Categories
Compliance Tip of the Day

Compliance Tip of the Day: Improving Culture Through Investigations

Welcome to “Compliance Tip of the Day,” the podcast where we bring you daily insights and practical advice on navigating the ever-evolving landscape of compliance and regulatory requirements.

Whether you’re a seasoned compliance professional or just starting your journey, our aim is to provide you with bite-sized, actionable tips to help you stay on top of your compliance game.

Join us as we explore the latest industry trends, share best practices, and demystify complex compliance issues to keep your organization on the right side of the law. Tune in daily for your dose of compliance wisdom, and let’s make compliance a little less daunting, one tip at a time.

In this episode, we consider how you can improve your culture through your investigation process.

 

For more information on the Ethico ROI Calculator and a free White Paper on the ROI of Compliance, click here.

Categories
Blog

Transforming Culture: Part 3 – Assessing Change Through the Culture Audit™

Boeing is not the first company to find itself amid a massive scandal. You can think of Siemens’ bribery and corruption scandal, the VW emissions-testing scandal, the Wells Fargo fraudulent accounts scandal, or any other myriad of corporate scandals where culture failed and created a toxic culture. The question for any organization in such a situation is how to transform its culture. Currently running on the Culture Crafters podcast on the Compliance Podcast Network is a 5–part of podcast series with myself and Sam Silverstein, the most trusted voice in America on accountability. (The Culture Audit™ is the sponsor of this blog post series.)

Over this companion, 5-part blog post series, we look at how a company in the depths of such a toxic culture can begin to make a culture comeback by planning and taking concrete steps to turn around and rebuild its culture. In Part 3, we consider assessing change through The Culture Audit™ as a starting point for culture transformation.

The Culture Audit™ plays a pivotal role in culture transformation. It serves as a structured framework for assessing key cultural aspects, providing a comprehensive analysis of strengths and areas needing improvement. By leveraging this assessment tool, organizations can gain valuable insights into their cultural landscape, paving the way for informed decision-making and targeted interventions to drive positive change. The Culture Audit™ is not just about knowing the existing culture, but about providing actionable insights and an action plan for organizations to implement changes and enhance their culture effectively. Its true transformative potential lies in its ability to catalyze meaningful cultural shifts by pinpointing areas of alignment and discord within an organization.

The Culture Audit™ provides organizations with a clear roadmap for culture transformation. The emphasis on anonymity within the audit process lets employees express their perceptions candidly, fostering a culture of openness and transparency. By providing a platform where individuals can share their feedback without fear of retribution, organizations can obtain honest and valuable insights to understand the actual state of their culture.

The Culture Audit™ stands out from traditional assessment strategies due to its unique features. It offers ease, speed, accuracy, and anonymity, making it a cost-effective and efficient tool for organizations striving to enhance their culture. Its ability to support multiple languages ensures accurate and in-depth insights from diverse workforce populations, further setting it apart from other tools.

The Culture Audit™ measures various aspects of a company’s culture, including compliance practices, hiring processes, and employee engagement. It generates a comprehensive report highlighting gaps and providing actionable improvement steps. The tool mainly benefits global organizations as it supports international language communication.

One key feature of The Culture Audit™ is its emphasis on auditability and transparency. In the event of a regulator’s inquiry, the tool provides a detailed report that can be shared to demonstrate the company’s commitment to assessing and improving its culture. The Culture Audit™ goes beyond basic measures of engagement and assesses accountability and decision-making processes, providing a comprehensive view of an organization’s culture. The raw data collected during The Culture Audit™ is also retained for future reference, allowing organizations to track their progress over time.

The Culture Audit™ brings significant benefits to organizations. It not only identifies areas for improvement but also provides actionable insights. The audit report includes a detailed action plan that guides organizations on specific areas to focus on and steps to take for improvement. As Silverstein emphasized, by continuously reinforcing positive aspects of their culture, organizations can prevent a decline over time. This continuous improvement approach is crucial for all companies, whether they are underperforming or reinforcing what they are already good at.

In conclusion, The Culture Audit™ provides organizations with a powerful tool to assess and improve their corporate culture. By measuring various aspects of culture, providing actionable insights, and emphasizing auditability and transparency, The Culture Audit™ helps organizations create a positive and productive workplace environment. With regulators’ increasing focus on corporate culture, The Culture Audit™ can also help companies demonstrate their commitment to ethical behavior and compliance. By utilizing this tool, organizations can drive better leadership, improve employee engagement, and ultimately enhance their bottom line.

Categories
Innovation in Compliance

Innovation in Compliance: Sue Bingham on Fostering Trust and Transparency in Organizational Culture

Innovation comes in many forms, and compliance professionals need to not only be ready for it but also embrace it.

Today, Tom Fox visits Sue Bingham, Founder and Principal of HPWP Group. She helps visionary, courageous leaders create a high-trust culture of adult communication and high expectations that results in attracting and retaining truly great people.

Sue Bingham has a unique perspective on compliance in the workplace, shaped by her vast experience and passion for nurturing positive work environments. Anchored in the principles of trust, value, and respect, she advocates for a shift from the conventional approach to compliance, which often entails a litany of rules, to one that promotes positive assumptions about employees.

Bingham believes that while compliance is crucial for legal requirements and operational changes, it should not be at the expense of treating employees as valuable adults deserving of respect and dignity. Her conviction that a culture of trust and positive assumptions can drive behavioral change at work is reflected in her book “Creating a High-Performance Workplace,” a testament to her commitment to fostering effective leadership and high-performing workplaces.

Key Highlights:

  • Trust-Based Approach for High Performance Culture
  • Fostering Trust and Valuing Employees for Success
  • Developing Commitment and Accountability in the Workplace
  • Balancing Compliance and Commitment in Organizations

Resources:

Sue Bingham on LinkedIn 

HPWP Group

Creating the High Performance Work Place on Amazon.com

Tom Fox

Instagram

Facebook

YouTube

Twitter

LinkedIn

Categories
Compliance Tip of the Day

Compliance Tip of the Day: How Investigative Triage Can Drive Culture

Welcome to “Compliance Tip of the Day,” the podcast where we bring you daily insights and practical advice on navigating the ever-evolving landscape of compliance and regulatory requirements.

Whether you’re a seasoned compliance professional or just starting your journey, our aim is to provide you with bite-sized, actionable tips to help you stay on top of your compliance game.

Join us as we explore the latest industry trends, share best practices, and demystify complex compliance issues to keep your organization on the right side of the law.

Tune in daily for your dose of compliance wisdom, and let’s make compliance a little less daunting, one tip at a time.

In this episode, we consider how your investigative protocol and triage can drive and improve your corporate culture.

For more information on the Ethico ROI Calculator and a free White Paper on the ROI of Compliance, click here.

Categories
Blog

Transforming Culture: Part 2 – The Role of Leadership

Boeing is not the first company to find itself amid a massive scandal. You can think of Siemens’ bribery and corruption scandal, the VW emissions-testing scandal, the Wells Fargo fraudulent accounts scandal, or any other myriad of corporate scandals where culture failed and created a toxic culture. The question for any organization in such a situation is how to transform its culture. Currently running on the Culture Crafters podcast on the Compliance Podcast Network is a 5–part of podcast series with myself and Sam Silverstein, the most trusted voice in America on accountability. (The Culture Audit™ is the sponsor of this blog post series.)

In this companion, 5-part blog post series, we look at how a company in the depths of such a toxic culture can begin to make a comeback by planning and taking concrete steps to turn around and rebuild its culture. In Part 2, we consider the role of leadership in any cultural transformation.

Exploring the pivotal role of senior leadership in driving cultural change underscores the top-down approach necessary for successful transformation. In organizational culture, the influence and accountability of senior management and the Board of directors cannot be overstated. Leaders at the helm of an organization must demonstrate unwavering commitment to shaping a positive culture by embodying the values and behaviors they wish to instill throughout the company.

But what are the implications of leadership beliefs and actions on cultural transformation? Leaders must consistently demonstrate their commitment to ethics, quality, and employee well-being. Leaders serve as the ultimate culture architects. Senior leaders set the tone for the entire organization through their decisions, communication, and actions, influencing every aspect of the workplace culture and employee behavior. This underscores the direct correlation between leadership effectiveness and the successful transformation of a toxic culture into one that thrives on trust and accountability.

