Categories
FCPA Compliance Report

Opinion Release Papers-07-02-Business Entertainment for Foreign Officials

In the second Opinion Release of 2007, 07-02, the Department of Justice (DOJ) considered another scenario where a US company desired to pay for travel to the US of foreign officials and for some business entertainment while these persons were in the US. It had some additional facts beyond those from Opinion Release 07-01 which are important for a compliance program.

Background
In Opinion Release 07-02 the Company desired to pay certain domestic expenses for a trip to the US by approximately six junior to mid-level officials of a foreign government for an educational program at the Requestor’s US headquarters prior to the delegates attendance at an annual six-week long internship program for foreign insurance regulators sponsored by the National Association of Insurance Commissioners (NAIC). The event was held at the Requestor’s US headquarters. The six officials have been selected by the foreign government, without the involvement of the Requestor.
The purpose of the trip was to familiarize the officials with the operation of a United States insurance company. The Requestor has no non-routine business pending before the foreign government agency that employs these officials. The sponsored training program will last for approximately six days (five days of training plus travel time). The Requestor paid the travel expenses where were limited to domestic economy class air travel to the Requestor’s U.S. headquarters. The Requestor paid for the domestic lodging, local transport, meals and incidental expenses (up to a modest set amount per day upon presentation of a receipt), and a modest four-hour city sightseeing tour for the six officials.
Requestor Representations
In Opinion Release 07-02 the representations made to the DOJ were as follows:

  • The US Company would not pay the travel expenses or fees for participation in the NAIC program.
  • The US Company had no “non-routine” business in front of the foreign governmental agency.
  • The routine business it did have before the foreign governmental agency was guided by administrative rules with identified standards.
  • The US Company would not select the delegates for the training program.
  • The US Company would only host the delegates and not their families.
  • The US Company would pay all costs incurred directly to the US service providers and only a modest daily minimum to the foreign governmental officials based upon a properly presented receipt.
  • Any souvenirs presented would be of modest value, with the US Company’s logo.
  • There would be one four-hour sightseeing trip in the city where the US Company is located.
  • The total expenses of the trip are reasonable for such a trip and the training which would be provided at the home offices of the US Company.

DOJ Response
As with Opinion Release 07-01, the DOJ ended this Opinion Release by stating, “Based upon all of the facts and circumstances, as represented by the Requestor, the Department does not presently intend to take any enforcement action with respect to the planned educational program and proposed payments described in this request. This is because, based on the Requestor’s representations, consistent with the FCPA’s promotional expenses affirmative defense, the expenses contemplated are reasonable under the circumstances and directly relate to “the promotion, demonstration, or explanation of [the Requestor’s] products or services.” 15 U.S.C. § 78dd-2(c)(2)(A).
Discussion
What can one glean from these two 2007 Opinion Releases? Based upon them, it would seem that a US company can bring foreign officials into the US for legitimate business purposes. A key component is that the guidelines are clearly articulated in a Compliance Policy. Based upon Releases Opinions 07-01 and 07-02, the following should be incorporated into a Compliance Policy regarding travel and lodging:

  • Any reimbursement for air fare will be for economy class.
  • Do not select the particular officials who will travel. That decision will be made solely by the foreign government.
  • Only host the designated officials and not their spouses or family members.
  • Pay all costs directly to the service providers; in the event that an expense requires reimbursement, you may do so, up to a modest daily minimum (e.g., $35), upon presentation of a written receipt.
  • Any souvenirs you provide the visiting officials should reflect the business and/or logo and would be of nominal value, e.g., shirts or tote bags.
  • Apart from the expenses identified above, do not compensate the foreign government or the officials for their visit, do not fund, organize, or host any other entertainment, side trips, or leisure activities for the officials, or provide the officials with any stipend or spending money.
  • The training costs and expenses will be only those necessary and reasonable to educate the visiting officials about the operation of your company.

