Categories
Everything Compliance - Shout Outs and Rants

Everything Compliance – Episode 121 – Shout Outs and Rants

Welcome to the only roundtable podcast in compliance. In this episode, we have the quartet of Matt Kelly, Special guest Kristy Grant-Hart, Tom Fox and Jay Rosen.

1. Matt Kelly rants about Sam Alito and his paid trip by a billionaire who later had a case at the Supreme Court.

2. Special guest Kristy Grant-Hart rants about the DOJ taking until 2023 to build out a criminal conviction data base for public use when her firm built one back in 2007.

3. Tom Fox shouts out to John Aceti, a 93-year-old Kerrville resident who just published his 8th book, his autobiography.

4. Jay Rosen rants about NE Patriots player Jack Jones who chastised Ja Morant for his gun waving and then was caught going through airport security with packed guns.  

The members of the Everything Compliance are:

•       Jay Rosen– Jay is Vice President, Business Development Corporate Monitoring at Affiliated Monitors. Rosen can be reached at JRosen@affiliatedmonitors.com

•       Karen Woody – One of the top academic experts on the SEC. Woody can be reached at kwoody@wlu.edu

•       Matt Kelly – Founder and CEO of Radical Compliance. Kelly can be reached at mkelly@radicalcompliance.com

•       Jonathan Armstrong –is our UK colleague, who is an experienced data privacy/data protection lawyer with Cordery in London. Armstrong can be reached at jonathan.armstrong@corderycompliance.com

•       Jonathan Marks can be reached at jtmarks@gmail.com

The host and producer, ranter (and sometime panelist) of Everything Compliance is Tom Fox the Voice of Compliance. He can be reached at tfox@tfoxlaw.com. Everything Compliance is a part of the Compliance Podcast Network.

Categories
31 Days to More Effective Compliance Programs

One Month to a More Effective Compliance Program with Boards – Incorporating Compliance into a Long-Term Corporate Strategy

How can a Board work incorporate the compliance function into a long-term business strategy of the organization?

The starting point for a Board of Directors is to develop a framework for incorporating compliance into your long-term strategy. To set up the framework for evaluating compliance into your Board’s long-term strategy is a three-step process, which you can use to determine how comprehensive the Board’s role in your compliance program is as a starting point.

1. Has the company identified the compliance issues relevant to the Board?

2. Has the company assessed and incorporated those compliance issues into its long-term strategy?

3. Has the company communicated its approach to compliance and the influence of those factors on its overall strategy?

From this initial inquiry, you can move into some specific questions that the Board can use to determine the overall state of your company’s compliance program. First, a Board can work to identify compliance issues material to your organization. This can be accomplished with compliance-related KPIs, which a Board should prioritize to elevate their impact on compliance. A Board should consider these through the life cycle of a business line or geographic sales area. Next, the Board should work to move compliance into the company’s long-term strategy and have the CCO detail the long-term strategy for the compliance function.

The Board should oversee incorporating KPIs into senior management performance evaluations and compensation. Once again building upon the 2020 Update, which asks how the company monitors its senior leadership’s behavior and how senior leadership models proper behavior to subordinates, the Board should make certain systems are in place to quantify or measure performance related to compliance issues, should establish performance goals against which they measure compliance achievement and disclose to shareholders the material compliance issues that drive compensation, the specific goals or performance targets that management must achieve and report on the actual performance against established goals to justify compensation payouts.

Finally, the Board should work to communicate the influence of compliance factors on overall corporate strategy by demonstrating how compliance was integrated into the business. Not only is this good from a business perspective and shareholder expectation, but it is also, as the 2020 Update makes clear, what the government expects is the operationalization of compliance going forward.

