Categories
Blog

Overcoming AI Resistance for Corporate Compliance Professionals

Artificial intelligence (AI) presents a paradox for corporate leaders. On one hand, its potential is undeniable: in a 2023 Gartner survey, 79% of corporate strategists deemed AI, automation, and analytics critical to their success. Yet, only 20% actively use AI in their daily activities. The gap between intention and action speaks volumes, especially in compliance, where AI offers unprecedented opportunities to manage risk, enhance efficiency, and ensure adherence to regulations. In a recent Harvard Business Review Article entitled Why People Resist Embracing AI, Julian De Freitas reviewed this issue and provided some ways to think through how to respond.

Despite its promise, AI adoption is hindered by human skepticism. Concerns range from fears of job loss to distrust in AI’s capacity for ethical decision-making. For compliance professionals, understanding and addressing these barriers is vital for leveraging AI to strengthen compliance programs and drive corporate integrity. In this blog post, I want to explore these challenges and how compliance leaders can overcome them. I have adapted Freitas’ article for the compliance professional.

The Five Barriers to AI Adoption in Compliance

  • AI’s Opacity: The “Black Box” Problem

Many employees resist AI because it operates as an inscrutable “black box,” offering conclusions without clear explanations. This lack of transparency can be a deal-breaker for compliance teams, as accountability is paramount in regulatory environments. How can an algorithm flag a suspicious transaction or identify potential bribery risks without explaining its rationale?

Compliance leaders should prioritize AI tools that offer clear, comparative explanations to overcome this barrier. For instance, instead of stating that a third-party transaction was flagged as high risk, the system should explain why, perhaps because of discrepancies in invoice patterns or connections to sanctioned entities. Such insights enhance trust and empower teams to make informed decisions.

Start small. Introducing simpler AI models before scaling to more complex ones can build confidence. Much like Miroglio Fashion’s approach to demand forecasting, a pilot program allows teams to familiarize themselves with AI and see its benefits before adopting more advanced systems.

  • AI Is Perceived as Emotionless

Compliance often involves navigating complex, human-centric issues, such as whistleblower reports, triage, Institutional Justice/Fairness, or ethical dilemmas. Many employees doubt AI’s ability to handle such subjective tasks, viewing it as emotionless and rigid. While AI can process vast amounts of data, can it understand the nuances of a whistleblower’s complaint or the subtleties of cultural differences in compliance?

Here, framing matters. Compliance leaders should emphasize AI’s ability to provide objective insights while leaving subjective decision-making to human professionals. For instance, AI can flag patterns in expense reports suggesting potential fraud, but the decision to investigate remains with compliance officers.

Anthropomorphizing AI tools can also make them more relatable. Tools like Amazon Alexa, with humanlike names and voices, have shown that users are more willing to interact with AI when it feels approachable. However, tread carefully in sensitive contexts, such as investigations, where a less personalized AI may feel less intrusive. Always remember the Human-in-the-Loop.

  • AI’s Perceived Rigidity

A common misconception about AI is that it cannot adapt or evolve. For compliance professionals, this rigidity could mean AI systems are seen as inflexible, unable to account for unique organizational contexts or evolving regulatory landscapes.

To address this, emphasize AI’s learning capabilities. Tools that improve over time, such as those that adapt to new fraud schemes or regulatory updates, mainly through large language models, can demonstrate AI’s ability to evolve alongside the business. Netflix’s content recommendations, for example, continuously improve based on user behavior. Compliance systems should follow suit, showcasing how AI refines its processes to meet organizational needs better.

At the same time, compliance leaders must balance flexibility with predictability. Highly adaptable AI systems can introduce risks if they deviate too far from expected outcomes. Regular monitoring and safeguards are critical to ensure the system operates within defined ethical and regulatory boundaries.

  • Fear of Loss of Control

AI’s autonomy often feels threatening, particularly in compliance, where human judgment is paramount. Employees may worry that AI will override their expertise or act independently in ways that could jeopardize compliance efforts. For example, an AI tool autonomously approving transactions without human review might lead to unchecked risks.

The solution? Implement human-in-the-loop systems, where AI supports decision-making rather than replaces it. Nest’s smart thermostat, which allows users to switch between manual control and automation, is an excellent analogy. In compliance, this could mean using AI to flag risks while leaving final decisions to compliance officers. Such hybrid models restore employees’ sense of agency while ensuring AI enhances rather than undermines human oversight.

  • Preference for Human Interaction

Compliance is inherently relational. Building trust, navigating cultural differences, and addressing employee concerns require human empathy—qualities many believe AI lacks. Resistance to AI often stems from the belief that humans are better equipped to handle nuanced interpersonal issues.

While AI cannot replicate human empathy, it can support human efforts. For example, generative AI can analyze patterns in hotline reports to identify systemic issues, allowing compliance officers to focus on building relationships and fostering a speak-up culture. Framing AI as a tool that amplifies human capabilities rather than replacing them can help reduce resistance.

Strategies for Driving AI Adoption in Compliance

  1. Start with Transparency. Be upfront about what AI can and cannot do. Educate employees on how AI systems work, their limitations, and the safeguards to prevent misuse. Transparency builds trust and encourages collaboration.
  2. Focus on Small Wins. Demonstrating tangible benefits through pilot programs can win over skeptics. For instance, AI can automate low-risk tasks like policy distribution or routine transaction monitoring. Success in these areas can pave the way for broader adoption.
  3. Prioritize Training and Support. AI adoption requires investment in employee training. Equip teams with the skills to use AI tools effectively and provide ongoing support to address questions or concerns. Mercedes-Benz’s Turn2Learn initiative offers extensive AI training and is a model worth emulating.
  4. Align AI with Ethical Standards. Compliance professionals must ensure AI systems align with the organization’s values and ethical standards. Regular audits, bias checks, and transparent reporting can reassure stakeholders that AI is being used responsibly.
  5. Measure and Iterate. Establish clear metrics to evaluate AI’s impact on compliance processes. Use these insights to refine the system, addressing pain points and enhancing effectiveness.

AI in Compliance: A Strategic Imperative 

AI’s potential to revolutionize compliance is immense. From automating routine tasks to identifying emerging risks, it can make programs more efficient, proactive, and resilient. However, realizing this potential requires more than technology; it demands a cultural shift.

Compliance leaders must champion AI adoption by addressing psychological barriers and demonstrating its value. Organizations can harness AI to strengthen compliance and drive business success by prioritizing transparency, fostering trust, and empowering employees. As the Gartner survey reminds us, AI is not just a tool for the future—it’s a strategic imperative for today. The question isn’t whether to adopt AI but how to do so in a way that aligns with organizational goals and values. For compliance professionals, the path forward is clear: embrace AI, empower your teams, and lead the charge toward a more efficient, ethical, and innovative compliance landscape.

Categories
31 Days to More Effective Compliance Programs

31 Days to a More Effective Compliance Program: Day 15 – Monitoring and Improving Internal Controls

Welcome to a special podcast series on the Compliance Podcast Network, 31 Days to a More Effective Compliance Program. Over these 31 days of the series in January 2025, Tom will post a key part of a best practices compliance program daily. By the end of January, you will have enough information to create, design, or enhance a compliance program. Each podcast will be short, at 6-8 minutes, and will include three key takeaways you can implement at little or no cost to help update your compliance program. I hope you will join us each day in January for this exploration of best practices in compliance.

In this episode, we look at the ongoing process of monitoring and improving company internal controls. Christina Ravelo starts by posing fundamental questions about the frequency of manual approvals and control overrides, emphasizing the importance of continuous evaluation and recalibration. This episode highlights the misperception among many compliance professionals and lawyers that controls are static and unchanging once implemented. Instead, internal controls should be dynamic, requiring regular reviews and updates based on collected data, such as the frequency of overrides. Proper documentation is crucial, and companies should engage in periodic self-reviews as part of their continuous monitoring efforts. Ravello also stresses the necessity of identifying issues and remedying them to prevent further complications. Today’s key takeaways include the idea that control overrides are not inherently problematic if appropriately managed, the dynamic nature of internal controls, and the importance of a comprehensive monitoring process incorporating feedback from every line of defense.

Key highlights:

  • Understanding Control Overrides
  • Continuous Monitoring and Improvement
  • Assessing and Updating Controls

Resources:

Click here to receive a 20% discount on The Compliance Handbook, 5th edition, for listeners to this podcast.

Categories
Great Women in Compliance

Great Women in Compliance – Catherine Razzano on Leading with Passion

In this week’s episode, Hemma visits Catherine Razzano, a veteran legal and compliance expert and Head of Global Legal Compliance at social media giant TikTok.

Learn about Catherine’s transition from private practice to in-house compliance work as she shares her journey from a prestigious clerkship and partnership track in Big Law with an FCPA and white-collar practice to leading in-house compliance teams at General Dynamics, Panasonic, and TikTok. Hemma asked Catherine about the challenges and benefits of working under a monitorship, with Catherine emphasizing the importance of relationship building and trust. Catherine also shared her experiences leading teams under scrutiny and pressure, including during the pandemic and at TikTok.

Catherine discusses the source of her firm commitment to mentoring and sponsoring the next generation of ethics and compliance leaders. Tune in to hear inspiring insights on the importance of intentionality and finding your passion when navigating transitions as we enter the second quarter of the century in 2025.

Highlights include:

  • Managing compliance teams under scrutiny and pressure
  • Culture-building in global organizations
  • Navigating different industries as a compliance professional
  • Following your passion for career growth and transitions
  • The importance of mentoring and sponsorship

Biography:

Catherine Razzano is the Head of Legal Compliance at TikTok, the social media giant where she leads a global team of compliance professionals. She joined TikTok from Panasonic Avionics Corp., where she was hired in 2018 to help the company strengthen its compliance systems while under independent oversight following an investigation into violations of U.S. antibribery law. Before Panasonic, Catherine was an Associate General Counsel and Director of International Law & Compliance at General Dynamics after leaving her white-collar criminal practice at prestigious law firms, Cadwalader Wickersham and Taft and Clifford Chance, LLP, and serving as Judicial Law Clerk to the Honorable John M. Facciola in the United States District Court for the District of Columbia

Thanks, as always, to our sponsor, Corporate Compliance Insights, and our wonderful #GWIC community. You can join the Great Women in Compliance community on LinkedIn here.

Categories
Blog

Climbing the Jungle Gym: Embracing Lateral Career Moves

In compliance, we often view career advancement as a ladder, a relentless climb toward greater authority, higher compensation, and more significant responsibilities. But what if the path to long-term success is not a straight ascent? Instead, what if it is more like a jungle gym, offering opportunities to move sideways or even down temporarily to reach greater heights in the future?

The phrase “careers are a jungle gym, not a ladder,” attributed to journalist Pattie Sellers and popularized by Sheryl Sandberg, offers a refreshing perspective. Adopting this mindset can be transformative for compliance professionals, as well as for both individual growth and organizational resilience. Interestingly, the Department of Justice evaluates the mobility of compliance professionals within an organization. Brian Elliott looked at this phenomenon in a recent MIT Sloan Management Review article entitled When Moving Sideways Makes Sense.

Why Compliance Professionals Feel Stuck 

In today’s job market, many professionals find themselves in a rut. The slowdown in promotions and a stabilizing economy have left employees feeling stagnant. While layoffs have not accelerated, promotions have plateaued, and opportunities for upward mobility seem limited. Rising burnout rates compound this reality. For compliance professionals managing the “do more with less” mantra, the grind of repeating the same tasks without growth opportunities can lead to disengagement.

So, what’s the solution? It may not be looking outside your organization but exploring new opportunities within. Lateral moves, whether to a different team, project, or function, can offer a much-needed change of pace, a chance to build new skills, and a renewed sense of purpose.

Recognizing When It’s Time to Move Laterally

Knowing when to consider a lateral move is critical. Here are some signals:

  1. Lack of Learning Opportunities. If you have mastered your current role and no longer feel challenged, it is time to look for something new.
  2. Misalignment with Leadership or Team. A poor fit with your manager or team can make work a struggle. Moving to a different group can offer a fresh start.
  3. Desire for Skill Development. If your long-term career goals require expertise, you can’t gain it in your current role, so a lateral move could help you bridge the gap.
  4. Burnout or Low Engagement. When work feels monotonous, a change of scenery, even within the same company, can re-energize you.

For compliance professionals, these factors often align with organizational needs. Expanding your skill set or shifting to a new area within compliance—such as data privacy, ESG reporting, or third-party risk management—can position you as a more valuable asset and expand your personal brand while keeping you engaged.