Yet these are only the first steps. A company must train its employees not only the specifics of a gift, travel and entertainment program in a compliance program. Pre-travel and entertainment approval by your compliance function book-ended with post monitoring of all expenses should be documented in case the regulators ever come knocking.

Categories
Everything Compliance

Everything Compliance-Episode 16, Review of Jesse Eisinger’s book, The Chickenshit Club

The Chickenshit Club by Jesse Eisinger may mean for the compliance practitioner. We consider the internal journey of the Department of Justice from their days of Enron, WorldCom, and Adelphia convictions to the 2008 financial crisis where no senior executives were prosecuted. A series of steps led to this change, and we discuss the key changes in the DoJ’s thinking. The book is a real page-turner, and our discussion reflects this. We believe that every compliance practitioner should read the book and understand its lessons from DOJ prosecution. Every compliance practitioner should read Eisinger’s book The Chickenshit Club. You can purchase a copy of the book The Chickenshit Club by clicking here.]]>

Categories
Compliance Into the Weeds

Compliance into the Weeds – Episode 46 – The Potted Plant Edition

HSBC v. Moore

In this case, a federal district court had ordered the release of a redacted monitor’s report in the HSBC money-laundering Deferred Prosecution Agreement (DPA) based upon the request of an interested citizen. Both the Department of Justice (DOJ) and HSBC appealed the order, and the Court of Appeals supported their position in overturning the trial court’s decision. The case is about a hook, line, and sinker overturning of any trial court jurisdiction one can have. The district court tried to claim it did not have the same role as a “potted plant,” but the Court of Appeals left no doubt that is the only role it sees for any district court where a DPA is filed. We discuss the implications for the compliance practitioner, FCPA enforcement, and potential future changes. Are district court’s simply potted plants when it comes to DPA oversight?

Categories
This Week in FCPA

This Week in FCPA-Episode 56

  • The Kokesh case at the US Supreme Court is significant for SEC enforcement of the FCPA around profit disgorgement. For what it means to the compliance practitioner, see Tom’s piece in the FCPA Compliance & Ethics Blog. For a legal review of the decision, see Miller & Chevalier client alert authored by Saskia Zandieh. Marc Bohn considered the case in the FCPA Blog. Marc and I discuss the case on the FCPA Compliance Report, Episode 332.
  • Trevor McFadden to leave the DOJ for federal bench. See article by Matt Kelly in Radical Compliance. Hui Chen’s contract not to be renewed, her position is posted for job applicants. Apply for the position here. Andrew Weissman leaves as head of the Fraud Section to go Special Prosecutor’s staff.
  • Former PetroTiger General Counsel Gregory Weismann is banned from SEC practice. See article in the FCPA Blog.
  • Matthew Stephenson considers what a Wal-Mart settlement might look like. See his article in the Global Anti-Corruption Blog.
  • The federal judge who sentenced Samuel Mebiame, the bag man for Och-Ziff; criticized the DOJ for its lack of prosecution of any individuals from the company. See article by Sam Rubenfeld in WSJ Risk and Compliance Report.
  • Jay previews his weekend report.
  • Tom continues to talk about the release of his new book 2016 – The Year in Corporate FCPA Enforcement. For more information and to purchase, click here.
  •  
    [tweet_box design=”default” url=”http://wp.me/p6DnMo-3kx” float=”none”]
    When do Mike & Mike agree on anything? Find out on This Week in FCPA. [/tweet_box]
    Jay Rosen can be reached:
    Mobile (310) 729-6746
    Toll Free (866)-201-0903
    JRosen@affiliatedmonitors.com
    Tom Fox can be reached:
    Phone: 832-744-0264
    Email: tfox@tfoxlaw.com]]>

    Categories
    Everything Compliance

    Everything Compliance-Episode 10, first 100 day of the Trump Administration

    This episode is dedicated to the chaotic (at best) first 100 days of the Trump administration related to compliance.

