Categories
Innovation in Compliance

Innovation in Compliance: Evie Wentink on Rethinking Compliance

Innovation comes in many areas and compliance professionals need to not only be ready for it but embrace it. Join Tom Fox, the Voice of Compliance, as he visits with top innovative minds, thinkers, and creators in the award-winning Innovation in Compliance podcast.

In this episode, Tom welcomes back Evie Wentink to discuss the importance of rethinking ethics and compliance practices.

Evie shares insights from her recent LinkedIn articles on best practices for ethics hotlines and the importance of finding creative ways to engage employees in compliance topics. She reads a whimsical Dr. Seuss-inspired piece on reaching ethics hotlines and emphasizes the need for compliance messaging to be approachable and engaging. Additionally, Evie discusses the challenges compliance professionals face with limited budgets and offers practical solutions such as leveraging LinkedIn for networking and creating low-cost, effective compliance awareness tools.

The conversation also touches on the significance of changing the narrative around ethics and compliance for younger generations. Evie shares her experiences discussing compliance with her children and highlights the need for better education in schools to prepare future employees. She concludes by mentioning her new website, Ethical Edge Experts, and various platforms she’s using to spread compliance awareness. Tom and Evie agree on the necessity of continuous dialogue and innovation in the compliance field.

Key Highlights:

  • Rethinking Compliance Practices
  • Creative Messaging for Ethics Hotlines
  • Leveraging Low-Cost Resources
  • Engaging Managers in Compliance

Resources:
Evie Wentink on LinkedIn

Evie’s Top 10 Compliance Back to Basics

Tom Fox

Instagram

Facebook

YouTube

Twitter

LinkedIn

Categories
Blog

The 2024 ECCP – Using Data Analytics to Determine Employee Engagement, Trust, and Corporate Culture

In her recent speech at the Society of Corporate Compliance and Ethics 23rd Annual Compliance & Ethics Institute. Principal Deputy Assistant Attorney General Nicole M. Argentieri spoke about the CWA and reviewed its early developments. (A copy of her remarks can be found here.) There was also updated information on the DOJ approach to whistleblowers and anti-retaliation found in the 2024 Update to the Evaluation of Corporate Compliance Programs (2024 ECCP). She addressed the growing importance of using data analytics to evaluate key aspects of a company’s corporate culture, particularly employee engagement, trust, and overall corporate ethics.

Assessing corporate culture is essential for compliance professionals. Culture is a powerful determinant of whether employees will adhere to company policies, report misconduct, and act ethically. The DOJ has made it clear through the 2024 ECCP that an organization’s culture of compliance is as critical as the controls themselves. Compliance programs must go beyond preventing misconduct and cultivate a culture where ethics and transparency are prioritized.

Employee engagement and trust are at the heart of this culture. Engaged employees are more likely to comply with rules and report issues. However, if there is a lack of trust—whether in the company’s leadership, policies, or reporting mechanisms—the risk of ethical lapses and misconduct increases. Data analytics can offer compliance professionals actionable insights into these hard-to-measure elements of corporate culture.

Leveraging Data Analytics for Cultural Insights

Traditionally, companies have relied on surveys, focus groups, and audits to assess employee engagement and trust. Despite their value, these methods frequently have limitations due to low response rates, biases, and a point-in-time perspective. On the other hand, data analytics offers ongoing, real-time insights across various indicators. Let’s explore how data analytics can help evaluate employee engagement, trust, and corporate culture:

Employee Engagement Data

Employee engagement can be a key indicator of whether a compliance program is likely to succeed. High levels of engagement suggest that employees are motivated, aligned with corporate values, and likely to act in the company’s best interest.

Metrics to Consider

  • Employee Feedback Platforms. Tracking data from feedback platforms (such as pulse surveys or anonymous feedback tools) can provide insights into employee sentiment about their work environment and leadership.
  • Participation in Training Programs. Data on employee participation in compliance training—especially voluntary programs—can offer insights into employees’ engagement with the company’s compliance initiatives.
  • Use of Corporate Tools. Monitoring internal systems such as compliance hotlines, whistleblower portals, and internal messaging boards can help assess whether employees feel empowered to engage with compliance resources.

