Categories
Compliance Tip of the Day

Compliance Tip of the Day – Terminating Third Parties

Welcome to “Compliance Tip of the Day,” the podcast where we bring you daily insights and practical advice on navigating the ever-evolving landscape of compliance and regulatory requirements. Whether you’re a seasoned compliance professional or just starting your journey, we aim to provide bite-sized, actionable tips to help you stay on top of your compliance game. Join us as we explore the latest industry trends, share best practices, and demystify complex compliance issues to keep your organization on the right side of the law. Tune in daily for your dose of compliance wisdom, and let’s make compliance a little less daunting, one tip at a time.

Why you should plan for 3rd-party termination and how to do so.

For more on this topic, check out The Compliance Handbook, a Guide to Operationalizing Your Compliance Program, 6th Edition, which LexisNexis recently released. It is available here.

Categories
12 O’Clock High-a podcast on business leadership

12 O’Clock High, a podcast on business leadership – Empowering Female Entrepreneurs: A Conversation with Linda Fisk

12 O’Clock High, an award-winning podcast on business leadership, brings together stories from history, the arts, sports and movies, research, and current events to consider leadership lessons. Tom takes a solo turn to visit Linda Fisk, the leader of LeadHERship Global, to talk about the challenges and opportunities female entrepreneurs face.

Linda shares her extensive professional journey from being a CMO at notable media companies to founding LeadHERship Global. They discuss women entrepreneurs’ impressive yet under-recognized contributions to the U.S. economy, highlighting stats and trends around new business ventures led by women, especially women of color. Linda emphasizes women’s ongoing difficulties in accessing capital and offers practical steps for success, including addressing stereotypes, learning from each other, and creating supportive networks. The conversation closes with insights on how LeadHERship Global helps women thrive professionally and how men can support this movement. Linda also mentions her recent anthology,” LeadHERship Unveiled,” which features inspiring stories from women leaders.

Key highlights:

  • Current Landscape for Female Entrepreneurs
  • Challenges in Funding for Women Entrepreneurs
  • Practical Steps for Women Entrepreneurs
  • The Vision Behind LeadHERship Global

Resources:

LeadHERship Website

 Tom Fox

Instagram

Facebook

YouTube

Twitter

LinkedIn

Categories
2 Gurus Talk Compliance

2 Gurus Talk Compliance – Episode 52 – The Big Jet Plane Edition

What happens when two top compliance commentators get together? They talk compliance, of course. Join Tom Fox and Kristy Grant-Hart in 2 Gurus Talk Compliance as they discuss the latest compliance issues in this week’s episode!

Stories this week include:

  • Trump closes tariff loophole on cheap online goods from China MSN)
  • If A.I. Systems Become Conscious, Should They Have Rights? (NYT)
  • Sarah Hadden & Corporate Compliance Insights: “Failure was always a possibility. It just wasn’t an option.” (Ideas & Answers)
  • ‘Everybody’s Replaceable’: The New Ways Bosses Talk About Workers (WSJ)
  • Florida man casually offers officer a vodka spritzer during police chase, officials say (Fox 35 Orlando)
  • The Board’s role in ransomware planning. (Harvard Law School Forum on Corporate Governance)
  • DOJ National Security Division issued a Declination. (Crime, Corruption and Compliance)
  • Based on whistleblower tips, UBS will pay $511MM for Credit Suisse’s failure to live up to DPA. (ComplianceWeek)
  • Malaysia wants Tim Leissner. (WSJ)
  • What is risk paralysis? (FT)

Resources:

Kristy Grant-Hart on LinkedIn

Prove Your Worth

Tom

Instagram

Facebook

YouTube

Twitter

LinkedIn

Categories
Daily Compliance News

Daily Compliance News: May 16, 2025, The Ethics Nightmare Edition

Welcome to the Daily Compliance News. Each day, Tom Fox, the Voice of Compliance, brings you compliance-related stories to start your day. Sit back, enjoy a cup of morning coffee, and listen in to the Daily Compliance News—all from the Compliance Podcast Network. Each day, we consider four stories from the business world: compliance, ethics, risk management, leadership, or general interest for the compliance professional.

