatory and liability risks if they are engaging in inappropriate and dangerous opioid prescribing practices, or not complying with the increasingly complex prescribing laws and regulations. 

What is the legal and regulatory framework impacting opioid prescribing?

  1. There are a number of federal and state laws impacting opioid prescribing practices. Some of the more recent and significant developments include state laws limiting the quantity and dosage of opioids that can be prescribed and requiring providers to use and check PDMP databases before prescribing certain drugs to a patient.  There are also more sophisticated guidelines for practitioners, including CDC Guidelines, for prescribing opioids, which are becoming the standard of care for prescribers. 
  2. For example, just about every state has a PDMP, which is a database that tracks a patient’s history of opioid prescriptions.Increasingly, states require providers to check the PDMP before prescribing opioids.  By checking the PDMP the physician can be informed whether the patient appears to have an addiction problem, may be doctor-shopping for opioid prescriptions, may be diverting drugs, or might be at risk for dangerous drug interactions. 
  3. More and more states are passing laws limiting the quantity or dosage of opioids prescribed. For example, Massachusetts, the first state to pass such a law in 2016, set a seven-day limit on initial opioid prescriptions. 
  4. The CDC’s Guidelines are targeted to primary care physicians treating adult patients for chronic pain and are designed to improve communications between providers and patients about the benefits and risks of using opioids, and ultimately to reduce opioid addiction and overdoses.  According to the CDC, the three main principles behind the Guidelines are:
  5. Non-opioid therapy is preferred for chronic pain in most circumstances;
  6. The lowest possible effective dosage should be prescribed; and
  7. Clinicians should always exercise caution when prescribing opioids and should closely monitor their patients who have been prescribed opioids.
  8. The CDC then offers 12 separate recommendations addressing each of these principles.

What should be the primary compliance concerns for healthcare organizations in connection with the opioid crisis?

  1. The big questions for healthcare organizations are:
  2. Do you have policies and procedures in place to ensure that your staff, and particularly your physicians, are aware of all the new requirements for opioid prescribing?
  3. Have your providers and staff been educated in those policies and procedures?
  4. And are they actually following appropriate opioid prescribing practices, and all relevant laws and regulations, including the organization’s own prescribing polices? 

Join us for Episode 2, where we discuss how healthcare organizations can identify and mitigate the risks from opioid prescribing.
For more information on Affiliated Monitors, check out their website here.

Categories
FCPA Compliance Report

FCPA Compliance Report-Episode 423, Sarah Hadden on the New CCI

In this episode I visit with Sarah Hadden, the new Editor-in-Chief at Corporate Compliance Insights (CCI). We discuss her professional background in journalism and her journey to becoming EIC at Corporate Compliance Insights. Some of the highlights from the podcast include:

  1. Her professional background as a journalist and how it informs her thinking for CCI.
  2. What drew her to CCI and the compliance space?
  3. Her ascension to the EIC role at Corporate Compliance Insights.
  4. How did CCI accomplish content marketing?
  5. What do you hope to accomplish with CCI?
  6. The CCI website recently went through a face-lift. What are some of the key elements of this new look?
  7. Why is CCI “not a house cat anymore”?
  8. Where can listeners go for more information?
  9. Calling all authors-CCI looking for new contributors

Resources:
Check out the newly redesigned CCI Website here.

Categories
Daily Compliance News

Daily Compliance News: March 25, 2019-the would you do business with this man edition

MARCH 25, 2019 BY TOM FOX


In today’s edition of Daily Compliance News:

