Categories
Kerrville Weekly News Roundup

Kerrville Weekly News Roundup: March 16, 2024

Welcome to the Kerrville Weekly News Roundup. Each week, veteran podcaster Tom Fox and his colleagues Andrew Gay and Gilbert Paiz get together to go over a couple of their favorite stories from the past week from Kerrville and the greater Hill Country.

Sit back, enjoy a cup of morning coffee and listen in to get a wrap-up of the Kerrville Weekly News. We each consider two of our favorite stories and talk about the upcoming weekend’s events, which we will enjoy or participate in.

In this episode, Tom, Gilbert, and Andrew discuss the following stories that caught their attention over the past week:

  • Tom reviews the peddler’s ordinance, passed by the Kerrville City Council.
  • Andrew talks about safety awareness for the upcoming eclipse.
  • Gilbert discusses tax season and tax preparation and planning available at the Dieter Center.


Resources:

Tom Fox on LinkedIn

Gilbert Paiz on LinkedIn

Andrew Gay on LinkedIn

Texas Hill Country Podcast Network

The Lead

Kerrville Daily Times

Categories
TechLaw10

TechLaw10 with Eric Sinrod: Personal Liability & Do I Really Need to Know about AI?

In this edition of TechLaw10, Jonathan Armstrong talks to Attorney and Professor Eric Sinrod from his home in California. They talk about personal liability for tech issues & tech failures. How will this play in the world of AI?

  • What do the cases of Joe Sullivan & Carlos Abarca tell us about personal liability?
  • Why do ambitious LinkedIn profiles lead to risk?
  • Are there any wider lessons from the spat between Nigel Farage & Dame Alison Marie Rose-Slade on NatWest?
  • Could the Horizon investigation & other scandals lead to greater regulation of lawyers regarding tech issues?
  • The formation of the New York State Bar Association Task Force on AI
  • Where data breaches might lead to personal liability, & what CISOs and others should do to protect themselves
  • What guidance has been given in France about the adoption of AI?

You can listen to earlier TechLaw10 audio podcasts with Eric and Jonathan at https://www.duanemorris.com/site/techlaw10.html

Connect with the Compliance Podcast Network at:

LinkedIn: https://www.linkedin.com/company/compliance-podcast-network/
Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/compliancepodcastnetwork/
YouTube: https://www.youtube.com/@CompliancePodcastNetwork
Twitter: https://twitter.com/tfoxlaw
Instagram: https://www.instagram.com/voiceofcompliance/
Website: https://compliancepodcastnetwork.net/

Categories
Career Can D0

Unlocking Your ADHD Career Path with Shell Mendelson

Are you struggling to find the right career path that aligns with your strengths and passions?

In this episode of Career Can Do, Mary Ann Faremouth is joined by Shell Mendelson, a seasoned expert in counseling and author of “A Course for ADHD Adults and Teens: Unlock Your Career Path.” Shell’s unique approach focuses on helping individuals, especially those with ADHD, develop confidence and clarity in their career choices.

Join us as we uncover the importance of mindset, self-accommodation in the workplace, and the journey to finding a fulfilling and sustainable career direction.

Self-awareness plays a crucial role in career development, especially for individuals with ADHD. Shell emphasizes the importance of identifying what conditions work and don’t work for you in the workplace. By creating a self-accommodation plan based on these insights, you can prioritize their needs and align them with your career goals. This process not only empowers you to advocate for yourself but also helps you find a work environment that resonates with your strengths and preferences. Shell speaks from experience. She shares how understanding herself was key to thriving in her professional journey.

Those with ADHD often possess unique strengths, such as creativity and flexibility, that can be valuable assets in the workplace. It is key for you to find a career path that allows you to leverage your strengths effectively, so you can tailor your career choices to align with your natural inclinations and preferences. Not only will you enhance your job satisfaction, but you’ll also be able to make more meaningful contributions in your field.

While it is valuable to gain industry knowledge and experience in corporate settings first, many people with ADHD gravitate toward entrepreneurship and self-employment, either as a direct choice or as a natural part of career progression. They prefer working independently because it allows them more control over their work environment, how and when they show up, and the best way to leverage their creativity and flexibility.

Resources:

Shell Mendelson on the Web | LinkedIn | Facebook

“Unlock Your Career Path: A Course for ADHD Adults and Teens”

Faremouth.com

Categories
Compliance Tip of the Day

Compliance Tip of the Day: Tenets of a Successful Hotline

Welcome to “Compliance Tip of the Day,” the podcast where we bring you daily insights and practical advice on navigating the ever-evolving landscape of compliance and regulatory requirements.

Whether you’re a seasoned compliance professional or just starting your journey, our aim is to provide you with bite-sized, actionable tips to help you stay on top of your compliance game.

Join us as we explore the latest industry trends, share best practices, and demystify complex compliance issues to keep your organization on the right side of the law. Tune in daily for your dose of compliance wisdom, and let’s make compliance a little less daunting, one tip at a time.

In this episode, I discuss the basic tenets of a successful hotline and how this can foster engagement across your organization.

For more information on the Ethico ROI Calculator and a free White Paper on the ROI of Compliance, click here.

Categories
2 Gurus Talk Compliance

2 Gurus Talk Compliance – Episode 24 — The Self-Disclosure Edition

What happens when two top compliance commentators get together? They talk about compliance, of course. Join Tom Fox and Kristy Grant-Hart in 2 Gurus Talk Compliance as they discuss the latest compliance issues in this week’s episode! In this episode, Tom and Kristy take on a wide variety of compliance-related topics.

The Department of Justice (DOJ) is launching a paid whistleblower initiative, specifically targeting cases of criminal exploitation of the U.S. financial system that slip through the cracks of existing agency schemes. This move has elicited various perspectives, notably from compliance experts Tom Fox and Kristy Grant-Hart. Fox, drawing on his extensive experience in compliance, identifies the program as a vital development, filling a gap in whistleblower compensation efforts. He anticipates that it will compel compliance officers to foster a culture of reporting and enhance efficiency in managing investigations. On the other hand, Kristy, a renowned compliance specialist, also views the initiative positively but expresses concerns about the increased pressure on organizations to ensure compliance.

Despite this, both experts agree that the program is a step in the right direction towards promoting transparency, accountability, and ethical corporate behavior.

Highlights Include:

1. DAG Monaco Speech (DOJ Release)

2. Nicole M. Argentieri Speech (DOJ Release)

3. CTA struck down (WSJ)

4. Leadership Lessons from Robert Oppenheimer (WSJ)

5. State governments move to regulate AI (NYU)

6. The Percentage Of Corporate DOJ And SEC FCPA Enforcement Actions That Result From A Voluntary Disclosure (FCPA Professor)

7. Husband Who Eavesdropped on Wife’s Work Calls Pleads Guilty to Insider Trading (WSJ)

8. SEC Adopts Climate Disclosure Rule (Radical Compliance)

9. Is It Ever OK to Have an 8 a.m. Meeting? (WSJ)

10. The Florida Man Games (NYTimes)

Resources:

Kristy Grant-Hart on LinkedIn

Spark Consulting

Tom

Instagram

Facebook

YouTube

Twitter

LinkedIn

Categories
Blog

The Gunvor FCPA Enforcement Action: Part 2 – The Bribery Schemes

We continue our exploration of the resolution of the FCPA enforcement action involving the Swiss trading firm Gunvor S.A. The enforcement action came in with a $661 million penalty against the company, which has pleaded guilty to bribing Ecuadorian government officials through the 2010s in exchange for intelligence about upcoming business contracts with the state-owned oil company of Ecuador. The matter was resolved via a Plea Agreement. Information detailing the company’s conduct was also issued.

The Gunvor bribery schemes ran for nearly 8 years. Between 2012 and 2020, Gunvor paid more than $97 million to intermediaries, knowing that some money was used to bribe Ecuadorean officials. Those officials included Nilsen Arias Sandoval, a then-high-ranking official at Petroecuador. To show the blatantness of the bribery scheme, Gunvor managers and agents attended meetings in the United States and elsewhere, and bribe payments were routed through banks in the United States using shell companies in Panama and the British Virgin Islands controlled by Gunvor’s co-conspirators. According to the DOJ, a Gunvor employee also directed one of the intermediaries to use the money to purchase an 18-karat gold Patek Philippe watch.

According to the Plea Agreement, the Brothers Ycaza, Antonio Pere, and  Enrique Pere were agents for Gunvor who exercised control over companies and bank accounts in the United States and elsewhere. These accounts were used to facilitate the payment of bribes to Ecuadorian government officials to, among other things, obtain and retain business for Gunvor.

Gunvor paid over $97 million to the Brothers Ycaza via their companies, EIC and OIC. Several Gunvor employees, including Kohut, Gunvor Manager #1, and Gunvor Manager #2, knew and intended that some payments would be used to bribe Ecuadorian officials. After that, the Brothers Ycaza made millions of dollars in bribe payments on Gunvor’s behalf, directly and indirectly, to Ecuadorian officials identified by number in the Plea Agreement.

To do so, the Brothers Ycaza set up shell companies to launder Gunvor’s corrupt payments, entered into several service agreements to facilitate the payment of bribes, created fake invoices for purported consulting services, and used email accounts with pseudonyms to transfer funds to offshore shell companies involved in the conspiracy. The illegal payments were made through multiple bank accounts in the United States and abroad to conceal the bribes.

Gunvor Singapore made the corruption payments through a services agreement with the Brothers Ycaza and their company through EIC, which enabled the payment of bribes to Ecuadorian officials on Gunvor’s behalf. The agreement provided for certain prepayments and success fees, but the bulk of the compensation was through per-barrel “volume fee” payments to EIC that depended on the amount of oil purchased in connection with the oil-backed loan contract. Gunvor and EIC amended the services agreement several times to change, among other things, the amount of the volume fees due to be paid to EIC. The Brothers Ycaza used portions of the volume fees to pay bribes to Ecuadorian officials on Gunvor’s behalf. The volume fee compensation model for the Brothers Ycaza was increased multiple times to increase both their compensation and the amount of bribes being paid on behalf of Gunvor over the length of the bribery scheme.

In exchange for the bribes, Ecuadorian officials provided improper advantages to Gunvor, including (a) helping to direct Petroecuador to award contracts to State-Owned Entities for the ultimate benefit of Gunvor and (b) providing Gunvor, through certain of its employees and agents, information about Petroecuador that assisted Gunvor in corruptly obtaining and retaining business for Gunvor in connection with Petroecuador. This structure allowed Gunvor and its co-conspirators to avoid a competitive bidding process and obtain contractual terms they could not have otherwise. Gunvor also received confidential Petroecuador information in exchange for the bribes. Gunvor earned more than $384 million in profits from the contracts it obtained corruptly from Petroecuador.

In 2017, when the corrupt Petroecuador official Arias left the company, the Brothers Ycaza engaged other corrupt Petroecuador officials through cash bribe payments. This new scheme included effecting bribe payments on Gunvor’s behalf in exchange for confidential Petroecuador information about shipping windows. To facilitate this scheme phase, Gunvor continued to pay fees to the Brothers Ycaza through another company, OIC, on each barrel of oil products purchased in connection with their oil-backed loan contracts with Petroecuador. As in the prior phase of the scheme, Gunvor employee Kohut continued to coordinate the processing and payment of the invoices by Gunvor. Upon receiving funds from Gunvor, the Brothers Ycaza wired money to intermediaries based in Ecuador, who then arranged for the bribes to be delivered in cash to Ecuadorian officials within Petroecuador, who provided confidential Petroecuador information to Gunvor.

Gunvor employees and officers participating in the bribery scheme worked to conceal their illegal actions. One Gunvor Manager instructed Kohut to communicate using personal email accounts. The Brothers Ycaza also used personal or pseudonymous email accounts to speak about the scheme. Alias were often used rather than their actual names.

Interestingly, and perhaps equally troublingly, Gunvor executives and compliance personnel knew that Gunvor had paid the Brothers Ycaza tens of millions of dollars. This was without receiving other supporting documentation for EIC’s or OIC’s business activities on Gunvor’s behalf. Between May 2018 and May 2020, Gunvor executives and compliance personnel requested the Brothers Ycaza (i) for supporting documentation to justify the commission payments and (ii) to meet with executives and compliance personnel. The Brothers Ycaza repeatedly failed to respond entirely to Gunvor’s documentary requests and would not travel to Gunvor’s headquarters for the requested meeting. Finally, the Plea Agreement dryly noted, “Notwithstanding these repeated failures, Gunvor continued to make corrupt payments to entities owned and controlled by Antonio Pere and Enrique Pere until approximately January 2020, at which time Gunvor suspended payments to OIC.”

It is unclear from any resolution documents or the DOJ Press Release how the bribery scheme was uncovered or even ended. It may have been through a DOJ investigation into one of the other corrupt companies that came to grief working in Ecuador or with Petroecuador. It is clear that Gunvor did not self-disclose.

Join us tomorrow, and we will consider Gunvor’s steps after the DOJ knocks.