By monitoring engagement trends over time, compliance officers can detect shifts in employee engagement and intervene if levels drop. For instance, increasing non-compliance with mandatory training could be a red flag for broader cultural issues.

Trust in Leadership and Compliance Programs

Trust is a critical component of a successful corporate compliance culture. If employees do not trust leadership or the compliance function, they are less likely to report misconduct and more likely to turn a blind eye to ethical violations.

Metrics to Consider

  • Whistleblower Reporting. Data on the number of whistleblower reports can be telling. A lack of reports may not necessarily indicate a lack of issues—it could signal a fear of retaliation or distrust in the reporting process.
  • Retention Rates in High-Risk Areas. Monitoring employee turnover in areas that are considered high-risk (e.g., finance, procurement, or overseas offices) can help determine whether ethical concerns are driving departures.
  • Survey Data on Trust Levels. Regular employee surveys on perceptions of leadership and the compliance program can offer a pulse on trust. The key is to go beyond traditional engagement surveys and ask questions about ethical concerns and trust in compliance leadership.

Combining survey data with data from whistleblower systems and employee retention analytics can offer a more nuanced view of whether employees trust leadership. A low reporting rate and high turnover in high-risk areas may indicate deeper cultural problems requiring intervention.

Monitoring Employee Behavior and Risk Indicators

One of the most significant ways data analytics can support compliance efforts is by detecting behavioral patterns that may indicate a lapse in corporate culture or potential compliance risks.

Metrics to Consider

  • Expense and Travel Data. Analyzing expense reports and travel data patterns can reveal inconsistencies or potential misconduct, such as fraudulent claims or unauthorized spending.
  • Email and Communication Analysis. Some companies use natural language processing (NLP) tools to analyze internal communications for warning signs of ethical issues. This can include detecting language that suggests rule-breaking, covering up misconduct, or expressing discontent with corporate policies.
  • Business Unit Performance vs. Compliance Reporting. Comparing performance data across business units with the frequency of compliance-related issues can provide insights into whether high-performing units are cutting corners to achieve their results.

Behavioral analytics can help compliance professionals detect patterns before they escalate into larger issues. For example, if a particular business unit shows exceptional financial performance but is under-reporting compliance concerns, this could signal a risky culture of non-compliance.

Driving a Data-Driven Culture of Compliance

Implementing data analytics in your compliance program requires the right technology, processes, and, most importantly, corporate buy-in. As the DOJ highlighted in its recent updates to the 2024 ECCP, compliance personnel must have adequate access to relevant data sources and the resources to interpret and act on that data. Companies should invest in the same level of technology for their compliance functions as they do for their business operations.

Some of the keys every compliance program should consider to help implement a data-driven culture of compliance include the following strategies:.

  • Build Cross-Functional Partnerships. Compliance teams should collaborate with human resources, IT, and business operations to gain access to the data they need. A cross-functional approach ensures compliance data is integrated into the company’s broader performance metrics.
  • Foster Transparency in Data Use. Be clear with employees about how their data will be used, particularly in sensitive areas such as monitoring communication. Emphasizing the ethical use of data can help build trust.
  • Regularly Reassess Your Metrics. As with any compliance program, the metrics used to evaluate corporate culture should evolve. New risks, technologies, and business challenges should inform your data strategy.

Strengthening Compliance through Analytics

The DOJ made clear in the Argentieri speech and the 2024 Update to the Evaluation of Corporate Compliance Programs that a data-driven approach to understanding employee engagement, trust, and corporate culture is essential for compliance success. Data analytics offers compliance professionals powerful tools to assess whether employees are following the rules and truly engaged in creating an ethical and compliant corporate environment.

As we look toward the future, companies prioritizing data analytics in their compliance programs will be better equipped to prevent misconduct, identify cultural risks, and foster a workplace that values ethics and transparency. For compliance officers, the time is now to embrace data analytics and use it to reinforce the foundation of a strong corporate compliance program.

Categories
Corruption, Crime and Compliance

Deep Dive into Deere SEC FCPA Settlement

The SEC’s recent settlement with Deere & Company for $9.9 million for FCPA violations is another textbook example of bribery schemes, which revealed the absence of a culture of compliance, and the circumvention of basic entertainment, hospitality and travel expense controls.

In this episode of Corruption, Crime, and Compliance, Michael Volkov breaks down the SEC’s $9.9 million settlement with Deere & Company following widespread FCPA violations by its subsidiary, Wirtgen Thailand. Michael discusses how the bribery schemes, involving government officials in Thailand, reveal significant failures in compliance oversight and corporate governance, while also highlighting the critical lessons for businesses aiming to avoid similar pitfalls.

Key Insights:

  • Deere’s subsidiary, Wirtgen Thailand, secured government tenders through cash bribes, entertainment at massage parlors, and lavish trips for officials from the Royal Thai Air Force (RTAF), Department of Highways (DOH), and Department of Rural Roads (DRR).
  • Wirtgen disguised entertainment and bribe payments in expense reports with vague descriptions and round-number amounts, which were improperly approved by regional managers.
  • Wirtgen organized extravagant trips disguised as factory visits for Thai officials, which included sightseeing and luxury hotels in Europe. These trips were arranged to win government tenders but involved no legitimate business activities.
  • Bribes were also funneled through a third-party consultant via sham commission agreements. This consultant acted as a middleman, facilitating bribe payments to government officials to secure high-value tenders.
  • Deere’s failure to fully integrate Wirtgen into its compliance program after acquisition allowed the bribery schemes to continue. This highlights the risks of not harmonizing compliance protocols in newly acquired subsidiaries.
  • In response to the SEC investigation, Deere terminated employees involved in the misconduct, revamped its compliance program, and introduced initiatives like a bi-monthly compliance newsletter and enhanced anti-bribery training.

Resources:

Michael Volkov on LinkedIn | Twitter

The Volkov Law Group

Categories
Adventures in Compliance

Adventures in Compliance: Special Episode – Old Time Radio Meets The Silver Screen – Adam Graham on The Movie The Hound of The Baskervilles

We take things in a different direction today with our first Special Episode in the Adventures in Compliance podcast. Today, Tom Fox is thrilled to bring back Adam Graham for a short, two-part special series where we begin to review some of the movie representations of Sherlock Holmes. Tom met Adam Graham at PodFest Expo 2024 and he is a huge old-time mystery radio show aficionado, including, of course, Sherlock Holmes.

Today, we begin with a look at the first Basil Rathbone/Nigel Bruce Holmes adventures, which is also the first of two productions by Universal Pictures, The Hound of the Baskervilles.

Graham shares insights on the 15th anniversary of his podcast and his background as an independent podcaster. The discussion focuses on the enduring appeal of Sherlock Holmes, the strong performances of Basil Rathbone and Nigel Bruce, and the rich atmosphere of films like The Hound of the Baskervilles and The Adventures of Sherlock Holmes (our next episode).

The conversation highlights the contrasts between the portrayals of Dr. Watson by Nigel Bruce in films and other adaptations. They praise the remarkable cinematography, the storytelling, and the significance of character actors like George Zucco as Moriarty. They also discuss the range shown by Rathbone and Bruce in the dynamic roles they played. The episode concludes with Adam sharing details about his upcoming 15thanniversary of his podcast, the Great Detectives of Old Time Radio Podcast and inviting listeners to learn more about old time radio detectives on his website.

Key Highlights:

  • Analyzing The Hound of the Baskervilles
  • Basil Rathbone as Sherlock Holmes
  • Nigel Bruce’s Portrayal of Dr. Watson
  • Universal Pictures are the Right Studio for Holmes
  • Final Thoughts and Announcements

Resources:

The New Annotated Sherlock Holmes

Sherlock Holmes FAQ

Adam Graham

Great Detectives of Old Time Radio

Sherlock Holmes on Great Detectives of Old Time Radio

Connect with Tom Fox

Instagram

Facebook

YouTube

Twitter

LinkedIn

Categories
Compliance Tip of the Day

Compliance Tip of the Day: Highlights from Argentieri Speech

Welcome to “Compliance Tip of the Day,” the podcast where we bring you daily insights and practical advice on navigating the ever-evolving landscape of compliance and regulatory requirements.

Whether you’re a seasoned compliance professional or just starting your journey, our aim is to provide you with bite-sized, actionable tips to help you stay on top of your compliance game.

Join us as we explore the latest industry trends, share best practices, and demystify complex compliance issues to keep your organization on the right side of the law.

Tune in daily for your dose of compliance wisdom, and let’s make compliance a little less daunting, one tip at a time.

Today, we look at the key highlights for compliance professionals from the recent speech by Nicole Argentieri announcing the 2024 Update to the Evaluation of Corporate Compliance Programs.

Categories
FCPA Compliance Report

FCPA Compliance Report: Vince Walden on Leveraging Data Analytics for Effective Compliance Monitoring

Welcome to the award-winning FCPA Compliance Report, the longest running podcast in compliance.

In this edition of the FCPA Compliance Report, Tom Fox welcomes back Vince Walden, founder of KonaAI. Vince reports on the 2024 Update to the Evaluation of Corporate Compliance Programs. (Today’s episode is a cross-posting from Data Driven Compliance.)

Walden, a distinguished expert in compliance data analytics, actively participates in industry forums such as the Society of Corporate Compliance and Ethics annual summit in Grapevine, Texas. He advocates for compliance professionals to have ample access to relevant data sources, enabling them to monitor and test policies, controls, and transactions effectively. Walden stresses the importance of AI developers being vigilant about potential biases and public harm, aligning with the Department of Justice’s stance on accountability. He advises compliance practitioners to collaborate with internal audit and finance teams to ensure they have the necessary transactional data for comprehensive risk assessments, highlighting successful, cost-effective implementations like those at Albemarle as models for gradual, data-driven compliance program adoption.

Highlights in this Episode

  • Data-Driven Compliance for Cost Savings
  • Enhancing Compliance through Advanced Data Analysis
  • Identifying High-Risk Areas for Data Analytics
  • Proactive Risk Mitigation through Real-Time Monitoring
  • ROI-driven Compliance Programs with Data Analytics

Resources

Vince Walden on LinkedIn

KonaAI

Tom Fox

Instagram

Facebook

YouTube

Twitter

LinkedIn

For more information on the Ethico Toolkit for Middle Managers, available at no charge by clicking here.

Categories
Blog

The 2024 ECCP: Complying with the 2024 ECCP on Whistleblowers

The Department of Justice (DOJ), in its 2024 Update, has explicitly directed companies to ensure they have robust processes in place to identify, manage, and mitigate emerging risks related to new technologies, including AI. As compliance professionals, we are responsible for safeguarding the integrity of our organizations and fostering a culture where ethical behavior is the norm, not the exception. The 2024 Update to the Evaluation of Corporate Compliance Programs provides us with critical insights into how we can enhance the effectiveness of our compliance programs, particularly regarding reporting mechanisms and whistleblower protection. These elements are the bedrock of a robust compliance culture, and the update offers a clear roadmap for their implementation and improvement.

The DOJ posed two sets of queries for compliance professionals. They are found in Section I, entitled “Is the Corporation’s Compliance Program Well Designed?” A prosecutor could ask a company or compliance professional going through an investigation in the following series of questions.

Effectiveness of the Reporting Mechanism

  • Does the company have an anonymous reporting mechanism, and if not, why not?
  • How is the reporting mechanism publicized to the company’s employees and other third parties? Has it been used?
  • Does the company test whether employees know the hotline and feel comfortable using it?
  • Does the company encourage and incentivize reporting of potential misconduct or violations of company policy? Conversely, does it use practices that tend to chill such reporting?
  • How does the company assess employees’ willingness to report? How has the company assessed the seriousness of the allegations it received?
  • Has the compliance function had full access to reporting and investigative information?

Commitment to Whistleblower Protection and Anti-Retaliation

  • Does the company have an anti-retaliation policy?
  • Does the company train employees on internal and external anti-retaliation policies and whistleblower protection laws?
  • To the extent that the company disciplines employees involved in misconduct, are employees who reported internally treated differently than others involved in misconduct who did not?
  • Does the company train employees on internal reporting systems, external whistleblower programs, and regulatory regimes?

As compliance professionals, we are charged with safeguarding the integrity of our organizations and fostering a culture where ethical behavior is the norm, not the exception. The 2024 Update to the Evaluation of Corporate Compliance Programs provides us with critical insights into how we can enhance the effectiveness of our compliance programs, particularly regarding reporting mechanisms and whistleblower protection. These elements are the bedrock of a robust compliance culture, and the update offers a clear roadmap for their implementation and improvement.

The Importance of an Anonymous Reporting Mechanism

One key takeaway from the 2024 Update is the emphasis on having an anonymous reporting mechanism. This tool is essential for any compliance program as it provides employees and third parties with a safe and confidential way to report potential misconduct or violations of company policy.

The update explicitly asks whether your company has such a mechanism and, if not, why not. The absence of an anonymous reporting system should be a red flag for any compliance professional. In today’s regulatory environment, where transparency and accountability are paramount, the lack of such a mechanism can severely undermine the credibility of your compliance program.

If your organization does not have an anonymous reporting mechanism, now is the time to implement one. The benefits are clear: it encourages more reports, provides a sense of security to the reporter, and demonstrates the company’s commitment to addressing unethical behavior. However, merely having a mechanism is not enough.

The lesson here is that the existence of an anonymous reporting mechanism is not just a best practice—it’s a necessity. If your company lacks such a system, it’s time to reconsider seriously. The key takeaway is ensuring your company has an anonymous reporting mechanism. This tool is crucial for empowering employees and third parties to report misconduct without fear of exposure. The absence of this mechanism signals a significant gap in your compliance program, which could undermine trust and deter reporting.

How Is the Reporting Mechanism Publicized?

Another critical aspect highlighted in the update is how well the reporting mechanism is publicized within the company and to third parties. A reporting mechanism that isn’t well-known or accessible might as well not exist. The compliance team is responsible for ensuring employees know and understand how to use this tool. This can be achieved through regular training sessions, clear communication channels, and visible reminders throughout the workplace.

It is not simply about making employees aware but also making them comfortable with using the mechanism. This involves creating a workplace culture where reporting misconduct is seen as a positive action, not something that will lead to negative repercussions.

The key lesson for every compliance professional is that a reporting mechanism is only as effective as its visibility and accessibility. If employees and third parties aren’t aware of it, it will not be used. However, it would be best if you publicized your reporting mechanism widely. Regularly communicate its existence, purpose, and how to use it. Training sessions, internal communications, and visible reminders throughout the organization are essential to ensure everyone knows how to report concerns.

Testing Employee Awareness and Comfort

The 2024 Update introduces a crucial question: Has the company tested whether employees know the hotline and feel comfortable using it? This goes beyond just tracking the number of reports received. It requires proactive steps such as surveys, focus groups, or even role-playing scenarios to gauge the effectiveness of your reporting system.

Understanding employees’ perceptions and addressing any concerns they may have is vital. For instance, if employees hesitate to use the hotline due to fear of retaliation or believing nothing will change, these issues must be addressed head-on. Ensuring that the reporting mechanism is perceived as a trusted and effective tool is key to its success.

The bottom line is that awareness is one thing; comfort in using the reporting system is another. Employees must feel secure using the mechanism without fear of retaliation or inaction. As a compliance professional, you must regularly test and measure employee awareness and comfort. Use surveys, focus groups, and feedback sessions to gauge whether employees know about the reporting channels and feel safe using them. Address any concerns or misconceptions that may prevent employees from reporting misconduct.

Encouraging and Incentivizing Reporting

The update also challenges companies to reflect on whether they encourage and incentivize reporting of potential misconduct or violations. This is a nuanced area, as it involves balancing encouragement without creating a system that can be abused.

