Categories
Blog

Danske Bank: Part 1 – Introduction

We finally have the big one in money laundering. That, of course, is Danske Bank A/S (Danske Bank), a global financial institution headquartered in Denmark, which pled guilty this week and agreed to forfeit $2 billion to resolve the US investigation into its fraud on US banks. According to the Department of Justice (DOJ) Press Release, “Danske Bank defrauded U.S. banks regarding Danske Bank Estonia’s customers and anti-money laundering controls to facilitate access to the U.S. financial system for Danske Bank Estonia’s high-risk customers, who resided outside of Estonia – including in Russia.” Danske Bank also settled with the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) who said, in their Press Release, the Bank misled investors about its anti-money laundering (AML) compliance program in its Estonian branch and failed to disclose the risks posed by the program’s significant deficiencies.

On the criminal side of things, Danske Bank pled guilty to one count of conspiracy to commit bank fraud. Under the terms of the plea agreement, the company has agreed to criminal forfeiture of $2.059 billion. Danske Bank will also enter into separate criminal or civil resolutions with domestic and foreign authorities. As a part of the overall fine and penalty, the DOJ will credit nearly $850 million in payments that Danske Bank makes to resolve related parallel investigations. Danske Bank agreed to pay $413 million to settle the SEC’s charges related to other domestic and foreign authorities.

What The Said

Deputy Attorney General Lisa Monaco said, “Today’s guilty plea by Danske Bank and two-billion-dollar penalty demonstrate that the Department of Justice will fiercely guard the integrity of the U.S. financial system from tainted foreign money – Russian or otherwise. Whether you are a U.S. or foreign bank, if you use the U.S. financial system, you must comply with our laws. We expect companies to invest in robust compliance programs – including at newly acquired or far-flung subsidiaries – and to step up and own up to misconduct when it occurs. Failure to do so may well be a one-way ticket to a multi-billion-dollar guilty plea.”

Assistant Attorney General Kenneth A. Polite added “Danske Bank lied to U.S. banks about its deficient anti-money laundering systems, inadequate transaction monitoring capabilities, and its high-risk, offshore customer base in order to gain unlawful access to the U.S. financial system. Danske Bank accepted responsibility for defrauding U.S. financial institutions and funneling billions of dollars in suspicious and criminal transactions through the United States. As part of its guilty plea, Danske Bank will forfeit over $2 billion and implement significant changes to its compliance program and AML controls. This coordinated resolution with the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) and Danish authorities sends a clear message that the Department of Justice stands ready to work with our partners around the world to investigate corporate wrongdoing and hold bad actors accountable for their criminal conduct.”

Gurbir S. Grewal, Director of the SEC’s Division of Enforcement, said in the SEC Press Release, “Corporations that raise money from the public must disclose information that is material to investors, who then get to decide what risks they want to take. That’s the basic bargain of our securities laws and it extends to foreign issuers like Danske Bank, which sought to access our capital markets, even though its securities were not registered with the Commission. But as alleged in our complaint, Danske Bank repeatedly broke that bargain by misrepresenting to its shareholders, including U.S. investors, that it had strong anti-money laundering controls while hiding its significant control deficiencies and compliance failures.”

The Illegal Conduct

According to the DOJ, between “2008 and 2016, Danske Bank offered banking services through its branch in Estonia, Danske Bank Estonia. Danske Bank Estonia had a lucrative business line serving non-resident customers known as the NRP. Danske Bank Estonia attracted NRP customers by ensuring that they could transfer large amounts of money through Danske Bank Estonia with little, if any, oversight. Danske Bank Estonia employees conspired with NRP customers to shield the true nature of their transactions, including by using shell companies that obscured actual ownership of the funds. Access to the U.S. financial system via the U.S. banks was critical to Danske Bank and its NRP customers, who relied on access to U.S. banks to process U.S. dollar transactions. Danske Bank Estonia processed $160 billion through U.S. banks on behalf of the NRP.”

According to the SEC, “when Danske Bank acquired its Estonian branch in 2007, it knew or should have known that a substantial portion of the branch’s customers were engaging in transactions that had a high risk of involving money laundering; that its internal risk management procedures were inadequate to prevent such activity; and that its AML and Know-Your-Customer procedures were not being followed and did not comply with applicable laws and rules. The SEC alleges that, from 2009 to 2016, these high-risk customers, none of whom were residents of Estonia, utilized Danske Bank’s services to transact billions of dollars in suspicious transactions through the U.S. and other countries, generating as much as 99 percent of the Estonian branch’s profits. The complaint further alleges that, although Danske Bank knew of these high-risk transactions, it made materially misleading statements and omissions in its publicly available reports stating that it complied with its AML obligations and that it had effectively managed its AML risks. As the full extent of Danske Bank’s AML failures became apparent, its share price dropped precipitously.”

What Does it Mean for Compliance

The Danske Bank enforcement action presents multiple lessons learned for the compliance professional, both in AML compliance and anti-corruption compliance. Over the next several blog posts, we will be looking at the illegal schemes and internal control failures in some detail. I hope you will join me for the exploration.

Tomorrow, where did it all start to go wrong?

Categories
Jamming with Jason

Always Look on the Bright Side of Life

Do you like Monty Python? If you’ve seen The Life of Brian, you are already familiar with the song they sang to close out that great #montypython movie. You are probably singing it in your head right now. There is a lot we can learn from the lyrics in this song, and did you know George Harrison financed the movie?

Whether you believe it or not, your reality is shaped by your perception and intention. If you always look on the bright side of life, you get a pretty bright life. It’s psychology, and it’s physics. We discuss this, the song, and so much more in this #jammingwithjason #podcast episode.

FOR FULL SHOW NOTES AND LINKS, VISIT:

E301 Always Look on the Bright Side of Life

DO YOU LOVE MUSIC LIKE ME?

If so, learn how to use it to intentionally heal and change your emotions and use it for entertainment at: https://bit.ly/MeffordMusic.

LIKE THE PODCAST?

If you’re the kind of person who likes to help others, then share this with your friends and family. If you find value, they will too. Please leave a review [https://itunes.apple.com/us/podcast/jamming-with-jason-mefford/id1456660699] on Apple Podcasts so we can reach more people.

Join my Facebook group: https://www.facebook.com/groups/beinguniquely

OTHER RESOURCES YOU MAY ENJOY:

My YouTube channel [https://www.youtube.com/c/jasonleemefford] and make sure to subscribe

My Facebook page [https://www.facebook.com/jammingwithjasonmefford]

My LinkedIn page [https://www.linkedin.com/in/jasonmefford/]

My website [https://jasonmefford.com]

STAY UP TO DATE WITH NEW CONTENT:

It can be difficult to find information on social media and the internet, but you get treated like a VIP and have one convenient list of new content delivered to your inbox each week when you subscribe to Jason’s VIP Lounge at: https://jasonmefford.com/vip/ plus; that way, you can communicate with me through email.

Categories
Great Women in Compliance

Jacki Cheslow – Bringing Life to a Compliance Program

Welcome to the Great Women in Compliance Podcast, co-hosted by Lisa Fine and Mary Shirley.

One of the best things about the longevity of the GWIC podcast is that Mary and Lisa get to build some of their own ideas and traditions.  Some are things like “bonus episodes” – a great idea by Mary, the #GWICies, and one of Lisa’s, which is to do her last podcast interview of the year with someone who is not only a leader in the E&C community due to her expertise, but also someone who is always a mentor and support to so many people (including Lisa).

This year, Lisa is speaking with Jacki Cheslow, who was on the podcast a few years back and since then has moved from a large corporate organization, Avis/Budget, to the Institute of Electrical and Electronic Engineers – the IEEE, which is the world’s largest non-profit technical organization.

Jackie talks about her experience with IEEE as a mission-driven organization, which is to develop technology to benefit humanity, and how that influences her role.  She also talks about starting out at IEEE and needed to learn a whole new area, sanctions, which then became even more important than she would have anticipated.

Jacki also shares how she had a bit of imposter syndrome when she started at IEEE,  She provides  valuable insight in how to change one’s mindset from a fixed mindset to a growth mindset and how that can also change one’s view that they are given the opportunity to learn new things as recognition of one’s potential and being open to learning.

The Great Women in Compliance Podcast is on the Compliance Podcast Network with a selection of other Compliance related offerings to listen in to.  If you are enjoying this episode, please rate it on your preferred podcast player to help other likeminded Ethics and Compliance professionals find it.  If you have a moment to leave a review at the same time, Mary and Lisa would be so grateful.  You can also find the GWIC podcast on Corporate Compliance Insights where Lisa and Mary have a landing page with additional information about them and the story of the podcast.  Corporate Compliance Insights is a much-appreciated sponsor and supporter of GWIC, including affiliate organization CCI Press publishing the related book; “Sending the Elevator Back Down, What We’ve Learned from Great Women in Compliance” (CCI Press, 2020).

If you enjoyed the book, the GWIC team would be very grateful if you would consider rating it on Goodreads and Amazon and leaving a short review.  Don’t forget to send the elevator back down by passing on your copy to someone who you think might enjoy reading it when you’re done, or if you can’t bear parting with your copy, consider it as a holiday or appreciation gift for someone in Compliance who deserves a treat.

You can subscribe to the Great Women in Compliance podcast on any podcast player by searching for it and we welcome new subscribers to our podcast.

Join the Great Women in Compliance community on LinkedIn here.

Categories
Compliance Into the Weeds

OCC ALJ Slams Ex-Wells Fargo Execs

The award-winning, Compliance into the Weeds is the only weekly podcast that takes a deep dive into a compliance-related topic, literally going into the weeds to explore a subject more. In this episode, we continue the ongoing saga of Wells Fargo and its fraudulent accounts scandal. Recently an administrative law judge has affirmed that three former audit and risk management executives at Wells Fargo should face millions in penalties for their sloppy oversight during the bank’s fake-account scandal in the 2010s. The defendants were Claudia Russ Anderson, former group risk officer for Wells Fargo’s community banking division; David Julian, former chief auditor; and Paul McLinko, former executive audit director.

Some of the highlights include:

·      The background facts.

·      Will the fallout from the Wells Fargo fake accounts scandal ever end? (Hint-When, our Sun, goes supernova.)

·      What is failure to provide a credible challenge?

·      Why are these execs trying to defend their inaction?

·      Why a clear line of authority is needed in compliance.

·      A root cause analysis is a basic Hallmark of an effective compliance program. Why was it separately called out?

·      What are the lessons learned for compliance?

 Resources

Matt Kelly in Radical Compliance

Categories
Daily Compliance News

December 14, 2022 – The Who is Eva Kaili Edition

Welcome to the Daily Compliance News. Each day, Tom Fox, the Voice of Compliance, brings you four compliance-related stories to start your day. Sit back, enjoy a cup of morning coffee and listen to the Daily Compliance News. All from the Compliance Podcast Network.

Stories we are following in today’s edition of Daily Compliance News: