Categories
Blog

How Triage and Investigations Can Drive a Culture of Speak Up

I recently concluded a podcast series with Case IQ. Over this series, I visited with Sharlyn Lauby, Jakub Ficner, Kenneth McCarthy, and Meric Bloch on the different facets of a great speak-up regime and how each of those facets will improve your corporate culture. We tackled such topics as the indicia of a great corporate culture, the importance of triage and internal investigations in improving corporate culture, non-retaliation and protections for those who speak up, tying your entire system of speaking up to improving culture, and will conclude with some thoughts on how an entire system of speaking up drives corporate culture to be better run and more profitably. This blog post series will expand on these topics. In Part 3, we consider why and how having an effective triage for reports and investigations can drive a culture of speaking up in your organization.

Jakub Ficner has over 15 years of experience in the internal investigative space and is currently the Director of Partnership Development at Case IQ. He strongly advocates for the importance of the triage process and technology in organizational compliance. He is a passionate and determined team player with experience in prospecting and implementing complex global solutions in various industries. Experience working in cross-functional and multi-cultural teams in Canada, the United States, Germany, and India. His specialties include business strategy and development, international management, ethics and compliance, investigation management, and global implementation strategy.

Jakub emphasized the need for organizations to consider the assessment and triage process before receiving complaints or allegations. This proactive approach allows for increased response time and the ability to set realistic stakeholder expectations.

One of the key points highlighted by Jakub is the importance of setting service level agreements (SLAs) to determine response times based on the nature of the allegation. This concept, borrowed from customer service practices, ensures that employees who come forward with complaints or allegations are provided with a clear understanding of the expected timeline for response and communication. By setting these expectations, organizations can foster a culture of open communication and trust.

The triage process is particularly important for multinational companies that operate across different regions. With varying compliance programs and regulations in different countries, having a well-documented process becomes essential. It allows compliance departments to navigate the complexities of compliance programs and investigations, ensuring consistency and adherence to local laws.

Technology also plays a crucial role in establishing effective compliance processes. Jakub points out that many organizations still need efficient documentation and tracking processes. Implementing technology, such as a case management solution, can help establish accountability and defensibility. It allows for establishing clear procedures monitoring performance and provides documentation that can be used to assess the effectiveness of compliance programs.

There is an overriding need for organizations to build accountability and defensibility into their compliance processes. By having a documented triage process and utilizing technology, organizations can ensure that complaints and allegations are handled promptly and consistently. This fosters a culture of speaking up and provides employees with the confidence that their concerns will be taken seriously and addressed promptly.

However, it is important to recognize the tradeoffs in balancing different factors when implementing a triage process and technology in organizational compliance. While efficiency and speed are crucial, organizations must also consider the need for thorough investigations and the protection of employee rights. Striking the right balance requires careful consideration and ongoing evaluation of processes to ensure continuous improvement.

In conclusion, the triage process and technology are vital in promoting a speak-up culture and ensuring organizational compliance. By proactively assessing and triaging complaints and allegations, organizations can increase response time and set realistic expectations for stakeholders. Implementing technology, such as a case management solution, helps establish accountability and defensibility. However, it is important to consider the impact on employee rights and the need for thorough investigations when making decisions about the importance of the triage process and technology in organizational compliance.

Join us tomorrow when we discuss closing the loop by improving your compliance program through a culture of speaking up.

Listen to Jakub Ficner on Innovation in Compliance here.

Categories
Innovation in Compliance

Breaking the Silence: How Speaking Up Enhances Corporate Cultures – Jakub Ficner on How Triage and Investigations Can Drive a Culture of Speak Up

Welcome to a special five-part podcast series on enhancing corporate culture through a great speak-up regime. This podcast series is sponsored by Case IQ. Over this series, Tom Fox will visit with Sharlyn Lauby, Jakub Ficner, Kenneth McCarthy, and Meric Bloch on the different facets of a great speak-up regime and how each of those facets will improve your corporate culture. They will tackle such topics as the indicia of a great corporate culture, the importance of triage and internal investigations in improving corporate culture, non-retaliation and protections for those who speak up, tying your entire system of speaking up to improving culture, and conclude with some thoughts on how an entire system of speaking up drives corporate culture to be better run and, at the end of the day, more profitably. In Part 3, Tom Fox visits with Jakub Ficner on the importance of your triage protocol and investigative process to foster a culture of speaking up.

Jakub Ficner has over 15 years of experience in the internal investigative space and is currently the Director of Partnership Development at Case IQ. He strongly advocates for the importance of the triage process and technology in organizational compliance. Jakub emphasizes the need for a rigorous reporting, triage, and investigation process, even before receiving a complaint or allegation. He believes that effective means of documenting and tracking investigative processes are crucial for establishing accountability and defensibility in compliance processes. Drawing from his extensive experience, Jakub highlights the significance of having a documented process, especially for multinational companies with compliance officers in various regions. He recommends using technology, such as a case management solution, to ensure accountability, defensibility, and easy information retrieval. Join Tom Fox and Jakub Ficner on this episode as they delve deeper into these topics of triage and investigations.

 Key Highlights:

  • The importance of effective triage
  • Improving Response Time and Setting Expectations
  • Effective Compliance Documentation and Tracking
  • Using Technology to Establish Accountability and Defensibility

Resources:

Jakub Ficner on LinkedIn

Case IQ

Categories
Data Driven Compliance

Data Driven Compliance: Jakub Ficner on Unlocking Data with Investigative Monitoring

Are you struggling to keep up with the ever-changing compliance programs in your business? Look no further than the award-winning Data Driven Compliance podcast, hosted by Tom Fox, featuring an in-depth conversation around the uses of data and data analytics in compliance programs. Data Driven Compliance is back with another exciting episode. The intersection of law, compliance, and data is becoming increasingly important in cross-border transactions, mergers, and acquisitions.

In this episode, Tom welcomes Jakub Ficner, Director of Partnership Development at Case IQ. We discuss how to unlock data through investigations and monitoring. With the Department of Justice’s 2023 Evaluation of Corporate Compliance Programs emphasizing the importance of assessing and monitoring risks, Investigative Monitoring is an invaluable protocol for companies to demonstrate their commitment to compliance. This protocol involves collecting data from an investigation to identify anomalies and assess risks, allowing companies to create a culture of compliance and meet the Department of Justice’s requirements.

This structured process allows data analysis and root cause analysis to understand a topic better. Continuous improvement is essential for any compliance program, and Investigative Monitoring provides a way to collect data and ensure fair and consistent outcomes, as well as focus on time and resources. Conversations between two parties are important for gaining insight into a topic, making Investigative Monitoring an essential tool for any company.

Key Highlights:

  • Investigative Monitoring
  • Investigating Anomalies
  • Continuous Improvement
  • The Process

 Resources:

Jakub Ficner on LinkedIn 

Case IQ

 Tom Fox 

Connect with me on the following sites:

Instagram

Facebook

YouTube

Twitter

Categories
Innovation in Compliance

Corporate Case Management in the Era of the DoJ’s Monaco Memo: Episode 4 – The Fair Process Doctrine

Welcome to a special podcast series, Corporate Case Management in the Era of the DoJ’s Monaco Memo, sponsored by i-Sight Software Solutions. Over this five-part podcast series, I visit with Jakub Ficner, Director of Partnership Development at i-SIght. This series considers how the Monaco Doctrine and Monaco Memo have impacted compliance in several key areas. In this Part 4, we look to consider the Fair Process Doctrine and how the Monaco Memo emphasized the requirements as laid out under the DOJ’s Evaluation of Corporate Compliance Programs and its Update.

 

Highlights include:

  • What are DOJ expectations?
  • The stakeholders needed to be involved with determining, recommending, and implementing that outcome based on your investigation.   
  • Why consistently applying the same disciplinary actions based on the nature of substantiated elements is critical.
  • What is the Fair Process Doctrine?
  • Following the Fair Process Doctrine is critical for the credibility of your investigative protocol.

For more information, check out i-Sight here.

Categories
Innovation in Compliance

Corporate Case Management in the Era of the DoJ’s Monaco Memo: Episode 3 -Ethical Investigations

Welcome to a special podcast series, Corporate Case Management in the Era of the DoJ’s Monaco Memo, sponsored by i-Sight Software Solutions. Over this five-part podcast series, I speak with Jakub Ficner, Director of Partnership Development at i-Sight Software. This series considers how the Monaco Doctrine and Monaco Memo have impacted compliance in several key areas. In this Part 3, we look at ethical investigations and how to allow your organization to meet the strictures of the Monaco Memo. Highlights include:

  • How did the Monaco Memo impact investigations?
  • The importance of keeping the reporter informed.
  • Why consistency and transparency are key aspects of the investigative process.
  • Creating an audit trail is in your investigation protocol.

For more information, check out i-Sight here.

Categories
Innovation in Compliance

Corporate Case Management in the Era of the DoJ’s Monaco Memo: Episode 2-Strategic Triage

Welcome to a special podcast series, Corporate Case Management in the Era of the DoJ’s Monaco Memo, sponsored by i-Sight Software Solutions. In this series, I am joined by Jakub Ficner, Director of Partnership Development at i-Sight. Over this series, we detail the changes wrought by the Monaco Memo and how compliance professionals can respond to these new challenges. In this Part 2, we look at the need for active triage in your investigative protocol to allow your organization to meet the strictures of the Monaco Memo. Some of the highlights include:

  • What is triage in a best practices compliance program?
  • Why triage is as important as the original report coming in.
  • How to document triage for regulators.
  • What to do when new issues are discovered
  • Why is the ability to ultimately learn from your collected data a key outcome?

For more information, check out i-Sight here.