Categories
Putin's Oil Heist

Putin’s Oil Heist Episode 6: Connecting the Dots


“I believe that Yukos was Putin’s first foray into trying to test the West… and the West fell flat on their faces – they did absolutely nothing to help the Western shareholders in Yukos.” The lack of response from the West during the Yukos Affair encouraged Putin’s tyranny. Putin’s Oil Heist is an insider’s account of the Yukos Affair. In this final episode, Loren Steffy draws a line from the 2022 invasion of Ukraine back to the expropriation of Yukos in the early 2000s, with first-person accounts from former Chief Financial Treasurer, Bruce Misamore.

Hear him talk about:

  • The West’s inaction. Yukos, in its bid to embrace Western standards of capitalism in the hopes of gaining a New York Stock Exchange listing, hired Misamore and other American shareholders. But when Putin’s government trumped up tax charges and used them to seize the entire company without compensating those shareholders, the US government did nothing. Misamore claims they could have made government-to-government claims on behalf of the shareholders that were harmed. The West’s failure to act became a pattern in the following years, which only emboldened Putin.
  • Putin’s grand plans. Had the invasion of Ukraine gone the way he wanted, it’s likely that Putin wouldn’t have stopped there, Misamore contends. Putin regrets the fall of the Soviet Union, and there have been hints throughout his presidency that suggest his intention to revive it. His next logical target, after Ukraine, would have been Moldova, and then the rest of Georgia. The resistance of the Ukranians seems to have halted Putin’s thirst for conquest.
  • The Russian people. The innocent citizens of Russia are not responsible for the actions of their government. Though Putin has improved their standard of living to keep up his popularity, they could easily be talked into going the other way. However, they’re scared and docile, behavior instilled by centuries of violent history, and they fear the dire consequences of rebellion. In addition, the government’s crackdown on independent media, prevents the people from getting an accurate view of the war in Ukraine.
  • How the Yukos Affair influenced other companies’ attempts to do business in Russia. One such situation involved a joint venture between BP and the Russian company TNK, which eventually devolved into the same tensions that pervaded the Yukos steal. The Russians bristled at Western efforts to control the operations, which led to reports of break-ins at BP executive Bob Dudley’s Moscow apartment, threats of him being detained, and even word that there was poison found in his blood. Dudley, who later became chairman of BP before retiring in 2020, wound up fleeing Russia and the venture was sold to Rosneft.

Resources
Loren Steffy on LinkedIn
Stoney Creek Publishing
 

Categories
Compliance Kitchen

Swiss Sanctions on Russia


Switzerland Imposes Sanctions on Russia.

Categories
Sunday Book Review

March 6, 2022 the Russia/Ukraine edition


In today’s edition of Sunday Book Review:

  • Bloodlands by Timothy Snyder
  • Red Famine by Anne Applebaum
  • Ukraine’s Nuclear Disarmament by Yuri Kostenkov
  • The Frontlines: Essays on Ukraine’s Past and Present by Serhii Plokhy
Categories
EMBARGOED!

EMBARGOED! Episode 45: Russia Invades Ukraine and Triggers the Biggest Week in Economic Sanctions History

After a tumultuous and historic week, Brian and Tim gather themselves to discuss the U.S. (and global) response to Russia’s invasion of Ukraine. They start by diving in to the broad, coordinated economic sanctions aimed at debilitating Russia’s financial sector and Putin’s inner circle, debate how well the new measures will work, and contemplate what could be coming next. They next turn to the significant expansion of export controls implicating Russia and discuss the likely impact. Finally, in the Lightning Round, Brian and Tim bid farewell to DOJ’s China Initiative and read between the lines to decipher DOJ’s ongoing priorities.

Subscribe * Apple Podcasts Spotify *  Amazon Music  * Google Podcasts * Stitcher
Questions? Contact us at podcasts@milchev.com.
EMBARGOED! is not intended and cannot be relied on as legal advice; the content only reflects the thoughts and opinions of its hosts.
***Stay sanctions free.***

Categories
Compliance Into the Weeds

Compliance Issues from the Russia Invasion of Ukraine


Compliance into the Weeds is the only weekly podcast which takes a deep dive into a compliance related topic, literally going into the weeds to more fully explore a subject. This week, Matt and Tom take a somewhat somber view on the Russia invasion of Ukraine. Some of the issues we consider:

  • Discussion of sanctions.
  • What do sanctions mean for US, UK and EU countries?
  • How companies should think about doing business in Russia going forward.
  • What about energy production and consumption?
  • US company employees in Ukraine and Russia.
  • The role of China in a potential resolution.

Resources
Tom in the FCPA Compliance and Ethics Blog
Matt in Radical Compliance

Categories
Daily Compliance News

February 28, 2022 the BP Pulls Out Edition


In today’s edition of Daily Compliance News:

  • Heightened cyber attack risk. (WSJ)
  • Stericycle says it will pay $81MM to settle FCPA claims.  (WSJ)
  • BP pulling out of JV with Rosneft. (WaPo)
  • Lukoil buys into Mexico energy market. (Reuters)
Categories
Blog

War in Ukraine: Part 1 – KYC, Who Is in Your Supply Chain and Third Parties

Almost all of the world has condemned the Russian invasion of the Ukraine and I will add my small voice to that condemnation. In trying to choose what to write, I did not want to emphasize the better the geopolitical commentary, so I decided to focus on how this invasion and its attendant fallout might impact compliance professionals and programs. At this point Russia has limited its attacks to Ukraine but my fear as more EU, other Western allies and the US respond with arms and technical support to the Ukraine government and army, we might see Russia unleash its cyber warfare specialists on those who are supporting Ukraine with material and other support. This week I am going to write about some of the issues a Chief Compliance Officer (CCO) needs to think about now. Today, I consider Russia.
The list of sanctions is growing as the situation on the ground becomes more intense and dynamic, so you need to be in constant contact with your operations, sales and supply chain functions. At this point, you should probably add Belarus to that list as they appear to be the only other country actively supporting Russia at this point. Given the US, EU and UK sanctions that have been levied and likely will be sanctioned over the next few days and weeks, at this point your organization probably needs to prepare for a full ban on sales from your organization into Russia. Russia (and Belarus) appears to be headed to the same list as North Korea and Iran and your business needs to ready.
Know Your Customer
One of the first thing every CCO needs to do right now is determine what goods, products or services flow from, through or to Russia. This means knowing who your customers are and where they are located. If you have not stopped selling to any Russian companies now you probably need to stop tomorrow. But this inquiry does not stop or even start at the Russian border. It means any products which might go into Russia through any of your sales channels. Do you have distributors? What countries are they in? Same inquiry for resellers. Any entity that can get your company’s products into Russia needs to be determined now. Make preparations now to cease all business.
Time for your legal department to start looking at every force majeure clause in every contract. Because of where I live, I have looked at force majeure clauses almost every hurricane season and I cannot remember one that did not include a war clause. I rewrote many such clauses to make such pandemic and other health emergencies covered. But your corporate legal department needs to be ready to invoke them under the war clause.
Who is in Your Supply Chain?
The same level of inquiry you put into KYC right now should go into your Supply Chain. Obviously if you have suppliers in Russia, you need to be prepared to jettison that relationship. However even if you do not formally or legally terminate those relationships, your organization needs to be ready for serious disruptions for any components you may be depending on for your company’s products. But once again it is not simply your direct suppliers. If you have never done a deep dive into at least five levels of your supply chain, NOW is the time do so. If there are base materials or component parts coming to your organization from that part of the world anywhere in your supply chain, you had best appreciate that risk sooner rather than later. The Financial Times (FT) has reported that Russia “is also an important source of metals used in manufacturing such as nickel, titanium, palladium and aluminium. Titanium is needed by aircraft and aero-engine manufacturers such as Boeing, Airbus and Rolls-Royce, while palladium is used in catalytic converters, electrodes and electronics.” Indeed, 14% of the world’s aluminium comes from Russia.
Even if you can still have the parts manufactured, you still must bring them to your manufacturing facilities, either in the US or Europe. Thomas L. Friedman, writing in the New York Times (NYT), said, “if Poland just halts truck and rail traffic from Russia to Germany, “as it should,” it would create immediate havoc for Russia’s economy, because the alternative routes are complicated and need to go through a now very dangerous Ukraine. Anyone up for an anti-Putin trucker strike to prevent Russian goods going to and through Western Europe by way of Poland? Watch that space. Some super-empowered Polish citizens with a few roadblocks, pickups and smartphones could choke Russia’s whole economy in this wired world.” If the fighting continues much longer, we will begin to see major transportation disruptions spreading not only from Russia and Ukraine but also to eastern Europe.
Third Parties 
At this point, I hope that ever CCO knows who their third-party sales agents are and that they are monitored on a regular basis. I also hope this same level of knowledge extends down to other third parties such as distributors, joint venture (JV) partners or other types of business relationships in Russia. Indeed the Washington Post announced BP was pulling out of its JV with Rosneft. But more than simply those direct relationships, you can sell your organization’s products into Russia through resale. When was the last time, you looked at your End User report? If it has been more than a few months, I would suggest that you move such a review to the top of your list early this week.
Every multinational organization needs to be fully engaged on these matters and a host of others. Michael Peregrine, writing in Forbes.com last week, said that corporate boards can perform the dual role of both governance and providing support to senior management. Indeed, they may well be obligated to do so. For every CCO reading this I would suggest you call the head of your compliance committee, tell them what you are doing, see what information they want and ask what resources they might be able to provide to you now.
Tomorrow, I will review some issues when looking at Ukraine.

Categories
FCPA Compliance Report

Matt Silverman on Preparing for Potential Sanctions Against Russia


In this episode of the FCPA Compliance Report, I am joined by Matt Silverman, Director of Trade Compliance at VIAVI. In Part 1, we considered the potential U.S. sanctions if Russia invades Ukraine. In this Part 2, we discuss what you can do to prepare for such an eventuality. Highlights in include:

  • First, ascertain your exposure and consider how some or all of these actions would impact your business.
  • Check your sanctions screening policies and procedures and check your customers and business partners in real time against global sanctions lists.
  • Identify all of your contracts with Russian entities or individuals and review your contracts for compliance with law clauses, notice clauses, and termination provisions.
  • Know your customer.
  • Identify what, if any, items, or technology you are exporting to Russia and any transactions with Russian entities that have ongoing or continuing obligations.
  • Take a look at your supply chain to avoid business interruption.
  • Identify whether you have any outstanding debts from Russian entities or individuals, and, if so, promptly purse collection activities.
  • Identify any procurement or manufacturing activities for goods intended for Russia and consider whether you can safely postpone or delay those activities, especially if you are dealing with specially designed or non-fungible goods (without breaching any contracts or risking failure to meet deadlines).

Resources
Matt Silverman on LinkedIn

Categories
FCPA Compliance Report

Matt Silverman on Potential Sanctions Against Russia

In this episode of the FCPA Compliance Report, I am joined by Matt Silverman, Director of Trade Compliance at VIAVI. In this Part 1 of a special two-part podcast series, we look at issues related to potential sanctions against Russia, Russian individuals and Russian interests if Russia invades Ukraine. In Part 2, we will discuss what you can do to prepare for such an eventuality. Potential sanctions we review in this episode ininclude:

  1. Impose a comprehensive or near-complete embargo of Russia.
  2. Impose additional sectoral sanctions on certain Russian industries.
  3. Prohibit exports of certain items or technology to Russia.
  4. Designate Russian entities under the Foreign Direct Product Rule.
  5. Add specific Russian entities or individuals to OFAC’s Specially Designated Nationals and Blocked Persons List (“SDN”).
  6. Prohibit Russian entities from accessing the U.S. financial system/using U.S. dollars and/or sanctioning foreign banks that conduct transactions with sanctioned Russian entities.
  7. Prohibit U.S. persons or entities from investing in Russian companies, requiring divestment, and/or sanctioning foreign entities that buy Russian government bonds.
  8. Impose “secondary sanctions” on entities or individuals that conduct certain transactions with Russia.
  9. Freeze Russian assets located in the U.S.
  10. Ban U.S. financial assistance to Russian entities.
  11. Withhold U.S. aid to any organizations that assist Russia.
  12. Prohibit imports and/or impose high tariffs on specific Russian imports.
  13. U.S. State-Level Sanctions: States may enact laws that prohibit business with, or require divestment of shares in, firms that conduct certain transactions with Russia.

Resources

Matt Silverman on LinkedIn

Categories
EMBARGOED!

EMBARGOED! Episode 44: Afghanistan in the Spotlight (while Iran, Russia, and China Lurk Offstage)

Brian and Tim discuss the new E.O. aimed at resolving the question of what to do with Da Afghanistan Bank’s assets in the U.S. and debate whether it will work as intended. Next, they place bets on whether it’s too late for JCPOA 2.0 to happen and discuss how far the U.S. may be prepared to go to impose costs on China if it disregards the (possible) “crushing” sanctions that could be imposed upon Russia. Finally, Brian and Tim stick with China to briefly cover the recently unsealed trade secret theft charges against Hytera Communications and an atypical CFIUS review initiated by a U.S. company unhappy with its Chinese investors.

Subscribe * Apple Podcasts Spotify *  Amazon Music  * Google Podcasts * Stitcher
Questions? Contact us at podcasts@milchev.com.
EMBARGOED! is not intended and cannot be relied on as legal advice; the content only reflects the thoughts and opinions of its hosts.
***Stay sanctions free.***