Categories
Compliance Tip of the Day

Compliance Tip of the Day: Lessons on Post – Acquisition Integration and Investigation in M&A from John Deere

Welcome to “Compliance Tip of the Day,” the podcast where we bring you daily insights and practical advice on navigating the ever-evolving landscape of compliance and regulatory requirements.

Whether you’re a seasoned compliance professional or just starting your journey, our aim is to provide you with bite-sized, actionable tips to help you stay on top of your compliance game.

Join us as we explore the latest industry trends, share best practices, and demystify complex compliance issues to keep your organization on the right side of the law.

Tune in daily for your dose of compliance wisdom, and let’s make compliance a little less daunting, one tip at a time.

The rules for compliance programs on post-acquisition integration and investigation are set out in the DOJ M&A Safe Harbor Policy. Learn and implement them.

Categories
Blog

Navigating Culture in Mergers and Acquisitions: A Strategic Approach

Mergers and Acquisitions (M&A) are often perceived as primarily financial transactions. However, the real success of these endeavors usually hinges on a less tangible but equally crucial factor: organizational culture. In the landscape of M&A, the traditional focus on financial synergies and operational efficiencies can overshadow the importance of cultural alignment. Culture, often viewed as a soft asset, is a pivotal element that can make or break the integration process. The webinar emphasized that assessing culture is not just a feel-good exercise but a critical step in ensuring the long-term success of the merger.

Why Cultural Fit Matters

One of the key takeaways from the webinar was the concept of cultural fit. While financial metrics are crucial, they don’t capture the essence of how well two organizations can work together. ETHOS, a company’s underlying character and values, plays an important role. A good cultural fit can foster synergy beyond financials, enhancing cooperation and reducing friction during integration.

On the flip side, a poor cultural fit can lead to misunderstandings, conflicts, and even the eventual failure of the merger. The importance of this alignment cannot be overstated, as it directly impacts employee morale, retention, and overall productivity. All of this means that any acquiring entity needs to understand the company and its culture at the point of closing and merger.

The Role of Leadership

Leadership plays a crucial role in navigating cultural integration. Effective leaders recognize the importance of culture and actively work to align their teams toward common goals. They are instrumental in setting the tone for the newly formed organization and ensuring cultural integration is as smooth as possible.

The Culture Audit™: A Strategic Tool

To effectively assess and integrate cultures, the webinar introduced The Culture Audit™. This tool evaluates various dimensions of organizational culture, including ethics, trust, safety, stress, and accountability. By systematically assessing these areas, companies can gain actionable insights into potential cultural mismatches and areas for improvement.

Pre-Acquisition Assessment

The Culture Audit™ is a pre-acquisition assessment tool that treats culture as an asset that can be measured and evaluated. This assessment provides a comprehensive view of the target company’s cultural landscape, enabling acquirers to make informed decisions about the merger.

Integrating Findings into the Valuation

Incorporating cultural findings into the overall valuation and assessment process allows companies to create a more holistic view of the acquisition. This approach highlights potential risks and uncovers opportunities for creating additional value through cultural alignment.

Actionable Insights for Integration

The insights derived from a culture audit can guide the integration planning process. Companies can develop tailored strategies to facilitate a smoother transition by understanding the cultural dynamics. This involves:

  1. Culture Assessment: Conducting a thorough culture audit to identify strengths and areas for improvement.
  2. Culture Strategy: Developing a strategic plan to address cultural gaps and align values.
  3. Implementation: Executing the cultural integration strategy with clear objectives and milestones.
  4. Monitoring: Continuously assess the integration process and make necessary adjustments.
  5. Improvement: Using data-driven insights to refine and enhance the cultural integration strategy.

DOJ M&A Safe Harbor

An added benefit of a thorough cultural assessment is the potential to leverage the DOJ M&A Safe Harbor. Using the culture audit, companies have up to six months to disclose issues and twelve months to remediate and integrate, providing a clear timeline and framework for addressing cultural challenges.

