Tag: Export Controls

Categories
Red Flags Rising

Red Flags Rising: S01 E26 – Grab the Carrots, Avoid the Sticks, and Get Ready for More Transparency

Mike and Brent pick up the discussion from Episode 25 with some further thoughts on the proposed revenue-sharing arrangement between the U.S. government and certain exporters, including what should be anticipated from the U.S. government in terms of increased transparency (01:36), give their take on the Maintaining American Superiority by Improving Export Controls Transparency Act signed into law by the President, including both what it does do and what it doesn’t do (10:27), and provide their takes on the long-running media speculation about a so-called “50% rule” that would extend the Entity List maintained by the U.S. Bureau of Industry & Security (BIS) automatically to subsidiaries or affiliates owned 50% or more by a listed entity (18:53), including questions that the debate raises about what due diligence is being done now on subsidiaries and affiliates of listed entities, and important distinctions between U.S. economic sanctions—from where the 50% rule concept is being borrowed—and U.S. export controls that suggest the rule is better suited for the former than the latter.

They conclude with another installment of Brent Carlson’s “Managing Up” (26:25).

Resources:

Brent LinkedIn

Mike LinkedIn

Mike & Brent’s “Fresh Looks” Series

Categories
Red Flags Rising

Red Flags Rising: S01 E25 – Deals, More Deals, and Protective Backstops

Mike & Brent dive into the latest geopolitical developments surrounding technology exports and the interplay between leading tech companies and the U.S. Administration.

Specifically, they discuss the latest news regarding U.S. conditions for licensing the export of Nvidia’s H20 chip to China (00:38), the impact of the deal on trade negotiations between the U.S. and the People’s Republic of China (and vice-versa) (04:59), the difficult position companies generally are in regarding export controls due diligence and the multiple potential meanings and consequences regarding public officials’ statements around export controls (16:01), the latest news regarding Intel’s CEO’s interactions with the U.S. Administration and how they illustrate vividly the “whipsaw” effect companies and executives face as geopolitical winds swirl (20:09), the relevance of the “pretend mistake” tactic in dealmaking—or, as Mike referred to it in the context of U.S. export controls, the “revoked forgiveness” tactic (22:40), and, practically speaking, how companies can best anchor themselves amidst the geopolitical storm by designing and implementing a “high probability protocol” to best anticipate core trends in U.S. export controls enforcement and serve as an important compliance backstop (25:36).

They then conclude with another installment of Brent Carlson’s “Managing Up” (26:59).

Resources:

Brent LinkedIn

Mike LinkedIn

Mike & Brent’s “Fresh Looks” Series

Categories
Compliance Into the Weeds

Compliance into the Weeds: A Deep Dive into Cadence Design Systems’ Export Control Violations

The award-winning Compliance into the Weeds is the only weekly podcast that takes a deep dive into a compliance-related topic, literally going into the weeds to explore a subject more fully. Looking for some hard-hitting insights on compliance? Look no further than Compliance into the Weeds! In this episode of Compliance into the Weeds, Tom Fox and Matt Kelly discuss the recent enforcement action against Cadence Design Systems for export control violations.

They explore the company’s illegal sales of sensitive technology to a Chinese university connected to the Chinese military, resulting in $140 million in penalties and a three-year probation. The conversation delves into topics like weak subsidiary governance, challenges in monitoring Chinese subsidiaries, and the complexities of conducting investigations in China. They also reflect on the broader implications for U.S. companies operating in China and the intractable risks involved.

Key highlights:

  • Cadence Design Systems Case Overview
  • Subsidiary Governance Issues
  • Details of the Misconduct
  • Resolution and Penalties
  • Challenges in Compliance and Monitoring
  • Complexities of Doing Business in China

Resources:

Matt Kelly in Radical Compliance

Tom

Instagram

Facebook

YouTube

Twitter

LinkedIn

A multi-award-winning podcast, Compliance into the Weeds was most recently honored as one of the Top 25 Regulatory Compliance Podcasts, a Top 10 Business Law Podcast, and a Top 12 Risk Management Podcast. Compliance into the Weeds has been conferred a Davey, Communicator, and W3 Awards for podcast excellence.