1. Having a long-term strategy is critical.

2. What is the Board’s framework for assessing compliance?

3. Create KPIs to measure senior management’s actions around compliance.

Categories
SBR - Authors' Podcast

SBR Author’s Podcast – Jim Massey: Trust in Action

Welcome to the Sunday Book Review, the Authors Podcast! Don’t miss out on this episode of SBR-Author’s Podcast, where Tom Fox sits down with Jim Massey to discuss his new book, Trust in Action. Massey brings a unique perspective as a behavioralist with a professional background in compliance and sustainability. The discussion touches on the societal loss of trust in government and education while the business remains the most trusted entity. Massey believes that companies can prioritize profits and still do the right thing for their employees, supply chain, and customers, making them a force for good.

The conversation discusses how leadership and involvement are essential in addressing society’s challenges and how every individual has the potential to be a leader. Listen in as Massey shares the Can Care to Do trust model for sparking action, focusing on three building blocks of trust: can, care, and do. He also discusses their experience of being perceived as an “ugly American” when working abroad and how they focus on building relationships. This podcast episode will teach you that good leaders are not tied to the past and are open to new ideas and solutions. Take advantage of this insightful conversation highlighting the power of trust, collaboration, and adaptability in leadership, especially in times of crisis.

Key Highlights Include:

  • The Importance of Trust in Business
  • The Role of Business in Systemic Change
  • Importance of Trust for Effective Leadership
  • Overcoming Obesity Bias in Global Health Leadership
  • Learning Agility and Humility in Leadership
  • Navigating societal and business risks
  • The Art of Writing with a Busy Schedule
  • Benefits of Mindfulness

Notable Quotes:

“Trust is the basis of any human interaction.”

“We cause the problem; therefore, I believe we can be the solution.”

“Leaders must be able to assess the situation be about 10000 feet above the details to see the whole picture and what’s going on.”

“The model of trust for me, Tom, sits at the self, team, & assist.”

Resources

Jim Massey on LinkedIn

Trust in Action

Tom Fox

Instagram

Facebook

YouTube

Twitter

LinkedIn

Categories
Daily Compliance News

Daily Compliance News: June 27, 2023 – The Wells Notices Edition

Welcome to the Daily Compliance News. Each day, Tom Fox, the Voice of Compliance brings to you compliance-related stories to start your day. Sit back, enjoy a cup of morning coffee, and listen in to the Daily Compliance News. All, from the Compliance Podcast Network. Each day we consider four stories from the business world, compliance, ethics, risk management, leadership, or general interest for the compliance professional.

  • Solar Winds execs receive Wells Notice. (Reuters)
  • Corruption hindering PdVSA. (InSight Crime)
  • Inhouse lawyers grapple with ESG demands. (FT)
  • SEC wants more information from small banks. (WSJ)
Categories
Data Driven Compliance

Data Driven Compliance: Vincent Walden – Analyzing the Philips FCPA Enforcement Action Using AI

Are you struggling to keep up with the ever-changing compliance programs in your business? Look no further than the award-winning Data Driven Compliance podcast, hosted by Tom Fox, is a podcast featuring an in-depth conversation around the uses of data and data analytics in compliance programs.

Data Driven Compliance is back with another exciting episode featuring the insightful Vince Walden from KonaAI. In this episode, Walden and host Tom Fox discuss how data analytics can help uncover potential FCPA enforcement actions, using the Philips case as an example. They delve into the benefits of internal controls and the segregation of duties to prevent bribery and corruption. Walden goes on to examine the customer 360 model, which focuses on analyzing customer orders to pinpoint risky transactions and potential improper payments. Additionally, they explore Kona AI’s platform, which utilizes advanced algorithms to pick up problems and highlight high-risk transactions.

The podcast also features a discussion on the use of artificial intelligence and how machine learning can help compliance professionals identify anomalies that require investigation. You won’t want to miss the exciting upcoming episode where Walden showcases real-world examples of how companies can use machine learning in 2023.  Tune in to Data Driven Compliance and stay ahead of the curve in the compliance world!

Key Highlights

·      Data analytics for FCPA compliance detection

·      Kona AI’s Customer Analytics and Risk Assessment

·      Improper Vendor Payments Tracking

·      The importance of second level reviews in internal control

·      Analytics and Investigating Fraud Potential

·      Improving Precision in Machine Learning Models

KEY QUOTES

“Just those basic type of analytics could have been easily spotted these issues.”

