Categories
Blog

The 2024 ECCP: Complying with the 2024 ECCP on Whistleblowers

The Department of Justice (DOJ), in its 2024 Update, has explicitly directed companies to ensure they have robust processes in place to identify, manage, and mitigate emerging risks related to new technologies, including AI. As compliance professionals, we are responsible for safeguarding the integrity of our organizations and fostering a culture where ethical behavior is the norm, not the exception. The 2024 Update to the Evaluation of Corporate Compliance Programs provides us with critical insights into how we can enhance the effectiveness of our compliance programs, particularly regarding reporting mechanisms and whistleblower protection. These elements are the bedrock of a robust compliance culture, and the update offers a clear roadmap for their implementation and improvement.

The DOJ posed two sets of queries for compliance professionals. They are found in Section I, entitled “Is the Corporation’s Compliance Program Well Designed?” A prosecutor could ask a company or compliance professional going through an investigation in the following series of questions.

Effectiveness of the Reporting Mechanism

  • Does the company have an anonymous reporting mechanism, and if not, why not?
  • How is the reporting mechanism publicized to the company’s employees and other third parties? Has it been used?
  • Does the company test whether employees know the hotline and feel comfortable using it?
  • Does the company encourage and incentivize reporting of potential misconduct or violations of company policy? Conversely, does it use practices that tend to chill such reporting?
  • How does the company assess employees’ willingness to report? How has the company assessed the seriousness of the allegations it received?
  • Has the compliance function had full access to reporting and investigative information?

Commitment to Whistleblower Protection and Anti-Retaliation

  • Does the company have an anti-retaliation policy?
  • Does the company train employees on internal and external anti-retaliation policies and whistleblower protection laws?
  • To the extent that the company disciplines employees involved in misconduct, are employees who reported internally treated differently than others involved in misconduct who did not?
  • Does the company train employees on internal reporting systems, external whistleblower programs, and regulatory regimes?

As compliance professionals, we are charged with safeguarding the integrity of our organizations and fostering a culture where ethical behavior is the norm, not the exception. The 2024 Update to the Evaluation of Corporate Compliance Programs provides us with critical insights into how we can enhance the effectiveness of our compliance programs, particularly regarding reporting mechanisms and whistleblower protection. These elements are the bedrock of a robust compliance culture, and the update offers a clear roadmap for their implementation and improvement.

The Importance of an Anonymous Reporting Mechanism

One key takeaway from the 2024 Update is the emphasis on having an anonymous reporting mechanism. This tool is essential for any compliance program as it provides employees and third parties with a safe and confidential way to report potential misconduct or violations of company policy.

The update explicitly asks whether your company has such a mechanism and, if not, why not. The absence of an anonymous reporting system should be a red flag for any compliance professional. In today’s regulatory environment, where transparency and accountability are paramount, the lack of such a mechanism can severely undermine the credibility of your compliance program.

If your organization does not have an anonymous reporting mechanism, now is the time to implement one. The benefits are clear: it encourages more reports, provides a sense of security to the reporter, and demonstrates the company’s commitment to addressing unethical behavior. However, merely having a mechanism is not enough.

The lesson here is that the existence of an anonymous reporting mechanism is not just a best practice—it’s a necessity. If your company lacks such a system, it’s time to reconsider seriously. The key takeaway is ensuring your company has an anonymous reporting mechanism. This tool is crucial for empowering employees and third parties to report misconduct without fear of exposure. The absence of this mechanism signals a significant gap in your compliance program, which could undermine trust and deter reporting.

How Is the Reporting Mechanism Publicized?

Another critical aspect highlighted in the update is how well the reporting mechanism is publicized within the company and to third parties. A reporting mechanism that isn’t well-known or accessible might as well not exist. The compliance team is responsible for ensuring employees know and understand how to use this tool. This can be achieved through regular training sessions, clear communication channels, and visible reminders throughout the workplace.

It is not simply about making employees aware but also making them comfortable with using the mechanism. This involves creating a workplace culture where reporting misconduct is seen as a positive action, not something that will lead to negative repercussions.

