Categories
Blog

Lessons in Corporate Governance from the NRA

Corporate governance often shines brightest in times of crisis, and few organizational crises have unfolded as publicly or contentiously as the litigation involving the National Rifle Association (NRA). In a recent Order from the years of ongoing litigation in New York state, the Court mandated sweeping governance reforms, providing a treasure trove of lessons for compliance professionals seeking to strengthen Transparency, accountability, and oversight in their organizations. Regardless of your personal or political views on the NRA, this case underscores universal principles of good governance. Let’s unpack these lessons and explore how they can be applied across organizations of all types and sizes. Matt Kelly wrote about this topic in a blog post, and we explored its implications for compliance professionals in a recent episode of the Compliance into the Weeds podcast.

What Happened at the NRA?

The NRA’s troubles began with allegations of rampant mismanagement under long-time CEO Wayne LaPierre. The New York Attorney General’s lawsuit in 2020 detailed years of financial abuses, including excessive salaries and lavish spending billed to the organization, conflicts of interest, and questionable vendor relationships, held together by a structurally weak board that served as a rubber stamp for LaPierre’s decisions. The fallout included four years of litigation, a jury finding LaPierre liable for abuses, and, ultimately, a court-mandated series of governance reforms designed to ensure the NRA could never again fall victim to such mismanagement.

Key Governance Failures

The NRA’s dysfunction stemmed from several structural weaknesses common to organizations suffering from poor governance. An overpowering CEO, LaPierre, exerted an outsized influence enabled by a lack of checks and balances. There needed to be stronger board oversight, with 76 members. The board needed to be bigger and more cohesive to provide effective governance. A small faction, aligned with the CEO, controlled key decisions. There needed to be more financial controls. This absence of robust controls allowed the CEO to withhold critical information from the board. These issues, while prominent in the NRA, are not unique. Theranos, Wynn Resorts, and countless other organizations have fallen prey to similar patterns.

The Reforms: A Blueprint for Good Governance

Judge Cohen’s final ruling laid out a series of governance reforms that every compliance professional should study and consider incorporating into their organization. The Court strengthened the NRA Audit Committee in various ways. First, the entire board now elects Audit Committee members, ensuring independence. Equally importantly, former audit committee members from 2014 to 2022 are barred from future service to eliminate cronyism.

Board refreshment was given importance. The Nominating and Governance Committee must propose 20 new director candidates annually for five years, injecting fresh perspectives and reducing entrenchment. The Court created a committee on board effectiveness, recommending measures to make the large board more functional, possibly through a smaller, empowered executive committee.

There were significant areas for the compliance function and the Chief Compliance Officer (CCO). The first was a mandate that the CCO deliver an annual report detailing travel expenses, related-party transactions, and whistleblower hotline activity.  This report ensures that the board has visibility into high-risk areas. There was a section on CCO empowerment and protection. The CCO now has employment protections, including a three-year contract and two years’ severance pay if terminated without cause. These measures give the CCO the independence to address risks without fear of retaliation. Finally, there is a mandate for independent oversight, with an external consultant assisting the CCO in developing and implementing governance improvements.

Universal Lessons for Compliance Professionals

The reforms imposed on the NRA are not merely punitive; they are a masterclass in building robust governance frameworks. There are several important points for every compliance officer.

1. Empower Your Compliance Function. An independent compliance officer is a figurehead. Employment protections, direct reporting lines to the board, and clear mandates are essential to ensure the CCO can act as an effective watchdog.

2. Prioritize Transparency. Transparency must be embedded in governance structures. Mechanisms like annual compliance reports provide critical insights into organizational risks and ensure the board has the information needed to fulfill its oversight role.

3. Strengthen the Board. Boards should be diverse, independent, and active in their oversight responsibilities. Critical steps include refreshing board membership and ensuring committees are free from undue influence.

4. Focus on Financial Controls. Weak financial controls are a common thread in governance failures. Organizations should implement robust policies to monitor executive spending, conflicts of interest, and other high-risk areas.

5. Learn (and Use) from Templates The Court Order includes detailed templates for compliance reports, employment contracts, and governance policies. While tailored to the NRA’s specific issues, these documents can serve as starting points for any organization seeking to strengthen its governance practices.

Good Governance Is Universal

Good governance transcends an organization’s specific mission or values. Whether your entity is a nonprofit like the NRA, a public company, or a private enterprise, strong governance principles, an empowered board, Transparency, and accountability remain constant. Judge Cohen’s reforms highlight the importance of building durable structures that withstand the pressures of powerful personalities and shifting priorities. These reforms serve as a reminder that governance is not just about preventing crises but ensuring the organization stays true to its mission.

The NRA’s governance overhaul is a cautionary tale and an opportunity for all compliance professionals. By studying the Court’s findings and implementing similar reforms, organizations can build stronger foundations for accountability and ethical leadership.

In the words of Matt Kelly, “Good governance is a universal principle dependent on building durable structures for transparency and vigorous oversight.” Let this case inspire your efforts to create governance frameworks that protect your organization’s integrity, irrespective of its mission or values.

Categories
Compliance Into the Weeds

Compliance into the Weeds: NRA Governance Reforms: A Compliance Case Study

The award-winning Compliance into the Weeds is the only weekly podcast that takes a deep dive into a compliance-related topic, literally going into the weeds to explore a subject more fully. Are you looking for some hard-hitting insights on compliance? Look no further than Compliance into the Weeds! In this episode, Tom Fox and Matt Kelly dive into the intricate and unusual story of the National Rifle Association (NRA) and its recent corporate governance overhaul.

Matt and Tom explore Judge Joel Cohen’s final ruling, which mandates extensive corporate governance reforms for the NRA. These reforms address significant issues, such as a structurally weak board, poor financial controls, and an overpowering CEO in Wayne LaPierre, who misused the organization’s resources. Necessary measures discussed include revamping the board’s audit committee and introducing annual compliance reports, along with significant protections for the role of the Chief Compliance Officer.

The episode highlights the universal principles of good governance, asserting that the NRA’s reforms can serve as a valuable lesson for other organizations. Regardless of the political or ethical stance on the NRA’s activities, the implemented governance structures underscore the necessity of transparency, an empowered compliance function, and robust oversight mechanisms to prevent misuse of organizational resources. These insights are illustrated through sample agreements and templates in the court ruling, which can guide other organizations in strengthening their governance and compliance programs.

Key highlights:

  • Corporate Governance Reforms Ordered by the Court
  • Specifics of the Court-Ordered Reforms
  • Audit Committee and Board Reforms
  • Compliance and Governance Templates
  • Universal Principles of Good Governance

Resources

Matt in Radical Compliance

Tom

Instagram

Facebook

YouTube

Twitter

LinkedIn

Categories
Innovation in Compliance

Innovation in Compliance: Tina Grubisa on Creating a Culture of Governance with Athennian

Innovation comes in many areas and compliance professionals need to not only be ready for it but embrace it. Join Tom Fox, the Voice of Compliance, as he visits with top innovative minds, thinkers, and creators in the award-winning Innovation in Compliance podcast. This month’s sponsor of Innovation in Compliance is Athennian.

In this episode, Tom welcomes Tina Grubisa, Industry Consultant, Fund Operations at Athennian, to discuss how Athennian can help to drive a culture of governance at your organization.

In this episode, Tina Grubisa discusses her career transition from finance to a tech startup, ultimately landing at Athennian as a Fund Operations consultant. Athennian, a cloud-based entity management platform, is known for aiding private equity, law firms, and corporations in automating compliance tasks and enhancing corporate governance. The conversation covers Athennian’s value proposition in the market, focusing on its innovative use of AI to evolve from a system of record to one of engagement and intelligence. Tina highlights Athennian’s role in helping clients stay ahead of regulatory demands, such as the SEC’s private fund rule, and building a culture of governance within an ESG framework. Additionally, the platform’s user experience and customer feedback are integral to its ongoing innovation process. Tina also explores future trends in governance and compliance, emphasizing the increasing importance of transparency and the potential impact of AI by 2030.

Key Highlights:

  • Building a Culture of Governance
  • Corporate Trends and AI in Governance
  • Future of Workflow Platforms
  • Advice for GRC Professionals Going Forward

Resources:

Tina Grubisa on LinkedIn

Athennian

Tom Fox

Instagram

Facebook

YouTube

Twitter

LinkedIn

Categories
The Corruption Files

The Corruption Files: Navigating Corporate Governance: The Hutchison Whampoa Scandal

What is stranger than fiction? The stories of worldwide corruption. In this podcast series, co-hosts Tom Fox, the Voice of Compliance and Mike DeBernardis, partner at Hughes Hubbard, discuss some of the most audacious corruption cases in anti-corruption enforcement. More importantly, they will discuss the lessons learned on what your organization can do to prevent running afoul of international anti-bribery laws.

In this episode of Season 2, Tom and Mike explore a unique corporate scandal from early 2000s Hong Kong involving Hutchison Whampoa Limited.

Unlike typical cases, there were no allegations of bribery, corruption, or significant financial penalties. Instead, the scandal revolved around the complex corporate governance issues and the control wielded by billionaire Li Ka-shing. The conversation delves into the importance of robust corporate governance, particularly in safeguarding the interests of minority shareholders in companies dominated by powerful individuals or families.

Tom and Mike highlight the expanding role of compliance professionals in overseeing corporate governance, especially with the rise of Environmental, Social, and Governance (ESG) criteria. They discuss the importance of board independence, the need for effective internal controls, and how compliance professionals can aid in board training. With compelling examples, such as the interlock of directors in the energy sector and the Bluebell Ice Cream scandal, the episode provides a thorough insight into how corporate governance issues can impact reputations and operational integrity.

Key Highlights:

  • Corporate Governance and Compliance
  • The Role of Boards in Risk Management
  • Compliance Professionals and Corporate Governance
  • Importance of Independent Board Members
  • Internal Controls and Compliance
  • Training Boards for Effective Governance

 Resources:

Mike DeBernardis on LinkedIn

HughesHubbardReed

Tom Fox

Instagram

Facebook

Categories
Everything Compliance

Everything Compliance: Episode 137, The Boeing Pleads Guilty Edition

Welcome to the only roundtable podcast in compliance as we celebrate our second century of shows.

In this episode, we welcome Karen Moore as a permanent panelist.

We have one topic for this episode, the Boeing guilty plea, which we slice and dice from a variety of perspectives. Karen is joined by Jonathan Marks, Jonathan Armstrong, and Matt Kelly as panelists, all hosted by Tom Fox.

  1. Karen Moore considers that there are multiple stakeholders involved with Boeing and will they be covered in the resolution? She shouts out to the UK for their seamless transition of power after the July 4 election and to the Men’s Football team for making the UEFA Cup Final.
  2. Matt Kelly asks multiple questions about the form of the guilty plea and what it may mean for compliance professionals going forward. He rants about Tractor Supply which ditched its DEI and sustainability efforts based on one Twitter campaign.
  3. Jonathan Armstrong takes a look at the Boeing plea deal from his uniquely British perspective, with 3 takeaways. He shouts out to the new British Prime Minister, Sir Keir Starmer.
  4. Jonathan Marks considers corporate governance and internal control failures. He rants about Board members who do not understand Board governance.
  5. Tom Fox shouts out to Pittsburgh rookie Paul Skenes for his great first season and being named the Starting Pitcher for the All-Star Game.

The members of the Everything Compliance are:

The host, producer, rantor (and sometimes panelist) of Everything Compliance is Tom Fox, the Voice of Compliance. He can be reached at tfox@tfoxlaw.com. Everything Compliance is a part of the award-winning Compliance Podcast Network.

Categories
Everything Compliance - Shout Outs and Rants

Everything Compliance: Shout Outs and Rants – Episode 137, The Boeing Edition

Welcome to the only roundtable podcast in compliance as we celebrate our second century of shows.

In this episode, we welcome Karen Moore as a permanent panelist. She is joined by Jonathan Marks, Jonathan Armstrong, Matt Kelly, and Tom Fox for shout-outs and rants.

  1. Karen Moore shouts out to the UK for their seamless transition of power after the July 4 election and to the Men’s Football team for making the UEFA Cup Final.
  2. Matt Kelly rants about Tractor Supply, which ditched its DEI and sustainability efforts based on one Twitter campaign.
  3. Jonathan Armstrong shouts out to the new British Prime Minister, Sir Keir Starmer.
  4. Jonathan Marks rants about Board members who do not understand Board governance.
  5. Tom Fox shouts out to Pittsburgh rookie Paul Skenes for his great first season and being named Starting Pitcher for the All-Star Game.

The members of Everything Compliance are:

  • Jonathan Armstrong is a partner at Punter Southall in London.
  • Karen Moore is an Adjunct Law professor at the Fordham School of Law.
  • Matt Kelly is the founder of Radical Compliance.
  • Jonathan Marks is a partner at BDO.

The host of Everything Compliance is Tom Fox, who is the founder of the Compliance Podcast Network.

Categories
Everything Compliance

Everything Compliance – Episode 127, The Awesome Edition

Welcome to the only roundtable podcast in compliance as we celebrate our second century of shows. In this episode, we have the quartet of Jonathan Armstrong, Matt Kelly, and Jay Rosen, all hosted by Tom Fox, joining us on this episode to discuss some of the topics they are watching in 2024.

  1. Matt Kelly looks at the recently enacted Foreign Extortion Prevention Act (FEPA). He rants about the SEC getting hacked around the Bitcoin ETF announcement and reminds everyone to use two-factor authentication.
  2. Tom Fox shouts out to the University of Michigan for winning the College Football National Championship.
  1. Jonathan Armstrong looks at the intersection of AI and Operational Resilience and ties it to the need for greater Board skills in these areas. He shouts out to Jay Rosen, who is in transition and would be a great addition to any compliance product or service BD team.
  1. Jay Rosen opines on the DOJ’s Expectations for Data Driven Analytics in 2024. He shouts out to Robert Kraft and the New England Patriots for paying departing coach Bill Belichick his full 2024 salary.
  1. Jonathan Marks asks, What does it mean to be on a Board in 2024? He rants about the Philadelphia Eagles.

The members of the Everything Compliance are:

  • Jay Rosen – Jay is Vice President, Business Development, Corporate Monitoring at Affiliated Monitors. Rosen can be reached at JRosen@affiliatedmonitors.com
  • Karen Woody – One of the top academic experts on the SEC. Woody can be reached at kwoody@wlu.edu
  • Matt Kelly – Founder and CEO of Radical Compliance. Kelly can be reached at mkelly@radicalcompliance.com
  • Jonathan Armstrong – is our UK colleague, who is an experienced data privacy/data protection lawyer with Cordery in London. Armstrong can be reached at armstrong@corderycompliance.com
  • Jonathan Marks can be reached at jtmarks@gmail.com.

The host, producer, ranter (and sometimes panelist) of Everything Compliance is Tom Fox, the Voice of Compliance. He can be reached at tfox@tfoxlaw.com. Everything Compliance is a part of the Compliance Podcast Network.

For more information on Ethico and a free White Paper on top compliance issues in 2024, click here.

Categories
10 For 10

10 For 10: Top Compliance Stories For The Week Ending January 6, 2024

Welcome to 10 For 10, the podcast that brings you the week’s Top 10 compliance stories in one podcast each week. Tom Fox, the Voice of Compliance, brings to you, the compliance professional, the compliance stories you need to be aware of to end your busy week. Sit back, and in 10 minutes, hear about the stories every compliance professional should be aware of from the prior week. Every Saturday, 10 For 10 highlights the most important news, insights, and analysis for the compliance professional, all curated by the Voice of Compliance, Tom Fox. Get your weekly filling of compliance stories with 10 for 10, a podcast produced by the Compliance Podcast Network.