Categories
Blog

King Lear Week: Part I – Innovation in Compliance Podcasting

This past weekend I was lucky enough to catch the performance of King Learwith Glenda Jackson as the mad king. It was a magnificent production and if you have the chance to see, I would certainly urge you to do so. The production had many interesting features and interpretations which seemed to be great entrees into several compliance topics. The play was directed by Sam Gold and it was scored by Phillip Glass but the star power was derived from Jackson as King Lear. It was a fabulous take on the story and one that will resonate directly to our turbulent times. Therefore, inspired by octogenarian Jackson and her performance, I am going to use King Lear as a deep dive into several compliance topics this week. Today, I want to use the nature of the production, to introduce the day’s topic of some great new innovation and additions to the Compliance Podcast Network.
Gold’s Lear production was both unique and innovative. It was quite a large stage but the lightening was used to great effect. When the director wanted to shift the action, to another group of actors or topic, the lights were simply shut off to the actors not involved. They did not have to exit the stage and then return. This allowed them to remain on stage and the action could move back and forth without disruption.
The second innovation was in the use of music. While I am generally not a fan of music in Shakespeare, unless used in the original show notes, such as bugles blaring; I am not a fan of music in the performances. However there was a classical quartet which played throughout the performance that I felt truly enhanced the entire production. Finally, I normally revolt at any singing in a Shakespearian production. There were a couple of singing scenes which almost worked for me but at least they did not detract from the overall performance.
These two innovations in lighting and music introduce today’s topic. As many of you know, the Compliance Podcast Network is now available through the online streaming service Spotify. With the revamp of Corporate Compliance Insights (CCI), the Compliance Podcast Network is now available on that site as well. Both of these additions are in addition to the other platforms I currently distribute the podcasts through, including the FCPA Compliance Report, Megaphone, JDSupra, YouTube and iTunes. By adding Spotify and CCI to the number of platforms for distribution of the Compliance Podcast Network, it continues to have the widest reach of any podcast in compliance.
Continuing this theme of innovation at the Compliance Podcast Network, I am extraordinarily pleased to announce that there are two new podcasts, which have been approved by iTunes,  and now join Great Women in Compliance as two additional non-Tom Fox produced podcasts, Modern Medium and Phorensically Speaking. They premier on this site today, as well as all other platforms going forward. They will be posted bi-weekly going forward.
The podcast Modern Medium is presented by Paris Fox  and will help the compliance practitioner understand two key challenges: communicating compliance to millennials and the full use of graphic design and art in a best practices compliance program. While you probably do not consider the philosophy behind the use of graphic arts to be a part of your compliance remit, if you follow this podcast you will not only understand the use of this communication tool but also more broadly understand communications in the context of your compliance program. Finally, your communication with millennials will be the largest part of your job going forward because they will likely constitute the largest component of your workforce. Reaching them and incorporating their thought leadership into your compliance program will be a key for you moving forward. Finally, if you find yourself stuck in a creative rut, sometimes it’s difficult to know where to begin with an idea. Even when you do have an idea, it’s easy to get caught up in what you think something is supposed to be or what it’s supposed to look like. It is an important part of the process to learn how to let go. The Modern Medium podcast will assist you in this quest!
The podcast Phorensically Speaking is presented by Jonathan Marks. Marks is a prolific author, speaker and thought leader in the forensic accounting space. You may know him from his blog, Board and Fraud, speaking at industry events or scholarly articles. If you have been fortunate enough to work with him, consider yourself lucky for having collaborated with a thought leader in the field. I have been after Marks to join the compliance podcast network for some time and he has finally done so. Listen in and learn from one of the country’s top forensic accountants/compliance practitioners about the difference in perspective from a legal trained compliance practitioner.
In addition to these two great new podcasts premiering today, I have added two podcasts from outstanding podcasts series. They are Dupe of the Week, a weekly podcast that discusses deception in a variety of areas such as business, politics, education, nonprofits and love. It’s a quick way to protect yourself from becoming a victim. Join forensic accounting experts Kelly Richmond Pope and Bill Kresse for a look into the latest scams. Some of the most recent podcasts include the college-admissions scandal, the Fyre Festival, Christmas purchasing scams and many others.
The second podcast addition is Mike Volkov’s signature podcast from his website, Corruption, Crime & Compliance. In addition to his uber-cool use of the Henry Mancini’s The Pink Panther theme music, he breaks down the Foreign Corrupt Practices Act (FCPA), compliance, data privacy, anti-trust and a wide variety of other issues. It is also a weekly podcast.
I hope you will join me all week and more importantly enjoy my exploration of this most innovate and unique production of King Learas well as the story of one of Shakespeare’s greatest tragedies to introduce a daily compliance topic. Tomorrow I will consider the story of Lear’s family, as it was presented as the key to this latest production of Shakespeare’s greatest tragedy.
This publication contains general information only and is based on the experiences and research of the author. The author is not, by means of this publication, rendering business, legal advice, or other professional advice or services. This publication is not a substitute for such legal advice or services, nor should it be used as a basis for any decision or action that may affect your business. Before making any decision or taking any action that may affect your business, you should consult a qualified legal advisor. The author, his affiliates, and related entities shall not be responsible for any loss sustained by any person or entity that relies on this publication. The Author gives his permission to link, post, distribute, or reference this article for any lawful purpose, provided attribution is made to the author. The author can be reached at tfox@tfoxlaw.com.
© Thomas R. Fox, 2019

Categories
Jamming with Jason

Are You Really a Trusted Advisor?

Many support functions in organizations want to be seen as a “trusted advisor” to the business, and internal audit is no exception. There is an aspiration to provide value, so we work really hard proving to ourselves that we are adding value, but other don’t see it and tend to runaway.
“And I wonder, I wo, wo, wo, wo, wonder, why,” we aren’t seen as trusted advisors. Maybe it’s because we don’t really understand what “trust” and “advice” really mean.

Jason Mefford is a Rock Star – Internal Audit, Risk Management and Compliance. He helps Chief Audit Executives (CAE) and professionals with technical & soft-skills training and coaching to navigate the minefields of audit, risk and compliance in organizations. http://www.jasonmefford.com/ and http://www.meffordassociates.com
Apple Podcast: https://itunes.apple.com/us/podcast/jamming-with-jason-mefford/id1456660699
PodBean: https://jammingwithjason.podbean.com/
#trustedadvisor #internalaudit #cae #chiefauditexecutive