Categories
Red Flags Rising

Red Flags Rising: S01 E20 – China, AI, and Export Controls – Facing a Moment of Truth

Mike and Brent follow-up on Episode 19’s discussion of “stack sweeps” with a discussion of the current “moment of truth” facing trade compliance teams dealing with high-probability, catch-all enforcement risks as explained in their recent WorldECR (Issue No. 141, July/August 2025) and Dow Jones Risk Journal article, “Anticipating the moment of truth: how to prepare for ‘high probability’ catch-all enforcement.” Specifically, they discuss the recent decision by the U.S. to allow (licensed) sales of certain advanced integrated circuits to China (00:42), their WorldECR/DJRJ article and how the Bureau of Industry & Security (BIS) guidance of May 13, 2025, which emphasized the “high probability” standard and catch-all provisions of the U.S. Export Administration Regulations (EAR), inspired the article (or at least inspired Tom Blass of WorldECR to ask us for an article) (07:10), how the underlying catch-all provisions are not “new” as of May 13, 2025 (10:26), how compliance teams can’t “zero-risk” export controls risk and need to adopt risk-based approaches (12:17), the relevance of the “inchoate” offenses under the EAR, i.e., aiding, abetting, conspiracy, evasion, acting with knowledge, and misrepresentations (13:21), the limitations of end-use and end-user certificates under the May 13, 2025 policy and guidance documents (14:47), their thoughts on the reportedly pending “50% rule” for the Entity List (18:32), the impact of the ability of malign actors, political parties, and military-intelligence actors to exercise influence even without shareholdings (19:25), why the most risky counterparties are those not on the Entity List (20:49), and the three key takeaways in their WorldECR/DJRJ article (24:09). They conclude with another installment of Brent Carlson’s “Managing Up” segment (30:28).

Resources:

WorldECR

Brent LinkedIn

Mike LinkedIn

Mike & Brent’s “Fresh Looks” Series

Categories
Red Flags Rising

Red Flags Rising: S01 E16 – The Israel-Iran Conflict’s Implications for U.S. Export Controls

Mike and Brent follow up on Mike’s being quoted in the Dow Jones Risk Journal regarding the unexpected export control consequences of the Israel-Iran conflict. They discuss the geopolitical context (00:39), the article by Richard Vanderford and Mengqi Sun (01:22), the risk that Iran tries to evade U.S. export controls (and sanctions) by procuring replacement parts and equipment through third-party intermediaries (02:12), the cautionary tale of an Alabama resident sentenced to five years in U.S. federal prison for diverting items to Iran (03:29), the need to be cognizant of “catch-all” U.S. export controls related to ballistic missiles and WMD programs (including nuclear) and those controls reliance on the full definition of “knowledge” to include “an awareness of a high probability” (04:42), increased tracking and investigative activity by the U.S. government (06:19), how companies need to think about responding to “red flags” (06:45), the likely impact of forensic review of battlefield recoveries on requests by Israel and NGOs to companies for assistance in tracing item or component flows to Iran (07:44), and the likelihood of increased, rather than decreased, activity by U.S. agencies as a result of the conflict (09:52). They conclude with another segment of Brent Carlson’s “Managing Up” (12:26).

Resources:

The Dow Jones Risk Journal article (June 13, 2025) (subscription req.)

The Wall Street Journal Morning Risk Report (June 16, 2025)

Brent LinkedIn

Mike LinkedIn

Mike & Brent’s “Fresh Looks” Series

Categories
Red Flags Rising

Red Flags Rising: S01 E14 – Getting a Grip on U.S. Export Controls Guidance

Mike and Brent unpack the May 13, 2025, due diligence guidance from the U.S. Bureau of Industry & Security. They describe what happened on May 13 (00:00), the guidance from BIS on General Prohibition 10 and Huawei Ascend chips (03:34), the related BIS policy statement (04:13), and then focus on the BIS “Industry Guidance to Prevent Diversion of Advanced Computing Integrated Circuits” (04:47), specifically the underlying U.S. national security concerns (05:50), relevant key takeaways from Episode 13’s special guest Dana W. White (06:51), the significance of the Industry Guidance’s reference to the WMD and military-intelligence catch-all provisions (08:29), the historical pre-1993 “KYC Guidance” cross-referenced by BIS in the new Industry Guidance (11:53), how the historical “KYC Guidance” is often misunderstood through selective quotation devoid of relevant context (13:34), the new “red flags” identified in the May 13, 2025 Industry Guidance (16:10), the key takeaways of the Industry Guidance (17:55), a warning about over-reliance on the Industry Guidance’s statement about existing end-use certificates (18:47), and the practical implications of the Industry Guidance for trade compliance teams (19:36). They then conclude with the next installment of Brent Carlson’s “Managing Up” (21:26).

Resources:

BIS May 15, 2025 Industry Guidance

Brent LinkedIn

Mike LinkedIn

Mike & Brent’s “Fresh Looks” Series

Categories
Red Flags Rising

Red Flags Rising: S01 E13 – Dana W. White on U.S. National Security & Export Controls

Mike and Brent welcome Dana W. White, Managing Partner at the Juno Collective, to share her thoughts and analysis on China and U.S. export controls, drawing on her extensive career in public service, including various national security-related roles. Mike, Brent, and Dana discuss Dana’s national security background (00:49), what happens “behind the scenes” that leads to U.S. agencies determining national security threats exists (02:28), how knowledge-sharing is both the strength and the Achilles’ heel of free societies (06:11), how U.S. businesses and business leaders play an important part in our national security (07:26), the challenge of finding reliable data points from which to infer export controls compliance risks (09:37), what business leaders should understand about how the relationship between the U.S. and China is different today than when China joined the World Trade Organization (11:21), how Dana and the Juno Collective help clients to understand and mitigate risks (13:46), and the common pitfalls companies face when responding to inquiries by the U.S. Congress (18:45). They conclude with yet another segment of Brent Carlson’s “Managing Up” (20:23).

