Categories
The ESG Report

A Data-Focused Lawyer on ESG with Christian Perez Font


 
Christian Perez Font, Managing Director of Thinkeen Legal, specializes in using data to help clients do traditional legal tasks. The legal department is a business support function, he tells host Tom Fox. He is licensed as an attorney in Venezuela and the USA, and opened Thinkeen Legal in 2018 to provide his clients with “business advice with legal content”, particularly in corporate, transactional, and compliance matters. In this episode of the ESG Report, Christian chats with Tom about how ESG impacts the healthcare, energy, and the M&A space.
 

 
Healthcare Compliance & ESG
Many healthcare companies donate to community initiatives and are often asked to contribute to social responsibility efforts. However, the healthcare space has specific compliance regulations, such as the anti-kickback statute which prohibits payment for referrals. These regulations are being enforced more strictly. How you set up your compliance program is so important, Christian tells Tom. You should have policies and separate structures for dealing with charitable contributions so that they can be audited and the data analyzed. He describes how he helps clients formulate an ESG program that incorporates modern concepts.
 
Energy Compliance & ESG
Tom remarks on Venezuela’s social responsibility requirement for energy companies that was in place long before ESG became a trend. It was one of the first countries to mandate such measures, Christian agrees; the aim was for international companies to contribute to local communities. Personally, Christian does not like these mandates: he prefers companies to contribute voluntarily because it’s the right thing to do and because they want to get involved. “My philosophy in compliance has always been that we need to move the needle from compliance to ethics, where we do the right thing not because we’re obligated to do it, but because we think it’s the right thing to do,” he comments. 
 
Tom asks, “How do we do this in the ESG, and then how do we document and report it to those ESG stakeholders who might be interested?” There’s no clear answer about who is best qualified to lead ESG in an organization, Christian responds, but somebody needs to do it. “Somebody needs to be tracking what the company’s doing in terms of ESG and not only tracking, but helping visualize it so that everybody can understand…” 
 
M&A & ESG 
“Are you beginning to have discussions with clients about looking at testing or performing due diligence on ESG components of [M&A] targets?” Tom asks Christian. ESG is becoming a bigger part of the conversation, especially with younger investors, Christian responds. Your reputation as a business will play a big part in whether you can attract investors. They also want to see your commitment to social responsibility, governance, and transparency, all of which are ESG issues.
 
Resources
Christian Perez Font on LinkedIn 
Thinkeen Legal | Email
 

Categories
FCPA Compliance Report

Trish Refo-Lawyers in the Public Square

In this episode of the FCPA Compliance Report, I am joined by Trish Refo, Immediate Past President of the ABA. Trish recently penned an article for the ABA magazine entitled “Lawyers in the Public Square”. In this article Trish spoke about the need for lawyers to do more then to simply follow the law but to “model civility and respect in broader society and in the public square”. We discuss the article and some of Trish’s highlights as President of the ABA. Highlights of this podcast include:

  1. Why Trish wrote ‘Lawyers in the Public Square’?
  2. When we were sworn in, we took an oath to follow the laws and constitution our state. Do we owe more as lawyers?
  3. Why do you feel lawyers have a duty to “model civility and respect in broader society and in the public square”?
  4. You wrote about the need for lawyers to engage in ‘self-examination’ as a profession. Why do we need to do so?
  5. Why do lawyers need to do more than ‘avoid violation of the rules’?
  6. Why do you believe lawyers bring ‘real morality into the legal consciousness’?
  7. What is the role of the ABA in facilitating this self-examination?
  8. Why is the role of the ABA as important as it has ever been?
  9. How can lawyers get more involved in this effort through the ABA?
  10. How can law firms help facilitate this conversation through the ABA?
  11. The 3 things you are most proud from tenure as President of the ABA?

Resources

Wilmer and Snell

Lawyers in the Public Square

Categories
Sunday Book Review

October 17, 2021, the Mystery at the Fair edition


In today’s edition of Sunday Book Review:
·       St. Peter’s Fair by Ellis Peters
·       Joyland by Stephen King
·       Fair Game by Annette Dashofy
·       One Gone Night by Tara Laskowski
·       Something Wicked Comes This Way by Rad Bradbury

Categories
Daily Compliance News

October 16, 2021 the Rogue Monitor edition


In today’s edition of Daily Compliance News:

  • Does the NFL have a truth problem?(WSJ)
  • Does ZTE have a rogue monitor. (WSJ)
  • Holocaust deniers and Texas schools. (WaPo)
  • Did Apple retaliate against Activist employee? (NYT)
Categories
Fraud Eats Strategy

Investigation Challenges: The More Things Change, the More They Stay The Same

Host Scott Moritz was a guest speaker at the October NAVEX Next Virtual Conference joined by Gregory Coleman, a former FBI colleague, to discuss established investigation techniques and how some of these practices have changed in recent times.

