Categories
Compliance Tip of the Day

Compliance Tip of the Day: Characteristics of a Toxic Culture

Welcome to “Compliance Tip of the Day,” the podcast where we bring you daily insights and practical advice on navigating the ever-evolving landscape of compliance and regulatory requirements.

Whether you’re a seasoned compliance professional or just starting your journey, our aim is to provide you with bite-sized, actionable tips to help you stay on top of your compliance game.

Join us as we explore the latest industry trends, share best practices, and demystify complex compliance issues to keep your organization on the right side of the law.

Tune in daily for your dose of compliance wisdom, and let’s make compliance a little less daunting, one tip at a time.

In this episode, we consider the 5 top characteristics of a toxic corporate culture.

For more information on the Ethico ROI Calculator and a free White Paper on the ROI of Compliance, click here.

Categories
Daily Compliance News

Daily Compliance News: April 30, 2024 – The Whitewash Edition

Welcome to the Daily Compliance News. Each day, Tom Fox, the Voice of Compliance, brings you compliance-related stories to start your day. Sit back, enjoy a cup of morning coffee and listen to the Daily Compliance News. All from the Compliance Podcast Network.

Each day, we consider four stories from the business world: compliance, ethics, risk management, leadership, or general interest for the compliance professional.

In today’s edition of Daily Compliance News:

  • Corporate investigations are under scrutiny.   (FT)
  • Vale and BHP propose reparations.  (FT)
  • The SCt will not hear Musk’s appeal of the SEC order. (Reuters)
  • What is a managerial city? (WaPo)

For more information on the Ethico ROI Calculator and a free White Paper on the ROI of Compliance, click here.

Categories
Innovation in Compliance

Innovation in Compliance – Matt Kunkel and Nick Kathmann on Dynamic GRC Systems with AI-driven Controls

Innovation comes in many forms, and compliance professionals must be ready for and embrace it. Today, I visited with Matt Kunkel, CEO of LogicGate, and Nick Kathmann, CISO at LogicGate, to consider how a dynamic GRC can help drive efficiency, compliance, and profitability.

With a background in business analysis and self-taught coding, Kunkel identified a need for a more comprehensive and user-friendly approach to governance, risk, and compliance (GRC) solutions, leading to the creation of Logic Gate. The platform was designed to meet businesses’ evolving needs without requiring constant developer intervention, utilizing a flexible data model and advanced graph database technology for superior efficiency.

Kathmann, with over 20 years of experience in security and compliance, stresses the importance of industry expertise in delivering effective solutions, focusing on ensuring the platform meets the highest security standards and adapts to changing business requirements seamlessly. Kunkel and Kathmann’s perspectives highlight the crucial role of innovative technology in simplifying GRC processes and addressing the complex regulatory, risk, and compliance needs of organizations.

Key Highlights:

  • Adaptive Logic Gate Platform for GRC
  • Harnessing Data for Strategic Compliance Oversight
  • Real-time Risk Optimization for Business Growth
  • Cyber Risk Alignment Between CISO and CEO
  • Executive Level Engagement for Cybersecurity Strategy
  • Tailoring Risk Communication to Stakeholder Priorities
  • Dynamic GRC Systems with AI-driven Controls

Resources:

Matt Kunkel on LinkedIn 

Nick Kathmann on LinkedIn 

LogicGate

Tom Fox

Instagram

Facebook

YouTube

Twitter

LinkedIn

Categories
Blog

Culture Week: Part 2 – Attributes of a Toxic Corporate Culture

We continue our exploration of aspects of corporate culture. Today, we turn to the dark side by reviewing some of the characteristics of a toxic corporate culture. An article in the MIT Sloan Management Review provided some guidance. In Why Every Leader Needs to Worry About Toxic Culture, Donald Sull, Charles Sull, William Cipolli, and Caio Brighenti posited that, by pinpointing the elements of toxic culture in a company, its leaders focus on addressing the issues that lead employees to disengage and quit. These ideas are essential for compliance as they navigate corporate culture and assess and improve it.

Moreover, the Chief Compliance Officer and corporate compliance function were again identified in the 2023 Evaluation of Corporate Compliance Programs (ECCP) as the institutional justice and fairness keepers. This means recognizing and preventing a toxic culture from spreading and infecting your entire organization, which is squarely in the compliance wheelhouse. The article lays out vital red flags for every CCO and compliance professional to look for in assessing culture. Last but not least, for any company with a toxic culture, the likelihood that its employees will commit fraud or bribe and corrupt others by breaking laws like the Foreign Corrupt Practices Act (FCPA) is much higher.

The authors identify behaviors they call “the Toxic Five attributes,” which are being “disrespectful, non-inclusive, unethical, cutthroat, and abusive—poison corporate culture in employees’ eyes. While organizational culture can disappoint employees in many ways, these five elements have by far the largest negative impact on how employees rate their corporate culture and have contributed most to employee attrition throughout the Great Resignation.” As a CCO or compliance professional, you must be on the lookout for them and take steps to remedy them if you see or hear about them.

Disrespectful Behavior

The authors found that “feeling disrespected at work has the largest negative impact on an employee’s overall rating of their corporate culture of any single topic.” Lack of respect can occur in many areas. The most obvious is the lack of a “speak up” culture where employees understand it is useless to raise issues with management, whether serious matters such as FCPA violations or more straightforward ideas such as process improvement. It can also be as simple as whether to return to the office full-time and whether management listens to employees about their desires to continue working from home or to utilize some hybrid working arrangement. The authors noted, “Whether you analyze culture at the level of the individual employee or aggregate to the organization as a whole, respect toward employees rises to the top of the list of cultural elements that matter most.

Non-inclusive Behavior

This concerns whether your employees are “treated fairly, made to feel welcome, and included in key decisions.” It is “the most powerful predictor of whether employees view their organization’s culture as toxic. It applies to all demographic groups: “gender, race, sexual identity and orientation, disability, and age.” It can be outright discrimination against the equally invidious but more subtle conflicts of interests of nepotism and playing favorites. The topic of non-inclusiveness includes “terms like ‘cliques,’ ‘clubby, or ‘in crowd that indicate that some employees are being excluded without specifying why.

Ethical Behavior

The authors believe ethics “is a fundamental aspect of culture that matters at both the organizational and individual levels. Interestingly, there are several different aspects of “ethics that every CCO needs to consider. Unethical behavior is “about integrity and ethics within an organization. It also includes dishonesty. “Employees described dishonest behavior in many ways, from outright lying to making false promises to shading the truth to simply “sugarcoating. Under regulatory compliance, employees talked about failure to comply with applicable regulations, including failure to meet safety standards.

Cutthroat Behavior

I found this category fascinating as it included both uncooperative coworkers and the lack of harmonization across organizational silos. This was not simply “friction in coordination, but situations in which “employees talked about colleagues actively undermining one another. It included what the authors termed as a “vivid lexicon to describe their workplace, including ‘dog-eat-dog and ‘Darwinian and talked about coworkers who ‘throw one another under the bus,‘ ‘stab each other in the back, or ‘sabotage one another.'”

Abusive Behavior

Having worked in law firms long ago, I understand abusive behavior. The authors called it “sustained hostile behavior toward employees, including “bullying, yelling, or shouting at employees, belittling or demeaning subordinates, verbally abusing people, and condescending or talking down to employees. While one would hope such behaviors do not exist in the 21st century, they still do. The article’s authors reported that only 0.8% of the employees surveyed described their manager as abusive. However, when employees did mention abusive managers, it significantly depressed the corporate culture.

What CCOs and compliance professionals should try to drive forward is a “culture that is inclusive, respectful, ethical, collaborative, and free from abuse by those in positions of power. However, the authors caution that these are the “baseline elements of a healthy corporate culture. Employees want more than the basics; other organizational stakeholders want companies to have official, solid core values. In an interview with LRN’s Susan Divers, she called this emphasis on core values the “value in values.” From the compliance professional’s perspective, it means values like integrity, collaboration, respect, and DEI.