The key lesson for every compliance professional is that a reporting mechanism is only as effective as its visibility and accessibility. If employees and third parties aren’t aware of it, it will not be used. However, it would be best if you publicized your reporting mechanism widely. Regularly communicate its existence, purpose, and how to use it. Training sessions, internal communications, and visible reminders throughout the organization are essential to ensure everyone knows how to report concerns.

Testing Employee Awareness and Comfort

The 2024 Update introduces a crucial question: Has the company tested whether employees know the hotline and feel comfortable using it? This goes beyond just tracking the number of reports received. It requires proactive steps such as surveys, focus groups, or even role-playing scenarios to gauge the effectiveness of your reporting system.

Understanding employees’ perceptions and addressing any concerns they may have is vital. For instance, if employees hesitate to use the hotline due to fear of retaliation or believing nothing will change, these issues must be addressed head-on. Ensuring that the reporting mechanism is perceived as a trusted and effective tool is key to its success.

The bottom line is that awareness is one thing; comfort in using the reporting system is another. Employees must feel secure using the mechanism without fear of retaliation or inaction. As a compliance professional, you must regularly test and measure employee awareness and comfort. Use surveys, focus groups, and feedback sessions to gauge whether employees know about the reporting channels and feel safe using them. Address any concerns or misconceptions that may prevent employees from reporting misconduct.

Encouraging and Incentivizing Reporting

The update also challenges companies to reflect on whether they encourage and incentivize reporting of potential misconduct or violations. This is a nuanced area, as it involves balancing encouragement without creating a system that can be abused.

One effective approach is to incorporate positive reinforcement into the reporting process. This could be recognition programs for employees who demonstrate ethical behavior, including those who report concerns. Additionally, communicating the outcomes of investigations (while maintaining confidentiality) can reinforce the idea that reporting leads to tangible results and positive organizational changes.

Conversely, the update warns against practices that might chill reporting. These can include overly aggressive investigations, a lack of confidentiality, or a corporate culture that implicitly discourages speaking up. Compliance professionals must be vigilant in identifying and eliminating these barriers. Ensuring that employees feel safe and supported when they report misconduct is non-negotiable.

It is incumbent to note that practices that discourage or chill reporting are counterproductive and can erode trust in the compliance program. Compliance professionals must identify and eliminate practices that may deter reporting. This includes ensuring confidentiality, avoiding overly aggressive investigations, and addressing any cultural factors that may implicitly discourage speaking up. Building a culture where reporting is seen as a positive and valued action is crucial.

Assessing and Acting on Reports

Once a report is made, how the company handles it speaks volumes about its commitment to compliance. The update emphasizes the importance of assessing the seriousness of the allegations and ensuring that the compliance function has full access to reporting and investigative information.

This means every report deserves to be taken seriously, regardless of how minor it may seem. The compliance department must ensure that investigations are thorough, impartial, and conducted with the utmost confidentiality. This helps resolve the issue at hand and builds trust in the system, encouraging more employees to come forward in the future.

Other key components are both transparency and communication. While maintaining confidentiality, it is crucial to keep the reporter informed about the status of their report. This can significantly impact their perception of the process and the company’s commitment to addressing misconduct.

A compliance professional must realize that how reports are handled reflects the company’s commitment to compliance and ethics. Further, every corporate compliance program must ensure thorough and impartial investigations. Every report deserves serious attention, regardless of its perceived severity. The compliance team should have full access to reporting and investigative information, and the process should be transparent. Keeping the reporter informed while maintaining confidentiality builds trust and encourages future reporting.

Commitment to Whistleblower Protection and Anti-Retaliation

One of the update’s most critical aspects is its focus on whistleblower protection and anti-retaliation. A robust compliance program is complete with strong measures to protect those who come forward. The 2024 ECCP asks whether the company has an anti-retaliation policy in place. This is a fundamental requirement. Without such a policy, employees will be reluctant to report misconduct, fearing repercussions. However, having a policy is just the first step.

Training ensures employees know internal anti-retaliation policies and external whistleblower protection laws. This training should be regular, comprehensive, and tailored to different levels of the organization. Employees must understand that retaliation is against company policy and illegal under various regulatory regimes.

The 2024 ECCP also asks whether employees who report misconduct are treated differently than those who do not. This question is crucial as it touches on the fairness and integrity of your compliance program. It is essential that reporters are not penalized for their actions and that the company consistently demonstrates its commitment to protecting whistleblowers. Protecting whistleblowers is fundamental to maintaining an effective compliance program. Without strong anti-retaliation measures, your program’s credibility is at risk. Every corporate compliance function must implement and enforce a robust anti-retaliation policy.

Compliance must regularly train employees on internal policies and external whistleblower protection laws. This will ensure that whistleblowers are not treated unfairly and that there is a clear, consistent approach to handling reports. This protection not only encourages reporting but also supports a culture of integrity.

However, simply being aware of the reporting mechanism is not enough. Employees also need to be trained in the broader regulatory environment. Compliance functions must not conduct regular training on internal reporting systems and external whistleblower programs. Make sure that employees understand not only how to report but also the legal protections available to them. This comprehensive approach helps reinforce the importance of compliance and the company’s commitment to ethical behavior.

The 2024 Update to the Evaluation of Corporate Compliance Programs is a critical reminder that compliance is not just about having policies in place but about creating a culture of ethics and integrity. For in-house compliance professionals, the lessons are clear: prioritize anonymous reporting mechanisms, ensure robust whistleblower protections, and foster a culture where employees feel safe and encouraged to speak up. Doing so protects our organizations and builds a workplace where ethical behavior is the norm, not the exception.

The 2024 Update to the Evaluation of Corporate Compliance Programs underscores the importance of a well-structured, well-publicized, and well-enforced compliance program. For compliance professionals, the key takeaways are clear: ensure your reporting mechanisms are robust and accessible, foster a safe and supportive environment for reporting, and protect those who come forward. By focusing on these areas, you can build a culture of integrity that meets regulatory expectations and creates a workplace where ethical behavior is the standard.

Categories
Daily Compliance News

Daily Compliance News: September 30, 2024 – The My Law Firm Edition

Welcome to the Daily Compliance News. Each day, Tom Fox, the Voice of Compliance, brings you compliance-related stories to start your day. Sit back, enjoy a cup of morning coffee, and listen to the Daily Compliance News. All from the Compliance Podcast Network.

Each day, we consider four stories from the business world: compliance, ethics, risk management, leadership, or general interest for the compliance professional.

In today’s edition of Daily Compliance News:

  • Trump plans to make DOJ his personal law firm. (WSJ)
  • CA wants carbon accounting. (WSJ)
  • Tim Brown wants tougher cyber laws. (FT)
  • Elliot affiliate wins Citgo auction. (Reuters)

Categories
Sunday Book Review

Sunday Book Review: September 29, 2024 The books on Frankenstein Edition

In the Sunday Book Review, Tom Fox considers books that would interest the compliance professional, the business executive, or anyone who might be curious. It could be books about business, compliance, history, leadership, current events, or anything else that might interest me.

In today’s edition of the Sunday Book Review, we look at the four books on Frankenstein Edition.

  1. Book 1, The Prodigal Sons by Dean Koontz
  2. Frankenstein Underground by Mike Mignola
  3. Monstrous Progeny by Lester Friedman
  4. Frankenstein: A Cultural History by Susan Tyler Hitchcock

Resources:

Categories
Blog

Argentieri on the DOJ’s Corporate Whistleblower Awards Pilot Program

The Department of Justice (DOJ) recently unveiled the Corporate Whistleblower Awards Pilot Program (CWA) to bolster corporate enforcement efforts. Although the program has only been operational for a few weeks, it has already started receiving promising tips. This initiative reflects a strategic effort by the DOJ to harness financial incentives in the fight against white-collar crime, offering new opportunities for whistleblowers and reshaping the landscape of corporate compliance.

In her recent speech at the Society of Corporate Compliance and Ethics 23rd Annual Compliance & Ethics Institute. Principal Deputy Assistant Attorney General Nicole M. Argentieri spoke about the CWA and reviewed its early developments. (A copy of her remarks can be found here.) There was also updated information on the DOJ approach to whistleblowers and anti-retaliation found in the 2024 Update to the Evaluation of Corporate Compliance Programs (2024 ECCP). This new language found in the 2024 ECCP will be the subject of a separate blog post.