>

Join us each week as we take a deep dive into the various forms of fraud across the world and discuss crime families, penny stock boiler rooms, international money launderers, narco-traffickers, oligarchs, dictators, warlords, kleptocrats and more.

Scott Moritz is a leading authority on white-collar crime, anti-corruption, and in the evaluation, design, remediation, implementation, and administration of corporate compliance programs, codes of conduct. He is also considered an authority in the establishment, training, and oversight of the investigative protocols carried out by financial intelligence, corporate security, and internal audit units.
 

Categories
Compliance Kitchen

Penalty for Crypto Services to North Korea


The DOJ obtains a guilty plea to providing crypto services to N Korea, in violation of US sanctions.  Stop by as the Kitchen reviews the details.

Categories
This Week in FCPA

Episode 273 – the Back in the ALCS edition


The Astros and Red Sox meet in the ALCS. Is it the Cheater’s Ball? Tom and Jay are back to review some of the top compliance and ethics stories on the Back in the ALCS edition.
 Stories

  1. Who knows what values lurk in the heart? The Shadow know (and your emails as well). The John Gruden firing. ESPN, Sports Illustrated, NYT, WSJ. Tom with a 2-part blog post series.
  2. Confronting Ethical and Moral Dilemmas: Don’t Go It Alone. Richard Snell in Knowledge@Wharton.
  3. Evolution of 3rd party risk management. Mike Volkov in Corruption, Crime and Compliance.
  4. The role of employees in weeding out corp misconduct. David Smagalla in the WSJ Risk and Compliance Journal.
  5. Ex-Braskem CEO gets 20 months. Kyle Brasseur in Compliance Week. (sub req’d)
  6. Cooperating (or not) with the SFO. Lloydettte Bai-Marrow in the FCPA Blog.
  7. Inconsistency in UK and EU banking regs? Deepali Nijhawan in CCI.
  8. What is tech risk? Carol Williams in Risk and Compliance Matters.
  9. Ozy from the audit perspective. Francine McKenna in The Dig. (sub req’d)
  10. ESG channels Watergate (as in follow the money). Lawrence Heim in practicalESG.

 Podcasts and Events

  1. Compliance Week is going ‘Inside the Mind of the CCO’. Participate in the survey here.
  2. Ethisphere’s World Most Ethical Company awards for 2022 are open for submission. For more information on the Application Process, click here.
  3. Are you exasperated? Then check, F*ing Argentina. In this podcast series co-hosts Tom Fox and Gregg Greenberg, author of F*ing Argentina explore the current American psyche of being overworked, over leveraged, overtired and overwhelmed. Find out about modern America’s exasperation with well…exasperation. In Episode 1, the dreaded Parent Meeting night at your child’s elementary school. In Episode 2, why F*ing Argentina? In Episode 3, one of the most beloved characters in musical theater, Officer Krupke is exasperated. In Episode 4, the ubiquitous ‘Couples Dinner’. In Episode 5, a tennis journeyman’s lament.
  4. This month on The Compliance Month, I visit with John Melican, Managing Director at Exiger on his journey to and from the CCO chair. In Episode 1, college and early professional career at NY County DA’s Office. In Episode 2, Melican moves into the corporate world and into compliance.
  5. What is Design Thinking in Compliance? Check out the newest edition to the CPN, where co-hosts Tom Fox and Carsten Tams discuss the social engineering tool of design thinking and how it creates greater compliance engagement and effectiveness. In Episode 2, we take up co-creation.
  6. How does a Compliance Bible become a best-seller? Check out Tom’s appearance on the C-Suite Network’s Best Seller TV to find out. Purchase The Compliance Handbook, 2nd edition here.

Tom Fox is the Voice of Compliance and can be reached at tfox@tfoxlaw.com. Jay Rosen is Mr. Monitor and can be reached at jrosen@affiliatedmonitors.com.

Categories
Daily Compliance News

October 15, 2021 the Know When to Fold ‘Em edition


In today’s edition of Daily Compliance News:

  • LinkedIn folds in China.(WSJ)
  • Pizza night no more? (Bloomberg)
  • Kenyan Preside to visit US. (Axios)
  • Does Green mean higher FCPA risk? (NYT)
Categories
Compliance Kitchen

Penalty for Hacking Services for Hire


The Kitchen looks at what is cooking at the DOJ, as it assesses a $1.68M penalty to ex U.S. intelligence & military personnel for provision of hacking-related services for hire.

Categories
Blog

Lessons Learned from L’Affair Gruden

The fallout from the John Gruden imbroglio has widened and deepened. Many have asked why the NFL sat on the Gruden emails which were uncovered in the investigation of the toxic culture of the Washington football team, known to the NFL since the spring of this year, are only now coming into the public eye. Additionally, if the first email where Gruden disparaged the head of the NFL’s players union with a racial slur, which if it had not been brought to light by the Wall Street Journal (WSJ) on Sunday of this week, would it have been released by the NFL or Las Vegas Raiders at all? Finally, why did the NFL only send the first email to the Raiders when clearly there were many, many more that were unearthed. All good questions and they demonstrate several salient factors, not the least being as how the fallout from one event and investigation, can impact an entire industry. However, even without current answers to these and other questions there are several very important lessons for the compliance professional.
Don’t Put Stupid Stuff in Emails
Before we get to compliance, consider the most basic problem here. Not that Gruden is simply a racist, homophobe, sexist, misogynist and a person with little moral compass. We might have never known what was in his heart, if Gruden had not put those immoral values into emails over eight years. The reason he is now out of professional football, probably forever, is that he put his values into emails, in the crudest terms possible. Twenty years ago, I did corporate training on this very topic. That training is apparently still needed. Imagine how the civil litigation will look when all this gets to trial. All the plaintiff’s lawyer(s) will have to do is read the emails to demonstrate a wide variety of civil wrongs and regulatory breaches and the only question left will be damages.
Fallout from Unrelated Investigations
In the 21st century, nothing happens in a vacuum. The offending emails were uncovered in an unrelated investigation. These emails largely came from outside the entity being investigated (the Washington football team) and the investigative firm turned them over to the entity overseeing the investigation, here the NFL. As noted above, it is not clear what action the NFL might have taken against Gruden, his former employer ESPN or his current employer, the Las Vegas Raiders. Gruden’s resignation from the Raiders may well forestall an answer into those questions.
Now imagine the same scenario when the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) investigates Activism for its toxic work environment (or the Department of Justice (DOJ) for that matter) or when the SEC investigated Lordstown Motors for a variety of other fraud and accounting issues. What if a set of similar emails appeared, all coming from an outside 3rd party, such as Gruden’s did to the Washington football team President Bruce Allen? Would the company employing that same 3rd party receive an email from the SEC requesting all emails from the offending employee? Would the SEC want to look at all emails? How would your company respond? Is the EEOC going to get involved? Will they (or the SEC) be contacting ESPN, owned by the Walt Disney Company, a publicly traded organization about the culture at ESPN which allowed Gruden to send those emails. Are you ready to respond to them? 
What is Due Diligence?
No person wakes up in their mid-40s or 50s and thinks, today is the day I will start sending out racist, homophobic, sexist or misogynist emails and a throw away my moral compass. No one. They were like that long before they started doing so. Gruden had thought and felt those things long before he put them into print. Put another way, a leopard does not change it spots overnight. They were there for a long time.
As our colleague Candice Tal, founder of Infortal, continually reminds us, due diligence is not a one-time event nor a cursory google search. It is a sustained deep dive investigation. Gruden did not become a racist, homophobic, sexist and misogynist overnight. You can bet there are other pieces of evidence of his values and beliefs out there. The then Oakland Raiders signed Gruden to the richest professional football contract ever given to a coach, $100 million over 10 years. Yet they apparently did little to no background due diligence on him. Was there evidence of his racist, homophobic, sexist and misogynist views in the public record? Would it have mattered to the Raiders? Would the Raiders have hired him anyway? Perhaps so but at least they might have known about Gruden’s racist, homophobic, sexist and misogynist values and tried to manage that risk. Of course, they might have passed on hiring him altogether if they knew what the fallout could look like.
Culture, Culture and More Culture
What is the culture of your organization? Why did the NFL allow such a culture to flourish that would allow a Monday Night Football commentator on ESPN to hold the job and then become the highest paid professional coach? Is it because the Maga-hatter wearing NFL owners are all Trump supporters? What about the other employees who make up those organizations? Professional football players are 70% African American. What do Gruden’s remarks, the NFL’s non-response and the Raiders hiring communicate to them about how management thinks of them? Raider owner Mark Davis advised people to look to the NFL for answers.
Bill Rhoden, writing in The Undefeated, an ESPN publication, put it succinctly, “my concern is about the legion of enablers who supported Gruden all of these years. What about them? Who are they? The NFL has gotten rid of its Gruden problem. It has not gotten rid of Gruden-ism: regressive sensibilities that stand foursquare against diversity, inclusion and tolerance.” He went on to say, “The reality is that the NFL, for all of its attempts to move forward, has been revealed as a regressive organization populated by white men who hold views about race and power that are antithetical to progress and enlightenment. Trust me, Gruden is not the only person who holds these beliefs. He’s the only one stupid enough, or emboldened enough, to express them via email.”
In short, the NFL has a huge culture problem. But you cannot change unless you admit you have a problem. We have seen nothing from the NFL that indicates it believes the problem is beyond John Gruden.