The Challenges of Lateral Moves

Despite their benefits, lateral moves come with risks. They may involve stepping down in authority, accepting stagnant compensation, or facing initial performance challenges in an unfamiliar area. These risks can be daunting in compliance, where professionals are often judged by their titles, responsibilities, and influence.

However, the rewards often outweigh the risks. Moving laterally can expand your network, broaden your expertise, and prepare you for leadership roles that demand cross-functional knowledge. These moves can be especially valuable in compliance, where adaptability and breadth of expertise are prized.

Building a Culture of Internal Mobility

For organizations, encouraging lateral mobility is not just an employee retention strategy but a business imperative. Companies like Google and Synchrony have recognized the value of internal mobility, implementing programs that make it easier for employees to explore new opportunities within the company. These initiatives reduce burnout, foster innovation, and build a pipeline of well-rounded leaders.

Yet many organizations lack the infrastructure to support lateral moves. Performance metrics and compensation structures often reward upward mobility, while managers may resist losing top talent to other teams. To overcome these barriers, compliance leaders can champion internal mobility by creating formal programs to develop frameworks for lateral moves, including short-term assignments or rotations, to encourage cross-functional collaboration. Another tactic might be to recognize lateral successes within your organization. Finally, train your middle managers on the benefits of internal mobility and encourage them to support their team members’ growth.

How Compliance Professionals Can Navigate Lateral Moves

If you are a compliance professional considering a lateral move, here are some strategies to ensure success:

  1. Identify Allies and Sponsors. Building relationships with leaders who can advocate for you is critical. Sponsors can provide guidance, open doors, and reduce the risks of making a significant change.
  2. Communicate Your Goals. Be transparent about your desire to grow and learn. This helps managers and mentors understand how they can support your development.
  3. Invest in Learning. Pair a lateral move with external learning opportunities, such as certifications or professional development courses, to enhance your value.
  4. Stay Open to Short-Term Setbacks. Accept that a lateral move might not yield immediate rewards. Focus on the long-term benefits, such as skill acquisition and expanded career options.

Why Lateral Moves Matter for Compliance 

Compliance professionals operate in a dynamic environment where regulations, risks, and business priorities constantly evolve. Lateral moves can equip you with the diverse experiences needed to navigate this complexity. Consider that a move from investigations to training can deepen your understanding of preventative measures; shifting from a regional role to a global one can enhance your perspective on cultural and regulatory nuances; or transitioning from compliance to a related function, like internal audit or legal, can broaden your strategic insights. These experiences make you a more effective compliance professional and prepare you for leadership roles where cross-functional expertise is essential. Never forget the Brand of You.

Final Thoughts: The Jungle Gym Advantage 

In the compliance field, careers are not linear. Embracing the jungle gym approach can help you stay engaged, continuously learn, and build the skills needed for long-term success. For organizations, fostering a culture of internal mobility is a strategic advantage, enabling you to retain talent, drive innovation, and develop future leaders.

So, the next time you feel stuck, consider a lateral move. It might just be the step you need, not up but across, to achieve your goals and elevate your career in compliance.

Categories
31 Days to More Effective Compliance Programs

31 Days to a More Effective Compliance Program: Day 14 – Internal Controls

Welcome to a special podcast series on the Compliance Podcast Network, 31 Days to a More Effective Compliance Program. Over these 31 days of the series in January 2025, Tom Fox will post a key part of a best practices compliance program daily. By the end of January, you will have enough information to create, design, or enhance a compliance program. Each podcast will be short, at 6-8 minutes, and will include three key takeaways you can implement at little or no cost to help update your compliance program. I hope you will join us each day in January for this exploration of best practices in compliance.

Today, the focus is on internal controls and their critical role in compliance frameworks. The episode provides a comprehensive definition of internal controls, emphasizing their importance for achieving operational efficiency, reliable financial reporting, compliance with laws and policies, and the reduction of risks such as fraud and waste. The discussion highlights the requirements outlined in the FCPA for internal controls, including the authorization and documentation of transactions and the protection and accountability of assets. Moreover, four significant internal controls for compliance practitioners are identified: delegation of authority, maintenance of the vendor master file, contracts with third parties, and management of cash and currency transfers. The episode underscores that effective internal controls are essential and mandated by the FCPA, forming a cornerstone of any robust compliance program.

