Categories
Everything Compliance

Everything Compliance-Episode 43, the Cohen Testifies edition-Part 2

Welcome to the only roundtable podcast in compliance. This episode is the conclusion of a special two-part episode. Today, in Episode 43 Jonathan Armstrong and Matt Kelly weigh in on issues that are on their collective minds. Last week, in Episode 42 Mike Volkov and Jay Rosen sounded off. Shout outs (and no rants) followed Part 1 in Episode 42.

  1. This week, Jonathan Armstrong discusses the UK Serious Fraud Office’s conclusion of its this week, Matt Kelly considers the continued taunting tweets from Elon Musk, the SEC’s request for a federal court to hold Musk in contempt from his prior SEC settlement over the ‘funding secured’ tweet and what all this may mean for the SEC going forward.
  2. This week, Matt Kelly considers the continued taunting tweets from Elon Musk, the SEC’s request for a federal court to hold Musk in contempt from his prior SEC settlement over the ‘funding secured’ tweet and what all this may mean for the SEC going forward.
  1. Last week Mike Volkov used the Cohen testimony to the House Oversight Committee to explain the process of Congressional oversight, including how a company or witness is called to testify, the testimony preparation process and the testimony process.
  1. Last week, Jay Rosen talked about the DOJ focus on new industries for FCPA investigations including Major League Baseball teams and universities and colleges.

The members of the Everything Compliance panelist are:

  • Jay Rosen– Jay is Vice President, Business Development Corporate Monitoring at Affiliated Monitors. Rosen can be reached at JRosen@affiliatedmonitors.com
  • Mike Volkov– One of the top FCPA commentators and practitioners around and the Chief Executive Officer of The Volkov Law Group, LLC. Volkov can be reached at mvolkov@volkovlawgroup.com.
  • Matt Kelly– Founder and CEO of Radical Compliance. Kelly can be reached at mkelly@radicalcompliance.com
  • Jonathan Armstrong– Rounding out the panel is our UK colleague, who is an experienced lawyer with Cordery in London. Armstrong can be reached at armstrong@corderycompliance.com

The host and producer (and sometime panelist) of Everything Compliance is Tom Fox the Compliance Evangelist. Everything Compliance is a part of the Compliance Podcast Network.
For additional reading see: Cordery Compliance client alert Rolls Royce Case Sends a Strong Signal

Categories
Adventures in Compliance

Adventures in Compliance: Episode III: The Priory School

Today, I consider the Adventure of the Priory School and the themes of criminality and compliance.

In the story The Adventure of the Priory School, Watson meets a character, Reuben Hayes, who  believes to be the most “self-evident villain” he has ever seen. The tale revolves around the disappearance of a Duke’s son who is kidnapped by the Duke’s illegitimate son, James Wilder, who has in turn hired that most evil person Hayes to kidnap the lad. In pulling off the crime, Hayes had killed the lad’s tutor, one Heidegger, who had gone off in search of the boy. Holmes resolves the matter, while Hayes swings for his crime, the illegitimate son, Wilder is packed off to Australia.
This story raises three key issues for a compliance program.

  1. Rarely to employees set out to engage in criminal activity so robust internal controls are imperative.
  2. Compliance practitioners need to study fraud examiners to understand the indicia of fraud and corruption.
  3. As compliance professionals also be objective and skeptical.
Categories
Compliance Into the Weeds

Compliance into the Weeds: Episode 114-Lessons on Internal Control Overrides

Compliance into the Weeds is the only weekly podcast which takes a deep dive into a compliance related topic, literally going into the weeds to more fully explore a subject. In this episode, Matt Kelly (the coolest guy in compliance) and I take a deep dive into the recent Bankrate DOJ enforcement action in which the company garnered a NPA and for which it paid a total penalty of $28.5 million. We feature a discussion of internal control overrides.

