Categories
Trekking Through Compliance

Trekking Through Compliance – Episode 37 – Ethical Decision-Making Lessons and the Return of Harry Mudd in I, Mudd

In this episode of Trekking Through Compliance, we consider episode I, Mudd, which aired on November 3, 1967, and occurred on Star Date 4513.3.

The Enterprise finds Harry Mudd (Harcourt Fenton Mudd) on a planet and the “ruler” of 500 robot women. Mudd is being studied by the robots, who are accommodating but refuse to let him go. The androids tell Kirk people from the Andromeda galaxy built them. However, the civilization that constructed them was destroyed by a supernova, so the androids were left without supervision. Now, they have found a new purpose in Mudd. Spock makes inquiries and discovers that there are 207,809 androids, and, most importantly, they seem to be controlled by some central coordinating power.

The robots find people too destructive and plan to take over and “serve” all humans in the galaxy to control them. Kirk leaves Harry on the planet with his attendant robots to serve as an example of human failure to them. The robots are also reprogrammed to perform their original task of rendering the planet fit for human life. As a final blow to Mr. Mudd, Kirk also leaves behind several android copies of his shrewish wife, Stella.

Commentary

The episode features the return of Harcourt Fenton Mudd, who hijacks the Enterprise and takes it to a planet of robots. The crew must outwit the androids using illogical actions to regain control. We delve into the episode’s ethical lessons and connect them to compliance practices, emphasizing the importance of ethical decision-making, ethical leadership, and continuous improvement in compliance programs. Fun fact: NBC considered a spin-off series for Harry Mudd due to the episode’s success, although it never came to fruition.

Key Highlights

  • Plot Summary: The Hijacking and Mudd’s Rule
  • The Androids’ Purpose and Kirk’s Plan
  • The Climax: Overloading the Androids
  • Ethical Decision-Making in Compliance

Resources

Excruciatingly Detailed Plot Summary by Eric W. Weisstein

MissionLogPodcast.com

Memory Alpha

 

Categories
Blog

Design-Centric Internal Controls: The Foundation for Compliance Excellence

The dynamic world of compliance is continually evolving. New regulations, emerging technologies, and changing market conditions demand that organizations remain vigilant and proactive in their compliance efforts. One crucial aspect of this ongoing vigilance is the design and implementation of internal controls. Recently, I had the pleasure of discussing this topic with Adrienne Bellehumeur. In this blog post, we will explore the key insights from our conversation and delve into the importance of design-centric internal controls.

Adrienne is a chartered accountant and entrepreneur in Canada who has advocated for a design-first approach to internal controls for many years. Adrienne says design-centric internal controls are essential because they lay the foundation for effective compliance. She likens this approach to baking a cake: the design is the cake itself, while testing and other compliance activities are the icing. Without a solid foundation, no amount of testing can ensure the effectiveness of internal controls.

The necessity of robust internal controls has never been more critical. With the increasing complexity of regulatory requirements (on both sides of the border) and the rapid advancement of technology, organizations must continuously assess and improve their internal control systems. Adrienne points out that while internal controls have existed for over two decades, many organizations have become complacent. This complacency can lead to outdated processes that may not adequately address current risks and regulatory expectations.

Adrienne outlined five principles to improve and energize control design work:

  1. Think of Design as the Cake and Testing as the Icing: Focus on building solid and well-thought-out processes before jumping into testing. This approach ensures that the foundation is solid and can withstand scrutiny.
  2. Assess the Organization’s Level of Maturity: Tailor the internal control program to the organization’s stage of development. A one-size-fits-all approach is ineffective, as different organizations have varying needs and challenges.
  3. Focus on Habits, Not Theory: Practical, habitual practices are more effective than theoretical concepts. Encourage habits like regular access control reviews and inventory management to embed compliance into the organizational culture.
  4. Support Continuous Improvement: Internal controls should not be static. Regularly review and update controls to ensure they remain effective and relevant. Continuous improvement helps organizations stay ahead of emerging risks and regulatory changes.
  5. Keep It Interesting: Vary the techniques used in internal control assessments to maintain engagement and effectiveness. Workshops, interviews, and creative diagramming can provide fresh perspectives and uncover new insights.

One of the most intriguing aspects of Adrienne’s approach is her use of workshops to discuss and improve internal controls. These workshops involve stakeholders, including internal auditors, compliance officers, and business unit leaders. By fostering open dialogue and collaboration, these sessions can identify inefficiencies, propose improvements, and build stronger relationships between auditors and the internal team.

Adrienne emphasizes that these workshops should occur before external audits. This pre-audit preparation allows organizations to address issues internally, reducing the likelihood of negative findings during the audit. Moreover, involving the internal team in the design process helps build a sense of ownership and commitment to maintaining robust controls.