  1. Senator Menendez draws more charges. (CNN)
  2. Political protests are a compliance risk. (WSJ)
  3. Can the Big 4 ever govern themselves? (FT)
  4. SpaceX illegally fired workers for protected conduct. (NYT)
  5. Broader DEI fights are coming to the Boardroom. (NYT)
  6. Trump companies took in $7.8 in payments from foreign governments and officials. (WSJ)
  7. A suspended Altice office leaves the company. (Bloomberg)
  8. AML whistleblower programs will help in greater ABC efforts. (Bloomberg)
  9. Taking on the banking culture of drive fast, crash.(WSJ)
  10. How FEPA will change ACP enforcement.(WSJ)

You can check out the Daily Compliance News for four curated compliance and ethics-related stories each day here.

Connect with Tom 

Instagram

Facebook

YouTube

Twitter

LinkedIn

Categories
Sunday Book Review

Sunday Book Review: November 12 , 2023 The Corporate Governance (Larcker and Tayan) Edition

In the Sunday Book Review, I consider books that would interest the compliance professional, the business executive or anyone who might be curious. It could be books about business, compliance, history, leadership, current events or anything else that might interest me. In today’s edition of the Sunday Book Review, Tom considers three books by Stanford professors David Larcker and Brian Tayan on corporate governance.

  • The Art and Practice of Corporate Governance by Larker and Tayan
  • Corporate Governance Matters (3rd ed)  by Larker and Tayan
  • A Real Look at World Corporate Governance by Larker and Tayan
Categories
All Things Investigations

All Things Investigations: Episode 38 – CCO Certification – A Better Approach with Kevin Abikoff

In this episode of All Things Investigation, Tom Fox and guest Kevin Abikoff discuss the Department of Justice’s introduction of a CCO certification in the wake of FCPA violations. Kevin offers his unique perspective on this issue; their conversation also explores broader issues of corporate governance and the role of the Board of Directors.

Kevin Abikoff is a Partner and Deputy Chair at Hughes Hubbard & Reed. He is a recognized authority in corporate governance and compliance. 

You’ll hear Tom and Kevin discuss:

  • Kevin questions the necessity of the CCO certification, suggesting it addresses a problem that doesn’t exist, given the absence of complaints from the Department of Justice about dishonesty during monitorships.
  • A more practical approach, Kevin posits, is a certification 12 to 24 months after a monitorship ends to empower CCOs during periods of vulnerability truly.
  • Measuring compliance effectiveness is subjective and may be void of vagueness in a legal context.
  • In the broader realm of corporate governance, the board has a pivotal role in overseeing compliance. Parallels to the Caremark duty and Delaware law are drawn.
  • Kevin raises concerns about the burden on CCOs to assess program effectiveness retrospectively, especially considering the dynamic nature of compliance programs over time.
  • Boards should take responsibility for compliance certifications and should sign off on these certifications, mirroring similar practices in financial reporting.
  • Innovation within compliance may be stymied if CCOs fear that enhancing a program might be used against them in the future, Kevin points out.

KEY QUOTES:

“I’ve just never heard, especially from the context of Chief Compliance Officer, that the DOJ feels like they’re being lied to. If that’s not the problem they’re trying to solve, I think the solution they have paved is, again, a solution in search of a problem that doesn’t exist…” – Kevin Abikoff

“If you’re going to have a certification and you want to empower the chief compliance officer, have the certification twelve months, 24 months after the conclusion of the monitorship and have the CCO certify that they continue to believe that the policies, procedures, things that have been put in place, continue to be in place.” – Kevin Abikoff

“Now what you fail to investigate can kill you.” – Kevin Abikoff

Resources:

Hughes Hubbard & Reed website 

Kevin Abikoff on LinkedIn