Why Whistleblower Programs Matter

Argentieri noted that whistleblower programs have a proven track record of success. Programs at other agencies, such as the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC), have led to thousands of tips and hundreds of millions of dollars in awards and have been instrumental in holding wrongdoers accountable. However, these existing programs do not cover the full spectrum of white-collar and corporate crime that the DOJ prosecutes. The CWA was designed to fill these critical gaps.

The CWA targets four priority areas not currently covered by other whistleblower programs: abuses of the financial system by financial institutions and insiders, foreign corruption and bribery schemes, domestic corruption, and health care schemes targeting private insurers. Importantly, the program is not limited to these categories. If a whistleblower has information about misconduct outside of these areas, the DOJ is still interested in hearing from them.

Encouraging Internal Reporting and Enhancing Corporate Compliance

Interestingly, Argentieri believes one of the CWA’s most innovative aspects is its focus on encouraging internal reporting. Whistleblowers who first report internally within their companies will be eligible for an award if they report to the DOJ within 120 days of their internal report. Furthermore, making an internal report before coming forward to the DOJ is a factor that will increase the potential whistleblower award.

This approach serves a dual purpose. It incentivizes employees to utilize internal reporting mechanisms, reinforcing the importance of strong internal compliance programs. At the same time, it creates a powerful incentive for companies to take internal reports seriously and to act swiftly in response to potential misconduct.

For companies, the stakes are high. The DOJ has clarified that the CWA will alter the calculus when considering whether to make a voluntary self-disclosure. Alongside the whistleblower program, the DOJ amended its Corporate Enforcement and Voluntary Self-Disclosure Policy (CEP). Under this amendment, if a company receives an internal whistleblower report and then reports the misconduct to the DOJ within 120 days—before the DOJ reaches out to the company—it will be eligible for the greatest benefit under the CEP: a presumption of a declination provided the company fully cooperates and remediates. This is a significant departure from the usual approach, as it allows a company to qualify for a declination even if the whistleblower comes to the DOJ first.

Protecting Whistleblowers: A Priority for the DOJ

The DOJ’s whistleblower program is about receiving tips and protecting those who come forward. The DOJ is fully committed to safeguarding whistleblowers’ identities to the fullest extent allowable under the law. Moreover, the DOJ will closely monitor any actions against whistleblowers who report misconduct internally. Compliance departments play a crucial role in this process by implementing robust anti-retaliation policies and training employees on these protections.

Under the 2024 ECCP, the DOJ will scrutinize a company’s commitment to whistleblower protection and the promotion of a “speak-up” culture. Companies retaliating against whistleblowers risk losing credit for cooperation and remediation and could face severe consequences, including sentencing enhancements and even prosecution for obstruction of justice.

Early Successes and Corporate Lessons

Argentieri said the CWA is already off to a strong start, with over 100 tips received in just a few weeks. If these whistleblowers also report internally, as the program incentivizes, companies must take their reports seriously and consider coming forward to the DOJ.

Turning to recent corporate resolutions, the DOJ’s approach to recognizing and rewarding cooperation and remediation is instructive. A prime example is the recent declination granted to Boston Consulting Group (BCG) under the CEP. BCG’s timely and voluntary self-disclosure of a potential FCPA violation and its complete and proactive cooperation led to the DOJ’s decision to decline prosecution. BCG’s remediation efforts were particularly noteworthy, including the termination of personnel involved in the misconduct and the imposition of compensation-based penalties, such as requiring certain partners to forfeit their equity and withholding bonuses.

On the other hand, SAP, mentioned earlier, earned a 40% reduction in its criminal penalty—near the maximum reduction available for companies that do not voluntarily self-disclose. SAP’s proactive cooperation began shortly after news reports surfaced, and its swift remediation, including disciplining responsible employees and enhancing its compliance program, was critical in earning this reduction.

In contrast, Trafigura received only a 10% reduction for cooperation and remediation. The company’s delayed preservation and production of evidence and a posture during resolution negotiations that caused significant delays limited its cooperation credit. Moreover, Trafigura’s remediation efforts were mixed, as it was slow to discipline certain employees, further diminishing its potential credit.