One effective approach is to incorporate positive reinforcement into the reporting process. This could be recognition programs for employees who demonstrate ethical behavior, including those who report concerns. Additionally, communicating the outcomes of investigations (while maintaining confidentiality) can reinforce the idea that reporting leads to tangible results and positive organizational changes.

Conversely, the update warns against practices that might chill reporting. These can include overly aggressive investigations, a lack of confidentiality, or a corporate culture that implicitly discourages speaking up. Compliance professionals must be vigilant in identifying and eliminating these barriers. Ensuring that employees feel safe and supported when they report misconduct is non-negotiable.

It is incumbent to note that practices that discourage or chill reporting are counterproductive and can erode trust in the compliance program. Compliance professionals must identify and eliminate practices that may deter reporting. This includes ensuring confidentiality, avoiding overly aggressive investigations, and addressing any cultural factors that may implicitly discourage speaking up. Building a culture where reporting is seen as a positive and valued action is crucial.

Assessing and Acting on Reports

Once a report is made, how the company handles it speaks volumes about its commitment to compliance. The update emphasizes the importance of assessing the seriousness of the allegations and ensuring that the compliance function has full access to reporting and investigative information.

This means every report deserves to be taken seriously, regardless of how minor it may seem. The compliance department must ensure that investigations are thorough, impartial, and conducted with the utmost confidentiality. This helps resolve the issue at hand and builds trust in the system, encouraging more employees to come forward in the future.

Other key components are both transparency and communication. While maintaining confidentiality, it is crucial to keep the reporter informed about the status of their report. This can significantly impact their perception of the process and the company’s commitment to addressing misconduct.

A compliance professional must realize that how reports are handled reflects the company’s commitment to compliance and ethics. Further, every corporate compliance program must ensure thorough and impartial investigations. Every report deserves serious attention, regardless of its perceived severity. The compliance team should have full access to reporting and investigative information, and the process should be transparent. Keeping the reporter informed while maintaining confidentiality builds trust and encourages future reporting.

Commitment to Whistleblower Protection and Anti-Retaliation

One of the update’s most critical aspects is its focus on whistleblower protection and anti-retaliation. A robust compliance program is complete with strong measures to protect those who come forward. The 2024 ECCP asks whether the company has an anti-retaliation policy in place. This is a fundamental requirement. Without such a policy, employees will be reluctant to report misconduct, fearing repercussions. However, having a policy is just the first step.

Training ensures employees know internal anti-retaliation policies and external whistleblower protection laws. This training should be regular, comprehensive, and tailored to different levels of the organization. Employees must understand that retaliation is against company policy and illegal under various regulatory regimes.

The 2024 ECCP also asks whether employees who report misconduct are treated differently than those who do not. This question is crucial as it touches on the fairness and integrity of your compliance program. It is essential that reporters are not penalized for their actions and that the company consistently demonstrates its commitment to protecting whistleblowers. Protecting whistleblowers is fundamental to maintaining an effective compliance program. Without strong anti-retaliation measures, your program’s credibility is at risk. Every corporate compliance function must implement and enforce a robust anti-retaliation policy.

Compliance must regularly train employees on internal policies and external whistleblower protection laws. This will ensure that whistleblowers are not treated unfairly and that there is a clear, consistent approach to handling reports. This protection not only encourages reporting but also supports a culture of integrity.

However, simply being aware of the reporting mechanism is not enough. Employees also need to be trained in the broader regulatory environment. Compliance functions must not conduct regular training on internal reporting systems and external whistleblower programs. Make sure that employees understand not only how to report but also the legal protections available to them. This comprehensive approach helps reinforce the importance of compliance and the company’s commitment to ethical behavior.

The 2024 Update to the Evaluation of Corporate Compliance Programs is a critical reminder that compliance is not just about having policies in place but about creating a culture of ethics and integrity. For in-house compliance professionals, the lessons are clear: prioritize anonymous reporting mechanisms, ensure robust whistleblower protections, and foster a culture where employees feel safe and encouraged to speak up. Doing so protects our organizations and builds a workplace where ethical behavior is the norm, not the exception.