Resources:

More about Dana W. White and the Juno Collective: https://www.juno-collective.com/about

Contact Dana W. White: dana@juno-collective.com

Brent LinkedIn

Mike LinkedIn

Mike & Brent’s “Fresh Looks” Series

Categories
Red Flags Rising

Red Flags Rising: S01 E11 – Point-Counterpoint – U.S. Export Controls Policy

Mike & Brent return with a point-counterpoint episode on U.S. export control policy. After discussing the latest news about U.S. AI export controls (01:03), they discuss the points and counterpoints related to whether we should have export controls at all (04:57), the relevance of the national security justifications offered by the U.S. Department of Commerce in promulgating its regulations (06:52), the lessons of Ukraine battlefield recoveries (09:59), the views of Anthropic’s CEO, Dario Amodei, on risk and how to push any industry to a more-compliance mindset (rather than acquiesce to the race to the bottom) (10:44), why Brent shouldn’t talk about the old days of corruption (12:08), and how not only the export controls’ design but also their enforcement by government and compliance efforts by industry are all relevant factors to consider in assessing export controls’ effectiveness (14:53). They conclude with the latest installment of Brent’s “Managing-Up” segment (23:04).

Resources:

Brent LinkedIn

Mike LinkedIn

Mike & Brent’s “Fresh Looks” Series

Categories
Red Flags Rising

Red Flags Rising: S01 E09 – Tariffs: Navigating Uncertainty & Mitigating Enforcement Risk

Mike & Brent jump into tariffs to focus on practical strategies to navigate these uncertain times and mitigate the risk of future enforcement actions. Specifically, they discuss what longer-term geopolitical trends help businesses to plot a strategy despite being whipsawed by tariff news each day (01:57), a recent and helpful Foreign Affairs article, by Emily Kilcrease and Geoffrey Gertz of the Center for a New American Security (03:21), the recent book “Chokepoints: American Power in the Age of Economic Warfare” by Edward Fishman and his description of the “impossible triad” between economic interdependence, economic security, and geopolitical competition (04:21), relevant historical background on the rise of China after the Second World War and its current oversupply problem (04:54), how severe pressures on businesses in both the U.S. and China will create white collar compliance risks today and enforcement risks tomorrow (07:42), customs evasion enforcement risk under the U.S. False Claim Act (FCA) and the FCA’s definition of “knowledge” (08:06), the importance of dynamic assessments of customs evasion risks (11:25), potential fines and penalties from U.S. Customs & Border Protection (CBP) and U.S. Department of Justice (DOJ) enforcement (12:54), a deeper dive into the FCA’s “knowledge” standard and its similarities to the “high probability” standard under the U.S. Export Administration Regulations (EAR) (16:14), and practical strategies for companies trying to manage these risks (17:50). Then they conclude with another installment, back by increasing popular demand, of Brent Carlson’s “Managing-Up” segment (20:39).

Resources:

Geoffrey Gertz & Emily Kilcrease, “A World Safe for Prosperity How America Can Foster Economic Security,” Foreign Affairs Magazine

Edward Fishman, “Chokepoints: American Power in the Age of Economic Warfare”

Brent LinkedIn

Mike LinkedIn

Mike & Brent’s “Fresh Looks” Series

Categories
Red Flags Rising

Red Flags Rising: S01 E08 – Responding to Congressional Inquiries

Mike & Brent react to recent media reports of several congressional committees demanding information from U.S. companies. They revisit their March 14, 2024, NYU PCCE blog post, “”Expect Some Illumination”: A Fresh Look at U.S. Congressional Hearings in the Era of Sanctions and Export Controls as the New FCPA” (01:21), then discuss common pitfalls to avoid when providing information to Congress, including the importance of thinking critically about how your data could be interpreted and used by Congress (02:28), how information provided by Congress can be shared across the U.S. federal government (03:38), the danger of being distracted by political theater (04:13), the value of having a “red team” (or “blue team,” depending on your political leanings) vet your data with hostile eyes before sending data to Congress (06:48), anticipating and preempting difficult questions that the data might raise (08:06), keeping in mind the geopolitical context (09:05), ensuring that investor relations and communications coordinate with legal and compliance regarding public statements (10:30), and the oversight role of boards of directors (12:49). They conclude with another installment, still by popular demand, of Brent Carlson’s “Managing Up” (14:05).

Resources: 

Mike & Brent’s Prior NYU PCCE Post

Brent LinkedIn

Mike LinkedIn

Mike & Brent’s “Fresh Looks” Series