Sam Silverstein encapsulated the essence of the discussion: “Well, everything rises and falls on leadership.” This highlights the significant impact that leadership has on organizational culture and success. This simple yet profound statement encapsulates how influential leaders set the tone for organizational culture. Whether steering the ship toward a new direction or reinforcing existing values, senior leadership is the guiding force that shapes the managerial ethos.

The Board’s strategic imperative is upholding and championing organizational culture and its transformation. A Board must protect and defend the culture as the first point in its strategic plan. A committed board can set the tone for a culture transformation that attracts and retains top talent while fostering sustained success.

Aligning corporate beliefs with action is critical as well.  There is a stark contrast between leaders who merely pay lip service to values like quality and ethics and those who actively embody and champion these principles. True leadership requires a deep commitment to values that resonate throughout the organization. A CEO must engage in trust-building and fostering accountability within an organization. This includes demonstrating an unwavering commitment to their people, earning their trust, and enabling them to perform at their best.

One way to do so is the cascade effect of organizational cultural change. Leaders at every level must uphold and prioritize a company’s defined values. By holding everyone accountable and ensuring alignment with the organization’s cultural ethos, leaders can drive meaningful change from the top down and engender trust. Trust catalyzes organizational success. When leaders prioritize building trust with their teams, they empower individuals to move forward confidently and speedily, ultimately driving higher productivity and engagement.

Key takeaways for leaders include the well-worn maxim that Actions Speak Louder Than Words. This means they must not simply state their values but actively demonstrate them through their actions. Leaders must visibly display actions and make decisions that connect to and support them. This authenticity and consistency in behavior are essential in fostering a culture of trust and accountability.

CEOs are accountable for fostering cultural change by prioritizing their people and standing up for values such as quality and ethics. The accountability is to his people or her people and for their people. This accountability involves being accessible, listening to employees, and taking decisive action to uphold the desired culture.

In conclusion, effective cultural transformation requires strong leadership commitment, visible actions aligned with values, and a cascading effect of cultural priorities from the top down. Organizations can create a positive workplace environment that drives success and employee satisfaction by prioritizing ethics, valuing people, and fostering a culture of trust. As Sam Silverstein aptly puts it, “When your people fully trust you, they can go forward at a much faster speed.”

Categories
Blog

Transforming Culture: Part 1 – From Merger to Culture Toxicity

Boeing is not the first company to find itself amid a massive scandal. You can think of Siemens’ bribery and corruption scandal, the VW emissions-testing scandal, the Wells Fargo fraudulent accounts scandal, or any other myriad of corporate scandals where culture failed and created a toxic culture. The question for any organization in such a situation is how to transform its culture. Currently running on the Culture Crafters podcast on the Compliance Podcast Network is a 5–part of podcast series with myself and Sam Silverstein, the most trusted voice in America on accountability.

Over this companion, 5-part blog post series, we look at how a company in the depths of such a toxic culture can begin to make a culture comeback by planning and taking concrete steps to turn around and rebuild its culture. In this concluding Part 5, we explore the dynamism of culture, assessing culture through The Culture Audit™ (the sponsor of this blog post series), putting together a plan to remediate your culture and implementing that plan, and conclude with why ongoing monitoring and continuous improvement are so critical for a true culture transformation. In Part 1, we consider the steps that led Boeing to the current state of its corporate culture.

Boeing’s cultural miasma led to the 737 MAX crisis, which has tarnished the company’s reputation and raised doubts about its future in the commercial airline industry. Yet the company’s slide into cultural toxicity began long before the 737 MAX disasters. From these pre-pandemic disasters, the company now finds itself in one of the worst places in recent memory for a company’s reputation.

The slide began with the merger with McDonnell Douglas back in 1996. This led to a shift in leadership, which transformed the company’s culture by prioritizing stock performance over quality. This emphasizes the importance of cultural due diligence in mergers and acquisitions, with the need to evaluate existing cultures, plan post-merger integration, and uphold a robust culture within the acquiring firm. The significance of workplace culture was highlighted as a pivotal factor influencing stakeholders, from employees to customers, impacting talent retention, productivity, and overall profitability.