The Takeaways for Compliance Officers

The lessons from these cases and the CWA are clear for compliance professionals. First, fostering a strong internal reporting culture is crucial. Companies encouraging internal whistleblowing and acting swiftly on these reports are better positioned to benefit from DOJ policies like the CEP. Second, the importance of proactive and thorough cooperation must be considered. Companies that fully cooperate and remediate—going above and beyond in their efforts—stand to receive significant benefits in any DOJ investigation.

Finally, the CWA emphasizes the need for robust whistleblower protections. Compliance departments must implement, actively promote, and enforce policies that protect whistleblowers from retaliation. The DOJ is watching closely, and companies that fail to protect their whistleblowers will face serious consequences.

A New Era of Corporate Accountability

The launch of the Corporate Whistleblower Awards Pilot Program marks a new era in corporate accountability. By leveraging financial incentives and protecting those who come forward, the DOJ is creating a powerful tool for combating white-collar crime. For companies, the message is clear: invest in strong compliance programs, encourage internal reporting, and act decisively on misconduct. Doing so aligns with ethical business practices and positions the company to achieve the most favorable outcomes in any DOJ investigation. As the CWA continues to gain traction, compliance professionals will play a critical role in guiding their organizations through this evolving landscape, ensuring they remain on the right side of the law and public trust.

Categories
10 For 10

10 For 10: Top Compliance Stories For The Week Ending September 28, 2024

Welcome to 10 For 10, the podcast that brings you the week’s Top 10 compliance stories in one podcast each week. Tom Fox, the Voice of Compliance, brings to you, the compliance professional, the compliance stories you need to be aware of to end your busy week. Sit back, and in 10 minutes, hear about the stories every compliance professional should be aware of from the prior week.

Every Saturday, 10 For 10 highlights the most important news, insights, and analysis for the compliance professional, all curated by the Voice of Compliance, Tom Fox. Get your weekly filling of compliance stories with 10 for 10, a podcast produced by the Compliance Podcast Network.

  • DOJ releases a 2024 Update to the Evaluation of Corporate Compliance Programs. (FCPA Compliance & Ethics Blog)
  • China probes PVH. (Reuters)
  • Wells Fargo must face Caremark claim. (Reuters)
  • Wagner Group used HSBC and JPMorgan for payments. (FT)
  • Caroline Ellison sentenced to 2 years in prison and forfeits $11bn (NYT)
  • How Binance found that old time ‘compliance’ religion. (WSJ)
  • New York City Mayor Adams indicted on bribery and corruption charges. (NYT)
  • SEC fines 12 more firms for failures in messaging apps. (SEC Press Release)
  • S. Iswaran was convicted for corruption in Singapore. (BBC)
  • Ex-CEO of Skael faces criminal fraud charges. (WSJ)

Connect with Tom 

Instagram

Facebook

YouTube

Twitter

LinkedIn

Categories
Because That's What Heroes Do

Deep Space 9 – Episode 14: Bar Association: Workers of the World Unite

Get ready for an exciting new season of Because That’s What Heroes Do. This season, they take a deep dive into their favorite 15 episodes of Deep Space 9. Alex Murphy (Murphy), a DS9 expert from Montreal and a fan of local history, cinema, and television who enjoys weird foreign films, horror, and obscure media, joins them in this exploration. He has been watching Trek since he was a tiny punk, and it’s been a lifelong love. In this episode, the discussion centers around what might appear to be a humorous episode of DS9, Bar Association. The gang finds several larger truths in this episode.

The gang appreciates the episode for exploring labor movements within the DS9 universe, drawing parallels to real-world historical events like the 1902 anthracite strike. They discuss the character developments, including Rom’s growth and the evolving relationship dynamics between Lita and Rom, contrasted with the cultural traits of Bajorans and Ferengis. The role of characters, including Cisco, O’Brien, and Bashir, in the episode’s narrative and their varying stances on unions are also examined. Both union history enthusiasts and DS9 fans find much to appreciate in the show’s portrayal of labor rights and its deeper insight into Ferengi culture.

Key Highlights and Themes:

  • Union Story in DS9
  • Ferengi Culture and Family Dynamics
  • Rom’s Growth and Future
  • Bashir’s Character Development
  • Ferengi’s Role in DS9

Resources

Megan Dougherty

LinkedIn

One Stone Creative

Twitter

Tom

Instagram

Facebook

YouTube

Twitter

LinkedIn

Categories
Blog

The Argentieri Speech: Mid-Point Reflections on the DOJ’s Compensation Clawback Pilot Program

Principal Deputy Assistant Attorney General Nicole M. Argentieri spoke at the Society of Corporate Compliance and Ethics 23rd Annual Compliance & Ethics Institute. ( A copy of her remarks can be found here.) She reiterated the long-stated policy that compliance professionals play a critical role in ensuring companies comply with the law and foster a culture of ethics and integrity. She noted that the Department of Justice (DOJ) has made it clear that companies are the first line of defense against corporate crime, and compliance officers are on the front lines of this defense. The 2024 update to the DOJ’s Evaluation of Corporate Compliance Programs (ECCP) and the introduction of new pilot programs in 2024 underscored the increasing importance of the roles of compliance professionals. This blog post will review her remarks on the DOJ Compensation Incentives and Clawbacks Pilot Program (Clawbacks Program).

The Early Impact: Changing Corporate Behavior

Argentieri believes that early indications suggest these innovations are changing corporate behavior. One notable example comes from a company under agreement with the Criminal Division that required adherence to compliance standards and reporting misconduct as part of its annual performance reviews. Coupled with a company-wide messaging campaign, these efforts have increased reporting of potential compliance issues—a clear sign that employees are responding to the new incentives.

Moreover, the DOJ has observed companies integrating assessments of how employees demonstrate core values into their performance reviews. For example, one company now evaluates employees across categories such as individual and team performance, goal accomplishment, and demonstration of core values. These metrics are then factored into both compensation and promotion decisions. This approach reinforces the importance of ethical behavior and embeds compliance into the fabric of corporate culture.

Dual Pillars of the Clawbacks Program

The program is built on two foundational pillars. The first involves mandating that every corporate resolution under the Criminal Division’s supervision include compliance-related criteria in its compensation and bonus systems. This mandate compels companies to establish metrics that reward compliance-promoting behavior and deter misconduct. While similar language has been included in some corporate resolutions, the pilot program has made it a requirement in every Criminal Division resolution since its inception. So far, this requirement has been incorporated into nine corporate resolutions spanning five industries: tech, finance, crypto, manufacturing, and energy.

This shift is a formality and a strategic realignment in how companies approach compensation. By linking financial incentives to ethical behavior, these nine companies set a precedent for others in their industries. They align compensation with financial performance and the broader goal of conducting business ethically. This is a significant move, one that has the potential to set a new tone across the marketplace.

The Second Pillar: Fine Reductions for Financial Accountability

The second part of the Clawbacks Program offers a tangible incentive for companies to hold individuals financially accountable for misconduct. Specifically, companies that recoup or withhold compensation from culpable employees—or those who had supervisory authority and were aware of or willfully blind to the misconduct—are eligible for a fine reduction. The reduction is equal to the amount of the withheld compensation, reflecting the DOJ’s commitment to promoting financial accountability as a cornerstone of corporate compliance.

Argentieri reviewed the two companies that have benefited from this aspect of the clawbacks program; both come from Foreign Corrupt Practices Act (FCPA) enforcement actions. Albemarle, for instance, implemented procedures to freeze future bonuses for those suspected of misconduct, those who directly oversaw employees involved in misconduct, or those who ignored red flags. As a result, Albemarle received a reduction in its criminal monetary penalty equal to the amount of the withheld bonuses. In recognition of its substantial cooperation and significant remediation efforts, Albemarle also received a 45% reduction from the low end of the applicable penalty range—the highest percentage reduction to date.

Similarly, SAP withheld compensation from culpable employees and defended this decision through litigation, reinforcing the message that misconduct would have individual financial consequences. SAP’s actions not only earned the company a fine reduction equal to the amount of the withheld compensation but also played a critical role in the DOJ’s decision to grant a 40% reduction in its overall fine.

Lessons for Compliance Professionals: The Power of Financial Incentives

The lessons from the DOJ’s clawbacks pilot program are clear and compelling for compliance professionals. First, integrating compliance into compensation structures is a powerful tool for driving ethical behavior and deterring misconduct. Companies that make compliance a critical factor in determining compensation send a strong message to their employees: engaging in ethical behavior is not just encouraged but essential for business success.

Second, the importance of financial accountability must be balanced. The DOJ’s willingness to reduce fines for companies that recoup compensation from culpable employees highlights the agency’s commitment to holding individuals responsible for their actions. This aspect of the pilot program is particularly significant as it underscores the role of individual accountability in fostering a strong culture of compliance.

Finally, continuous evaluation is key. The DOJ is urging companies to regularly assess the effectiveness of their compliance-linked compensation systems, seek feedback, and make necessary adjustments. This iterative process ensures compliance metrics remain relevant and effective, allowing companies to stay ahead of emerging risks and maintain a robust compliance culture.

As we move towards the second half of the DOJ’s pilot program, the early successes in promoting compliance through compensation-linked incentives and financial accountability are setting the stage for a new era in corporate governance. The evidence so far suggests that this approach is feasible and effective in driving meaningful change in corporate behavior.

For those in the compliance profession, this is a pivotal moment. Integrating compliance into compensation and emphasizing financial accountability are significant advancements in corporate ethics and governance. It’s an opportunity to champion these changes within your organization and to be part of a broader movement that aligns financial success with ethical business practices.

In the long run, this pilot program’s true test will be its enduring impact on corporate behavior. But if the early indicators are anything to go by, we are witnessing the beginning of a new chapter in compliance—one where doing the right thing is not just the ethical choice but also the smart one.

Categories
Kerrville Weekly News Roundup

Kerrville Weekly News Roundup: September 28, 2024

Welcome to the Kerrville Weekly News Roundup. Each week, veteran podcaster Tom Fox and his colleagues Andrew Gay and Gilbert Paiz get together to go over a couple of their favorite stories from the past week from Kerrville and the greater Hill Country. Sit back, enjoy a cup of morning coffee, and listen in to get a wrap-up of the Kerrville Weekly News. We each consider two of our favorite stories and talk about the upcoming weekend’s events, which we will enjoy or participate in this weekend.

In this episode, Tom and Andrew are back to look at some things that caught their attention over the past week.

Stories Include:

  • New apartment complex approved for construction
  • New animal shelter contract nearing approval for Kerr County
  • Shakespeare at Schreiner University this weekend-King Lear
  • Mindy Wendele named Executive Director of Kerrville Chamber of Commerce
  • Andrew and Zach win a Pickleball Tournament
  • Kerrville Triathlon this weekend

Resources

Tom Fox on LinkedIn

Gilbert Paiz on LinkedIn

Andrew Gay on LinkedIn

Texas Hill Country Podcast Network

The Lead

Kerrville Daily Times

Categories
Daily Compliance News

Daily Compliance News: September 27, 2024 – The Hiz Honor Indicted Edition

Welcome to the Daily Compliance News. Each day, Tom Fox, the Voice of Compliance, brings you compliance-related stories to start your day. Sit back, enjoy a cup of morning coffee, and listen to the Daily Compliance News. All from the Compliance Podcast Network.

Each day, we consider four stories from the business world: compliance, ethics, risk management, leadership, or general interest for the compliance professional.

In today’s edition of Daily Compliance News:

  • NYT Mayor Adams indicted on bribery and corruption charges.  (NYT)
  • What happens when a news organization is a hedge fund or class action firm? (Bloomberg)
  • DOJ probing Super Micro Computer. (WSJ)
  • SEC fines 11 more firms for failures in messaging apps. (SEC Press Release)

Categories
Compliance Tip of the Day

Compliance Tip of the Day: Lesson from The John Deere FCPA Enforcement Action – Root Cause Analysis for Remediation

Welcome to “Compliance Tip of the Day,” the podcast where we bring you daily insights and practical advice on navigating the ever-evolving landscape of compliance and regulatory requirements.

Whether you’re a seasoned compliance professional or just starting your journey, our aim is to provide you with bite-sized, actionable tips to help you stay on top of your compliance game.

Join us as we explore the latest industry trends, share best practices, and demystify complex compliance issues to keep your organization on the right side of the law.

Tune in daily for your dose of compliance wisdom, and let’s make compliance a little less daunting, one tip at a time.

Today, we review why a root cause analysis is the first step you should take before you begin the remediation of your compliance program.