The award-winning Compliance into the Weeds is the only weekly podcast which takes a deep dive into a compliance related topic, literally going into the weeds to more fully explore a subject. Looking for some hard-hitting insights on compliance? Look no further than Compliance into the Weeds! In this episode, Tom Fox and Matt Kelly take a deep dive, analyzing term-ending Supreme Court decisions from a compliance perspective.
They address the Jarkesy decision on SEC in-house tribunals, the Loper ruling overturning the Chevron deference doctrine, and the Snyder decision that narrows the scope of federal anti-corruption law. Despite the headlines, they conclude that these rulings have minimal direct impact on corporate compliance programs, emphasizing the ongoing importance of ethical integrity and effective compliance practices.
Key Highlights:
- Supreme Court Cases Impacting Compliance
- The Jarkesy Decision: Minimal Impact on Compliance
- The Loper Case: Chevron Deference Overturned
- The Snyder Decision: A Controversial Ruling
- Implications and Final Thoughts
Resources:
Matt on Radical Compliance
Tom