Key highlights:

  • Defining Internal Controls
  • Key Components of Internal Controls
  • Internal Controls in Compliance Programs

Resources:

Listeners to this podcast can receive a 20% discount on The Compliance Handbook, 5th edition, by clicking here.

Categories
Daily Compliance News

Daily Compliance News: January 14, 2025 – The RTO Compliance Edition

Welcome to the Daily Compliance News. Each day, Tom Fox, the Voice of Compliance, brings you compliance-related stories to start your day. Sit back, enjoy a cup of morning coffee, and listen in to the Daily Compliance News—all from the Compliance Podcast Network. Each day, we consider four stories from the business world: compliance, ethics, risk management, leadership, or general interest for the compliance professional.

Top stories include:

  • Using AI as an excuse for ‘cost avoidance.’ (WSJ)
  • Crypto’s compliance conundrum. (CoinDesk)
  • Has corporate purpose lost its purpose? (FT)
  • Return To Office compliance. (Bloomberg)

For more information on the Ethico Toolkit for Middle Managers, available at no charge, click here.

Check out The FCPA Survival Guide on Amazon.com.

Categories
Innovation in Compliance

Innovation in Compliance: Todd Haugh on Ethical Decision Making in the Workplace: Beyond Financial Incentives

Innovation comes in many areas, and compliance professionals must be ready for and embrace it. Join Tom Fox, the Voice of Compliance, as he visits with top innovative minds, thinkers, and creators in the award-winning Innovation in Compliance podcast. In this episode, host Tom Fox visits with Todd Haugh, Associate Professor of Business Law and Ethics at the IU Kelley School of Business, Arthur M. Weimer Faculty Fellow in Business Law Board Member and Jesse Fine Fellow, The Poynter Center for the Study of Ethics, and American Institutions Director of the Institute for Corporate Governance and Ethics.

Tom and Todd have too much fun, deep-diving into the intricate relationship between missed bonuses and ethical decision-making in a corporate environment. They discuss how unmet expectations around bonuses can lead to the rationalization of unethical or illegal behavior by employees. They emphasize the importance of managers understanding the broader implications beyond economic incentives, as ignoring these psychological factors can introduce significant risks to an organization. They also talk about the Institute for Corporate Governance and Ethics. Tune in to hear two top commentators talk about financial and other incentives in compliance and how these dynamics can affect overall corporate compliance. Learn strategies to mitigate associated risks.

  • Understanding Behavioral Ethics in Business
  • Impact of Missed Bonuses on Ethical Decision Making
  • Rationalizing Unethical Behavior
  • Perception of Company Care
  • Potential for Unethical or Illegal Behavior
  • The Institute for Corporate Governance and Ethics

Resources:

Todd Haugh on LinkedIn

Indiana University-Kelley School of Business

Institute for Corporate Governance and Ethics

Todd Haugh at Kelley School of Business

Tom Fox

Instagram

Facebook

YouTube

Twitter

LinkedIn

Categories
SBR - Authors' Podcast

SBR – Author’s Podcast – Exploring the Future of Work, Ethics, and Compliance with Kelly Monahan, Part 1

Welcome to the SBR – Author’s Podcast! Host Tom Fox visits with authors in the compliance arena and beyond in this Podcast Series. Today, Tom is joined by his good friend and colleague, Earnie Broughton (Earnie from Boerne), to visit with Dr. Kelly Monahan, co-author of the soon-to-be-released book Essential: How Distributed Teams, Generative AI, and Global Shifts Are Creating a New Human-Powered Leadership (Co-authored with Dr. Christie Smith) We three had such good fun that we went on for nearly an hour, so we have broken up the interview into two podcasts.

In today’s Part 1, Kelly delves into her academic and professional journey and how her experiences have shaped her focus on the intersection of technology and human development. The discussion centers on three macro trends affecting the future of work: generative AI, remote and hybrid work models, and the rise of the alternative workforce. Kelly elaborates on the ‘gray collar’ concept of workers, emphasizing the merging of physical labor with technology. She also highlights the importance of power skills, formerly known as soft skills, in navigating these transformations successfully.

Key highlights:

  • The Future of Work: Trends and Insights
  • AI and Its Impact on the Workforce
  • The Rise of the Gray Collar Workforce
  • Freelancers and Corporate Culture
  • Leadership Mindset and Workforce Engagement

Resources:

The Essential Website

Pre-Order: Essential: How Distributed Teams, Generative AI, and Global Shifts Are Creating a New Human-Powered Leadership on Amazon.com

Kelly Monahan on LinkedIn

Earnie Boughton on LinkedIn

Tom Fox

Instagram

Facebook

YouTube

Twitter

LinkedIn

Categories
Blog

The Personalization Imperative: Lessons for Compliance Professionals 

Personalization has emerged as a transformative force in modern business and modern communications. Marketing is no longer about addressing a customer by name in an email but delivering tailored experiences at scale, powered by artificial intelligence (AI) and data-driven insights. In a recent article in the Harvard Business Review, entitled Personalization Done Right, authors Mark Abraham and David Edelman wrote about how companies like SonderMind, Spotify, and Sweetgreen lead the charge, using innovative personalization strategies to create value and delight their customers. However, personalization presents some interesting opportunities for compliance professionals to balance innovation with regulatory obligations, ethical considerations, and data privacy concerns.

Today, I want to examine the lessons that compliance professionals can draw from the personalization strategies outlined in the BCG Personalization Index. I will focus on maintaining compliance while enabling businesses to leverage personalization as a competitive advantage. 

The Five Promises of Personalization 

Personalization leaders succeed by fulfilling five implicit promises to their customers:

  1. Empower Me – Make my experience seamless and intuitive.
  2. Know Me – Use my data responsibly to understand my needs.
  3. Reach Me – Engage with me at the right time, on the right channel.
  4. Show Me – Provide relevant, tailored content.
  5. Delight Me – Continuously improve my experience through innovation.

Each of these promises presents opportunities and risks that compliance professionals must navigate.

  • Empower Me: Enhancing the Customer Journey 

Businesses like SonderMind demonstrate how personalization can empower users. SonderMind’s mental wellness app analyzes individual data to suggest actionable steps, such as meditation or journaling, and arm therapists with anonymized insights to optimize treatment plans. This results in better outcomes for patients and reduced costs for insurers.

For the compliance professional empowering employees (the customers of compliance), Personalization leaders start by asking: How can I make the employee’s experience better by personalizing it? For a compliance professional, this means understanding an employee’s unique needs at every step of their journey and deciding how personalization can best help them. The Department of Justice calls this ‘targeted’ training and communications.

  • Know Me: Building Trust Through Data 

The authors point to Sweetgreen, “a newcomer to the restaurant business relative to the largest chains,” which illustrates this point well. Right from its start, in 2007, it invested in building digital customer relationships. It launched a mobile app in 2013, ahead of many large restaurant chains, and progressively added features such as mobile ordering, delivery, personalized offers and challenges, and a loyalty program to drive digital engagement.

Here, the compliance professional can not only stream compliance communications more efficiently but also use those same communications to build relationships and trust with your employees. Obviously, this is directly in the compliance wheelhouse, as data governance is paramount. Compliance teams must oversee the integration of customer data across systems, ensuring it is accurate, secure, and used in accordance with stated policies.

  • Reach Me: Engaging Responsibly 

Having the data to know the customer is not enough. Your organization must use AI to identify triggers to reach out, such as when a customer browses online or inquires. Then, orchestrate touches across channels and use smart frequency management to ensure their touches are coordinated and not overwhelming. The authors pointed to Cisco, whom they said is “a personalization leader. Its sales team knows whom to contact, when, and about what and comes armed with relevant content and demos. Because Cisco’s sales and marketing teams are closely linked, customers get coordinated exposure to content that supports their needs and that opens up sales dialogues.”

This is precisely how compliance professionals should think about targeted and effective training and communications. This type of coordinated approach, based on employee needs or questions, can pay off with big compliance benefits. Overreach will turn off employees if the communications are bad, useless, and overwhelming. You do not want to cause ‘compliance communication fatigue.’ Compliance professionals must monitor how AI models are recommended, ensuring they align with legal standards and ethical norms.

  • Show Me: Tailoring Content 

Pandora shows how generative AI can create personalized content, reducing production times and improving engagement. The authors noted, “The global jewelry brand Pandora thrives by sparking customer interest with inspirational content. As part of its strategy, it uses AI-generated content to tailor its messaging to each customer and cut cycle times for certain types of content creation from 12 to 14 months to a mere 10 days. The company learned that personalizing the background and model image for each individual—and coordinating how the customer sees those images across emails, websites, and other ads—substantially improved conversion rates.”

