Tag: CCO

Categories
31 Days to More Effective Compliance Programs

One Month to a More Effective Compliance Program Through Culture: Day 16 – How a Culture of Speak Up Improves Corporate Culture

What is a speak-up culture, and how does it improve the overall corporate culture? A speak-up culture is a work environment where open communication is encouraged, fostering trust and innovation. This culture is built on leadership that values listening and employee involvement in problem-solving. One of the key factors in fostering a speaking-up culture is protecting employees from retaliation. Anti-retaliation policies and procedures, training for middle managers, and a consistent, transparent process for investigating concerns are crucial to maintaining this culture. The fair process doctrine, which emphasizes transparency, consistency, and protection from retaliation, plays a significant role in building trust, encouraging engagement, and enhancing the overall organizational culture.

Empowered Employees. When employees feel empowered to contribute their ideas, it can lead to significant positive outcomes for the organization. However, fostering a speak-up culture goes beyond just listening. Retaliation should never be tolerated, and organizations must make it clear that it will not be accepted under any circumstances.

Role of Middle Managers. Middle managers play a vital role in fostering a speak-up culture. They need to be trained to listen, accept information, and report it to the appropriate channels.

Consistency and transparency. Consistency and transparency in the investigation process are also key components of a speak-up culture. Organizations must have a clear process in place for investigating concerns, and employees should be aware of this process.

Fostering a speak-up culture in the workplace is crucial for building trust, encouraging engagement, and enhancing the overall organizational culture. It requires leadership that values listening and employee involvement, as well as policies and procedures to protect employees from retaliation. Middle managers play a vital role in supporting employees and facilitating open communication. Consistency and transparency in the investigation process are essential for building trust and ensuring that employees feel comfortable bringing forward their concerns. By fostering a speak-up culture, organizations can create a culture where employees feel empowered to contribute their ideas and make a positive impact on the workplace.

 Three key takeaways:

1. Having a reporting system is important but listening is equally critical.

2. Employees must be protected from retaliation.

3. Fostering a speak-up culture can create a culture where employees feel empowered to contribute their ideas and make a positive impact on the workplace.

Do you want to improve your culture? How can you assess your culture and develop a strategy to improve it going forward? Check out the new tool, The Culture Audit. For more registration, click here.

Categories
31 Days to More Effective Compliance Programs

One Month to a More Effective Compliance Program Through Culture – Day 15 – The ROI of a Culture of Speak Up

We are now at a place where there is sufficient data, academic research, and actual use cases from corporations and businesses that demonstrate good ethics and compliance programs are not simply good for business but when properly used, they lead to greater profitability.

For 15 years, Ethisphere has been collecting data around its World’s Most Ethical Company awards. Companies that receive this designation have been found to outperform their peers on various stock indices. Ethisphere calls this the “Ethics Premium.” Ethisphere Executive Vice President (EVP) Erica Salmon Byrne has noted, “In tracking how the stock prices of publicly traded honorees compare to the U.S. Large Cap Index, we found that listed World’s Most Ethical Companies outperformed the large cap sector.” In 2010 that number was a delta of 4.5%. Yet by 2020, that number had skyrocketed to 13.5%. Clearly, Ethisphere has been on to something.

Academic research has also shown the efficacy of ethics and compliance programs. George Serafeim and Paul M. Healy demonstrated in their paper, An Analysis of Firm’s Self-Reported Anti-Corruption Efforts, that companies with robust compliance programs do better financially in countries prone to corruption than companies with less effective compliance programs. Without a robust compliance program, even with high sales in a high-risk country, the sales will drop off and lead to a negative Return on Equity (ROE) of between 24% to 30%.

Dr. Kyle Welch, Assistant Professor at George Washington University (GWU), in his paper, co-authored with Stephen Stubben, Associate Professor from The University of Utah, entitled “Evidence on the Use and Efficacy of Internal Whistleblowing Systems” (Report). In this paper, Welch and Stubben reviewed some 15 years of anonymized data from NAVEX Global, Inc. This data was from the company’s hotline reporting systems. Some of the key findings included that companies with a robust whistleblower and reporting system had greater profitability and workforce productivity as measured by Return on Assets (ROA) there were fewer material lawsuits brought against the company overall and there were lower settlement costs if a lawsuit did occur. Finally, there were fewer external whistleblower reports to regulatory agencies and other authorities.

 Three key takeaways:

1. It’s not simply speaking up, it’s a culture of speaking up.

2. Companies with speak-up culture, have a material reduction in legal fines and penalties.

3. Use Companies with a speak-up culture, to have a higher ROI.

Do you want to improve your culture? How can you assess your culture and develop a strategy to improve it going forward? In this free webinar on the new tool, The Culture Audit with Tom Fox and Sam Silverstein on Tuesday, November 28, 12 CT. For more information and registration, click here.