    1. Jonathan Armstrong leads a discussion of the Trump administration’s devolution of Privacy Shield, GDPR, and what they mean for American companies doing business in the UK and EU. He discusses the key differences in the DOJ’s Evaluation of Corporate Compliance Programs in an FCPA analysis and under the Bribery Act, differences in the EU approach to conflict minerals, and under the Trump Administration, and concludes by giving us his thoughts on what Brexit means for compliance.

    For the Cordery Compliance client alerts, see the following:
    EU conflicts minerals compliance legislation 
    DOJ Evaluation of Corporate Compliance: how does it compare to UK Bribery Act 2010?
    BREXIT Glossary

    1. Jay Rosen considers what companies the intersection of business and politics under the Trump administration, the business response he has observed to Trump administrations steps and miss-steps, the comments made by DOJ representatives at Q1 conferences, and the vibe of compliance conference attendees.

    For Jay’s posts, see,
     Still in the Enforcement Business and Evaluation of Corporate Compliance Programs
    “It Was the Best of Times, It was the Worst of Times,” or “Ignorance is Strength”
     Matt Kelly opens with a discussion of regulatory enforcement under the Trump administration, how the ‘Trump Effect’ is negatively impacting corporations, and industry responses to deregulation issues and lays down some markers around compliance issues under the new administration.
    For Matt Kelly’s posts, see:
    Compliance in the Trump Era: More Markers Placed
    Trump Administration Whacks Telco Firm for $892 Million
    Drone Industry Pan Trump’s Regulatory
    Trump Risk Disclosures Start Rolling In
    First SEC Whistleblower Award of the Trump Era
    Sessions Dodges, Weaves, Promises on FCPA

    1. Mike Volkov rounds out the discussion with a review of where the DOJ is currently under AG Sessions, remarks by DOJ officials on FCPA enforcement, the future of the Pilot Program, and DOJ Compliance Counsel Hui Chen.

    For Mike Volkov’s posts, see the following:
    Yates, AG Sessions and Individual Criminal Prosecutions
    New E-Book — Moving the Goalposts: The Justice Department Redefines Effective Compliance
    FCPA Remediation Focus on Supervisory Personnel
    FPCA Pilot Program Motors On
    For Tom Fox’s posts on the Trump administration’s first 100 days, see the following:
    The Trump Administration-Kaos is Bad for Business
    The Trump Administration-Failures in Leadership and Management
    The Trump Administration-Preparing for a Catastrophe
    The Trump Administration-the Business Response
    DOJ Enforcement of the FCPA and the International Fight against Corruption in the Trump Administration
    The members of the Everything Compliance panel include:

    • Jay Rosen– Jay is Vice President, Business Development Corporate Monitoring at Affiliated Monitors. Rosen can be reached at JRosen@affiliatedmonitors.com
    • Mike Volkov – One of the top FCPA commentators and practitioners around and the Chief Executive Officer of The Volkov Law Group, LLC. Volkov can be reached at mvolkov@volkovlawgroup.com.
    • Matt Kelly – Founder and CEO of Radical Compliance, is the former Editor of Compliance Week. Kelly can be reached at mkelly@radicalcompliance.com
    • Jonathan Armstrong – Rounding out the panel is our UK colleague, who is an experienced lawyer with Cordery in London. Armstrong can be reached at armstrong@corderycompliance.com

    [tweet_box design=”default” url=”http://wp.me/p6DnMo-3eF” float=”none”]What has the Trump effect meant for FCPA? The experts weigh in.[/tweet_box]]]>

    Categories
    Everything Compliance

    Everything Compliance – Episode 10, first 100 days of the Trump Administration

    • Jonathan Armstrong discusses the Trump administration’s devolution of Privacy Shield, GDPR, and what they mean for American companies doing business in the UK and EU. He discusses the key differences in the DOJ’s Evaluation of Corporate Compliance Programs in an FCPA analysis, under the Bribery Act, in the EU approach to conflict minerals, and under the Trump Administration. He concludes by giving us his thoughts on what Brexit means for compliance.