The 2024 Update to the Evaluation of Corporate Compliance Programs underscores the importance of a well-structured, well-publicized, and well-enforced compliance program. For compliance professionals, the key takeaways are clear: ensure your reporting mechanisms are robust and accessible, foster a safe and supportive environment for reporting, and protect those who come forward. By focusing on these areas, you can build a culture of integrity that meets regulatory expectations and creates a workplace where ethical behavior is the standard.

Categories
Daily Compliance News

Daily Compliance News: September 30, 2024 – The My Law Firm Edition

Welcome to the Daily Compliance News. Each day, Tom Fox, the Voice of Compliance, brings you compliance-related stories to start your day. Sit back, enjoy a cup of morning coffee, and listen to the Daily Compliance News. All from the Compliance Podcast Network.

Each day, we consider four stories from the business world: compliance, ethics, risk management, leadership, or general interest for the compliance professional.

In today’s edition of Daily Compliance News:

  • Trump plans to make DOJ his personal law firm. (WSJ)
  • CA wants carbon accounting. (WSJ)
  • Tim Brown wants tougher cyber laws. (FT)
  • Elliot affiliate wins Citgo auction. (Reuters)

Categories
Sunday Book Review

Sunday Book Review: September 29, 2024 The books on Frankenstein Edition

In the Sunday Book Review, Tom Fox considers books that would interest the compliance professional, the business executive, or anyone who might be curious. It could be books about business, compliance, history, leadership, current events, or anything else that might interest me.

In today’s edition of the Sunday Book Review, we look at the four books on Frankenstein Edition.

  1. Book 1, The Prodigal Sons by Dean Koontz
  2. Frankenstein Underground by Mike Mignola
  3. Monstrous Progeny by Lester Friedman
  4. Frankenstein: A Cultural History by Susan Tyler Hitchcock

Resources:

Categories
Blog

Argentieri on the DOJ’s Corporate Whistleblower Awards Pilot Program

The Department of Justice (DOJ) recently unveiled the Corporate Whistleblower Awards Pilot Program (CWA) to bolster corporate enforcement efforts. Although the program has only been operational for a few weeks, it has already started receiving promising tips. This initiative reflects a strategic effort by the DOJ to harness financial incentives in the fight against white-collar crime, offering new opportunities for whistleblowers and reshaping the landscape of corporate compliance.

In her recent speech at the Society of Corporate Compliance and Ethics 23rd Annual Compliance & Ethics Institute. Principal Deputy Assistant Attorney General Nicole M. Argentieri spoke about the CWA and reviewed its early developments. (A copy of her remarks can be found here.) There was also updated information on the DOJ approach to whistleblowers and anti-retaliation found in the 2024 Update to the Evaluation of Corporate Compliance Programs (2024 ECCP). This new language found in the 2024 ECCP will be the subject of a separate blog post.

Why Whistleblower Programs Matter

Argentieri noted that whistleblower programs have a proven track record of success. Programs at other agencies, such as the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC), have led to thousands of tips and hundreds of millions of dollars in awards and have been instrumental in holding wrongdoers accountable. However, these existing programs do not cover the full spectrum of white-collar and corporate crime that the DOJ prosecutes. The CWA was designed to fill these critical gaps.

The CWA targets four priority areas not currently covered by other whistleblower programs: abuses of the financial system by financial institutions and insiders, foreign corruption and bribery schemes, domestic corruption, and health care schemes targeting private insurers. Importantly, the program is not limited to these categories. If a whistleblower has information about misconduct outside of these areas, the DOJ is still interested in hearing from them.

Encouraging Internal Reporting and Enhancing Corporate Compliance

Interestingly, Argentieri believes one of the CWA’s most innovative aspects is its focus on encouraging internal reporting. Whistleblowers who first report internally within their companies will be eligible for an award if they report to the DOJ within 120 days of their internal report. Furthermore, making an internal report before coming forward to the DOJ is a factor that will increase the potential whistleblower award.

This approach serves a dual purpose. It incentivizes employees to utilize internal reporting mechanisms, reinforcing the importance of strong internal compliance programs. At the same time, it creates a powerful incentive for companies to take internal reports seriously and to act swiftly in response to potential misconduct.