Top stories include:

  • The Trump Administration wants to roll back EU protections for children. (WSJ)
  • Pay to meet with the President. (WSJ)
  • United Healthcare Group is under investigation for alleged Medicare fraud. (Forbes)
  • The $100K in cash deposit.  (WSJ)
Categories
Regulatory Ramblings

Regulatory Ramblings: Episode 69 – Human Intelligence vs. Machine Judgment  with Nigel Morris-Cotterill and Patrick Dransfield

This episode of Regulatory Ramblings is a little different from what we usually do as we explore the ways technology, particularly computers and, more specifically, artificial intelligence (AI), can either improve the human condition and help us achieve our highest goals and ideals or just be an uncaring, unreasoning, and, as some might say, psychopathic hindrance.

Today’s guests, Patrick Dransfield and Nigel Morris-Cotterill, explore artificial intelligence’s cultural, ethical, and professional implications. Patrick Dransfield examines Eastern versus Western perspectives and legal innovation, while Nigel Morris-Cotterill cautions against entrusting emotionless algorithms with life-changing choices.

In our initial spotlight segment, we discuss Patrick’s recently written article on AI and human intelligence, “All Watched Over by Machines of Loving Grace.” Following that, we chatted with Nigel about his recent article for LinkedIn, “Computers are Mechanized Psychopaths.”

Patrick M. Dransfield

Patrick M. Dransfield is a principal at Clearway Communications and a business development manager at Mouannes International Specialized Consultants (UAE).

He also holds a master’s degree in Chinese History, Politics, and anthropology from SOAS, University of London, and a BA (Joint Hons.) in English and History of Art from Leeds University. He is a senior business executive in legal business development.
He is also a qualified trainer, author, and photographer based in Abu Dhabi, the UAE’s capital. He co-founded the Managing Partners’ Club, an international, by-invitation group of senior lawyers across Asia, the Middle East, Africa, and Europe.

Patrick’s career includes serving as Asia-Pacific marketing director for international law firms Shearman & Sterling and White & Case, managing director of Asia Law & Practice, Asia Publisher of IFLR, and Hong Kong-based subsidiary Euromoney (Jersey) Limited board member.

Nigel Morris-Cotterill

Nigel Morris-Cotterill was previously a solicitor in London. Throughout his career, he dealt with various matters, including contracts, property, company law, litigation, international trade, criminal law, intellectual property, family law, and financial services compliance.

In 1994, he brought all those areas together to address a new field: financial crime risk and compliance. As a strategist, he identifies and discusses trends long before they become fashionable.

Nigel is the author of “How Not to Be a Money Launderer,” which in 1996 described all the areas that would, in some cases, decades later, become topics for international groups and regulators to prioritize. He also authored the only book on Understanding Suspicion in Financial Crime.

Additionally, he has written a book for families and others to help start discussions about online safety and fraud for young people and the elderly.

Nigel also provides training and consultancy services. However, he admits to becoming jaded by the prevalence of superficiality and a lack of attention to the fundamentals. Since the 1980s, when he first encountered technology in earnest, he has cautioned against the trend of so-called “artificial intelligence,” frequently pointing out its shortcomings in even the most basic tasks.

Discussion:

Today’s podcast begins with a spotlight conversation between Patrick and our host, Ajay Shamdasani, on what compelled him to write a piece on human intelligence and AI – especially given that he is a veteran legal services marketing and business development maven and not a techie with a STEM background. As Patrick explains, his motivation to pen the article stemmed from his interest in the world’s major religions and their spiritual and philosophical views on human nature and the idea of the self. The chat ends with Patrick sharing his views on AI and the legal profession.

We then shift to a discussion with Nigel on his recent LinkedIn article, and he stresses that the title of his piece is not intended to be clickbait but a sincere warning. His key point is that you cannot reason with a computer; they do not care about their intended users and frustrations. To that end, he offers the following definition of psychopathy from Psychology Today: “Psychopathy is a condition characterized by the absence of empathy and the blunting of other affective states. Callousness, detachment, and a lack of empathy enable psychopaths to be highly manipulative.”

He and Ajay flesh out what that means in practical terms to often exasperated and baffled users of modern IT. They discuss computing technology at a crossroads, whether empathy can be written into algorithms and, ultimately – what it means for those in legal and compliance circles.

Regulatory Ramblings podcasts is brought to you by The University of Hong Kong—Reg/Tech Lab, HKU-SCF Fintech Academy, Asia Global Institute, and HKU-edX Professional Certificate in Fintech, with support from the HKU Faculty of Law.

Useful links in this episode:

You might also be interested in:

Connect with RR Podcast at:

LinkedIn: https://hk.linkedin.com/company/hkufintech 
Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/hkufintech.fb/
Instagram: https://www.instagram.com/hkufintech/ 
Twitter: https://twitter.com/HKUFinTech 
Threads: https://www.threads.net/@hkufintech
Website: https://www.hkufintech.com/regulatoryramblings 

Connect with the Compliance Podcast Network at:

LinkedIn: https://www.linkedin.com/company/compliance-podcast-network/
Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/compliancepodcastnetwork/
YouTube: https://www.youtube.com/@CompliancePodcastNetwork
Twitter: https://twitter.com/tfoxlaw
Instagram: https://www.instagram.com/voiceofcompliance/
Website: https://compliancepodcastnetwork.net

Categories
Blog

Preparing for the New Data Security Program, Part 2

Yesterday, I began a two-part blog post on preparing to respond to the Department of Justice’s (DOJ) new Data Security Program (DSP), which was released on April 8, 2025. Today, I want to conclude this series by reviewing additional key actions you can take now to prepare for the full effective date of October 6, 2025.

  • Set up internal processes for training, audit, and reporting.

The DSP does not just ask for policies; it demands proof of implementation. Your organization must build internal compliance muscle around training, auditing, and reporting specific to DSP obligations. Start with training. Who needs to know what? Procurement teams must understand vendor screening protocols. IT and security teams must recognize DSP risk categories. Legal must know the redlines on cross-border data sharing. Executives must understand their certification responsibilities. Everyone must grasp the stakes: violations carry real-world consequences, including civil penalties and criminal charges.

Next comes auditing. You must create audit plans that review DSP compliance across your data lifecycle, collection, storage, access, processing, sharing, and deletion. These audits should be independent, recurring, and specific to your Data Compliance Program. And don’t forget: if you engage in restricted transactions, you must conduct an audit and submit an annual compliance certification. This is not optional, but mandatory compliance activity is baked into the regulation.

Lastly, establish internal reporting mechanisms. That includes hotlines or portals for employees to report suspected violations and internal systems for escalating rejected transactions to compliance or legal. DSP requires you to report known or suspected breaches within 14 days. This is not a theoretical SLA; failing to meet the timeline is a compliance failure. Build templates, designate responsible officers, and track every report. If your whistleblower program is not integrated with your data governance team, you are already behind the proverbial 8-ball.

Think of this as building a new compliance pillar, just like you did for FCPA or anti-money laundering. It’s not about reinventing the wheel but about embedding DSP-specific requirements into the systems, teams, and culture you already rely on.

  • Engage your board and C-suite on DSP requirements. This is national security compliance, not just privacy.

One of the most underappreciated risks in corporate compliance today is the leadership’s assumption that DSP is just an extension of privacy laws. It is decidedly not. This is national security compliance. And that means the board and C-suite must be informed and actively engaged.

Start by educating the board on how the DSP aligns with existing fiduciary duties and oversight obligations. Directors must understand that data exposure to hostile foreign powers could result in enforcement actions, reputational damage, shareholder litigation, and, in some sectors, revocation of government contracts. This could raise the level of a material disclosure risk for public companies.

The C-suite also has new legal responsibilities. Senior officers must sign off on DSP compliance certifications, ensure audits are conducted, and provide adequate resources for risk management. That means CEOs, GCs, and CFOs are personally accountable for implementation, and their failure to act could aggravate an enforcement action. Bring DSP compliance into board audit committee agendas. Create executive-level working groups that include the CISO, Chief Privacy Officer, General Counsel, and Chief Compliance Officer. Produce quarterly dashboards showing compliance metrics, known or suspected violations, audit results, and third-party risk assessments.

Do not make the mistake of treating this like another privacy briefing. Treat it like an FCPA or sanctions discussion, with risk maps, case studies, DOJ priorities, and benchmark expectations, because this is not about theoretical data misuse. It’s about preventing hostile state actors’ strategic exploitation of American data. And that is a matter of national urgency. If your board does not understand this message, it is up to compliance to evangelize the message before regulators do it for you.

  • Start building your Data Compliance Program today—October 6, 2025, is not as far off as it seems.

October 6, 2025, may feel like a future problem, but let me assure you that the future is already knocking at your door. The DOJ has given us a roadmap and a runway. What you do with that time will define your compliance posture for years. Don’t treat the DSP as a regulatory cliff. Treat it as a strategic build.

Begin by appointing a DSP compliance lead with data governance and regulatory experience. Next, map your data flows, classify your datasets, and identify your exposure to restricted or prohibited transactions. Use that information to build a risk profile. That’s your foundation.

Then, develop your Data Compliance Program. Create written policies for due diligence, vendor screening, internal reporting, and audit procedures. Set up governance structures, designate accountable officers, and prepare for annual certifications. Do not wait until Q3 to scramble; start embedding controls into your existing compliance infrastructure now.

Use this runway to build muscle memory: conduct tabletop exercises, test your reporting protocols, and audit your readiness. Engage your business units with training, mock scenarios, and real-life case studies. The goal is not just compliance; it is about cultural adoption. You’ve already failed if your people see this as a box-checking exercise. The organizations that will thrive under DSP are the ones that treat this not as a regulatory burden but as an opportunity to lead. Because let’s face it: national security compliance is the new frontier. And October 6, 2025, won’t end this journey. It’s the beginning.

The DSP marks a seismic shift for compliance professionals in the era of data as a national security asset. This is not just another privacy framework but a national security regulation with teeth. U.S. companies must now treat data governance the way they’ve treated anti-bribery compliance or export controls: with rigor, documentation, and executive oversight. That starts with reviewing and aligning privacy policies to DSP-defined risk categories, especially around government-related and bulk-sensitive personal data.

Vendor agreements must be audited for exposure to covered persons or countries of concern and updated with enforceable clauses to prevent prohibited data transfers. Organizations must also build robust internal training, auditing, and reporting systems, with mandatory 14-day reporting windows for violations. Most critically, boards and C-suites must be actively engaged, and this is national security compliance, not just IT hygiene. The clock is ticking, with full enforcement kicking in on October 6, 2025. Compliance professionals have a unique opportunity to lead from the front, building a proactive, risk-based Data Compliance Program that integrates DSP mandates into business operations before DOJ examiners come knocking. The message is clear: Know your data. Know your risks.

Finally, take action before your inaction becomes your liability.

Categories
Compliance Tip of the Day

Compliance Tip of the Day – Using Supply Chain to Innovate in Compliance

Welcome to “Compliance Tip of the Day,” the podcast where we bring you daily insights and practical advice on navigating the ever-evolving landscape of compliance and regulatory requirements. Whether you’re a seasoned compliance professional or just starting your journey, we aim to provide bite-sized, actionable tips to help you stay on top of your compliance game. Join us as we explore the latest industry trends, share best practices, and demystify complex compliance issues to keep your organization on the right side of the law. Tune in daily for your dose of compliance wisdom, and let’s make compliance a little less daunting, one tip at a time.

How to use your supply chain partners to innovate for your compliance program.

For more on this topic, check out The Compliance Handbook, a Guide to Operationalizing Your Compliance Program, 6th Edition, which LexisNexis recently released. It is available here.

Categories
Career Can D0

Confident Voices, Lasting Impact with Aletta Rochat

What happens when someone dares to speak up—not just clearly, but confidently—in the moments that matter most? Aletta Rochat, International President-Elect of Toastmasters International, joins Mary Ann Faremouth on this episode of Career Can Do to explore how powerful communication and leadership skills can shape careers, strengthen confidence, and create lasting personal impact.

Aletta shares insights from her global leadership journey, emphasising the unifying nature of Toastmasters: “We come from different countries who might speak different languages and have different cultures. But as Toastmasters, we unite and connect. And we’re there for a common purpose. And that’s why it works so well.”

In times of crisis, communication can be your greatest tool. Aletta recalls a moment shared by a longtime Toastmaster she mentored: “Suddenly, with the confidence she built up through Toastmasters, she was able to take charge in a very stressful moment… and to keep calm in the midst of something that could have been exceptionally stressful.” Experiences like these, she says, highlight how communication skills, built over time, become instinctive when you need them most.

She also tells the inspiring story of Emil, a new member who gave his first speech—despite a profound stutter: “It took him 16 agonizingly long minutes to get those words out.” With ongoing support, Emil went on to become a confident leader. “He learned, and he improved because of the support of the members around him. He couldn’t have done that by himself.”

Looking ahead to her conference session, Building Clubs That Are Member Magnets, Aletta promises to keep things practical and impactful: “I’m not going to give you the theory. I’m going to give you the stuff that works.”

Reflecting on her 16-year Toastmasters journey, Aletta sums it up in one word: “Enriching.” She explains, “Toastmasters is not a spectator sport. The more you get involved, the better the return on investment.”

This episode is a powerful reminder that communication isn’t just a skill—it’s a life-changing asset, and one that’s more essential now than ever.

Resources

Toastmasters on the Web | District 65 Annual Conference 2025

Aletta Rochat on the Web | LinkedIn

Mary Ann Faremouth on the Web | X (Twitter)

Categories
Daily Compliance News

Daily Compliance News: May 15, 2025, The Downfall in Davos Edition

Welcome to the Daily Compliance News. Each day, Tom Fox, the Voice of Compliance, brings you compliance-related stories to start your day. Sit back, enjoy a cup of morning coffee, and listen in to the Daily Compliance News—all from the Compliance Podcast Network. Each day, we consider four stories from the business world: compliance, ethics, risk management, leadership, or general interest for the compliance professional.

Top stories include:

  • The whistleblower brings claims to the World Economic Forum. (FT)
  • The Office of Federal Contract Compliance will lay off 90% of the workforce. (Federal News Network)
  • JBS to go public. (Forbes)
  • The Trump Administration scraps AI Diffusion rules. (WSJ)
Categories
Blog

Preparing for the New Data Security Program, Part 1

Yesterday, I introduced the Department of Justice’s (DOJ) new Data Security Program (DSP), which was released on April 8, 2025, and implemented under Executive Order 14117. Today, I want to begin reviewing key actions you can take now to prepare for the full effective date of October 6, 2025. We will complete our review of key steps to take tomorrow.

1. Review your current data governance and privacy policies—align them with DSP risk categories.

Data governance is no longer just about classification and access rights; it’s now a frontline national security function. The DSP requires fundamentally rethinking how organizations define, inventory, and control sensitive data. Compliance officers must start with a forensic review of current data governance frameworks: What data are you collecting? Who touches it? Where does it live? Who can access it, and how is it transferred internally and externally? Once mapped, each dataset must be examined through the DSP lens: Is it government-related? Does it contain bulk sensitive personal data? Is it linked to current or former U.S. government personnel? These are not simply IT questions. These are compliance questions with profound legal implications.

Next, organizations must evaluate their privacy policies for blind spots. Many policies were written for GDPR or CCPA, not for adversarial data exfiltration by foreign intelligence services. If your data policies are not risk-aligned to DSP categories, such as data brokered to third parties or aggregated in ways that make re-identification likely, you are flying blind in a regulatory minefield. This isn’t a call for a quick redline but a strategic overhaul of how you structure data controls, policies, and risk frameworks. Collaborate with your CISO, but lead with your compliance hat on. The DOJ is not asking for IT security alone, and they are demanding accountable, auditable compliance with national security-grade rigor. Treat this like an FCPA compliance program: document everything, know your risk vectors, and escalate anomalies. The age of “data policy as an afterthought” is over. In the DSP era, data is not just a privacy concern but a geopolitical flashpoint.

