Tag: mergers and acquisitions

Categories
Blog

Deere FCPA Enforcement Action: Lessons on Post-Acquisition Integration and Investigation in M&A

We recently had a Foreign Corrupt Practices Act (FCPA) enforcement action that reminded me that everything old is new again in anti-corruption compliance. The Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) FCPA enforcement action involving Deere has bribery schemes that were torn literally from the first decade of the 21st century as they involved gifts, travel, and entertainment. In other words, it was about a low set of hanging fruit that any compliance officer would see. Today, I want to conclude my multipart look at the case and see what lessons the enforcement action can provide to the 2024 compliance professional.

Deere offers valuable insights for compliance professionals tasked with ensuring that corruption risks are identified, mitigated, and resolved during the post-acquisition phase of M&A. This post will explore the key lessons from the Deere FCPA enforcement action, focusing on post-acquisition integration and investigation. As organizations expand through acquisitions, especially in foreign markets, the compliance team is critical in safeguarding the company from inheriting liabilities that could have been avoided with effective post-acquisition measures.

Deere, a multinational corporation known for its agricultural machinery, faced FCPA enforcement following its acquisition of a foreign company, the Wirtgen Group, which operates in regions with high corruption risks, specifically in Thailand. The Wirtgen Group-Thailand had engaged in corrupt practices, including the bribery of foreign officials to win contracts. After the acquisition, these activities continued for a period, undetected by Deere’s compliance team, which had not yet fully integrated the acquired company into its compliance program.

This case is a cautionary tale for compliance professionals on the importance of swift and effective post-acquisition integration and investigation processes. The lesson here is clear: post-acquisition efforts cannot be an afterthought. They must be a central part of the compliance strategy from day one.

Establish a Post-Acquisition Integration Plan from the Start

One key takeaway from the Deere FCPA enforcement action is the need for a well-defined post-acquisition integration plan with a robust compliance component. All too often, post-acquisition focuses on operational integration, with compliance being pushed down the priority list. However, Deere’s case demonstrates that failing to integrate compliance programs immediately can result in ongoing illegal activities that expose the acquiring company to FCPA violations.

Compliance professionals must ensure that the integration plan includes the following.

Immediate roll-out of the parent company’s compliance policies and procedures to the acquired entity.

  • Compliance training for all acquired company employees, focusing on FCPA and anti-corruption standards.
  • Review and revise the acquired entity’s third-party relationships to ensure compliance with the company’s standards and the FCPA.
  • Enhanced monitoring of high-risk activities, particularly interactions with foreign officials or government contracts.

Had Deere implemented these steps immediately post-acquisition, it could have identified and halted the corrupt practices sooner, avoiding the costly consequences of prolonged illegal activities.

Prioritize Post-Acquisition Investigations

Post-acquisition investigations are crucial in identifying undisclosed or ongoing corrupt activities within the acquired entity. The Deere case highlights how important it is for compliance professionals to conduct thorough investigations after the acquisition to ensure that any risks missed during the pre-acquisition phase are uncovered.

Key components of a post-acquisition investigation include:**

  • Forensic reviews of financial transactions, particularly payments to third parties, to detect any suspicious or abnormal patterns that could indicate bribery or corruption.
  • Employee interviews at various levels of the acquired entity to gather information about day-to-day operations, compliance culture, and potential risks.
  • Contracts and business deals are reviewed to ensure no irregularities or unethical practices, particularly in jurisdictions with high corruption risks.
  • 3rd-party audits of key suppliers, agents, and intermediaries who may have been involved in transactions with government entities or foreign officials.

In Deere’s case, a thorough post-acquisition investigation could have identified the ongoing corrupt practices early, allowing the company to take corrective action before it became the subject of an FCPA enforcement action.

Leverage Internal and External Resources for Compliance Integration

Deere’s failure to quickly integrate its compliance program into the acquired entity highlights the need for compliance professionals to leverage internal and external resources to accelerate the integration process. Post-acquisition compliance integration is often resource-intensive, especially when acquiring companies with operations in high-risk regions.

Key steps include the following.

  • Internal audit teams will be utilized to conduct a deep-dive assessment of the acquired entity’s financial and operational controls, focusing on FCPA compliance.
  • Engaging external forensic auditors and FCPA specialists to assist with investigations in high-risk jurisdictions where corruption is more likely to occur.
  • Establishing cross-functional teams that include representatives from compliance, legal, finance, and operations to ensure that compliance integration is holistic and touches every aspect of the acquired business.

Deere could have benefited from engaging external experts to help accelerate the compliance integration process and identify areas of concern within the newly acquired entity. By failing to do so, the company allowed corrupt practices to continue, resulting in significant FCPA penalties.