Categories
31 Days to More Effective Compliance Programs

One Month to a More Effective Compliance Program Through Culture: Day 14 – How Investigative Triage Can Drive Culture

One area that organizations rarely consider impacting culture is the assessment and triage process in a hotline or speak-up process. A proactive approach allows for increased response time and the ability to set realistic expectations for stakeholders, but this is a key component for improving corporate culture. One mechanism not thought of by compliance professionals is the setting of service level agreements (SLAs) to set response times based on the nature of the allegation. This concept, borrowed from customer service practices, ensures that employees who come forward with complaints or allegations are provided with a clear understanding of the expected timeline for response and communication. By setting these expectations, organizations can foster a culture of open communication and trust.

Obviously, a triage process is particularly important for multinational companies that operate across different regions. With varying compliance programs and regulations in different countries, having a well-documented process becomes essential. It allows compliance departments to navigate the complexities of compliance programs and investigations, ensuring consistency and adherence to local laws.

The triage process and technology play a vital role in promoting a corporate culture. By proactively assessing and triaging complaints and allegations, organizations can increase response time and set realistic expectations for stakeholders. It is important to consider the impact on employee rights and the need for thorough investigations when making decisions about the importance of the triage process and technology in organizational compliance.

 Three key takeaways:

1. Think about how your triage process can be used to foster culture.

2. Set Service Level Agreements, make them public, and adhere to them to engender trust in your organization.

3. However, it is important to recognize the tradeoffs involved in balancing different factors when implementing a triage process.

Do you want to improve your culture? How can you assess your culture and develop a strategy to improve it going forward? In this free webinar on the new tool, The Culture Audit with Tom Fox and Sam Silverstein on Tuesday, November 28, 12 CT. For more information and registration, click here.

Categories
Blog

Understanding the Risk – Return Relationship in Compliance

Investing in any form involves a certain level of risk, and the potential return is directly related to the level of risk taken on. This principle holds true for both private equity and venture capital investing. Private equity investors aim for positive returns on most of their investments by acquiring established businesses, while venture capital investors accept higher risk for the potential of significant returns on early-stage companies. Understanding this risk-return relationship is crucial for making informed investment decisions.

It is incumbent for every Chief Compliance Officer (CCO) and compliance professional to understand the risk-return relationship in investment and how that relationship applies to a corporate compliance function. By developing such an understanding, CCOs and compliance professionals can not only change the dynamic between seemingly disparate corporate functions such as compliance and finance; but will also allow a broader and more fulsome discussion of corporate investment in compliance resources.

One key concept in assessing investment stability and potential rewards is beta risk. Investopedia defines it as “Beta is used in the capital asset pricing model (CAPM), which describes the relationship between systematic risk and expected return for assets (usually stocks). CAPM is widely used as a method for pricing risky securities and for generating estimates of the expected returns of assets, considering both the risk of those assets and the cost of capital.” In other words, Beta risk refers to the correlation between an investment and the broader market. Compliance officers can utilize this concept to identify low-risk investments that perform well regardless of market conditions. By considering beta risk, compliance officers can make more informed decisions about allocating resources and managing compliance programs.

This highlights the concept of compliance as risk balancing, which challenges traditional notions of avoiding surprises and instead embraces potential positive surprises and opportunities for growth. This approach recognizes that managing risk can create significant growth opportunities, demonstrating the value of compliance in supporting business growth. This also provides an opportunity for the compliance function to demonstrate its role in a business’s overall growth strategies and greater profitability.

Such an approach also emphasizes the importance of CCOs and compliance professionals speaking the language of finance when discussing risk and return. By using concepts such as beta risk and understanding the different approaches to investing, compliance professionals can have more meaningful conversations with finance departments and other stakeholders. This enables them to effectively communicate the potential risks and rewards associated with compliance investments.

Obviously there are tradeoffs involved in balancing different factors when considering risk and return. While minimizing surprises may seem like a desirable goal, CCOs and compliance professionals should also be open to positive surprises can lead to unexpected growth opportunities. By managing risk effectively and considering the potential rewards, compliance officers can make strategic decisions that align with the organization’s goals.

This also leads directly to the importance of considering the compliance impact when making decisions about risk and return. Compliance programs play a crucial role in managing risk and ensuring ethical business practices. By investing in compliance initiatives, organizations can protect their reputation, mitigate legal and regulatory risks, and create a culture of integrity. Compliance investments can yield positive returns by fostering employee trust, attracting investors, and enhancing overall business performance.

Understanding the risk-return relationship in investment and compliance roles is essential for making informed decisions. Compliance officers can leverage concepts such as beta risk to identify low-risk investments that perform well regardless of market conditions. By embracing Compliance as Risk Balancing and considering the potential rewards, compliance professionals can effectively communicate the value of compliance investments to finance departments and other stakeholders. Ultimately, investing in compliance supports business growth and helps organizations navigate the complex landscape of risk and return.