    For the Cordery Compliance client, alerts see the following: EU conflicts minerals compliance legislation  DOJ Evaluation of Corporate Compliance: how does it compare to UK Bribery Act 2010? BREXIT Glossary

    1. Jay Rosen considers what companies the intersection of business and politics under the Trump administration, the business response he has observed to Trump administrations steps and miss-steps, the comments made by DOJ representatives at Q1 conferences, and the vibe of compliance conference attendees.

    For Jay’s posts, see,  Still, in the Enforcement Business and Evaluation of Corporate Compliance Programs “It Was the Best of Times, It was the Worst of Times,” or “Ignorance is StrengthMatt Kelly opens with a discussion of regulatory enforcement; under the Trump administration, how the ‘Trump Effect’ is negatively impacting corporations, industry responses to deregulation issues and lays down some markers around compliance issues under the new administration. For Matt Kelly’s posts, see Compliance in the Trump Era: More Markers Placed Trump Administration Whacks Telco Firm for $892 Million Drone Industry Pan Trump’s Regulatory Trump Risk Disclosures Start Rolling In First SEC Whistleblower Award of Trump Era Sessions Dodges, Weaves, Promises on FCPA.

    1. Mike Volkov rounds out the discussion with a review of where the DOJ is currently under AG Sessions, remarks by DOJ officials on FCPA enforcement, the future of the Pilot Program, and DOJ Compliance Counsel Hui Chen.

    For Mike Volkov’s posts, see the following: Yates, AG Sessions and Individual Criminal Prosecutions New E-Book — Moving the Goalposts: The Justice Department Redefines Effective Compliance FCPA Remediation Focus on Supervisory Personnel FPCA Pilot Program Motors On For Tom Fox’s posts on the Trump administration’s first 100 days see the following: The Trump Administration-Kaos is Bad for Business The Trump Administration-Failures in Leadership and Management The Trump Administration-Preparing for a Catastrophe The Trump Administration-the Business Response DOJ Enforcement of the FCPA and the International Fight against Corruption in the Trump Administration The members of the Everything Compliance panel include:

    • Jay Rosen– Jay is Vice President, Business Development Corporate Monitoring at Affiliated Monitors. Rosen can be reached at JRosen@affiliatedmonitors.com.
    • Mike Volkov – One of the top FCPA commentators and practitioners and the Chief Executive Officer of The Volkov Law Group, LLC. Volkov can be reached at mvolkov@volkovlawgroup.com.
    • Matt Kelly – Founder and CEO of Radical Compliance, is the former Editor of Compliance Week. Kelly can be reached at mkelly@radicalcompliance.com.
    • Jonathan Armstrong – Rounding out the panel is our UK colleague, an experienced lawyer with Cordery in London. Armstrong can be reached at armstrong@corderycompliance.com.
    Categories
    This Week in FCPA

    This Week in FCPA-Episode 46, the On the Rode to Prague Edition

  • Why powerful people fail to stop bad behavior by their underlings. Click here for the article.
  • Some policy management lesson, courtesy United Airlines. Click here for Matt Kelly’s article on Radical Compliance.
  • Why you shouldn’t linger too long in the wrong compliance position. See Julie DiMauro’s blog post on the FCPA Blog.
  • Bribe recipient in the Gerald and Patricia Green FCPA case gets 50 years in prison. See article in the FCPA Blog.
  • Using data to operationalize your compliance program. Read Tom’s blog post, by clicking here.
  • What the New York state Department of Financial Services new regulation on cybersecurity for financial services companies means for compliance officers. See Tom’s blog post by clicking here.
  • Jay previews his weekend report.
  • Jay Rosen new contact information:
    Jay Rosen, CCEP
    Vice President, Business Development
    Monitoring Specialist
    Affiliated Monitors, Inc.
    Mobile (310) 729-6746
    Toll Free (866)-201-0903
    JRosen@affiliatedmonitors.com
    [tweet_box design=”default” url=”http://wp.me/p6DnMo-3aD” float=”none”]How can the use of data help to operationalize your compliance program?[/tweet_box]]]>

