Categories
Data Driven Compliance

Data Driven Compliance: Julie Myers Wood – Using AI for Data Driven Compliance

Are you struggling to keep up with the ever-changing compliance programs in your business? Look no further than the award-winning Data Driven Compliance podcast, hosted by Tom Fox, is a podcast featuring an in-depth conversation around the uses of data and data analytics in compliance programs. Data Driven Compliance is back with another exciting episode The intersection of law, compliance, and data is becoming increasingly important in the world of cross-border transactions and mergers and acquisitions.

In this podcast episode, Tom Fox and Julie Myers Wood, CEO at Guidepost Solutions take a deep dive into the intersection of compliance and generative AI and how this intersection will lead to more data driven compliance.  Wood emphasizes the importance of understanding the various ways AI can impact a company, including internal use, sales, compliance tools, freelancers, and criminal exploitation. Compliance teams need to have a comprehensive inventory of the tools being used and understand the capabilities and limitations of AI to ensure compliance and mitigate risks.

They discussed the need for companies to be aware of the potential risks associated with AI and have clear policies and procedures in place to protect intellectual property. He also discusses the importance of employee retraining and thoughtful decision-making when integrating AI into business practices. Overall, the podcast provides valuable insights into the challenges and considerations of incorporating AI into compliance programs, emphasizing the need for compliance professionals to adapt and stay informed.

Highlights Include

·      Key Considerations for Compliance and AI

·      Importance of Inventorying Tools and Managing Risks

·      AI and Intellectual Property Protection

·      Challenges of Implementing AI

·      AI and Compliance

Resources:

Julie Myers Wood on LinkedIn

Guidepost Solutions

 Tom Fox 

Connect with me on the following sites:

Instagram

Facebook

YouTube

Twitter

LinkedIn

Categories
31 Days to More Effective Compliance Programs

One Month to More Effective Written Standards: Day 1 – Introduction to Written Standards

The cornerstone of any best practices compliance program is written protocols. This includes a Code of Conduct, policies and procedures. These elements have long been memorialized in the US Sentencing Guidelines; the Department Of Justice’s (DOJs) Opinion Releases regarding compliance programs, the 2012 FCPA Guidance, both DOJ and Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) enforcement actions, the 2019 Guidance and FCPA Corporate Enforcement Policy.
There are three levels of standards and controls, Code of Conduct standards and policies and procedures. Every company should have a Code of Conduct that expresses its ethical principles. But a Code of Conduct is not enough. The Code of Conduct is implemented through your compliance policies. It is further operationalized through your compliance procedures. The DOJ spoke to their importance in the 2019 Guidance when it stated, “As a threshold matter, prosecutors should examine whether the company has a code of conduct that sets forth, among other things, the company’s commitment to full compliance with relevant Federal laws that is accessible and applicable to all company employees.” As a corollary, prosecutors should also assess whether the company has established policies and procedures that incorporate the culture of compliance into its day-to-day operations.

At the end of the 31 Days you will have a very detailed grounding on better written standards for your compliance program. You will be able to utilize the information presented to implement a more effective compliance program for your organization. 

Three key takeaways: 

  1. The cornerstone of any best practices compliance program is its written protocols.
  2. Written standards work to prevent, detect and remediate.
  3. What are the specific written protocols you should have in your compliance program?

For more information, check out The Compliance Handbook, 4th edition, here.

Categories
Everything Compliance - Shout Outs and Rants

Everything Compliance – Episode 123, Shout Outs and Rants – The Spanish Kiss Edition

Welcome to the only roundtable podcast in compliance as we celebrate our second century of shows. In this episode, we have the quartet of Jay Rosen, Jonathan Armstrong, Matt Kelly and Karen Woody, with Tom Fox hosting on this episode of our fan fav Shout Outs and Rants section.

1. Matt Kelly rants about the US Federal Courts not allowing television cameras and says we need the Trump trials televised in federal courts.

2. Karen Woody shouts out to the Barbie movie.

3. Tom Fox shouts out to Megan Rapinoe for great professional career and her social activism while a member of the USWNT.

4. Jay Rosen shouts out SOCAR, the South Orange County Compliance and Ethics Roundtable.

5. Jonathan Armstrong shouts out Sgt. Graham Saville lost his life helping a person in distress.

The members of the Everything Compliance are:

•       Jay Rosen– Jay is Vice President, Business Development Corporate Monitoring at Affiliated Monitors. Rosen can be reached at JRosen@affiliatedmonitors.com

•       Karen Woody – One of the top academic experts on the SEC. Woody can be reached at kwoody@wlu.edu

•       Matt Kelly – Founder and CEO of Radical Compliance. Kelly can be reached at mkelly@radicalcompliance.com

•       Jonathan Armstrong –is our UK colleague, who is an experienced data privacy/data protection lawyer with Cordery in London. Armstrong can be reached at jonathan.armstrong@corderycompliance.com

•       Jonathan Marks can be reached at jtmarks@gmail.com.

•       Special Guest Kristy Grant-Hart is the founder of Spark Consulting.

The host and producer, ranter of Everything Compliance is Tom Fox the Voice of Compliance. He can be reached at tfox@tfoxlaw.com. Everything Compliance is a part of the Compliance Podcast Network.

Categories
Blog

The Importance of Effective Policies and Training in Data Protection: Lessons from a Scottish Hospital Breach

I recently had the chance to visit with Jonathan Armstrong on a recent data breach case that occurred in the health service provider NHS Lanarkshire (Scotland) during the COVID-19 pandemic. This breach serves as a stark reminder of the challenges organizations face in maintaining data protection and compliance, especially when it comes to communication platforms like WhatsApp. In this blog post we will explore the lessons learned from this incident and discuss practical advice for organizations to ensure robust data protection measures.

Background

According to the Cordery Compliance Client Alert on the matter, over a two-year period between 2020 and 2022, 26 staff at NHS Lanarkshire had access to a WhatsApp group where there were a minimum of 533 entries that included patient names. The information included 215 phone numbers, 96 with dates of birth and 28 included addresses. 15 images, 3 videos, and 4 screenshots were also shared, which included personal data of patients and clinical information, which is a “special category” health data under both EU and UK law. Other data to the WhatsApp group was also added in error. Other communications were also identified where the staff in question had used WhatsApp.

WhatsApp was not approved by NHS Lanarkshire for processing personal data of patients.  The use of WhatsApp was an approach adopted by the staff apparently without organizational knowledge. It was used by the staff as a substitute for communications that would have taken place in the clinical office but did not do so after staff reduced office attendance due to the COVID-19 pandemic. No Data Protection Impact Assessment was in place and no risk assessment relating to personal data processing was completed concerning WhatsApp, as WhatsApp was not approved by NHS Lanarkshire for the sharing of personal data relating to patients. NHS Lanarkshire undertook an internal investigation and reported this matter to the ICO.

ICO Holding

The UK ICO determined that NHS Lanarkshire did not have the appropriate policies, clear guidance and processes in place when WhatsApp was made available to download. Additionally,  there were a number of infringements of UK GDPR, not the least being not implementing appropriate technical and organizational measures (TOMs) to ensure the security of the personal data involved, as a consequence of which personal data was shared via an unauthorized means and an inappropriate disclosure occurred. There was also a failure to report this matter, as a data breach, to the ICO in time.

Armstrong noted that ICO recommended that NHS Lanarkshire should take action to ensure their compliance with data protection law, including:

  1. Considering implementing a secure clinical image transfer system, as part of NHS Lanarkshire’s exploration regarding the storage of images and videos within a care setting;
  2. Before deploying new apps, consideration of the risks relating to personal data and including the requirement to assess and mitigate these risks in any approval process;
  3. Ensuring that explicit communications, instructions or guidance are issued to employees on their data protection responsibilities when new apps are deployed;
  4. Reviewing all organizational policies and procedures relevant to this matter and amending them where appropriate; and,
  5. Ensuring that all staff are aware of their responsibilities to report personal data breaches internally without delay to the relevant team.

Armstrong concluded that “In light of the remedial steps and mitigating factors the ICO issued an official reprimand – a fine has not yet been imposed. The ICO also asked NHS Lanarkshire to provide an update of actions taken within six months of the reprimand being issued.”

Discussion

This case highlights the challenges organizations face when it comes to communication during internal investigations. In many instances, the most interesting documents are not found in emails, as one organization discovered. Employees often turn to alternative platforms like WhatsApp to avoid leaving a paper trail. However, it is crucial to understand that these platforms may not provide the expected privacy and security.

While platforms like WhatsApp may seem secure, they still share data with big tech companies, raising concerns about privacy. Organizations must adapt to the preferences of digital-native employees who may find email restrictive and opt for alternative communication methods. However, this adaptation should be done consciously, ensuring that policies and procedures are in place to protect sensitive information. Armstrong emphasizes the importance of revisiting emergency measures implemented during the pandemic. As remote work continues, organizations must conduct thorough data protection impact assessments to ensure compliance across all communication platforms and measures.

As with all types of compliance, setting policies and procedures is just the first step. It is essential to communicate and educate employees on these policies to ensure their understanding and compliance. Annual online training sessions are not enough; organizations should provide engaging training that goes beyond passive learning. In addition to targeted and effective training there must be ongoing communications provided to employees. Armstrong also related on the ineffectiveness of off-the-shelf online phishing training. Waiting for an incident to occur and then providing training is not enough to prevent people from clicking on malicious links. Organizations should focus on providing better training before incidents happen, rather than trying to enhance training afterwards.

The next step is monitoring as compliance with policies and procedures should be actively monitored. Technical solutions are available to help companies track compliance, but it’s crucial to involve individuals at all levels of the organization when designing these policies. Additionally, a balanced approach is needed, where employees are recognized for their service but also held accountable for policy breaches. The days of solely relying on punishment for enforcement are gone.

The data breach in the Scottish hospital serves as a wake-up call for organizations to prioritize data protection and compliance. Communication challenges during internal investigations, privacy concerns associated with alternative platforms, and the need for effective policies and training are crucial areas to address. By conducting regular data protection impact assessments, providing engaging training, and ensuring buy-in from employees, organizations can strengthen their defense against cyber threats and protect sensitive information. Always remember that compliance is an ongoing process, and continuous evaluation and improvement are necessary to adapt to the evolving digital landscape. Finally stay vigilant and proactive in safeguarding data privacy and protection.

Categories
Daily Compliance News

Daily Compliance News: September 5, 2023 – The Pig-Butchering Edition

Welcome to the Daily Compliance News. Each day, Tom Fox, the Voice of Compliance brings to you compliance related stories to start your day. Sit back, enjoy a cup of morning coffee and listen in to the Daily Compliance News. All, from the Compliance Podcast Network. Each day we consider four stories from the business world, compliance, ethics, risk management, leadership or general interest for the compliance professional.

  • US sanctions Russian company for selling rockets to North Korea. (WSJ)
  • Pig-butchering and crypto. (WSJ)
  • Using AI to improve workplace safety. (WSJ)
  • Do you need to know? (WSJ)