Monitor and Reassess Compliance Risks Regularly

Post-acquisition compliance efforts don’t end with the initial integration. Continuous monitoring and reassessment of compliance risks are essential to ensure that the acquired entity remains aligned with the parent company’s standards and the requirements of the FCPA. This is particularly important in industries and regions where corruption is more prevalent.

Continuous monitoring should include the following.

  • Regular audits of financial transactions and third-party payments.
  • Ongoing risk assessments that factor in changes in business operations, market conditions, and regulatory environments.
  • Compliance reporting mechanisms, such as whistleblower hotlines, allow employees of the acquired entity to report any concerns anonymously.
  • Periodic reviews of the acquired entity’s compliance culture are needed to ensure that employees adhere to the company’s anti-corruption policies.

In Deere’s case, ongoing monitoring could have helped identify and mitigate corruption risks earlier in the post-acquisition phase. The absence of regular monitoring and reassessments allowed corrupt practices to continue unchecked for an extended period.

Act Swiftly on Red Flags if They Appear

The most critical lesson from the Deere case is quickly identifying red flags. In this case, the acquired entity had numerous warning signs, including operations in high-risk regions, dealings with government officials, and lacking robust internal controls. However, these red flags should have been addressed promptly, allowing illegal activities to persist.

When red flags are identified, take some of the following steps.

  • Launch a formal investigation immediately to determine the scope of the issue.
  • Take corrective action, including terminating contracts with third parties involved in corrupt practices or dismissing employees who engage in illegal activities.
  • Notify regulatory authorities if there is a risk of FCPA violations and work proactively to resolve the issue before enforcement actions are taken.

Had Deere acted swiftly on the red flags within the acquired entity, the company might have been able to avoid the FCPA enforcement action and the associated penalties.

The Deere FCPA enforcement action provides a sobering reminder that compliance efforts cannot end with signing an acquisition deal. For compliance professionals, the real work begins in the post-acquisition phase. By prioritizing compliance integration, conducting thorough post-acquisition investigations, leveraging internal and external resources, continuously monitoring compliance risks, and swiftly acting on red flags, companies can avoid the pitfalls that Deere faced.

In today’s global business environment, with companies expanding through M&A in high-risk jurisdictions, compliance professionals must take a proactive and vigilant approach to post-acquisition compliance. The lessons from Deere remind us that the cost of failure is high, but with the right strategies in place, the risks can be managed effectively.

As a compliance professional, your role is to ensure post-acquisition compliance becomes integral to your company’s M&A strategy, protecting your organization from FCPA risks and safeguarding its reputation in the global marketplace.

Categories
Blog

Compliance Lessons on Mergers and Acquisitions from Star Trek: The Ultimate Computer

Last month, I wrote a blog post on the tone at the top, exemplified in Star Trek’s Original Series episode, Devil in the Dark. Based on the response, some passionate Star Trek fans are out there. I decided to write a series of blog posts exploring Star Trek: The Original Series episodes as guides to the Hallmarks of an Effective Compliance program set out in the FCPA Resources Guide, 2nd edition. Today, I will continue my two-week series by looking at the following Hallmarks of an Effective Compliance Program laid out by the Department of Justice (DOJ) and Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) in the FCPA Resources Guide, 2nd edition. Today, we look at lessons learned about mergers and acquisitions. Mergers and acquisitions (M&A) are complex and often high-stakes endeavors that require meticulous planning, due diligence, and a robust compliance framework. The importance of these factors is vividly illustrated in the episode The Ultimate Computer. This episode, while set in a futuristic and fictional context, offers valuable lessons for compliance professionals navigating the intricate processes of M&A. This blog post will explore the parallels between the episode’s narrative and the real-world compliance challenges in M&A.

In “The Ultimate Computer,” the USS Enterprise is selected to test the M-5 Multitronic Unit, an advanced computer system designed to autonomously control the ship’s functions. Dr. Richard Daystrom’s system aims to revolutionize space exploration by removing the need for human crews. However, as the test progresses, the M-5 begins to act unpredictably, viewing real-life training exercises as actual combat and attacking other Federation ships. The episode culminates in a dangerous scenario where Captain Kirk and his crew must wrest control back from the M-5, highlighting the perils of over-reliance on untested technology and the critical need for human judgment.

Lesson 1. The Importance of Thorough Pre-Acquisition Due Diligence

One of the most glaring issues in “The Ultimate Computer” is the failure to conduct thorough pre-acquisition due diligence on the M-5 before deploying it in a high-stakes scenario. Dr. Daystrom’s confidence in his creation led to an oversight in properly assessing the risks associated with the M-5, resulting in catastrophic outcomes.

In the context of M&A, due diligence is paramount. Compliance professionals must ensure that the acquiring company thoroughly investigates the target company’s compliance landscape, including its legal obligations, regulatory history, and potential liabilities. This process involves more than just a surface-level review; it requires a deep dive into the target company’s operations, culture, and historical compliance with relevant regulations. As a compliance professional, you should develop a comprehensive due diligence checklist that includes specific compliance-related areas such as anti-bribery, anti-money laundering, data protection, and industry-specific regulations. Engaging external experts to assist in areas where the target operates in complex or unfamiliar regulatory environments can also be beneficial.

Lesson 2. Risk Management and Contingency Planning

M-5’s unexpected behavior underscores the importance of risk management and contingency planning. The Enterprise crew was unprepared for the system’s malfunction, leading to a scenario where they had to improvise under extreme pressure. In M&A transactions, the risks associated with integrating a new entity are significant. Compliance professionals must proactively identify potential risks, such as cultural clashes, regulatory breaches, or undisclosed liabilities, and develop strategies to mitigate these risks. This includes creating contingency plans to address any issues during the integration process.

Your compliance function should implement a robust risk management framework as part of the M&A strategy for post-acquisition. This framework should include regular risk assessments, scenario planning, and establishing a crisis management team to address unexpected challenges. Having a clear plan ensures that your organization can respond quickly and effectively to any issues that emerge during or after the transaction.

Lesson 3. The Role of Human Oversight

The Ultimate Computer is a cautionary tale about the dangers of overreliance on technology without adequate human oversight. While the M-5 was designed to improve efficiency, it ultimately became a liability because no mechanism was in place to monitor and override its actions when it began to malfunction. This lesson could not be more timely in the age of ChatGPT and AI in compliance.

While technology and automation can greatly assist in managing the transaction’s complexities, human oversight remains indispensable. Compliance professionals must ensure adequate controls and monitoring systems to oversee integration and detect issues early. Your M&A policy should establish clear oversight mechanisms, including regular audits, compliance monitoring, and continuous engagement with key stakeholders. This oversight should extend to all aspects of the integration process, ensuring that both the acquiring and target companies adhere to the agreed-upon compliance standards and practices.

Lesson 4. Adapting to Unforeseen Challenges

The crew’s ability to adapt to the M-5’s unexpected behavior was crucial to averting disaster. Captain Kirk and his team demonstrated flexibility and quick thinking, ultimately allowing them to regain control of the Enterprise. M&A transactions often involve unforeseen challenges that require adaptability and quick decision-making. Compliance professionals must be prepared to adjust their strategies in response to new information or changing circumstances. This could involve revising integration plans, addressing unexpected regulatory issues, or recalibrating risk management approaches.

Compliance professionals need to discuss adapting to unforeseen challenges more. You must work to build flexibility into your M&A compliance strategy by creating a dynamic integration plan that can be adjusted as needed. Encourage open communication across all levels of the organization to ensure that any issues are identified and addressed promptly. Maintaining an agile mindset also allows your team to respond effectively to challenges, minimizing disruption and ensuring a smoother integration process.

Lesson 5. The Ethical Implications of Integration

Dr. Daystrom’s fixation on the success of the M-5 led him to overlook the ethical implications of its actions, such as the loss of life. This highlights the importance of considering the ethical dimensions of decisions, particularly in high-stakes situations. Ethical considerations are central to the success of any M&A transaction. Compliance professionals must ensure that the integration process upholds the highest ethical standards, particularly regarding employee treatment, customer relations, and regulatory compliance. This involves assessing the ethical culture of the target company and ensuring that it aligns with your organization’s values.

In addition to compliance considerations, you should integrate ethical considerations into every stage of the M&A process. This includes conducting an ethical audit of the target company during due diligence, communicating ethical expectations clearly to all employees, and establishing a code of conduct that reflects the combined entity’s commitment to ethical behavior. Ensuring ethics are at the forefront of the integration process helps build trust and fosters a positive organizational culture.

The Ultimate Computer offers a powerful narrative on the importance of diligence, risk management, human oversight, adaptability, and ethical considerations in high-stakes scenarios. These lessons directly apply to the world of mergers and acquisitions, where the stakes are equally high, and the potential for unforeseen challenges is significant.

For compliance professionals, the key takeaway is the need for a comprehensive and proactive approach to managing M&A transactions. By prioritizing thorough pre-acquisition due diligence, implementing robust risk management strategies, maintaining human oversight, staying adaptable, and upholding ethical standards, compliance teams can navigate the complexities of M&A with confidence and success.

In the fast-paced and ever-changing landscape of mergers and acquisitions, the lessons from The Ultimate Computer remind us that while technology and innovation are valuable tools, they must be complemented by sound judgment, ethical considerations, and a commitment to continuous improvement. Integrating these principles into your M&A strategy can help ensure your organization survives and thrives after a merger or acquisition.

Join us tomorrow as we conclude our blog post series on the Hallmarks of an Effective Compliance Program by considering the requirement for a Root Cause analysis from the Star Trek episode The Corbomite Maneuver.

Categories
Blog

Transforming Culture: Part 1 – From Merger to Culture Toxicity

Boeing is not the first company to find itself amid a massive scandal. You can think of Siemens’ bribery and corruption scandal, the VW emissions-testing scandal, the Wells Fargo fraudulent accounts scandal, or any other myriad of corporate scandals where culture failed and created a toxic culture. The question for any organization in such a situation is how to transform its culture. Currently running on the Culture Crafters podcast on the Compliance Podcast Network is a 5–part of podcast series with myself and Sam Silverstein, the most trusted voice in America on accountability.

Over this companion, 5-part blog post series, we look at how a company in the depths of such a toxic culture can begin to make a culture comeback by planning and taking concrete steps to turn around and rebuild its culture. In this concluding Part 5, we explore the dynamism of culture, assessing culture through The Culture Audit™ (the sponsor of this blog post series), putting together a plan to remediate your culture and implementing that plan, and conclude with why ongoing monitoring and continuous improvement are so critical for a true culture transformation. In Part 1, we consider the steps that led Boeing to the current state of its corporate culture.

Boeing’s cultural miasma led to the 737 MAX crisis, which has tarnished the company’s reputation and raised doubts about its future in the commercial airline industry. Yet the company’s slide into cultural toxicity began long before the 737 MAX disasters. From these pre-pandemic disasters, the company now finds itself in one of the worst places in recent memory for a company’s reputation.

The slide began with the merger with McDonnell Douglas back in 1996. This led to a shift in leadership, which transformed the company’s culture by prioritizing stock performance over quality. This emphasizes the importance of cultural due diligence in mergers and acquisitions, with the need to evaluate existing cultures, plan post-merger integration, and uphold a robust culture within the acquiring firm. The significance of workplace culture was highlighted as a pivotal factor influencing stakeholders, from employees to customers, impacting talent retention, productivity, and overall profitability.

The culture that permeates an organization’s operations plays a pivotal role in determining its outcomes. A toxic culture characterized by shortsightedness, a profit-over-quality mentality, and a lack of ethical standards can have catastrophic consequences for the organization as a whole. Such cultures often prioritize immediate gains at the expense of long-term sustainability, leading to compromised quality, ethical dilemmas, and damaged stakeholder relationships.

The merger with McDonnell Douglas in 1997 marked a turning point for Boeing. A shift towards a culture focused on stock performance and short-term gains took precedence over a culture of engineering excellence. This shift strayed from Boeing’s legacy of quality and engineering excellence, resulting in significant setbacks like the 737 MAX crisis. The Boeing situation underscores the importance of upholding a culture that values integrity, quality, and long-term success to avoid such catastrophic outcomes.

 Mergers and acquisitions are complex processes that extend beyond financial considerations to encompass cultural integration. The compatibility of organizational cultures is a critical factor that can significantly impact the success or failure of such strategic decisions. To mitigate risks and facilitate a smooth transition, assessing cultural alignment, creating a clear roadmap for integration, and ensuring a strong, cohesive culture in the new entity are essential steps that leaders must prioritize during mergers and acquisitions.

In the context of mergers and acquisitions, culture synergy is critical, and indeed, the Boeing-McDonnell Douglas merger is a cautionary tale. The takeover of Boeing by McDonnell Douglas’s leadership brought about a cultural shift that veered away from Boeing’s core values, leading to subsequent challenges. Organizations embarking on such endeavors must pay close attention to cultural compatibility and actively work towards fostering a unified culture built on shared values and objectives. All of this underscores the critical role of culture in shaping the success of strategic business decisions like mergers and acquisitions.

The bottom line is that the best cultures are always the ones where senior leadership at the top always asks, how can we improve this culture?” This emphasizes the need for organizations to continually prioritize ongoing efforts to enhance their workplace culture. Action follows belief. This underscores the notion that an organization’s outcomes are rooted in its beliefs and values. Companies like Boeing can drive positive actions and results by fostering a culture that prioritizes quality and safety.

When you create a fantastic workplace culture, it goes home with your people. It impacts their spouses. It affects other businesses in the community. This serves as a poignant reminder of the far-reaching influence of workplace culture on individuals and broader societal interactions.

With this unique narrative, Boeing demonstrates the profound impact of leadership on culture and the overall organizational environment. Yet this sets the stage for exploring strategies to transform toxic cultures into thriving, ethical ones for CEOs and organizational leaders seeking actionable insights. I hope you will join us for the rest of the blog posts this week, in which we show how a company can transform its culture.