For companies, the stakes are high. The DOJ has clarified that the CWA will alter the calculus when considering whether to make a voluntary self-disclosure. Alongside the whistleblower program, the DOJ amended its Corporate Enforcement and Voluntary Self-Disclosure Policy (CEP). Under this amendment, if a company receives an internal whistleblower report and then reports the misconduct to the DOJ within 120 days—before the DOJ reaches out to the company—it will be eligible for the greatest benefit under the CEP: a presumption of a declination provided the company fully cooperates and remediates. This is a significant departure from the usual approach, as it allows a company to qualify for a declination even if the whistleblower comes to the DOJ first.

Protecting Whistleblowers: A Priority for the DOJ

The DOJ’s whistleblower program is about receiving tips and protecting those who come forward. The DOJ is fully committed to safeguarding whistleblowers’ identities to the fullest extent allowable under the law. Moreover, the DOJ will closely monitor any actions against whistleblowers who report misconduct internally. Compliance departments play a crucial role in this process by implementing robust anti-retaliation policies and training employees on these protections.

Under the 2024 ECCP, the DOJ will scrutinize a company’s commitment to whistleblower protection and the promotion of a “speak-up” culture. Companies retaliating against whistleblowers risk losing credit for cooperation and remediation and could face severe consequences, including sentencing enhancements and even prosecution for obstruction of justice.

Early Successes and Corporate Lessons

Argentieri said the CWA is already off to a strong start, with over 100 tips received in just a few weeks. If these whistleblowers also report internally, as the program incentivizes, companies must take their reports seriously and consider coming forward to the DOJ.

Turning to recent corporate resolutions, the DOJ’s approach to recognizing and rewarding cooperation and remediation is instructive. A prime example is the recent declination granted to Boston Consulting Group (BCG) under the CEP. BCG’s timely and voluntary self-disclosure of a potential FCPA violation and its complete and proactive cooperation led to the DOJ’s decision to decline prosecution. BCG’s remediation efforts were particularly noteworthy, including the termination of personnel involved in the misconduct and the imposition of compensation-based penalties, such as requiring certain partners to forfeit their equity and withholding bonuses.

On the other hand, SAP, mentioned earlier, earned a 40% reduction in its criminal penalty—near the maximum reduction available for companies that do not voluntarily self-disclose. SAP’s proactive cooperation began shortly after news reports surfaced, and its swift remediation, including disciplining responsible employees and enhancing its compliance program, was critical in earning this reduction.

In contrast, Trafigura received only a 10% reduction for cooperation and remediation. The company’s delayed preservation and production of evidence and a posture during resolution negotiations that caused significant delays limited its cooperation credit. Moreover, Trafigura’s remediation efforts were mixed, as it was slow to discipline certain employees, further diminishing its potential credit.

The Takeaways for Compliance Officers

The lessons from these cases and the CWA are clear for compliance professionals. First, fostering a strong internal reporting culture is crucial. Companies encouraging internal whistleblowing and acting swiftly on these reports are better positioned to benefit from DOJ policies like the CEP. Second, the importance of proactive and thorough cooperation must be considered. Companies that fully cooperate and remediate—going above and beyond in their efforts—stand to receive significant benefits in any DOJ investigation.

Finally, the CWA emphasizes the need for robust whistleblower protections. Compliance departments must implement, actively promote, and enforce policies that protect whistleblowers from retaliation. The DOJ is watching closely, and companies that fail to protect their whistleblowers will face serious consequences.

A New Era of Corporate Accountability

The launch of the Corporate Whistleblower Awards Pilot Program marks a new era in corporate accountability. By leveraging financial incentives and protecting those who come forward, the DOJ is creating a powerful tool for combating white-collar crime. For companies, the message is clear: invest in strong compliance programs, encourage internal reporting, and act decisively on misconduct. Doing so aligns with ethical business practices and positions the company to achieve the most favorable outcomes in any DOJ investigation. As the CWA continues to gain traction, compliance professionals will play a critical role in guiding their organizations through this evolving landscape, ensuring they remain on the right side of the law and public trust.