Categories
2 Gurus Talk Compliance

2 Gurus Talk Compliance – The Snow in Florida Edition

What happens when two top compliance commentators get together? They talk compliance, of course. Join Tom Fox and Kristy Grant-Hart in 2 Gurus Talk Compliance as they discuss the latest compliance issues in this week’s episode!

Stories This Week Include:

  • DEI-reframing, not retreating.  (FT) and WVA replaces DEI with “Dept. of Engagement and Compliance”.  (12WBOY)
  • Trafigura and ex-COO were convicted of bribery.  (Bloomberg)
  • How Binance is ensuring compliance. (CoinPedia)
  • The CCO Departure Bonus.  (Cosmos)
  • Serbians are done with corruption.  (The Guardian)
  • Wells Fargo banks on (Not) risky business. (PYMNTS)
  • Crackdown on Tariff Exemption Snares U.S. E-Commerce Retailers (WSJ)
  • An investing revolution is coming. The U.S. isn’t ready for it. (The Washington Post)
  • The Sanctions Year in Review: DOJ Takes First Steps to Enforce “The New FCPA” While OFAC’s Enforcement Actions Decline (Volkov)
  • Fewer Americans Are Quitting Their Jobs (WSJ)
  • 1 arrested after snowballs thrown at Florida police officers, officials say (Fox 35 Orlando)

Resources:

Kristy Grant-Hart on LinkedIn

Spark Consulting

Prove Your Worth

Tom

Instagram

Facebook

YouTube

Twitter

LinkedIn

Categories
Fox on Podcasting

Fox on Podcasting – Celebrating Excellence in Podcasting in the Domestic Arena

Join Tom Fox as he explores the world of podcasting, and get ready to be inspired to start your podcast. Today, we begin a three-part series on honoring excellence in podcasting and the Agora Awards. In this second episode celebrating the Compliance Podcast Network Agora Awards, host Nick Gallo introduces four guests and hosts of their own podcasts: Mike Volkov, Matt Kelly, Mike DeBernardis, and Karen Woody.

In this episode, we stress the importance of being listenable and engaging rather than rigidly adhering to a set script when discussing compliance issues. Reflecting on experiences from 14 to 15 years ago, it’s clear that a heavily scripted approach can fall short. All our guests agree that a more conversational format resonates better with audiences. We focus on meaningful dialogues, keep episodes concise, typically around 20 minutes, and highlight the value of slowing down and prioritizing listener engagement over extensive, pre-planned talking points.

Key highlights:

  • Engaging Podcasting
  • Evolution with Compliance Into the Weeds
  • Building a Good Conversation
  • Podcast Length and Ambitions

Resources:

Matt Kelly

Compliance into the Weeds

Everything Compliance

Karen Woody

The Woody Report

Classroom Insiders

Succession-the Final Season

Everything Compliance

Mike DeBernardis

All Things Investigation

Mike Volkov

Corruption, Crime and Compliance

Categories
Corruption, Crime and Compliance

Catch up on OFAC Enforcement – 3M and Emigrant Banks Cases

3M faced a dual settlement, first with the SEC and then with OFAC, over alleged Iranian sanctions violations stemming from misconceptions and oversights in a license plate deal with a German intermediary. Despite the gravity of the case, 3M took proactive remedial actions, including voluntary disclosure and internal changes. Similarly, Emigrant Bank maintained a CD account for two Iranian residents for over two decades without proper screening, leading to a $31,000 settlement. In this episode of Corruption, Crime, and Compliance, Michael Volkov shares details of both cases, underscoring the complexities of navigating sanctions regulations, the consequences of compliance failures, and the pivotal role of voluntary disclosure and proactive remediation in mitigating penalties.

You’ll hear Michael talk about:

  • 3M settled with the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) for $6.5 million and the Office of Foreign Assets Control (OFAC) for $9.6 million over alleged violations of Iranian sanctions. 3M’s Dubai-based subsidiary entered a deal to manufacture reflective license plate sheeting for a German company. Still, it misunderstood the end user, believing it was a reseller when it was Iran. 
  • Between 2016 and 2018, 3M sent 43 shipments to the German intermediary, who resold them to Iran, violating OFAC regulations. This led to 54 violations of the Iran sanctions program. 3M’s compliance team approved the deal without realizing the end-user was in Iran. Suggestions to review the agreement were ignored, and steps were taken to conceal its true nature. 
  • 3M took remedial steps, including voluntary disclosure, termination or discipline of involved employees, leadership changes, revamped sanctions compliance training, and discontinuation of business with the German reseller.
  • In another case, Emigrant Bank maintained a certificate of deposit (CD) account for two Iranian residents from 1995 until 2021 without properly screening it for sanctions issues. In 2016, when the account holders requested a wire transfer, Emigrant became aware of potential sanctions issues but still approved the transfer.
  •  In 2019, Emigrant’s upgraded screening software flagged the account, but the compliance team overrode the alert based on erroneous guidance from the 2016 wire transfer. Emigrant recognized the account’s status in 2021, closed it, and took steps to remediate compliance program shortcomings.
  • Emigrant settled the matter for $31,000, significantly lower than the maximum penalty applicable ($9.9 million), with voluntary disclosure and proactive remediation efforts considered mitigating factors by OFAC.

KEY QUOTES

“In setting up this agreement, numerous managers at 3M suggested that trade compliance reviewed the deal. But these 60 suggestions were ignored by the deal’s proponents. Even worse, a 3M subsidiary received an outside due diligence report, flagging the connection to Iranian law enforcement, and closed the matter without further investigation.” – Michael Volkov

“On September 21 of this year, OFAC announced that Emigrant agreed to pay $31,867 to resolve 30 violations of the Iran Sanctions Program. The violations all relate to a single CD account that Emigrant maintained for two Iranian residents from 1995 until it closed the account in 2021.”  – Michael Volkov

“In 2019, Emigrant upgraded its screening software, sanctioned screening, and the new program flagged the account as problematic due to the account holder’s Iranian residency. However, the software is only effective as its operator. Upon review, Emigrant’s compliance team overrode the alert based on erroneous guidance from the 2016 wire transfer. Now, Emigrant finally recognized the account status in 2021 and took steps to remediate its compliance program shortcomings.” – Michael Volkov

Resources

Michael Volkov on LinkedIn | Twitter

The Volkov Law Group

Categories
31 Days to More Effective Compliance Programs

One Month to a More Effective Compliance Program for Business Ventures-Why Business Ventures are Different than 3rd Parties

Business ventures, whether JVs, partnerships, franchises, team agreements, strategic alliances or one of the myriad types of business relationships a U.S. company can form outside the U.S., are different than the usual risk presented by third-parties under compliance requirements such as those mandated by the FCPA. The problems for companies is that they tend to treat business venture risk the same as third-party risk. They are different and must be managed differently.

The bottom line is that may compliance practitioners have not thought through the specific risks of business ventures such as JVs, franchises, strategic alliances, teaming partner or others as opposed to sales agents or representatives on the sales side of the business. I hope that this will help facilitate a discussion that maybe people will begin to think about more of the issues, more of the risk parameters and perhaps put a better risk management strategy in place.
Three key takeaways:

  1. Business ventures bring different FCPA risks from third-parties.
  2. JVs have both external compliance risks and corporate governance risks.
  3. Use your full compliance tool kit for business ventures in managing the FCPA risk for franchises.
Categories
Corruption, Crime and Compliance

DOJ’s Compliance Frontier: Incentives and Disincentives

On this episode of the Crime, Corruption and Compliance podcast, host Michael Volkov discusses the Department of Justice’s recent focus on incentives and disincentives as part of an effective ethics and compliance program. This includes awards for ethical conduct, clawbacks, and deferred payment schemes to hold officers and employees accountable for misconduct, and requirements for executives to be evaluated on their compliance with laws and regulations. Michael also talks about how companies can create appropriate policies and procedures to incentivize and monitor compliance, and how to design and implement a compensation system that ensures compliance.



Key ideas you’ll hear in this episode: 

  • DOJ stresses the need for positive incentives for ethical conduct, including awards and annual employee performance reviews.
  • Companies already have a strong disincentive for engaging in misconduct, which is termination.
  • Recent enforcement actions against companies like Novartis and Wells Fargo have highlighted the gap in the incentive-disincentive framework.
  • DOJ is examining the efficacy of clawbacks and deferred payment schemes as an important alternative to massive criminal fines against companies. This will hold the bad actors accountable, as well as those who had supervisory responsibilities and failed to act.
  • Clawbacks and punishments for bad actors will need to be incorporated into settlements and terminations. Company policies will need to include more protections and discretion to pull back benefits from bad actors.
  • There are a number of issues to consider when implementing a clawback program, including who it applies to, how it is triggered, and how much of the company’s bonus payments should be subject to clawback.
  • DOJ anticipates requiring a wide clawback program that extends to senior management level. Crafting these measures will require a collaborative process within the company involving legal and business representatives, human resources, ethics and compliance, senior management, and potentially union representatives or work councils.
  • Danske Bank is the first to implement a compliance compensation requirement in their settlement papers with the Justice Department. The settlement includes a provision that executives will be evaluated on their compliance efforts and a failing score will make them ineligible for bonuses.
  • Companies need to design and implement compensation systems to incentivize compliance behavior and create disincentives for non-compliant conduct.

 

KEY QUOTES:

“Your company policies are going to have to incorporate more protections and more discretion for the company to pull back on benefits to bad actors. Bad actors here, I mean not just the actual bribe payer or scheme designer, but also those people who failed to conduct proper oversight and monitoring of the department that engaged in the misconduct.” – Michael Volkov 

 

“In practice, companies need to formulate appropriate policies and procedures, document their system, and demonstrate commitment to enforcement of the policies to incentivize compliance behavior and create clear disincentives for noncompliant conduct.” – Michael Volkov

 

“A compliance-oriented compensation system has to be implemented along with other clawback and deferred payment systems.” – Michael Volkov

 

Resources

Michael Volkov on LinkedIn | Twitter

The Volkov Law Group

Categories
FCPA Compliance Report

Tom Fox and Mike Volkov with the 2022 Year in Review for the FCPA, Part 2

Welcome to the award-winning FCPA Compliance Report, the longest-running podcast in compliance. In this special episode, I am joined by Mike Volkov, founder of the Volkov Law Group. We conclude with Part 2, looking back on the year 2022 in FCPA and Compliance. We consider the Monaco Memo, the key cases, and some of the important issues which arose in 2022 and how they might impact compliance in 2023.

In this episode, we consider the following:

·      Building trust and credibility in the investigative process

·      The ABB FCPA enforcement action

·      The Honeywell FCPA enforcement action

·      Why the heat is on compliance after the Monaco Memo

·      Corporate incentives and discipline, including clawbacks

·      The Glencore FCPA enforcement action and CCO Certification

Resources

Mike Volkov on LinkedIn

The Volkov Law Group

Categories
FCPA Compliance Report

Tom Fox and Mike Volkov with the 2022 Year in Review for the FCPA, Part 1

Welcome to the award-winning FCPA Compliance Report, the longest running podcast in compliance. In this special episode, I am joined by Mike Volkov, founder of the Volkov Law Group. We begin a two-part podcast on looking back on the year 2022 in FCPA and Compliance. We consider the Monaco Memo, the key cases and some of the important issues which arose in 2022 and how they might impact compliance in 2023.

In this episode we consider:

·      The Monaco Memo

·      The Stericycle FCPA enforcement action

·      The KT FCPA enforcement action

·      The upcoming trial of Cognizant executives and internal investigations

·      Key individual prosecuted

Resources

Mike Volkov on LinkedIn

The Volkov Law Group

Categories
Corruption, Crime and Compliance

A Deep Dive into the Oracle FCPA SEC Settlement

Oracle Corporation settled its second FCPA case in ten years. It agreed to pay the SEC $23 million to resolve allegations that its subsidiaries in Turkey, India and the United Arab Emirates maintained slush funds to bribe foreign officials. Ten years ago in 2012, Oracle paid the SEC $2 million for creating millions of dollars in off-the-books accounts at its India subsidiary. Join Michael Volkov as he takes a deep dive in the Oracle case and provides valuable lessons for managing third-party corruption risks.

  • In the SEC’s mind, Oracle is a recidivist, having its second enforcement action case in 10 years.
  • The settlement for $23 million underscored the power of the FCPA provisions, which mandate effective internal controls and accurate books and records, and can be applied to a wide range of conduct beyond foreign bribery, Michael remarks. 
  • The controls that Oracle put in place to prevent improper use of discounts and marketing reimbursements were not effective because there was a lack of compliance culture within the business.
  • The Oracle case is one that should be studied by compliance professionals, Michael believes. It reminds you to look at your own controls that surround discounting and ensure that the necessary documentation is carried out. “No matter what controls you have in place, they still have to be adhered to with a true culture of compliance underneath it as a foundation,” he adds.

 

Resources

SEC Oracle Case

Email Michael: mvolkov@volkovlaw.com

Categories
Corruption, Crime and Compliance

Episode 233 – Tom Fox and Michael Volkov Discuss Recent DOJ Criminal Trials


In this episode, Tom Fox and Mike Volkov review recent DOJ trial successes and stumbles — Tom and Mike review DOJ trial strategy, successes and failures, and the approach of the antitrust division.

Categories
FCPA Compliance Report

Mike Volkov on DOJ Trial Record


In this episode of the FCPA Compliance Report I visit with Mike Volkov. Mike recently did a three-part blog post series reviewing the DOJ trial strategy, successes and failures and approach of the antitrust division. In this podcast we take a deep dive into FCPA trials, other white collar fraud trials and antitrust trials the DOJ has had over the past few years. We assess the key approaches, discuss some important wins and unfortunate stumbles.
Resources
Mike Volkov on Corruption Crime & Compliance
Part 1 –  A Mixed Bag
Part 2 – Big Victories and Misguided Targets
Part 3 – Antitrust Division Stumbles