Categories
The ESG Report

Hughes Hubbard & Reed’s New ESG Resource Guide – Part 1

 

Tom Fox welcomes Alexandra Poe, Andrew Fowler, and Bryan Sillaman of Hughes Hubbard & Reed (HHR) to the ESG Report! Hughes Hubbard & Reed released their newest ESG guide with practical guidance about the most common issues in establishing an ESG program. It also gives companies resources to help them comply with the evolving ESG expectations of regulators and investors.

 

 

The ESG Resource Guide

Tom asks Alexandra to explain the genesis of the ESG Resource Guide. Andrew’s previous work with renewable energy projects paved the way, she responds. It firstly led to launching the ESG practice at HHR. Eventually, they recognized the need for a guide that helps companies “unpack and understand quickly the aim of bringing ESG into their company and creating a program”. The ESG Resource Guide is the result.

 

The guide begins by defining ESG terminology and available resources to ensure that companies understand the importance of having an ESG program. The next chapter helps companies “orient themselves to the breadth of this endeavor, about all the different types of folks who likely would … contribute to the genesis of your ESG program,” Alexandra says. ESG regulations from various jurisdictions and other hot topics like diversity, equity, climate change, and inclusion are also explored. 

 

ESG Means Different Things to Different People

Bryan explains that ESG is a broad topic that means different things to different companies within different industries. You have to determine what is most relevant for your particular company, which is based on “your sector, your industry, and your geographic footprint”. This is why the team at HHR gathered data from multiple stakeholders. This process helped them to determine which ESG topics were most relevant to the various companies and organizations. 

 

ESG and Funding

Tom asks Andrew to describe some critical issues they have identified for private equity lenders and financial institutions seeking capital investments. Andrew replies that they should ensure that they aren’t falling behind in their field while still acknowledging the new regulatory environment regulations. As a company you have to ensure that your investors feel like they’re not investing in a lost cause – that there is evidence and data to show why they should invest in your ESG program. 

 

Resources

Alexandra Poe | LinkedIn 

Andrew F. Fowler | LinkedIn

Bryan Sillaman | LinkedIn 

Hughes Hubbard & Reed | How to ESG: A Resource Guide for Establishing an ESG Program for your Company 

 

Categories
FCPA Compliance Report

Professor George Serafeim on Purpose + Profits

In this episode of the FCPA Compliance Report, I am joined by Harvard Business School Professor, author of the book Purpose + Profits, How Business Can Lift Up the World. Some of the highlights include:

1.     Why this book and why now?

2.     His personal journey to ‘purpose.’

3.     Is this book an extension of his earlier work around white-collar crime and anti-corruption compliance?

4.     What trends bring together both business goals and broader societal goals?

5.     How did technology and social media help this change?

6.     What is the role of Gen Xers and Millennials?

7.     How can or should a company data analytics into this change?

8.     What are the 6 archetypes of value creation?

9.     What is the Southwire “12 for Life” story?

10.  Why did your student’s attempt to replicate it fail, and what lessons did you draw from that failure?

Resources

George Serafeim at the Harvard School of Business

George Serafeim on Linkedin

Purpose + Profits on Amazon.com

Categories
Daily Compliance News

August 29, 2022 the Cesspool of Corruption Edition

In today’s edition of Daily Compliance News:

  • Facebook to settle Cambridge Analytical lawsuit. (WSJ)
  • Saudi tour sues PGA. (WaPo)
  • How dangerous is the US? Dutch commandos shot while training in Indiana. (Reuters)
  • Haitian government a ‘cesspool of corruption.’ I am shocked. (Miami Herald)
Categories
Sunday Book Review

August 28, 2022 the Podcasting edition

In today’s edition of Sunday Book Review:

Podcasting for Business

The Queen of Podcasts

Podcasts Made Easy

Education is Important, but Podcasting is Importanter

Categories
Daily Compliance News

August 27, 2022 the Please Don’t Let Me be Misunderstood edition

In today’s edition of Daily Compliance News:

  • Steinmetz-I am misunderstood. (TimesofIsrael)
  • Convicted of corruption, Lula promises to fight corruption. (Reuters)
  • What is ‘The Merge’? (NYT)
  • SEC deletes Trump-era attempt to cut back on whistleblower awards. (WSJ)
Categories
Popcorn and Compliance

Leadership Lessons from No Country for Old Men

In this episode of Popcorn and Compliance, Richard Lummis and Tom Fox take at the 2007 Best Picture-winning film, No Country for Old Men. Some of the highlights were: (1)  One of the key themes of the movie is the tension between destiny and self-determination; (2)  What have been the changes in law enforcement in the former wild west? (3)  What does enforcing laws on the former frontier mean? (4)  Crime has changed and become more sophisticated. The regulator and enforcers must also change, and (5)  What happens when a hero or business leader grows old?

Categories
Corruption, Crime and Compliance

Episode 244 – Building a Compliance Program Dashboard

Chief compliance officers have access to a vast amount of data generated by their compliance programs. CCOs have to establish effective monitoring processes. A critical part of this process is to build a compliance program dashboard. This is a practical issue of real importance. In this episode, Michael Volkov reviews this important issue.

Categories
Because That's What Heroes Do

WandaVision: Episode 4 – We Interrupt This Program

In this podcast series, two complete MCU fans, Tom Fox, founder of the Compliance Podcast Network, and Megan Dougherty, co-founder of One Stone Creative, indulge in a passion for all things in the Marvel Cinematic Universe. We previously reviewed all the movies, and now we have a series on WandaVision. If you want to indulge in your love for the MCU with two fans passionate about all things MCU, this is the podcast series for you. For this offering, we continue with Episode 4, We Interrupt This Program.

Some of the highlights include:

Ø The story synopsis.

Ø What are the key plot points?

Ø What were some of our favorite cookies?

Next up in our series WandaVision, Episode 5 On a Very Special Episode.

Categories
Daily Compliance News

August 26, 2022 the Cyber Insurance Edition

In today’s edition of Daily Compliance News:

  • Llyod’s changes rules on cyber-insurance claims. (Cordery Compliance)
  • Former TN Speaker arrested on corruption charges. (AP)
  • $4.5bn oil spill. (BBC)
  • Prescott goes all in on crypto. (Bloomberg)
Categories
Blog

Farewell to Len Dawson and Triage in Compliance

Lenny Dawson died yesterday. He was the winning quarterback for the Kansas City Chiefs in Super Bowl III, after having been the losing quarterback for the same team in Super Bowl I. A graduate of that little-known football power Purdue, he was a six-time AFL all-star and known, according to his NYT obituary as a “pin-point passer.” He was elected to the Pro Football Hall of Fame in 1986. In his post playing career, I got know Dawson, as one of the early co-hosts, all with Nick Buoniconti, from 1978 to 2001 of the HBO program Inside the NFL. Dawson is perhaps lesser known for one of the greatest pro football pictures ever taken which appears with this blog.

I thought Dawson’s ability to read defenses was a great way to intro a discussion of triage in your compliance program. In October 2021, Deputy Attorney General Lisa Monaco announced the “Monaco Doctrine” around white-collar enforcement actions, which include those under the Foreign Corrupt Practices Act (FCPA). Under the Monaco Doctrine, the Yates Memo requirement for the investigation and turning over of all information discovered about potential criminal activity was required for a company to qualify for credits and discounts available under the FCPA Corporate Enforcement Policy. This announce and subsequent court cases have put more pressure on compliance professionals in the investigative phase of any FCPA or other federal matter. This paper will lay out some of the key steps to meet this burden.

Triage of Internally Reported Allegations

Everyone who has watched the movie or television show M*A*S*H, understands the need for triage. In the hospital setting, triage is the process of determining the priority of patients’ treatments based on the severity of their condition. In the 2020 FCPA Resource Guide, 2nd Edition,  there is a short but succinct statement, “once an allegation is made, companies should have in place an efficient, reliable, and properly funded process for investigating the allegation and documenting the company’s response, including any disciplinary or remediation measures taken.” This is considered in more expansive language in the 2020 Update to the Evaluation of Corporate Compliance Programs. Under Part 1, Section D. Confidential Reporting Structure and Investigation Process, it stated in part, Properly Scoped Investigation by Qualified Personnel—How does the company determine which complaints or red flags merit further investigation?

Given the number of ways that information about violations or potential violations can be communicated to the government regulators, having a robust triage system is an important way to separate the wheat from the chaff and bring the right number of resources to bear on a compliance problem. One important area is making an initial determination of whether to bring in outside counsel to head up an investigation and the resources that you may want or need to commit to a problem. You literally need to “kick the tires” of any allegations or information so that you know the circumstances in front of you before you make decisions. You can achieve this through a robust triage process.

The five-stage process includes the following:

  • Stage 1. These consist of allegations that have a low threat level and do not suggest a breakdown of internal controls. Tips that get grouped into this stage do not have a financial or reputational impact.
  • Stage 2. These allegations are more serious in nature, and often indicate some deficiency in the design of internal controls. Examples include business rule violations such as recurring employee theft or patterns of falsifying expense reports.
  • Stage 3. These allegations are serious in nature, generally involve an override of internal controls, and thus are at a minimum a serious deficiency. But they have only a minimal impact on the financial statements or the company’s reputation. More serious allegations in this category include fraud, embezzlement, and bribery involving employees or mid-level management.
  • Stage 4. These are serious allegations that could have an impact on the completeness and accuracy of the audited financial statements, and that could indicate a material weakness in internal controls. They do not, however, appear to involve any member of the senior management team.
  • Stage 5. These are serious allegations that involve one or more members of the senior management team or are serious enough to damage the company’s reputation. The receipt of allegations in this stage usually place the company into crisis management mode and could result in the restatement of audited financial statements or added regulatory scrutiny.

By using such an approach, you will be able to respond more quickly and efficiently to any allegations that arise. Of course, as more information is developed during an investigation, the matter can be moved up or down this scale. Such an approach is also important for a company’s outside investigative counsel to partner more with the entity to help hold down costs. Outside counsel can work to build confidence that the company’s investigators could handle a large or wide-ranging investigation. This confidence would help outside counsel in any discussions they might have with the DOJ during the pendency of an investigation.

Appropriate triage of allegations has several different impacts for any matter which comes to the attention of compliance. Obviously, it will help you to initially determine the seriousness of the matter. From there you can allocate an appropriate level of resources. It will also aid in your discussion with the DOJ if you must go that route. Finally, in the situation where facts come in, it provides the required documented evidence that a process was followed that you can show the government that a claim was properly scoped, as required under the 2020 Update. But the key is to be prepared, not only in terms of having your investigation and notification protocols in place before an allegation comes in but also doing the proper triage so that you have an initial understanding of what you may be facing.

 For more in triage in your compliance program, check out the iSight sponsored webinar, Everything You Need to Get E&C Investigations Right Tuesday, August 30 at 2 PM ET. Best of all the event is available at no charge. For additional information and registration, click here.