The Safe Harbor policy continues the DOJ’s push for voluntary corporate self-disclosure. Monaco outlined efforts by the DOJ to increase the benefits to companies that voluntarily disclose corporate misconduct rather than those companies that decide not to disclose misconduct. The key for the acquirer company to obtain the “carrot” DOJ is dangling and poses questions as to the “stick” the DOJ might wield if a self-disclosure does not achieve safe harbor or, more broadly, if an acquirer fails to identify misconduct in the acquisition process, either pre or post-closing. This new Mergers & Acquisitions Safe Harbor Policy demonstrates that the DOJ’s interest is to avoid discouraging companies with ethical, solid cultures and compliance programs from acquiring companies with ineffective compliance programs and toxic cultures.  On the contrary, the DOJ seeks to incentivize an acquiring company to uncover and remediate timely misconduct uncovered during the M&A process.

Conclusion

In the realm of M&A, culture should never be an afterthought. By prioritizing cultural assessments and leveraging tools like The Culture Audit™, companies can enhance their integration strategies, reduce risks, and ultimately drive the long-term success of their mergers and acquisitions. For those interested in exploring this further, Sam Silverstein and his team offer consultations and a behind-the-scenes look at how The Culture Audit™ can be implemented effectively. Embrace the power of culture in M&A to unlock new synergies and achieve sustainable growth.

Categories
Blog

New DOJ M&A Safe Harbor Policy

We continue our review of DOJ initiatives from 2023 and what they may portend for the compliance professional in 2024 and beyond. In October 2023, Deputy Attorney General Lisa Monaco announced a new policy regarding M&A. It is a Mergers & Acquisitions Safe Harbor policy that encourages companies to self-disclose criminal misconduct discovered by an acquiring company during the acquisition of a target company. Under the policy, the acquiring party will receive a presumption of criminal declination if it promptly and voluntarily discloses criminal misconduct, cooperates with any ensuing investigation, and engages in appropriate remediation, restitution and disgorgement.

The Safe Harbor policy is a clear continuation of the DOJ’s push for corporate voluntary self-disclosure. Monaco outlined efforts by DOJ to increase the benefits to companies that voluntary disclose corporate misconduct rather than those companies that decide not to disclose misconduct. The key for the acquirer company to  obtain the “carrot” DOJ is dangling and poses questions as to the “stick” the DOJ might wield if a self-disclosure does not achieve safe harbor, or more broadly, if an acquirer fails to identify criminal misconduct in the acquisition process, either pre or post-closing. This new Mergers & Acquisitions Safe Harbor Policy clearly demonstrates the DOJ’s interest is to avoid discouraging companies with strong compliance programs from acquiring companies with ineffective compliance programs and/or a history of misconduct.  To the contrary, DOJ is seeking to incentivize an acquiring company to timely disclose misconduct uncovered during the M&A process.

The Key Policy Takeaways are as follows:

  • The acquiring company must disclose criminal misconduct within six months of the transaction closing date.
  • The acquiring company has one year from the closing date to fully remediate the misconduct, including remediation, restitution and disgorgement, where appropriate.
  • Both deadlines are subject to reasonableness and may be extended by prosecutors due to deal complexity and other factors.
  • Misconduct that threatens national security or involves ongoing imminent harm must be immediately disclosed.
  • Misconduct disclosed under the policy will not factor into present or future recidivist analysis for the acquiring company.
  • The acquiring company’s eligibility for a criminal declination will not be impacted by the presence of aggravating factors at the acquired company.
  • The target company can also qualify for self-disclosure benefits, potentially including a declination, if there are no aggravating factors at the target company.
  • The policy does not impact civil merger enforcement.
  • The policy does not apply to misconduct that is otherwise required to be disclosed, already public or otherwise known to the DOJ.

Under this new Mergers & Acquisitions Safe Harbor, which applies across the Department of Justice, companies that promptly and voluntarily disclose criminal misconduct with the Safe Harbor period, and then cooperate with the resulting investigation, engage in timely and appropriate remediation and pay applicable restitution and disgorgement, will receive a presumption of a declination. Once again, the key deadlines are as follows:

  • Companies must disclose misconduct discovered (whether pre-or post-acquisition) at the acquired entity within six (6) months from the date of closing.
  • Companies will then have one year from the date of closing to fully remediate the misconduct.

The 6 month and one-year deadlines are subject to modification depending on the specific circumstances and complexity of the transaction.  The acquired company can also qualify under the Mergers & Acquisition Safe Harbor Policy for voluntary self-disclosure benefits.  Interestingly, DOJ clarified that any misconduct disclosed under the Safe Harbor Policy will not implicate or be counted in any future potential recidivist analysis.

As with most new DOJ policy initiatives, these concepts have been around for some time. As far back as 2008, the DOJ in Opinion Release 08-02 laid out safe harbor concepts in mergers and acquisitions. This Opinion Release was followed by the FCPA Resource Guide, 1st edition, released in 2012 which brought these concepts forward. However, many defense counsel decried the lack of certainty in both of these initiatives. Now under this new Mergers & Acquisition Safe Harbor Policy, the benefits are laid out in black and white.

The DOJ has made clear that under this new Mergers & Acquisition Safe Harbor Policy organizations that do not perform effective due diligence or self-disclose misconduct at an acquired entity will be subject to full successor liability. DOJ’s objective is clear — they do not want to penalize companies with strong compliance programs from acquiring companies with weak compliance programs when they conduct proper due diligence and discover and self-disclose misconduct. With this new policy, the DOJ is encouraging companies to conduct robust pre-acquisition due diligence and post-acquisition integration. Compliance must have a prominent seat at the deal table if an acquiring company wishes to effectively de-risk a transaction.

Categories
31 Days to More Effective Compliance Programs

31 Days to a More Effective Compliance Program: Day 6 – DOJ M&A Safe Harbor

In October 2023, Deputy Attorney General Lisa Monaco announced a new policy regarding M&A. It is a Mergers & Acquisitions Safe Harbor policy that encourages companies to self-disclose criminal misconduct discovered by an acquiring company during the acquisition of a target company. Under the policy, the acquiring party will receive a presumption of criminal declination if it promptly and voluntarily discloses criminal misconduct, cooperates with any ensuing investigation, and engages in appropriate remediation, restitution, and disgorgement.

Under this new Mergers & Acquisitions Safe Harbor, which applies across the Department of Justice, companies that promptly and voluntarily disclose criminal misconduct during the Safe Harbor period and then cooperate with the resulting investigation, engage in timely and appropriate remediation, and pay applicable restitution and disgorgement will receive a presumption of a declination. Once again, the key deadlines are as follows:

  • Companies must disclose misconduct discovered (whether pre-or post-acquisition) at the acquired entity within six (6) months from the date of closing.
  • Companies will then have one year from the date of closing to fully remediate the misconduct.

The 6 month and one-year deadlines are subject to modification depending on the specific circumstances and complexity of the transaction. The acquired company can also qualify under the Mergers & Acquisitions Safe Harbor Policy for voluntary self-disclosure benefits. Interestingly, the DOJ clarified that any misconduct disclosed under the Safe Harbor Policy will not implicate or be counted in any future potential recidivist analysis.

Three key takeaways:

1. The DOJ Mergers & Acquisitions Safe Harbor policy encourages companies to self-disclose criminal misconduct discovered by an acquiring company during the acquisition of a target company.

2. The DOJ is seeking to incentivize an acquiring company to timely disclose misconduct uncovered during the M&A process.

3. The DOJ has made it clear that under this new Mergers & Acquisitions Safe Harbor Policy, organizations that do not perform effective due diligence or self-disclose misconduct at an acquired entity will be subject to full successor liability.

Categories
Daily Compliance News

Daily Compliance News: November 2, 2023 – The Pyramid of Deceit Edition

Welcome to the Daily Compliance News. Each day, Tom Fox, the Voice of Compliance, brings you compliance-related stories to start your day. Sit back, enjoy a cup of morning coffee, and listen to the Daily Compliance News. All from the Compliance Podcast Network. Each day, we consider four stories from the business world: compliance, ethics, risk management, leadership, or general interest for the compliance professional.

Stories we are following in today’s edition:

  • Chinese generals and corruption.  (Bloomberg)
  • More compliance scrutiny on M&A targets. (WSJ)
  • GE Healthcare discloses FCPA investigation in China. (WSJ)
  • Prosecutors make closing arguments in the SBF trial. (NYT)