The culture that permeates an organization’s operations plays a pivotal role in determining its outcomes. A toxic culture characterized by shortsightedness, a profit-over-quality mentality, and a lack of ethical standards can have catastrophic consequences for the organization as a whole. Such cultures often prioritize immediate gains at the expense of long-term sustainability, leading to compromised quality, ethical dilemmas, and damaged stakeholder relationships.

The merger with McDonnell Douglas in 1997 marked a turning point for Boeing. A shift towards a culture focused on stock performance and short-term gains took precedence over a culture of engineering excellence. This shift strayed from Boeing’s legacy of quality and engineering excellence, resulting in significant setbacks like the 737 MAX crisis. The Boeing situation underscores the importance of upholding a culture that values integrity, quality, and long-term success to avoid such catastrophic outcomes.

 Mergers and acquisitions are complex processes that extend beyond financial considerations to encompass cultural integration. The compatibility of organizational cultures is a critical factor that can significantly impact the success or failure of such strategic decisions. To mitigate risks and facilitate a smooth transition, assessing cultural alignment, creating a clear roadmap for integration, and ensuring a strong, cohesive culture in the new entity are essential steps that leaders must prioritize during mergers and acquisitions.

In the context of mergers and acquisitions, culture synergy is critical, and indeed, the Boeing-McDonnell Douglas merger is a cautionary tale. The takeover of Boeing by McDonnell Douglas’s leadership brought about a cultural shift that veered away from Boeing’s core values, leading to subsequent challenges. Organizations embarking on such endeavors must pay close attention to cultural compatibility and actively work towards fostering a unified culture built on shared values and objectives. All of this underscores the critical role of culture in shaping the success of strategic business decisions like mergers and acquisitions.

The bottom line is that the best cultures are always the ones where senior leadership at the top always asks, how can we improve this culture?” This emphasizes the need for organizations to continually prioritize ongoing efforts to enhance their workplace culture. Action follows belief. This underscores the notion that an organization’s outcomes are rooted in its beliefs and values. Companies like Boeing can drive positive actions and results by fostering a culture that prioritizes quality and safety.

When you create a fantastic workplace culture, it goes home with your people. It impacts their spouses. It affects other businesses in the community. This serves as a poignant reminder of the far-reaching influence of workplace culture on individuals and broader societal interactions.

With this unique narrative, Boeing demonstrates the profound impact of leadership on culture and the overall organizational environment. Yet this sets the stage for exploring strategies to transform toxic cultures into thriving, ethical ones for CEOs and organizational leaders seeking actionable insights. I hope you will join us for the rest of the blog posts this week, in which we show how a company can transform its culture.

Categories
Blog

Culture Week: Part 5 – A Listening Tour to Improve Culture

We conclude our focus on culture this week by returning to some of our long-time compliance roots for improving culture, such as the listening tour. In 2022, returning Starbucks Chief Executive Officer (CEO) Howard Schultz began engaging in a “listening tour” of Starbucks stores literally across America. In an article by Justin Bariso, he said Schultz told employees, “We are traveling the country, trying to, with great sensitivity, understand from you how can we do better.” What are employees telling him? Bariso wrote, “he listens intently to one Starbucks employee after another; a pained look comes over Schultz’s face. Employees lament the lack of training, increased turnover, and extreme pressure they’ve endured as company profits soared, but worker conditions plummeted.”

This listening tour has several goals for Schultz. The first is that even though the company has sustained record profits, morale at the company is at an all-time low. Witness the unionizing efforts that have been successful. Employees are simply fed up with not being listened to. This has eroded employee trust and management and driven down the once vibrant culture at the iconic institution. To rebuild that trust, Starbucks, as their CEO, “must first listen.” However, it is more than simply listening to rebuild trust; it is rebuilding employee engagement by making them and their ideas part of the solution.

There is still much work for Starbucks and Schultz to do. Yet these initial steps can lead to real change. Schultz is doing more than saying “We Care”; he is modeling that language in his behavior. This is action at the top. It also communicates to other senior management that they must listen to re-engage and build employee trust. What if a Chief Compliance Officer took that same approach to culture? I believe that a Schulz-inspired listening tour can improve your corporate culture. Below are three keys for the compliance officer to conduct a practical listening tour.

A. Engagement

Start by meeting as many compliance stakeholders as possible. You can use town hall settings or go smaller, meeting with key employee leaders, key stakeholders, and employees identified as high-risk who you can meet with individually or in smaller groups. Listen to their compliance concerns and take their compliance ideas back to the home office. After returning to your office, winnow down their ideas and suggestions to form the basis of enhancements to your culture. This employee engagement will lead to greater stakeholder buy-in for your culture.

B. Education

During the town hall meetings and the smaller, more informal group meetings, you can do more than simply listen—you can also train. This training is on ethics and how the employees could use compliance as a business tool. Most business’s ethical standards are not found in an existing compliance program. They are found in the general anti-discrimination guidelines and ethical business practices such as anti-competitiveness and prohibition of using confidential information. Often, these general concepts can be found in a company’s overall Code of Conduct or similar statement of business ethics. Workplace anti-discrimination and anti-harassment guidelines can be found in Human Resource policies and procedures. Concepts such as anti-competitiveness and the use of customers’ and competitors’ illegally obtained confidential information may be found in antitrust or other business practice-focused guidelines.

This gets your employees and other stakeholders thinking about doing business ethically. It is ethical concept-based training, in contrast to a rules-based approach. Moreover, this lays the groundwork for enhancing your culture and the training that will occur as the enhancement is rolled out.

C. Risk Assessment

Now, think about this same approach from the risk assessment perspective. Listen to your employees’ concerns and compliance issues. From there, you can ask questions about what was done and why. This approach is not adversarial or interrogation, but it is ferreting out the employees’ concerns while having the employees educate your compliance team on the actual procedures that are used. By listening and gently questioning, you should garner enough information to create a risk assessment profile that can inform and even become the basis of compliance program enhancements.

Bariso concluded his article by stating, “People lose motivation when they sense you don’t care. But the simple act of listening creates goodwill. When your people feel understood, they’ll be motivated to contribute and can help you discover insights you wouldn’t otherwise. So, when it comes to solving your company’s biggest problems, don’t ignore your most helpful resource: your people.” It all starts with listening. Let your employees and other stakeholders have the “chance to share their problems, as well as to propose solutions. Meetings like these will reveal key insights and transform your people from employees to partners.”

I hope you have enjoyed and, more importantly, found this week’s blog posts on helpful culture. I also hope you will join the conversation by commenting or posting on LinkedIn about your experiences around corporate culture.

Categories
Blog

Culture Week: Part 4 – Employee Engagement to Improve Culture

Suppose there is one thing I have learned from working with Carsten Tams, an ethical business architect and founder and chief executive officer (CEO) of Emagence LLC. In that case, employee engagement is one of the very top keys to a successful compliance program. Tams and I explored this topic in the popular Design Thinking in Compliance podcast series. It also appears that engagement can lead to excellent business resiliency based on an article in the MIT Sloan Management Review, entitled The Top 10 Findings on Resilience and Engagement, by Marcus Buckingham. Covid 19 and the Russian invasion of Ukraine changed business forever, making business resiliency a key trait for any business, corporate function, and especially a Chief Compliance Officer (CCO) or compliance professional. That last arena is where engagement is so critical.

The author defined resilience as “the capacity of an individual to withstand, bounce back from, and work through challenging circumstances or events.” However, it is also a “reactive capacity, describing how people will respond when challenges arise.” Conversely, engagement was seen as a proactive state of mind. The authors defined the criteria by making such inquiries “as how clear their expectations were, whether they got to use their strengths every day, whether they felt they would be recognized for doing excellent work, and whether someone at work was encouraging them to grow.” Yet, the most exciting part is the dichotomy between reactive and proactive. It is a bit like the difference in prevention and detection in a compliance program. The former is preferred to stop illegal or unethical conduct, so you do not have to detect it.

Not surprisingly, trust is the number one factor in both engagement and resilience. Astoundingly, the author found that “employees who said they completely trust their team leader were 14 times more likely to be fully engaged.” Moreover, those employees who completely trusted their colleagues, team leader, and senior leaders “were 42 times more likely to be highly resilient.” The reason should seem obvious as it is undoubtedly “easier to engage in our best work when we don’t have to expend mental resources looking over our shoulders or protecting ourselves against dysfunctional workplace practices that erode trust, like bullying or micromanaging. When it comes to building engagement and resilience, trust is everything.” [emphasis added throughout]

Teamwork is also a key factor. Although this is not something I have experienced over the past 12 years of working alone, the author found, “Those who said they are on a team were 2.6 times more likely to be fully engaged and 2.7 times more likely to be highly resilient than those who didn’t identify as team members. For millennia, humans have experienced psychological well-being only when they feel connected to and supported by a small group of people around them.” When the pandemic hit, working from home (WFH) was not new to me as I had been doing it since 2010, but even in the WFH or Hybrid Work era, most employees need to feel like they are part of a team.

However, being or even feeling like you are a part of a team is a state of mind, not a state of place. I always feel engaged with my blog posts, article readers, podcast listeners, and the greater compliance community. Based on that experience, I agree with the author’s statement that “engagement and resilience are about who you work with, not where you’re working.” Moreover, he noted, “virtual workers are both more engaged and resilient than those physically in an office or shared workspace … In 2020, well into the pandemic, 20% of virtual workers were fully engaged, and 18% were highly resilient—a stark contrast to the 11% of fully engaged and 9% of highly resilient office-based workers during the same period. How the work is done and with whom people work are important, but organizations can stop worrying about whether virtual work is detrimental to teamwork.” Even more than teamwork, it is about having relationships with your co-workers. The author stated, “Relationships boost resilience. Women are not more resilient than men, or vice versa … This data strongly suggests that it is much harder to summon and sustain one’s resilience when going through life alone.”

I can certainly attest that the unknown is more terrifying than change. The author found that employees “who reported five or more changes at work were 13 times more likely to be highly resilient. This suggests that we humans fear the unknown more than we fear change. Company leaders shouldn’t rush employees back to normalcy when so much of the danger inherent in this current ‘normalcy’ remains unknown and unknowable. Instead, leaders should tell their teams specifically what changes they are making to their work and why to increase their overall level of resilience.”

These findings suggest that every CCO and compliance professional must work to lessen or dissolve the disconnect between senior leadership and front-line workers. Your front-line business folks will make or break your compliance program. Getting your senior management more engaged will create and establish the trust that your employees will need to show resilience in the face of the following major business location, whether a pandemic or military invasion. Giving employees needed clarity and specificity from leaders, not sugarcoated enthusiasm, will help drive this trust. The author ended this concept by stating, “Leaders need to see their employees not as ‘labor’ but as the messy, complex, emotional beings they are—dealing with real-world human challenges, just like they are. The more leaders can infuse these findings in their organizations’ policies and practices, the more likely we will all be to flourish, both during these difficult times and beyond.”

Categories
Compliance Tip of the Day

Compliance Tip of the Day: Characteristics of a Toxic Culture

Welcome to “Compliance Tip of the Day,” the podcast where we bring you daily insights and practical advice on navigating the ever-evolving landscape of compliance and regulatory requirements.

Whether you’re a seasoned compliance professional or just starting your journey, our aim is to provide you with bite-sized, actionable tips to help you stay on top of your compliance game.

Join us as we explore the latest industry trends, share best practices, and demystify complex compliance issues to keep your organization on the right side of the law.

Tune in daily for your dose of compliance wisdom, and let’s make compliance a little less daunting, one tip at a time.

In this episode, we consider the 5 top characteristics of a toxic corporate culture.

For more information on the Ethico ROI Calculator and a free White Paper on the ROI of Compliance, click here.

Categories
Blog

Culture Week: Part 2 – Attributes of a Toxic Corporate Culture

We continue our exploration of aspects of corporate culture. Today, we turn to the dark side by reviewing some of the characteristics of a toxic corporate culture. An article in the MIT Sloan Management Review provided some guidance. In Why Every Leader Needs to Worry About Toxic Culture, Donald Sull, Charles Sull, William Cipolli, and Caio Brighenti posited that, by pinpointing the elements of toxic culture in a company, its leaders focus on addressing the issues that lead employees to disengage and quit. These ideas are essential for compliance as they navigate corporate culture and assess and improve it.

Moreover, the Chief Compliance Officer and corporate compliance function were again identified in the 2023 Evaluation of Corporate Compliance Programs (ECCP) as the institutional justice and fairness keepers. This means recognizing and preventing a toxic culture from spreading and infecting your entire organization, which is squarely in the compliance wheelhouse. The article lays out vital red flags for every CCO and compliance professional to look for in assessing culture. Last but not least, for any company with a toxic culture, the likelihood that its employees will commit fraud or bribe and corrupt others by breaking laws like the Foreign Corrupt Practices Act (FCPA) is much higher.

The authors identify behaviors they call “the Toxic Five attributes,” which are being “disrespectful, non-inclusive, unethical, cutthroat, and abusive—poison corporate culture in employees’ eyes. While organizational culture can disappoint employees in many ways, these five elements have by far the largest negative impact on how employees rate their corporate culture and have contributed most to employee attrition throughout the Great Resignation.” As a CCO or compliance professional, you must be on the lookout for them and take steps to remedy them if you see or hear about them.

Disrespectful Behavior

The authors found that “feeling disrespected at work has the largest negative impact on an employee’s overall rating of their corporate culture of any single topic.” Lack of respect can occur in many areas. The most obvious is the lack of a “speak up” culture where employees understand it is useless to raise issues with management, whether serious matters such as FCPA violations or more straightforward ideas such as process improvement. It can also be as simple as whether to return to the office full-time and whether management listens to employees about their desires to continue working from home or to utilize some hybrid working arrangement. The authors noted, “Whether you analyze culture at the level of the individual employee or aggregate to the organization as a whole, respect toward employees rises to the top of the list of cultural elements that matter most.

Non-inclusive Behavior

This concerns whether your employees are “treated fairly, made to feel welcome, and included in key decisions.” It is “the most powerful predictor of whether employees view their organization’s culture as toxic. It applies to all demographic groups: “gender, race, sexual identity and orientation, disability, and age.” It can be outright discrimination against the equally invidious but more subtle conflicts of interests of nepotism and playing favorites. The topic of non-inclusiveness includes “terms like ‘cliques,’ ‘clubby, or ‘in crowd that indicate that some employees are being excluded without specifying why.

Ethical Behavior

The authors believe ethics “is a fundamental aspect of culture that matters at both the organizational and individual levels. Interestingly, there are several different aspects of “ethics that every CCO needs to consider. Unethical behavior is “about integrity and ethics within an organization. It also includes dishonesty. “Employees described dishonest behavior in many ways, from outright lying to making false promises to shading the truth to simply “sugarcoating. Under regulatory compliance, employees talked about failure to comply with applicable regulations, including failure to meet safety standards.

Cutthroat Behavior

I found this category fascinating as it included both uncooperative coworkers and the lack of harmonization across organizational silos. This was not simply “friction in coordination, but situations in which “employees talked about colleagues actively undermining one another. It included what the authors termed as a “vivid lexicon to describe their workplace, including ‘dog-eat-dog and ‘Darwinian and talked about coworkers who ‘throw one another under the bus,‘ ‘stab each other in the back, or ‘sabotage one another.'”

Abusive Behavior

Having worked in law firms long ago, I understand abusive behavior. The authors called it “sustained hostile behavior toward employees, including “bullying, yelling, or shouting at employees, belittling or demeaning subordinates, verbally abusing people, and condescending or talking down to employees. While one would hope such behaviors do not exist in the 21st century, they still do. The article’s authors reported that only 0.8% of the employees surveyed described their manager as abusive. However, when employees did mention abusive managers, it significantly depressed the corporate culture.

What CCOs and compliance professionals should try to drive forward is a “culture that is inclusive, respectful, ethical, collaborative, and free from abuse by those in positions of power. However, the authors caution that these are the “baseline elements of a healthy corporate culture. Employees want more than the basics; other organizational stakeholders want companies to have official, solid core values. In an interview with LRN’s Susan Divers, she called this emphasis on core values the “value in values.” From the compliance professional’s perspective, it means values like integrity, collaboration, respect, and DEI.