Some of the highlights include:

  • What are the background facts of the matter?
  • Why should you never name a slush fund “Ed’s Cushion?
  • What is the difference between management over-ride of internal controls and abuse of management control override?
  • Why is robust accounting required when there is a single source of data?
  • What is the straight line from internal controls and accounting to the Board and the audit committee?
  • Where was the Audit Committee?

For additional reading see Matt’s blog post Bankrate pays $28.5 million in fraud case on Radical Compliance.

Categories
Daily Compliance News

Daily Compliance News: March 13, 2019-the Back to School edition

MARCH 13, 2019 BY TOM FOX


In today’s edition of Daily Compliance News:

Categories
Adventures in Compliance

Adventures in Compliance: The Abbey Grange

Today, I consider The Adventure of the Abbey Grange.

In the story The Adventure of the Abbey Grange, Holmes feels something is just not right about the story told by Lady Mary Brackenstall regarding the death of her step-father Sir Eustace Brackenstall. Holmes’ largest concern turns on the contents of three wine glasses, one of which contains beeswing and the other two do not. It turns out that Sir Eustace was killed by a companion of Lady Mary, which Holmes uncovers. However, Holmes has an adaptability for justice when the situation demands it, stating, “Once or twice in my career I feel that I have done more harm by my discovery of the criminal than ever he had done by his crime.” Satisfied the actions of the criminal and his accomplice (Lady Mary) were both warranted and just; Holmes does not report his findings to the local police. Klinger dryly noted, “his sympathies may have overridden his judgement: Many scholars believe that Holmes lets himself be fooled by a villainess clever than he credited.”
This story provide two key points for any best practices compliance program.

  1. Institutional Fairness through the Fair Process Doctrine, which mandates that the process itself is fair and impartial.
  2. Institutional Justice which means more than simply fair and equitable treatment; it requires employees concerns, once raised, be listened to and addressed, all without the fear of retaliation. Moreover there will be a consistency of both discipline and incentives.
Categories
Daily Compliance News

Daily Compliance News: March 12, 2019-the loonshot edition

MARCH 12, 2019 BY TOM FOX


In today’s edition of Daily Compliance News:

Categories
Innovation in Compliance

Innovation in Compliance: Using AI to Detect Bad Actors with Brandon Carl


Can you pick up misconduct signals from a conversation? Joining us today is Brandon Carl, the Vice President of Product Management at Digital Reasoning. He oversees their product portfolio and brings together research, machine learning, and development for their audio analytics and conduct surveillance, and he’s here to share how artificial intelligence can change the way we do compliance.

Digital Reasoning Solutions
Digital Reasoning got its start working with government institutions on identifying bad actors. When they shifted over into conduct surveillance, it was a very natural foray into looking for misconduct or bad actors within financial markets. The key behind all these regulations is to instill confidence in people participating in markets and make sure that the market is protected and liquid and that they’re getting fair prices.
Finding signals
When you take a look at bad actors in general, you tend to find two buckets of people:
1) Negligent bad actors who don’t have bad intentions, but are probably just unaware of the laws, and 2) Nefarious bad actors who are working to skirt the system and are intentionally engaging in misconduct.
When you take a look at them, you will see signals around how people communicate: someone may ask people to “keep things confidential” after engaging in some form of misconduct; if someone is narcissistic, you may hear them boasting after the fact. So the technology not only looks for the act of misconduct itself, but these behavioral signals as well.
Passing on the information
There are two views of the world that their customers traditionally think of:
First, the Alert-Based View, which you can think of as a single communication travelling through time that the algorithm will scan. Second is the Investigations View, where teams will review and investigate the alerts.
Now you want to amalgamate the various alerts that have happened over time, and think of those as either weak indicators of misconduct (like boasting), or strong indicators of misconduct (that point to a very specific form of activity). The world has evolved, and we’re realizing our communications say a lot about who we are and what we do.
Ongoing Education Credits
If you’re a compliance professional looking for a convenient and effective way to fulfill your continuing education requirements, check out our 4 hour-long training packages that will keep you up to date with the latest developments in the compliance field.
Resources
Brandon Carl (LinkedIn)
Resources for Digital Reasoning
Website
Twitter
Facebook
Vimeo
Financial Conduct Surveillance
AI is Starting to Change Compliance Practices. Here’s how

Categories
Adventures in Compliance

Adventures in Compliance: The Red Circle

In this episode, I consider the Adventure of the Red Circle and how it informs listening and communication in a best practices compliance program.