“These are the types of things that when you could just sort, you would be able to find those high risk transactions.”

“Nowadays the technology is there to spot these types of activities when compliance has access to the data.”

“Let’s see if this event took place. And he just did a simple Google search on the Internet couldn’t find the event.”

Resources:

Vince Walden on LinkedIn 

KonaAI

 Tom Fox 

Connect with me on the following sites:

Instagram

Facebook

YouTube

Twitter

LinkedIn

Categories
Innovation in Compliance

Messaging Compliance in a Shifting Regulatory Landscape: Part 1 – The Future is Now: U.S. Regulatory Compliance

Is messaging compliance giving your compliance function headaches? Welcome to a special 5 part podcast post series, messaging compliance in a shifting regulatory landscape, sponsored by Global Relay. Over this series, I will visit with Chip Jones, Executive Vice President – Compliance at Global Relay;  Alex Viall, Chief Strategy Officer at Global Relay; Rob Mason, Director, Regulatory Intelligence at Global Relay; Jennifer Clarke, Head of Content at Global Relay; and Raewyn Danvers, Sales Manager, Unified Communications. Over this series, we will consider the US and UK regulatory framework for messaging apps, consider if business innovation is being stifled by regulatory action, preview the Global Relay Report: Compliant Communications in 2023, and look down the road on how to stay Ahead of regulation with the compliant communications in one app.

In this Part 1, I visit with Chip Jones, Executive VP of Compliance at Global Relay, on the current US regulatory landscape for messaging apps and discuss the challenges of maintaining communication compliance in various industries, focusing on off-channel communications, particularly in the financial services industry. Chip shares insights on the recent collective settlement issued by the SEC, which sends a clear message to firms about the importance of adhering to internal communication retention and supervision policies. Learn about how Global Relay is helping firms monitor their communications to detect fraudulent activities and avoid compliance issues. Take advantage of this informative podcast, which ends with a teaser for the next episode on the impact of regulatory action on business innovation.

Key Highlights:

  • The Challenges of Regulatory Compliance in the US
  • SEC enforcement actions on communication violations
  • Monitoring Electronic Communications in Financial Services
  • Off-channel Communications Consequences

For more information, go to Global Relay.

Join us in our next episode, where we ask: Is business innovation stifled by regulatory action?

Categories
Blog

Messaging Compliance in a Shifting Regulatory Landscape: U.S. Regulatory Compliance

Are you ready to learn how to implement electronic communications capture and supervision in your firm for better compliance and prevention of regulatory violations? Is messaging compliance giving your compliance function headaches? Welcome to a special 5 part blog post series on messaging compliance in a shifting regulatory landscape, sponsored by Global Relay. In this Part 1, I visited with Chip Jones on the current US regulatory landscape for messaging apps.

The importance of capturing and supervising electronic communications cannot be overstated for financial services compliance professionals. By properly managing these communications, you are taking a proactive approach to preventing potential regulatory violations and protecting both your personal and professional reputation. Through implementing a robust communication compliance policy, training your employees, and establishing a monitoring process, you can ensure a secure and compliant environment in which your firm can thrive.

Here are the key steps:

  • Understand electronic communication regulations;
  • Choose a reliable communication capture tool;
  • Implement a clear communication compliance policy;
  • Train employees on communication best practices; and
  • Establish a monitoring and supervision process.

 1. Understand electronic communication regulations.

In the ever-evolving world of financial services, electronic communication regulations play a critical role in ensuring transparency, accountability, and compliance. Familiarizing yourself with these regulations is the first essential step in implementing effective Electronic Communications Capture and Supervision (ECCS) processes at your firm. By understanding the governing rules and industry standards, financial service professionals can avoid potential pitfalls and unwarranted regulatory scrutiny.

In light of the SEC’s enforcement actions against large investment banks, it becomes apparent how crucial it is to stay informed of these regulations and maintain proactive supervision. The use of electronic communication tools, enables firms to monitor their internal communications closely and prevent regulatory violations. One effective method is to actively flag specific phrases and keywords that indicate off-channel communications, which in turn draws attention to and helps monitor those potential risks.

2. Choose a reliable communication capture tool.

Implementing electronic communication capture and supervision within a financial firm is essential for ensuring compliance with regulatory requirements and maintaining a transparent and accountable work environment. When choosing a reliable communication capture tool, it is crucial to consider its effectiveness in monitoring and archiving all forms of electronic communication within the organization. This includes emails, instant messages, social media interactions, and any other relevant communication channels. A dependable tool should be able to capture and retain all electronic communications while additionally providing the option to search, analyze, and review the retained data for potential regulatory violations or areas of concern.

One way their solution helps is by tracking phrases and words that may suggest an attempt to shift discussions to off-channel platforms. This raises a red flag, which allows compliance professionals to identify potential violations and take appropriate action. The Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) is increasingly focusing on individuals within firms who breach regulatory guidelines. As a result, the SEC may impose stronger consequences such as termination or monetary actions to deter similar violations from occurring.  The implementation of a reliable communication capture tool is essential for a firm’s overall compliance efforts, as it helps promote transparency and instills accountability within the organization.

Ensuring that electronic communications are monitored and retained reduces the likelihood of rogue representatives pushing unsuitable investments or engaging in other illegal activities. Furthermore, the use of reliable tools can provide financial firms with a solid foundation for communication compliance supervision, which regulators are increasingly emphasizing. As compliance professionals are likely to face more individual-level enforcement actions, firms must have the right tools and processes in place to maintain compliance and mitigate potential risks.

 3. Implement and train employees on a clear communication compliance policy.

Implementing a clear communication compliance policy is an essential step in ensuring your firm’s electronic communications are appropriately supervised and within regulatory requirements. By establishing a well-structured policy, compliance professionals can effectively monitor and mitigate potential risks, which may result in regulatory violations and penalties. A comprehensive compliance policy should address the monitoring of on- and off-channel communications, identify patterns of misconduct, and establish procedures to escalate and resolve potential issues.

A robust policy should educate employees on the importance of proper communication compliance and the dangers of using personal devices for business communications.  The regulators, including the SEC, are closely monitoring and enforcing communication compliance rules, increasing the potential for individual-level actions, such as termination or monetary penalties, against those violating such requirements.  Understanding and implementing a communication compliance policy is crucial for financial services compliance professionals to mitigate the risk of regulatory violations.

By proactively monitoring electronic communications and capturing data, firms can equip their compliance teams with invaluable information to identify and address potential issues early. Moreover, implementing a robust compliance policy can help encourage employees to maintain transparency in their communications and understand the importance of using appropriate channels for business purposes. In doing so, organizations can effectively minimize regulatory risks, protect their reputation, and ensure the highest standard of integrity in their business operations.

In today’s fast-paced financial services industry, ensuring compliance with electronic communication regulations is more vital than ever. By following the steps outlined in this blog post, compliance professionals like you can significantly reduce the risk of regulatory violations and protect your firm’s reputation. Remember, a well-thought-out communication compliance policy, coupled with employee training and a reliable communication capture tool, can provide the foundation for a robust compliance program. Don’t hesitate to take action – invest in the right tools and processes to safeguard your firm’s future.

Join us tomorrow when we ask the provocative question: Is Regulation stifling innovation?

Categories
Corruption, Crime and Compliance

Crypto Conundrum: Coinbase vs. SEC – A Deep Dive with Matt Stankiewicz

The complex relationship between digital currencies and global financial regulations is highlighted yet again with the SEC’s recent crack down on major crypto exchanges Binance and Coinbase. Michael Volkov welcomes Matt Stankiewicz, also known as Crypto Max, to share his insight on these ongoing cases. He discusses the implications these enforcement actions might have on the industry, the securities law-related legal issues, and the internal mechanics of these exchanges.