For the internal auditor, leveraging technology is crucial for adequate internal controls. Adrienne highlighted the decreasing reliance on transactional testing, thanks to automation and data analytics advancements. Modern internal controls must adapt to these changes by incorporating technology that enhances efficiency and accuracy.

AI and data analytics can provide deeper insights into organizational processes, helping identify potential risks and areas for improvement. By integrating these technologies into the internal control framework, organizations can achieve higher precision and responsiveness.

Adrienne’s expertise in documentation is particularly relevant to internal controls. I wholeheartedly agree that good documentation practices are the backbone of any effective compliance program and form the basis of information management. Clear, accurate, accessible documentation supports transparency, accountability, and continuous improvement.

Companies must establish simple rules for naming, classifying, and managing documents. This foundational step ensures that all relevant information is readily available for internal reviews, audits, and regulatory inspections.

The compliance landscape continually evolves, with new challenges like ESG and AI gaining prominence. Adrienne articulated that a back-to-basics approach can help organizations navigate these new areas. Organizations can build a solid foundation that supports emerging compliance requirements by focusing on fundamental principles of good information management and documentation.

For instance, effective ESG reporting relies on accurate and comprehensive data. Similarly, AI systems must be underpinned by robust data management practices to ensure transparency and accountability. By strengthening these foundational elements, organizations can more easily adapt to new regulatory expectations and technological advancements.

Adrienne and I also discussed the role of internal controls in supporting whistleblower programs. With the Department of Justice (DOJ) formulating new rules for financial incentives in whistleblower programs, organizations must ensure their internal controls can detect and address issues before they escalate. Adequate internal controls can help prevent whistleblower claims by identifying and mitigating risks early. For example, strong documentation practices provide a clear audit trail that can validate the organization’s actions and decisions. Additionally, fostering a culture of transparency and accountability encourages employees to report concerns internally, allowing the organization to address them proactively.

Design-centric internal controls are essential for building a robust and effective compliance program. By focusing on the principles outlined by Adrienne Bellehumeur, organizations can enhance their internal control frameworks, support continuous improvement, and stay ahead of emerging compliance challenges. A proactive approach to internal controls is crucial for long-term compliance success, whether through innovative workshops, leveraging technology, or strengthening documentation practices.

Categories
FCPA Compliance Report

FCPA Compliance Report: Jonathan Armstrong on Sweeping Changes in The UK Government: Insights on Compliance

Welcome to the award-winning FCPA Compliance Report, the longest running podcast in compliance. In this edition of the FCPA Compliance Report, Tom Fox welcome Jonathan Armstrong to discuss the seismic shift in the UK’s political landscape following the election last week.

The election was literally one for the ages. It led to a significant Labor victory over the Conservatives. They delve into the implications for compliance and governance in both the UK and globally. Topics include the new government’s proactive approach, anticipated shifts in bribery enforcement, and fiscal policies.

They also explore potential changes in AI regulation, employment law, data protection, and international relations, especially concerning Russia and China. The conversation highlights Labor’s balanced strategy, aiming for sensible, centrist policies while addressing key issues like corruption, AI, and data privacy.

Highlights in this Episode:

  • An election result for the ages
  • Impact on Bribery and Corruption Enforcement
  • Trade Sanctions, Russian Oligarch’s and Forced Labor
  • AI and Beyond
  • Data Privacy and Data Protection
  • Labor and Employment Rights

 Resources:

Jonathan Armstrong on LinkedIn

UK General Election 2024 – What Might This Mean for Compliance?

Tom Fox

Instagram

Facebook

YouTube

Twitter

LinkedIn

For more information on the Ethico ROI Calculator and a free White Paper on the ROI of Compliance, click here.

Categories
Compliance Tip of the Day

Compliance Tip of the Day: HR Touchpoints for Compliance

Welcome to “Compliance Tip of the Day,” the podcast where we bring you daily insights and practical advice on navigating the ever-evolving landscape of compliance and regulatory requirements.

Whether you’re a seasoned compliance professional or just starting your journey, our aim is to provide you with bite-sized, actionable tips to help you stay on top of your compliance game.

Join us as we explore the latest industry trends, share best practices, and demystify complex compliance issues to keep your organization on the right side of the law.

Tune in daily for your dose of compliance wisdom, and let’s make compliance a little less daunting, one tip at a time.

In today’s episode, we begin an exploration of how HR can assist in the operationalization of compliance through its number of employee touchpoints.

For more information on the Ethico ROI Calculator and a free White Paper on the ROI of Compliance, click here.

Categories
Daily Compliance News

Daily Compliance News: July 8, 2024 – The Tiger Tally Edition

Welcome to the Daily Compliance News. Each day, Tom Fox, the Voice of Compliance, brings you compliance-related stories to start your day. Sit back, enjoy a cup of morning coffee and listen to the Daily Compliance News. All from the Compliance Podcast Network.

Each day, we consider four stories from the business world: compliance, ethics, risk management, leadership, or general interest for the compliance professional.

In today’s edition of Daily Compliance News:

  • 2024 Tiger tally thru June 30. (South China Morning Post)
  • Microsoft fined for leave discrimination.  (WSJ)
  • Ex-Post Office Chair denies hiding an exculpatory report on the Horizon scandal. (BBC)
  • Indian regulators go after Hindenburg. (Bloomberg)

For more information on the Ethico ROI Calculator and a free White Paper on the ROI of Compliance, click here.

Categories
Riskology

Riskology by Infortal: Episode 28 – China & Global Risk – A European Perspective

Welcome to Episode 28 of Riskology by Infortal.

Have you ever wondered about the complexities of China’s increasing influence on European politics, the rise of far-right movements, and the impact of economic sanctions?

In this episode, hosts Dr. Ian Oxnevad and Christopher Mason, Esq., welcome Shannon Brandao, Esq., an EU-based attorney with the firm Harris Sliwoski LLP, to discuss the current global outlook on China from a European perspective.

Shannon is internationally regarded as a China expert and has worked on geopolitical and business issues across various public, private, and non-profit industries.

She is the founder of the China Boss newsfeed on LinkedIn, with over 25,000 followers, and the China Boss newsletter on Substack, from which she shares news and analysis on China-related business and geopolitical developments. Shannon’s analysis has also appeared in Foreign Policy, Arabian Business News, Financial Times’ Banking Risk and Regulation, and Harris Sliwoski’s award-winning China Law Blog.

The Geopolitical Implications of China’s Influence

China’s international expansion involves a blend of economic, political, and military tactics to project its influence worldwide. Understanding China’s strategy is crucial for businesses in the United States and Europe to mitigate risks and seize opportunities.

The situation calls for a nuanced understanding of the geopolitical shifts and the ability to anticipate the implications of China’s moves on international trade, intellectual property rights, and supply chain integrity.

Recent events, including European elections, have highlighted the growing impact of China’s influence beyond its borders. The rise of populist movements across Europe and shifts in the political landscape reflects, in part, the broader contest between global powers. China’s role in these developments is noteworthy.

The Impact of China’s Economic Struggles

The impact of economic challenges on China’s geopolitical ambitions has dominated global financial headlines.

China’s approach to managing its economic challenges, particularly in the property sector, is a delicate balancing act with global implications. The country’s economy, heavily reliant on property investment, faces considerable strain as it navigates the aftermath of speculative practices and seeks sustainable growth pathways.

Moreover, the tension between domestic economic needs and international trade dynamics places China in a complex position on the world stage.

The concept of decoupling, particularly in the context of Sino-Western relations, stands out as a significant shift in the global economic and geopolitical landscape. China’s strategic move away from dependency on Western economies isn’t a recent development; rather, it’s a part of a broader strategy initiated under the leadership of President Xi Jinping.

The complex interplay between China’s economic policies and global ambitions will undoubtedly shape the international order for years to come. As China continues to pursue self-reliance, decoupling, and a reshaped global role, the rest of the world, particularly Western nations, must recalibrate their strategies in response.

Understanding the nuances of China’s approach will be crucial for businesses, policymakers, and strategists to navigate the emerging global landscape characterized by shifting alliances and the pursuit of alternative world orders.

Whether you’re a politics aficionado, global economics enthusiast, or someone curious about international relations, this episode is packed with thought-provoking discussions you don’t want to miss.

We hope you  can join us for the latest episode of Riskology by Infortal!™

Resources:

Infortal Worldwide

Email

Dr. Ian Oxnevad on LinkedIn

Christopher Mason on LinkedIn

Categories
Corruption, Crime and Compliance

Sanctions Enforcement Risks

In this episode of Corruption, Crime and Compliance, we delve into the complex world of sanctions compliance and enforcement.

In this new era of aggressive sanctions enforcement, companies have to understand the red lines that define where criminal and civil enforcement risk increases.

In contrast to the history of FCPA enforcement, DOJ and OFAC have provided helpful guidance to alert companies where risks are likely to increase.

Join host Michael Volkov as he navigates the intricate landscape of voluntary disclosures, criminal and civil enforcement risks, and the evolving strategies of regulatory agencies like OFAC and the Department of Justice.

Hear Michael discuss:

  • Sanctions enforcement involves a mix of civil and criminal line drawing.
  • On the civil side, OFAC has explained that sanctions violations can be found based on strict liability with aggravating factors that turn the actor’s state of mind. 
  • Third-party liability for distributors extends to situations where a principal company knew or reasonably should have known that products sold to a third party were intended for shipment to a prohibited entity or individual or a prohibited country. 
  • Third-party liability for violations occurring in a company’s supply chain requires companies to break down its supply chain and learn the sourcing for all companies in its supply chain. It is clear that a failure to examine and assess your supply chain can lead to civil liability. 
  • In defining where criminal enforcement picks up on the culpability spectrum, DOJ and OFAC have defined potential criminal conduct based on the term “willful,” meaning when an actor knew that its conduct was wrong but did not necessarily know the specific law that her/she was violating. 
  • Applying the “you know it when you see it” standard, companies have to weigh the evidence of surrounding circumstances to determine if an individual actor or actors possessed the requisite intent. 
  • Criminal enforcement determination will turn on the attribution of individual conduct to a company based on respondent superior principles—that is, whether the conduct was committed in the course of an individual’s duties and in furtherance of a legitimate business purpose. 
  • Enforcement examples to track where the precise line falls between criminal and civil are few—a good start is by reviewing a meaningful record of DOJ enforcement actions against sanctions violations. The situation is akin to the early days of aggressive FCPA enforcement, where enforcement and settlement cases were reviewed for important precedents and explanations. DOJ’s record here is about to be defined and companies, commentators and trade compliance professionals will be reading tea leaves and looking for patterns.

Resources:

Michael Volkov on LinkedIn | Twitter

The Volkov Law Group

Categories
Principled Podcast

Principled Podcast: S11E7 | Fortifying Ethical Frameworks: Navigating Emerging Risks in the Middle East

Amid the escalating severity and frequency of new risks worldwide, Ethics and Compliance (E&C) initiatives are doubling down on efforts to mitigate these risks. This critical focus is underscored in LRN’s latest 2024 Ethics & Compliance Program Effectiveness Report, which draws insights from over 1,400 E&C professionals globally. Our findings reveal that values-driven programs not only prove most effective but also exhibit a robust correlation with risk reduction and enhanced business outcomes. In light of this evolving risk landscape, how are E&C programs in regions such as the Middle East adapting? Furthermore, what do the everyday practices of global best standards entail for programs operating within this region?

In this episode of the Principled Podcast, host Eric Morehead is joined by Elvis Angyiembe, the co-founder of the Middle East and Africa Compliance Association (MEACA). Elvis joined us last season to discuss the E&C priorities of companies in the Middle East. Today, they discuss key findings from the global edition of the 2024 Ethics & Compliance Program Effectiveness Report and how they apply to programs in that region.

Guest: Elvis Angyiembe

Principled Podcast - Season 11 Episode 7 featuring Elvis Angyiembe MEACA - Episode Cover

Elvis Angyiembe is co-founder and co-chair of the Middle East and Africa Compliance Association (MEACA). He has experience working for multinational companies, helping them manage significant legal and compliance matters. He has supported three companies under deferred prosecution agreements with the US Department of Justice. He has lived in Cameroon, Germany, the US, South Africa, and Dubai. He holds a Juris Doctorate (JD) from Thurgood Marshall School of Law in Houston, Texas, and a bachelor’s degree in criminology from the University of Maryland in College Park, Maryland.

Host: Eric Morehead

Headshot_Principled Podcast_Eric Morehead

Eric Morehead is a member of LRN’s Advisory Services team and has over 20 years of experience working with organizations seeking to address compliance issues and build effective compliance and ethics programs. He conducts program assessments and examines specific compliance risks, drafts compliance policies and codes of conduct, works with organizations to develop and improve compliance processes and tools, and provides live training for Boards of Directors, executives, managers, and employees.

Eric ran his consultancy for six years, advising clients on compliance program enhancements and assisting in creating effective compliance solutions.

Eric was formerly the Head of Advisory Services for NYSE Governance Services, a leading compliance training organization. In this position, he was responsible for all aspects of NYSE Governance Services’ compliance consulting arm.

Before joining NYSE, Eric was an Assistant General Counsel of the United States Sentencing Commission in Washington, DC. Eric served as the policy team chair that amended the Organizational Sentencing Guidelines in 2010.

Eric also spent nearly a decade as a litigation attorney in Houston, Texas, where he focused on white-collar and regulatory cases and represented clients at trial and before various agencies including SEC, OSHA, and CFTC.

Get a copy of the Global edition of LRN’s 2024 Ethics & Compliance Program Effectiveness Report.

Connect with the Compliance Podcast Network at:

LinkedIn: https://www.linkedin.com/company/compliance-podcast-network/
Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/compliancepodcastnetwork/
YouTube: https://www.youtube.com/@CompliancePodcastNetwork
Twitter: https://twitter.com/tfoxlaw
Instagram: https://www.instagram.com/voiceofcompliance/
Website: https://compliancepodcastnetwork.net/