Shmoop found that in addition to the overall storytelling of Dr. Watson, “nearly every character in the Sherlock Holmes stories is a storyteller.” Storytelling is a crucial part of the entire detective fiction genre, and the Sherlock Holmes stories really explore this aspect. Each tale begins with a new case, which is always narrated by a participant, and ends with some sort of confession/explanation scene. While we are on this journey with Holmes and Watson, both they and we “encounter tons of different people and listen to their stories. In a way, the cases that Holmes and Watson solve are like giant umbrella stories composed of a dozens of smaller stories being told by a revolving door of characters.”
In the story The Adventure of the Red Circle, Holmes solves the immediate mystery in front of him, as told by the landlady of a boarding house. The first mystery is that a lodger has not been seen for over 10 days, always staying in his room and only communicating with oblique messages such as SOAP, MATCH, DAILY GAZZETTE printed on a torn piece of paper. But Holmes divines a greater mystery as it turns out the lodger is not a man but a woman whose life is under threat and her male traveling companion can only communicate with her through references to newspaper columns. Holmes stated to Watson, “Education never ends, Watson. It is a series of lessons with the greatest for the last. This is an instructive case. There is neither money nor credit in it, and yet one would wish to tidy it up. When dusk comes we should find ourselves one stage advanced in our investigation.”
This story illustrates a couple of key points for every CCO and compliance practitioner.

  1. The first is listening. Not only is listening a key part of any leadership skill but listening will bring you a much better picture of your compliance program, its faults and successes. The reason is that its own employees are a company’s best source of information about what is going on in the company. It is a best practice for a company to listen to its own employees, particularly to help improve its processes and procedures. This type of listening extends to an internal reporting system as a company should provide a safe and secure route for employees to escalate their concerns. Of course, the Dodd-Frank Whistleblower provisions also give heed to the implementation of a hotline.
  2. This second compliance point is communication. Just as education never ends for Holmes, it should never end for a compliance practitioner, your communications on compliance should never end either. Louis Sapirman calls this a 360-degree approach to communications.
Categories
FCPA Compliance Report

FCPA Compliance Report-Episode 421, Andrew Beato

In this episode I visit with Andrew Beato from the law firm of Stein Mitchell Beato & Missner LLP. We discuss the firm’s recent Federal Claims Act settlement with Walgreen on behalf of firm client  Marc Baker. Walgreens agreed to pay $60 million to settle allegations that it knowingly overcharged government healthcare plans such as Medicaid for prescription drugs. With this settlement, Walgreens resolved allegations that the company defrauded the U.S. government and 39 states by submitting false and inflated prices for prescription drugs to increase its government reimbursements. The settlement is one of the largest of its kind against a retail pharmacy under the qui tam whistleblower provisions of the False Claims Act. Some of the highlights of the podcast include:

  • The practice at Stein Mitchell Beato & Missner LLP;
  • What are qui tamwhistleblower protection under the FCA;
  • The allegations and resolution of the lawsuit against Walgreens.
  • Why are qui tam actions to powerful?
  • How do qui tam actions benefit the individual, the government and society as a whole?
  • How whistleblowers in such actions are in a private-public partnership to prevent government fraud, waste and abuse?

Resources
Stein Mitchell Beato & Missner LLP website
Andrew Beato LinkedIn profile
Case Name:     United States ex rel. Marc D. Baker v. Walgreen, Co., 12 Civ. 0300 (JPO) (S.D.N.Y.).

Categories
Daily Compliance News

Daily Compliance News: March 11, 2019-the Wells Fargo edition

MARCH 11, 2019 BY TOM FOX

In today’s edition of Daily Compliance News: