Categories
Life with GDPR

Life With GDPR: Critical Perspectives on Big Law Firm Cybersecurity

Tom Fox and Jonathan Armstrong, renowned experts in cyber security, co-host the award-winning Life with GDPR. In this episode, they look at a breach of a big law.

In the wake of a recent spearphishing attack and data breach at a UK law firm, the legal community is abuzz with discussions on the responsibility of lawyers to prevent such attacks. Tom Fox, known for his critical perspective on big law firms, highlights the mistakes made by the firm in question, emphasizing the increasing concern over cyber-attacks targeting law firms and the need for timely reporting to regulatory authorities. Jonathan Armstrong, on the other hand, underscores the importance of proactive cybersecurity measures and timely reporting, commending the firm for taking immediate action but criticizing the delay in reporting the breach. Both Fox and Armstrong bring their unique perspectives shaped by their experiences in the field. Join them on this episode of the Life with GDPR podcast as they delve deeper into this topic.

Key Takeaways:

  • A spearphishing Attack Leads to Data Breach
  • Cybersecurity Measures for Law Firms
  • The Power of Dedicated Data Protection Training

 Resources:

For more information on the issues raised in this podcast, check out the Cordery Compliance News Section. For more information on Cordery Compliance, go to their website here.

Also, check out the GDPR Navigator, one of the top resources for GDPR compliance, by clicking here. Check out the Cordery Data Breach Academy here.

Connect with Tom Fox

●      LinkedIn

Connect with Jonathan Armstrong

●      Twitter

●      LinkedIn

Categories
31 Days to More Effective Compliance Programs

One Month to a More Effective Compliance Program Through Data Analytics: Day 10 – The Impact of Privacy Regulations on Compliance

What is the impact of privacy regulations on data-driven compliance? Every CCO must be aware of the importance of privacy in data-driven compliance and the challenges and tradeoffs involved in implementing effective compliance strategies. A key mandate is for CCOs and compliance professionals to have a compliance program that provides visibility into their data. This emphasizes the importance of having efficient and effective compliance solutions in place or as I have previously noted CCOs must have access to their compliance data literally at their fingertips.

This is one of the drivers for key trends shaping compliance technology in 2025 and beyond. The RegTech market is growing rapidly, and there is increased regulatory focus on cryptocurrency activities, ESG, and information security and cybersecurity. These trends indicate the evolving landscape of compliance and the need for organizations to stay updated and adapt their compliance strategies accordingly. By embracing connected compliance and leveraging technology, organizations can navigate the complex regulatory landscape and ensure compliance with privacy regulations while driving business efficiency.

 Three key takeaways:

  1. CCOs and compliance professionals must have a compliance program that provides visibility into their data.
  2. ESG regulations affect not only regulated industries but also any company holding private customer data or involved in large supply chains.
  3. By embracing connected compliance and leveraging technology, organizations can navigate the complex regulatory landscape and ensure compliance with privacy regulations while driving business efficiency.

For more on KonaAI, click here.

Categories
Life with GDPR

Life With GDPR – Lessons Learned from The Singtel Opus Data Breach

Tom Fox and Jonathan Armstrong, renowned experts in cyber security, co-host the award-winning Life with GDPR. In this episode, they look at litigation over a data breach against Singtel Opus in Australia and the fallout from an investigation report.

The recent data breach at Intel Optus, affecting 1.2 million individuals, has brought to light the critical role of strategic communication in managing cybersecurity breaches. Tom and Jonathan Armstrong, offer their unique perspectives on this issue. Fox emphasizes the inevitability of cybersecurity breaches and the need for a comprehensive strategy, including effective communication, to manage them. He warns against the potential consequences of mishandling communication during a breach, such as jeopardizing insurance coverage.

Armstrong highlights the complexity of maintaining privilege in a global corporate structure and the importance of careful language to avoid invalidating insurance or causing unnecessary speculation. He also underscores the need for a holistic approach to cybersecurity, encompassing prevention, detection, remediation, and crisis communication. Join Tom Fox and Jonathan Armstrong as they delve deeper into this topic in the latest Life with GDPR podcast episode.

  •  Key Takeaways:
  • Implications of Language in Data Breach Reporting
  • Navigating CEO Communication and Insurance Coverage
  • Navigating Insurance Coverage in Data Breaches

 Resources

For more information on the issues raised in this podcast, check out the Cordery Compliance, News Section. For more information on Cordery Compliance, go to their website here. Also check out the GDPR Navigator, one of the top resources for GDPR Compliance by clicking here. Check out the Cordery Data Breach Academy here.

Connect with Tom Fox:

Connect with Jonathan Armstrong:

●   Twitter

●   LinkedIn

Categories
Life with GDPR

Life With GDPR: WhatsApp Breach: Hospital’s GDPR Failures Exposed

Tom Fox and Jonathan Armstrong, renowned experts in cyber security, co-host the award-winning Life with GDPR. The recent controversy surrounding Nigel Farage’s banking situation highlights the risks and compliance challenges faced by the banking industry in relation to data protection. In this episode, Tom and Jonathan discuss a data breach in a Scottish hospital during the COVID-19 pandemic.

The breach occurred when hospital staff shared patient details on WhatsApp, raising concerns about GDPR compliance. The hospital informed the ICO about the breach but chose not to notify affected patients, highlighting the need for appropriate advice and support when making such decisions. The conversation also explores communication challenges in internal investigations and the privacy and security risks of platforms like WhatsApp. It emphasizes the importance of organizations adapting to the preferences of digital native employees and conducting data protection impact assessments. The podcast also highlights the importance of effective policies, training, and proactive phishing training to prevent cyber-attacks and protect sensitive information.

 

Key Takeaways:

  • Data breach in Scottish hospital
  • The Challenges of Communication in Internal Investigations
  • Importance of Policies and Training
  • Phishing Training Effectiveness

Resources

For more information on the issues raised in this podcast, check out the Cordery Compliance News Section. For more information on Cordery Compliance, go to their website here. Also, check out the GDPR Navigator, one of the top resources for GDPR Compliance, by clicking here.

Connect with Tom Fox

Connect with Jonathan Armstrong

Categories
Blog

AI and GDPR

Artificial Intelligence (AI) has revolutionized various industries, but with great power comes great responsibility. Regulators in the European Union (EU) are taking a proactive approach to address compliance and data protection issues surrounding AI and generative AI. Recent cases, such as Google’s AI tool, Bard, being temporarily suspended in the EU, have highlighted the urgent need for regulation in this rapidly evolving field. I recently had the opportunity to visit with GDPR maven Jonathan Armstrong on this topic. In this blog post, we will delve into our conversations about some of the key concerns raised about data and privacy in generative AI, the importance of transparency and consent, and the potential legal and financial implications for organizations that fail to address these concerns.

One of the key issues in the AI landscape is obtaining informed consent from users. The recent scrutiny faced by video conferencing platform Zoom serves as a stark reminder of the importance of transparency and consent practices. While there has been no official investigation into Zoom’s compliance with informed consent requirements, the company has retracted its initial statements and is likely considering how to obtain consent from users.

It is essential to recognize that obtaining consent extends not only to those who host a Zoom call but also to those who are invited to join the call. Unfortunately, there has been no on-screen warning about consent when using Zoom, leaving users in the dark about the data practices involved. This lack of transparency can lead to significant legal and financial penalties, as over 70% of GDPR fines involve a lack of transparency by the data controller.

Generative AI heavily relies on large pools of data for training, which raises concerns about copyright infringement and the processing of individuals’ data without consent. For instance, Zoom’s plan to use recorded Zoom calls to train AI tools may violate GDPR’s requirement of informed consent. Similarly, Getty Images has expressed concerns about its copyrighted images being used without consent to train AI models.

Websites often explicitly prohibit scraping data for training AI models, emphasizing the need for organizations to respect copyright laws and privacy regulations. Regulators are rightfully concerned about AI processing individuals’ data without consent or knowledge, as well as the potential for inaccurate data processing. Accuracy is a key principle of GDPR, and organizations using AI must conduct thorough data protection impact assessments to ensure compliance.

Several recent cases demonstrate the regulatory focus on AI compliance and transparency. In Italy, rideshare and food delivery applications faced investigations and suspensions for their AI practices. Spain has examined the use of AI in recruitment processes, highlighting the importance of transparency in the selection process. Google’s Bard case, similar to the Facebook dating case, faced temporary suspension in the EU due to the lack of a mandatory data protection impact assessment (DPIA).

It is concerning that many big tech providers fail to engage with regulators or produce the required DPIA for their AI applications. This lack of compliance and transparency poses significant risks for organizations, not just in terms of financial penalties but also potential litigation risks in the hiring process.

To navigate the compliance and data protection challenges posed by AI, organizations must prioritize transparency, fairness, and lawful processing of data. Conducting a data protection impact assessment is crucial, especially when AI is used in Know Your Customer (KYC), due diligence, and job application processes. If risks cannot be resolved or remediated internally, it is advisable to consult regulators and include timings for such consultations in project timelines.

For individuals, it is essential to be aware of the terms and conditions associated with AI applications. In the United States, informed consent is often buried within lengthy terms and conditions, leading to a lack of understanding and awareness. By being vigilant and informed, individuals can better protect their privacy and data rights.

As AI continues to transform industries, compliance and data protection must remain at the forefront of technological advancements. Regulators in the EU are actively addressing the challenges posed by AI and generative AI, emphasizing the need for transparency, consent, and compliance with GDPR obligations. Organizations and individuals must prioritize data protection impact assessments, engage with regulators when necessary, and stay informed about the terms and conditions associated with AI applications. By doing so, we can harness the power of AI while safeguarding our privacy and ensuring ethical practices in this rapidly evolving field.

Categories
Blog

The Importance of Effective Policies and Training in Data Protection: Lessons from a Scottish Hospital Breach

I recently had the chance to visit with Jonathan Armstrong on a recent data breach case that occurred in the health service provider NHS Lanarkshire (Scotland) during the COVID-19 pandemic. This breach serves as a stark reminder of the challenges organizations face in maintaining data protection and compliance, especially when it comes to communication platforms like WhatsApp. In this blog post we will explore the lessons learned from this incident and discuss practical advice for organizations to ensure robust data protection measures.

Background

According to the Cordery Compliance Client Alert on the matter, over a two-year period between 2020 and 2022, 26 staff at NHS Lanarkshire had access to a WhatsApp group where there were a minimum of 533 entries that included patient names. The information included 215 phone numbers, 96 with dates of birth and 28 included addresses. 15 images, 3 videos, and 4 screenshots were also shared, which included personal data of patients and clinical information, which is a “special category” health data under both EU and UK law. Other data to the WhatsApp group was also added in error. Other communications were also identified where the staff in question had used WhatsApp.

WhatsApp was not approved by NHS Lanarkshire for processing personal data of patients.  The use of WhatsApp was an approach adopted by the staff apparently without organizational knowledge. It was used by the staff as a substitute for communications that would have taken place in the clinical office but did not do so after staff reduced office attendance due to the COVID-19 pandemic. No Data Protection Impact Assessment was in place and no risk assessment relating to personal data processing was completed concerning WhatsApp, as WhatsApp was not approved by NHS Lanarkshire for the sharing of personal data relating to patients. NHS Lanarkshire undertook an internal investigation and reported this matter to the ICO.

ICO Holding

The UK ICO determined that NHS Lanarkshire did not have the appropriate policies, clear guidance and processes in place when WhatsApp was made available to download. Additionally,  there were a number of infringements of UK GDPR, not the least being not implementing appropriate technical and organizational measures (TOMs) to ensure the security of the personal data involved, as a consequence of which personal data was shared via an unauthorized means and an inappropriate disclosure occurred. There was also a failure to report this matter, as a data breach, to the ICO in time.

Armstrong noted that ICO recommended that NHS Lanarkshire should take action to ensure their compliance with data protection law, including:

  1. Considering implementing a secure clinical image transfer system, as part of NHS Lanarkshire’s exploration regarding the storage of images and videos within a care setting;
  2. Before deploying new apps, consideration of the risks relating to personal data and including the requirement to assess and mitigate these risks in any approval process;
  3. Ensuring that explicit communications, instructions or guidance are issued to employees on their data protection responsibilities when new apps are deployed;
  4. Reviewing all organizational policies and procedures relevant to this matter and amending them where appropriate; and,
  5. Ensuring that all staff are aware of their responsibilities to report personal data breaches internally without delay to the relevant team.

Armstrong concluded that “In light of the remedial steps and mitigating factors the ICO issued an official reprimand – a fine has not yet been imposed. The ICO also asked NHS Lanarkshire to provide an update of actions taken within six months of the reprimand being issued.”

Discussion

This case highlights the challenges organizations face when it comes to communication during internal investigations. In many instances, the most interesting documents are not found in emails, as one organization discovered. Employees often turn to alternative platforms like WhatsApp to avoid leaving a paper trail. However, it is crucial to understand that these platforms may not provide the expected privacy and security.

While platforms like WhatsApp may seem secure, they still share data with big tech companies, raising concerns about privacy. Organizations must adapt to the preferences of digital-native employees who may find email restrictive and opt for alternative communication methods. However, this adaptation should be done consciously, ensuring that policies and procedures are in place to protect sensitive information. Armstrong emphasizes the importance of revisiting emergency measures implemented during the pandemic. As remote work continues, organizations must conduct thorough data protection impact assessments to ensure compliance across all communication platforms and measures.

As with all types of compliance, setting policies and procedures is just the first step. It is essential to communicate and educate employees on these policies to ensure their understanding and compliance. Annual online training sessions are not enough; organizations should provide engaging training that goes beyond passive learning. In addition to targeted and effective training there must be ongoing communications provided to employees. Armstrong also related on the ineffectiveness of off-the-shelf online phishing training. Waiting for an incident to occur and then providing training is not enough to prevent people from clicking on malicious links. Organizations should focus on providing better training before incidents happen, rather than trying to enhance training afterwards.

The next step is monitoring as compliance with policies and procedures should be actively monitored. Technical solutions are available to help companies track compliance, but it’s crucial to involve individuals at all levels of the organization when designing these policies. Additionally, a balanced approach is needed, where employees are recognized for their service but also held accountable for policy breaches. The days of solely relying on punishment for enforcement are gone.

The data breach in the Scottish hospital serves as a wake-up call for organizations to prioritize data protection and compliance. Communication challenges during internal investigations, privacy concerns associated with alternative platforms, and the need for effective policies and training are crucial areas to address. By conducting regular data protection impact assessments, providing engaging training, and ensuring buy-in from employees, organizations can strengthen their defense against cyber threats and protect sensitive information. Always remember that compliance is an ongoing process, and continuous evaluation and improvement are necessary to adapt to the evolving digital landscape. Finally stay vigilant and proactive in safeguarding data privacy and protection.

Categories
Compliance and AI

Compliance and AI – Jonathan Armstrong on Unleashing Generative AI: Privacy, Copyright, and Compliance

What is the role of Artificial Intelligence in compliance? What about Machine Learning? Are you using ChatGPT? These questions are but three of the many questions we will explore in this exciting new podcast series, Compliance and AI. Hosted by Tom Fox, the award-winning Voice of Compliance, this podcast will look at how AI will impact compliance programs into the next decade and beyond. If you want to find out why the future is now, join Tom Fox on this journey to the frontiers of AI.

Welcome back to another exciting episode of our podcast, where we delve into the fascinating world of compliance and artificial intelligence (AI). Today I am joined by Jonathan Armstrong from Cordery Compliance to discuss how regulators in the EU are looking at AI.

Regulators in the EU are taking action to address the use of artificial intelligence (AI) and generative AI. A recent case involving Google’s AI tool, Bard, being temporarily suspended in the EU highlights the need for regulation and compliance in this rapidly evolving field. Concerns are raised about data and privacy, as generative AI uses large amounts of data, potentially infringing copyright and processing individuals’ data without consent. It is crucial for organizations to conduct data protection impact assessments and consider GDPR obligations. Transparency and consent are also key, with Zoom’s data practices being questioned in terms of transparency and obtaining user consent. The conversation emphasizes the potential legal and financial consequences organizations face for non-compliance.