2. Audit your third-party vendor agreements for exposure to covered persons or countries of concern.

Third-party risk just got geopolitical. Under the DSP, vendor due diligence has become a national security obligation. You must now screen for performance and financial viability and whether any foreign vendor, subcontractor, or partner is a “covered person” or tied to a country of concern like China, Russia, Iran, North Korea, Venezuela, or Cuba. Even indirect ownership or residency triggers a compliance obligation. That friendly cloud storage provider with a branch in Shenzhen? Is that IT support firm subcontracting code maintenance to Belarus? They may now be regulatory liabilities under the DSP.

Start with a comprehensive audit of all current vendor agreements, focusing on data-sharing terms, sub-licensing permissions, and geographic exposure. Can the vendor access, process, or host government-related or bulk-sensitive personal data? If so, is there a clause prohibiting onward transfer to covered persons or countries of concern? If not, you’re potentially out of compliance. You may need to renegotiate or terminate contracts that create risks you can’t control. Relying on “we didn’t know” is insufficient, as the DSP holds U.S. persons accountable for failing to implement reasonable and proportionate due diligence.

Also, consider implementing a DSP-specific screening protocol that goes beyond sanctions and AML lists and includes the DOJ’s Covered Persons List. Integrate this into your vendor onboarding, renewal, and periodic review processes. Remember, under the DSP, even inadvertent exposure can constitute a violation. That means it’s no longer enough to run a vendor through OFAC and call it a day. You need a national security screening lens. Compliance must lead this effort, not procurement, legal, or IT. If a vendor relationship enables DSP-prohibited access, the legal liability will land squarely on your doorstep.

3. Draft contractual clauses that prohibit data resale or access by covered entities.

The DSP has thrown a wrench into how we think about contract drafting. Referencing generic data use terms or standard confidentiality clauses is no longer sufficient. You’re exposed if your contracts do not explicitly prohibit the onward sale or transfer of covered data to countries of concern or covered persons. Under the DSP, exposure is not simply reputational but both civil and criminal.

Compliance teams should immediately collaborate with legal and procurement to update all relevant agreements. That includes data-sharing contracts, licensing, cloud service agreements, vendor onboarding templates, and M&A data room protocols. Insert clauses prohibiting foreign counterparties from transferring sensitive personal or government-related data to any covered person or country of concern. Go further: mandate that they notify you of any suspected breach and certify compliance annually.

Do not stop at language insertion. Require enforceability mechanisms, termination clauses, indemnification provisions, and audit rights. The DOJ clarified that including boilerplate language will not shield you from enforcement. You may have committed a prohibited transaction if you knew or should have known that a foreign vendor resold data to a hostile actor. Even the best legalese won’t save you without operational controls to back it up.

Consider maintaining a DSP Clause Library, a set of pre-approved terms for use across contracts by legal and compliance staff. Train your contract managers on red flags. Build escalation protocols when counterparties push back. And do not forget to update your templates as the DOJ issues more guidance. In short, think of DSP compliance clauses the way you would anti-corruption reps and warranties in an FCPA context: a first line of defense, but only effective when part of a broader compliance architecture.

The Department of Justice’s new Data Security Program, effective October 6, 2025, is a game-changer for corporate compliance. It redefines data governance as a national security obligation, requiring companies to align privacy policies with DSP risk categories and scrutinize third-party vendors for ties to covered persons or countries of concern. Compliance professionals must proactively draft enforceable contracts, build auditable training and reporting systems, and educate C-suites and boards that DSP is not “just privacy”; rather, it is national security compliance. With the clock ticking, the time to act is now. Join us tomorrow for Part 2, where we continue the roadmap to DSP readiness.