This speaks to the DOJ mandate for tailored training. However, you should also consider the business ethics message you can give customers. It can be similar to that of other companies that have gotten into FCPA or other regulatory trouble, celebrating your employees who have done the right thing or consistent messages from your CEO or senior executive about doing business ethically and in compliance.

  • Delight Me: Driving Continuous Improvement 

Personalization leaders adopt agile working methods to accelerate testing and learning, improving the intelligence behind each customer interaction. Companies like DoorDash epitomize the “delight me” promise by running hundreds of micro-experiments to refine their personalization efforts. This agile approach enables rapid innovation but requires robust oversight to ensure compliance with regulations.

Continuous improvement is directly in the wheelhouse of compliance. You should be able to take the feedback you receive from your employees and incorporate that information into your future communications. Even more exciting is the opportunity to have employees individually improve their ways of doing business ethically and in compliance. Compliance professionals should collaborate with product teams to ensure experiments respect privacy laws and customer expectations.

Key Lessons for Compliance Professionals 

  1. Embrace the Role of Enabler. Compliance should not be a roadblock to innovation. Instead, compliance professionals can enable responsible personalization by embedding themselves in cross-functional teams and offering solutions aligning with business goals and regulatory requirements.
  2. Prioritize Data Privacy. As personalization relies heavily on customer data, compliance teams must prioritize data privacy and security. This includes ensuring compliance with global regulations like GDPR, CCPA, and industry-specific standards.
  3. Establish AI Governance. AI is a cornerstone of modern personalization. Compliance professionals must develop and enforce governance frameworks to ensure AI is used ethically and transparently.
  4. Foster a Culture of Transparency. Customers are more likely to trust companies that are upfront about how their data is used. Compliance teams should advocate for clear and accessible privacy policies.
  5. Monitor Regulatory Trends. Personalization efforts are subject to evolving regulations. Compliance professionals must stay informed about changes in data privacy, AI ethics, and advertising standards to guide their organizations effectively.

The Future of Compliance is Personalization 

The rise of personalization presents compliance professionals with a unique opportunity to lead. By ensuring that personalization efforts are ethical, transparent, and compliant, they can help their organizations build trust, drive innovation, and achieve sustainable growth.

As the BCG Personalization Index shows, companies that excel in personalization delight their customers and create significant business value. The same applies to a corporate compliance function and its customers, IE., employees. Compliance professionals are essential to realizing this potential, ensuring businesses can innovate responsibly and thrive in an increasingly competitive landscape.

Compliance is not simply about preventing wrongdoing but enabling your organization to do things correctly. Personalization of compliance is no exception. Compliance professionals should embrace this opportunity and take charge of a future where personalization and compliance go hand in hand.

Categories
31 Days to More Effective Compliance Programs

31 Days to a More Effective Compliance Program: Day 13 – Policies and Procedures

Welcome to a special podcast series on the Compliance Podcast Network, 31 Days to a More Effective Compliance Program. Over these 31 days of the series in January 2025, Tom Fox will post a key part of a best practices compliance program daily. By the end of January, you will have enough information to create, design, or enhance a compliance program. Each podcast will be short, at 6-8 minutes, and will include three key takeaways you can implement at little or no cost to help update your compliance program. I hope you will join us each day in January for this exploration of best practices in compliance.

In this episode, we review the importance of having well-crafted compliance policies and procedures as the foundation of a robust compliance program. As highlighted by the 2024 ECCP and 2020 FCPA Resource Guide, such policies and procedures are crucial for addressing and mitigating risks identified during a company’s risk assessment. Regulators emphasize having articulated anti-bribery and anti-corruption policies regularly reviewed and updated to reflect evolving risks. We discuss the five general elements of a compliance policy and underscore the need for consistent implementation to maintain the credibility and effectiveness of the compliance program. Key takeaways include the necessity of written policies, expectations from the DOJ and SEC, and the critical role of institutional fairness.

Key highlights:

  • Importance of Compliance Policies
  • Key Elements of Compliance Policies
  • Assessment and Evolution of Policies

Resources:

Listeners to this podcast can receive a 20% discount on The Compliance Handbook, 5th edition, by clicking here.