    Categories
    Compliance Into the Weeds

    Compliance into the Weeds-Episode 29


    In this episode, Matt Kelly and myself take a deep dive into the Department of Justice (DOJ) recent release, entitled “Evaluation of Corporate Compliance Programs” (Evaluation), which went up on the Fraud Section website on February 8.
    The document is an 11-part list of questions which encapsulates the DOJ’s most current thinking on what constitutes a best practices compliance program. Within the list are some 46 different questions that a Chief Compliance Officer (CCO) or compliance practitioner can use to benchmark a compliance program. In short, it is an incredibly valuable and most significantly useful resource for every compliance practitioner.
    The Evaluation, most generally, follows the DOJ and Securities and Exchange Commission’s (SEC) seminal Ten Hallmarks of an Effective Compliance Program, released in the 2012 FCPA Guidance. If there is one over-riding theme in the Evaluation, it is the DOJ’s emphasis on doing compliance as the questions posed are designed to test how far down your compliance program is incorporated into the fabric of your organization. The Evaluation is not simply a restatement of the Ten Hallmarks, as it clearly incorporates the DOJ’s evolution in what constitutes a best practices compliance program, and it certainly builds upon the information put forward in the DOJ’s FCPA Pilot Program regarding effective compliance programs, most particularly found in Prong 3 Remediation.
    [tweet_box design=”default” url=”http://wp.me/p6DnMo-33Q” float=”none”]What does the DOJ Evaluation mean for compliance programs?[/tweet_box]]]>

    Categories
    Everything Compliance

    This Week in FCPA-Episode 38, the M&M Edition

    Show Notes for Episode 38, for the week ending February 3, the M&M edition:

    1. January a month for the FCPA record books. See article in the FCPA Blog.
    2. Are hunting trips a FCPA violation? How about in Sweden? See article in by Tom Fox in Compliance Week.
    3. VW update-what the former CEO knew and when did he know it and CCO ‘departs’. What does it all mean? See Tom Fox articles in Compliance Week on the former CEO and the departure of the CCO.
    4. New Tom Fox series on One Month to a Better Board, FCPA Compliance Report.
    5. Everything Compliance-Episode 6 is out. It is dedicated exclusively to Rolls-Royce.
    6. Jay Rosen Weekend Report preview.
    7. Super Bowl predictions.

    [tweet_box design=”default” url=”http://wp.me/p6DnMo-31q” float=”none”]What were the week’s top FCPA, compliance and ethics stories? Check out This Week in FCPA to find out. [/tweet_box]]]>

    Categories
    This Week in FCPA

    This Week in FCPA-Episode 35

    th edition:

    1. Hernandez and Beech FCPA guilty pleas. Hernandez Criminal Information, Beech Criminal Information.
    2. VW guilty plea in emissions-testing scandal. Link to article in New York Times.
    3. VW executive Oliver Schmidt arrested in US. See article on FCPA Compliance and Ethics Blog.
    4. Zimmer Bio-Met in follow-up FCPA enforcement action. See article on FCPA Blog.
    5. Mondelez FCPA enforcement action. See SEC Cease and Desist Order and article on FCPA Compliance and Ethics Blog.
    6. Supreme Court to take up 5 year statute of limitations for profit disgorgement under Securities Act, which applies to FCPA enforcement actions brought by SEC. Article in Law360.
    7. NFL Playoff update on Patriots, Cowboys and Texans.

    [tweet_box design=”default” url=”http://wp.me/p6DnMo-2XB” float=”none”]What were the FCPA matters, issues and lessons from the week ending January 13, 2017? Check out This Week in FCPA.[/tweet_box]]]>