Matt Stankiewicz is a Managing Counsel at The Volkov Law Group. His expertise includes financial regulation and compliance, with a focus on securities, anti-money laundering (AML), and cryptocurrency regulation. Given his professional background and interest in crypto regulations, he is a frequent speaker on legal matters concerning cryptocurrency exchanges and the SEC.

 

You’ll hear Michael and Matt discuss:

  • The SEC’s enforcement actions hinge on their assertion that Binance was serving US customers without the proper registration, thereby violating securities laws. They allege that Binance knowingly allowed and even encouraged US customers to utilize their offshore platform, enhancing their profits and trading volumes but breaching US regulations in the process.
  • Rather than directly challenging the status of specific tokens, the SEC is targeting exchanges like Binance and Coinbase. By regulating these exchanges, the SEC could effectively control the access points to the crypto industry, thus having a broader impact.
  • Binance is preparing for a legal fight with the SEC over these compliance issues, including allegations of wash trading to artificially inflate trading volume. The platform’s potential troubles are linked to similar issues faced by FTX and their trading arm, Alimator Research.
  • Given the recent pattern of the SEC bringing complaints without the DOJ pursuing criminal cases, it’s unlikely that the DOJ will bring a criminal case against Binance. 
  • Coinbase’s IPO was approved by the SEC despite allegations that the company had engaged in illegal activities related to the trading of unregistered securities. The SEC argues that the approval of an IPO doesn’t guarantee the legality of the company’s underlying operations, but this could be seen as contradictory to the SEC’s stated role of protecting investors.
  • Coinbase, in attempting to comply with securities regulations and being continuously rebuffed by the SEC, is the most compliant cryptocurrency exchange. However, should the SEC crack down on Coinbase and other major U.S. exchanges, it could push investors to offshore exchanges where the SEC has limited jurisdiction and where there is a higher risk of fraud. 

 

KEY QUOTES

“The SEC is taking obvious actions to show that they are very aggressive in their enforcement actions.” – Matt Stankiewicz

 

“This is a perfect reminder for everyone listening, whether you’re into crypto or not. If you are working internally with your email or you’re in [a] corporate chat, that can all be discoverable in future litigation. And you need to be careful what you say.” – Matt Staniewicz

 

“It is a very poor look in the court of public opinion for the SEC to stand on the ground of saying, ‘We are here to protect investors,’ but [avoid] stopping this before investors have a chance to throw all their money in that IPO.” – Matt Stankiewicz

 

Resources

Matt Stankiewicz on LinkedIn

Categories
31 Days to More Effective Compliance Programs

One Month to a More Effective Compliance Program with Boards – The Board and Succession Planning

The 2023 ECCP mandated a Board of Directors ensure “the sufficiency of the personnel and resources within the compliance function, in particular, whether those responsible for compliance have: (1) sufficient seniority within the organization; (2) sufficient resources, namely, staff to effectively undertake the requisite auditing, documentation, and analysis; and (3) sufficient autonomy from management, such as direct access to the board of directors or the board’s audit committee.”

It went on to pose the following questions about the “sufficiency of the personnel” in the following manner. Under the topic, Seniority, and

 Stature, are the following questions:

How does the compliance function compare with other strategic functions in the company in terms of stature, compensation levels, rank/title, reporting line, resources, and access to key decision-makers? and What role has compliance played in the company’s strategic and operational decisions?

Under the topic Experience and Qualifications are the following questions:

Do compliance and control personnel have the appropriate experience and qualifications for their roles and responsibilities? Has the level of experience and qualifications in these roles changed over time? How does the company invest in further training and development of the compliance and other control personnel? Who reviews the performance of the compliance function and what is the review process?

All of this leads to the inescapable conclusion that the Board of Directors needs to be involved in not only the hiring process for a CCO but also the succession planning. Yet many Boards fall short on that score. In a Chapman and Cutler LLP quarterly update, entitled, Advancing Board Refreshment Through the Director Succession Planning Process, William Libit and Todd Freier laid out a framework for Boards to use which I have adapted for CCO succession. There are some key traits you should consider in succession planning for any senior management position, including a CCO.

  1. Examine the key corporate documents.
  2. Use an assessment framework.
  3. Conduct due diligence.
  4. Maintain a pipeline.
  5. Assess Board policies.
  6. Disclose your succession strategy.
  7. Benchmark your succession strategy.

 Three key takeaways:

1. Refreshment is a hot topic in corporate governance.

2. Review your Board policies to understand what your company will need going forward.

3. Transparency in succession planning.

Categories
Principled Podcast

Principled Podcast – S9 E 19 – The Value of Cross-Functional Collaboration for Compliance Program Effectiveness

What you’ll learn on this podcast episode

As the regulatory environment continues to evolve and organizations adapt, it is becoming increasingly important for ethics and compliance professionals to break down department silos.  But how do you do that effectively when so many stakeholders are involved? How do you develop a stronger network of assurance partners inside your organization? On this episode of LRN’s Principled Podcast, host Dave Hansen talks about the impact of cross-functional collaboration on program effectiveness with Tony Tocco, the chief ethics and compliance officer and assistant corporate secretary of DT Midstream.

Guest: Tony Tocco

Tony Tocco – Grayscale

Anthony M. Tocco (Tony) is the chief ethics and compliance officer and assistant corporate secretary at DT Midstream. He is responsible for overseeing the development and implementation of effective programs and processes to promote an ethical culture and compliance with applicable laws and regulations. He also provides board governance and support responsibilities as the assistant corporate secretary.  

Tony joined DT Midstream as part of the business unit spin from DTE, where he began as the manager of Audit Services in 2001 as a result of the merger with MCN Energy Group.  In 2002, he was promoted to assistant general auditor and subsequently performed as interim general auditor for a period. During this time, Tony directed the developing and implementing of the independent centralized testing center for Sarbanes-Oxley Act compliance and supporting corporate governance policies and procedures. 

Prior to joining DTE Energy, Tony held leadership positions in the MCN Energy Internal Audit department and Michigan Consolidated Gas Company’s Corporate Security & Investigations department. Tony has approximately 30 years of compliance-related experience in the utility and energy industry. Tony also has four additional years of compliance experience working for the Department of Defense in reviewing and auditing defense contracts and also established the internal audit department for a major Michigan public university. 

Tony earned a Bachelor of Science degree in accounting from Detroit College of Business, an MBA from Wayne State University, and a Master of Science degree in security administration from the University of Detroit-Mercy. Tony is a Certified Compliance and Ethics Professional (CCEP), a Certified Internal Auditor (CIA), and a Certified Fraud Examiner (CFE).   

Tony is a member of the Ethics and Compliance Institute (ECI), the Society for Corporate Compliance and Ethics (SCCE), the Institute of Internal Auditors (IIA), the Association of Certified Fraud Examiners (ACFE), and the Society for Corporate Governance.   

Tony also has lectured for the Institute of Internal Auditors, the Society for Corporate Compliance and Ethics, the Compliance and Ethics Officer Association, Compliance Week, and the University of Detroit-Mercy. Tony is a former chairperson for the Ethics and Compliance Officer Association Utility Industry Group, which is comprised of approximately 70 utility companies. Tony serves on the CCEP Exam Writing Committee and is on the Board of Big Brothers Big Sisters of Metropolitan Detroit as development committee chair. 

Host: Dave Hansen

Principled_Podcast_Dave-Hansen_Host

Dave Hansen is the global advocacy marketing director at LRN, an organization focused on ethics and compliance solutions that help people around the world do the right thing. His team drives LRN’s customer obsession by building community, deepening customer engagement, and finding meaningful opportunities for collaboration. Dave is passionate about learning, having spent most of his career in higher education or training. He loves sharing customer stories and best practices in the name of continuous improvement. Dave is a proud dad, coffee enthusiast, drummer, and scuba diver. In his spare time, he enjoys cooking and reading!