Remember, compliance professionals are the co-pilots of our businesses, guiding us through the complexities of the AI revolution. Let’s not wait too long between podcasts and continue this journey together!

Key Highlights

·      Concerns with Bard

·      Regulators’ Actions on AI

·      Concerns over Data and Privacy in Generative AI

·      Transparency and Consent in Zoom’s Data Practices

 Resources

For more information on the issues raised in this podcast, check out the Cordery Compliance, News Section. For more information on Cordery Compliance, go their website here. Also check out the GDPR Navigator, one of the top resources for GDPR Compliance by clicking here.

Connect with Jonathan Armstrong

●      Twitter

●      LinkedIn

Tom Fox

Instagram

Facebook

YouTube

Twitter

LinkedIn

Categories
Blog

Protecting Personal Data in the Banking Industry: Lessons from the Farage Controversy

Today I want to consider a burgeoning imbroglio in the UK involving Nigel Farage. While you might not think of Farage as a candidate for the FCPA Compliance Blog, it turns out that his current banking situation has some very interesting data privacy issues, shedding light on the data protection risks faced by banks and the importance of compliance with GDPR regulations. So in this blog post, we will explore the lessons learned from this incident and provide practical advice for financial institutions to ensure the security and privacy of customer information.

The recent episode surrounding Nigel Farage’s banking situation has sparked concerns about data protection and compliance within the banking industry. Farage, a prominent figure in the Brexit movement, had his bank account with Coutts, a high-end bank owned by NatWest, closed and was offered an account with another associated bank. The alleged reason was that he did not have a high enough net worth to merit the account with Coutts. It turned out the real reason was his right-wing politics, particularly around leading the charge for Brexit.

NatWest then compounded its problem by leaking a story to the BBC, that Farage had been dropped because, as reported in the Guardian, the CEO of NatWest, Dame Alison Rose had been the source of the leak to the BBC of this false information. All of this raised concerns about a potential data breach. Coutts had closed his account after lengthy discussions over the reputational risk that his political views posed for the bank.

Rose tried to apologize to Farage but as the New York Times reported, “The apology and a promise to review the bank’s policies were not enough to ease the pressure on Ms. Rose. Reports late Tuesday that the government, which has a 39 percent stake in the bank, was “significantly concerned” about Ms. Rose’s leadership seemed to seal her fate. Before dawn, the bank announced her immediate departure” in late July. Peter Flavel, the boss of its private bank, Coutts was also sent packing.

From the regulatory, data privacy and GDPR responses, NatWest is in severe trouble. Not only had the Bank violated its own data privacy regulations in providing the information to the now former CEO but it also released that same information to the BBC. The consequences of non-compliance with GDPR regulations can be severe, particularly in regulated industries like financial services. Banks may face potential violations and internal policy breaches, which could lead to legal action and impact their banking license and fit and proper provisions. CEOs can be held liable for consent and connivance in data protection cases, emphasizing the importance of understanding data protection laws and potential criminal offenses associated with them.

The controversy surrounding Nigel Farage’s banking situation serves as a wake-up call for the banking industry to prioritize data protection and compliance. Financial institutions cannot afford to overlook these issues, as the consequences in the era of GDPR can be significant. It is crucial to establish proper policies and procedures, provide training and education for top-level management, and ensure a compliance culture is embedded throughout the organization.

There are multiple lessons to be learned from this controversy and several key takeaways that can help banks navigate the complexities of data protection and compliance:

1.Be cautious with written communication: The incident underscores the importance of being mindful of what is written in emails, as subject access requests can expose them. Consider whether a controversial email would be better discussed through a phone call or read aloud before sending.

2. Learn from previous compliance issues: NatWest had previous issues with data protection compliance, leading to the resignation of CEO Dame Allison Rose. This highlights the need for organizations to build a compliance culture at all levels, including those in top positions.

3. Allocate resources for subject access requests: The bank’s CFO has provided extra resources to handle subject access requests, as the cost of non-compliance is usually higher than the cost of compliance. It is estimated that it takes a six-figure sum for a bank to respond to a subject access request.

4. Scrutinize politically exposed persons and connections to Russian individuals: Financial institutions have an obligation to carefully scrutinize politically exposed persons and individuals with connections to Russian individuals. Balancing legitimate activities with obeying the law is crucial.

This affair provides valuable insights into the importance of data protection and compliance in the banking industry. The Farage controversy serves as a reminder that the security and privacy of customer information should be paramount for financial institutions. By learning from past incidents, allocating resources for subject access requests, and adhering to GDPR obligations, banks can safeguard their reputation, avoid legal repercussions, and build trust with their customers.

Categories
Life with GDPR

Life With GDPR: Banking’s Data Dilemma – Farage’s Account Closure & the Risks of Data Breach

Tom Fox and Jonathan Armstrong, renowned expert in cyber security, co-host the award-winning Life with GDPR. The recent controversy surrounding Nigel Farage’s banking situation highlights the risks and compliance challenges faced by the banking industry in relation to data protection.

In this episode, Tom and Jonathan discuss the closure of Farage’s bank account with Coutts, a high-end bank owned by NatWest, and the potential data breach that ensued. They discuss the risks of internal emails being exposed through subject access requests (SARs) and emphasize the importance of caution in email communication. The conversation also explores the cost and consequences of non-compliance with GDPR obligations, particularly in relation to SARs. The potential legal implications for banks that violate their own policies or delete data that should be provided in response to a SAR are highlighted. Overall, the episode underscores the need for banks to prioritize data protection, compliance, and proper decision-making in the financial industry.

 Key Takeaways:

·      Nigel Farage’s Banking Controversy

·      Data Protection Risks in Banking

·      The Cost and Consequences of Subject Access Requests

·      Serious concerns about data protection and access to banking

 Resources

For more information on the issues raised in this podcast, check out the Cordery Compliance, News Section. For more information on Cordery Compliance, go their website here. Also check out the GDPR Navigator, one of the top resources for GDPR Compliance by clicking here.

Connect with Tom Fox

●      LinkedIn

Connect with Jonathan Armstrong

●      Twitter

●      LinkedIn

Categories
2 Gurus Talk Compliance

2 Gurus Talk Compliance – Episode 10 – Ethical Remote Workers Edition

What happens when two top compliance commentators get together? They talk compliance of course. Join Tom Fox and Kristy Grant-Hart in 2 Gurus Talk Compliance as they discuss the latest compliance issues in this week’s episode!

Tom and Kristy consider the possibility of an international anti-bribery court, challenges in enforcing judgments against countries without strong anti-corruption laws, and the United States’ unlikely participation. The European Commission issued an adequacy decision regarding data transfers between the US and EU, resolving a long-standing issue, but privacy advocate Max Schrems plans to challenge its validity. The importance of on-site due diligence, and the value of on-site audits and cybersecurity disclosure were also explored. The benefits of remote work, global anti-corruption efforts, AI safeguards, and the dangers of zero tolerance policies were covered as well. The conversation provided insights into various compliance-related topics.

Highlights Include

·      World ABC Court

·      No DOJ control on Cognizant investigation.

·      SEC adopts Cyber disclosure rules.

·      Fight against corruption in Ukraine.

·      Goldilocks Compliance.

·      Data Privacy Framework Program Launches New Website Enabling U.S. Companies to Participate in Cross-Border Data Transfers

·      Site Visits: Sometimes the Best Due Diligence is Done on Foot

·      New Data Reveals that Remote Workers are Likely More Ethical than their Office Counterparts.

·      White House Says Amazon, Google, Meta, Microsoft Agree to AI Safeguards

·      Man Steals Vehicle, Crashes it into Building during Search for WiFi Connection

 Resources 

  1. WSJ Risk and Compliance Journal
  2. FCPA Blog
  3. Radical Compliance
  4. Dept. Of Commerce Press Release
  5. WSJ
  6. Conflicts of Interest Blog
  7. GAB
  8. Fast Company
  9. Fox 35 Orlando

Connect with Kristy Grant-Hart on LinkedIn

Spark Consulting

Tom 

Instagram

Facebook

YouTube

Twitter

LinkedIn