Categories
31 Days to More Effective Compliance Programs

One Month to a More Effective Compliance Program Through Culture: Day 13 – Preventing Retaliation to Improve Culture

Retaliation against a person who speaks up is a pervasive issue that not only creates a toxic work environment but also discourages victims from reporting incidents. This means you must address retaliation and encourage reporting in workplaces. When employees report harassment face severe retaliation, which leads to a loss of trust in the reporting process. This fear of being labeled a “rat” or “gossip” often prevents victims from coming forward and seeking justice. To combat this issue, non-retaliation protocols are crucial to protect individuals and ensure legal compliance.

Non-retaliation protocols must be in place to encourage reporting.  The fear of retaliation is deeply rooted in the perception of being a whistleblower or complainant. Every compliance must have strong policies, consequences for violators, and open workplace conversations to empower bystanders. Bystanders play a crucial role in identifying and reporting harassment, but they often fear retaliation or loyalty conflicts.

Addressing retaliation and encouraging reporting in workplaces requires a multifaceted approach. Strong non-retaliation protocols, open workplace conversations, and the empowerment of bystanders are key factors in creating a safe and inclusive work environment. By prioritizing the well-being of employees and fostering a culture of trust, organizations can effectively combat sexual harassment and ensure compliance with legal and regulatory requirements.

 Three key takeaways:

1. You must have robust policies and procedures against retaliation.

2. A lack of confidential reports will have an impact on culture.

3. Bystanders are the key to a robust culture.

Do you want to improve your culture? How can you assess your culture and develop a strategy to improve it going forward? In this free webinar on the new tool, The Culture Audit with Tom Fox and Sam Silverstein on Tuesday, November 28, 12 CT. For more information and registration, click here.

Categories
31 Days to More Effective Compliance Programs

One Month to More Effective Compliance Through Culture: Day 12 – Fixing an Unsafe Workplace

We continue to look at fostering an ethical culture through psychological safety, using as a starting point the “Fostering Ethical Conduct Through Psychological Safety” whose authors believe that “when psychological safety is lacking, it may be a consequence of the employee having witnessed unethical behavior.” The more unethical behavior a person sees, the more likely they are to feel psychologically unsafe.

The authors basically state the obvious when they write, “It makes intuitive sense that being in a work environment where unethical behavior is prevalent might diminish psychological safety.” Put another way “people are most reluctant to speak up in ethically troubled environments, where we most need them to do so.” This is an important issue for every CCO and business leader. To overcome such a deficiency, they found that “several other factors correlated with strong speak-up behavior, keeping everything else constant: moral engagement, moral attentiveness, and organizational justice combined with clarity of expectations.”

Moral engagement. As a CCO you should endeavor to create an atmosphere where ethical conduct matters, “so that when employees recognize a potentially unethical situation, they will be motivated to do what’s right.”

Moral attentiveness. You can educate employees to recognize the ethical dimensions of situations. You can have managers highlight examples of ethical and unethical behavior with their teams and encourage dialogue on workplace ethics.

Organizational justice. Obviously, talk is cheap and it is actions, not deeds, that matter. The DOJ has made clear in the 2023 Evaluation of Corporate Compliance Programs that the keeper and responsibility of institutional justice sits with the CCO and the authors find that this same concept “is vital to building a reputation of organizational justice.”

Clarity of expectations. CCOs must communicate a clear message to employees so that employees will have “an understanding of organizational standards and are clear about expectations.”

Unethical conduct can remain hidden for a time but is likely to be discovered eventually, causing far more harm than if it were caught and corrected early. Psychological safety thus can help organizations respond and improve quickly instead of allowing misconduct and unethical behavior to fester and further degrade workplace psychological safety, thus triggering a vicious cycle.”

 Three key takeaways:

1. Without psychological safety, corporate culture will suffer.

2. When your CEO engages in illegal behavior, what is the impact on culture?

3. Use moral engagement, moral attentiveness, and organizational justice to foster an improved culture.

Do you want to improve your culture? How can you assess your culture and develop a strategy to improve it going forward? In this free webinar on the new tool, The Culture Audit with Tom Fox and Sam Silverstein on Tuesday, November 28, 12 CT. For more information and registration, click here.

Categories
Compliance Into the Weeds

Compliance into the Weeds: OIG Says CCO Should be Independent

The award-winning, Compliance into the Weeds is the only weekly podcast that takes a deep dive into a compliance-related topic, literally going into the weeds to explore a subject more fully. Looking for some hard-hitting insights on sanctions compliance? Look no further than Compliance into the Weeds! In this episode, Tom and Matt take a deep dive into the recent OIG guidance for healthcare compliance professionals and healthcare compliance programs which notes that CCOs should be independent from the General Counsel’s Office.

The Office of Inspector General (OIG) has recently released guidelines that underscore the importance of independence for compliance officers in the healthcare sector. These guidelines, seen as a significant development in the field, stipulate that compliance should be separate from legal and finance departments, and outline the responsibilities of healthcare compliance officers.

Tom views this as a clear call for compliance officers to be independent and report directly to the CEO and the board. He suggests that this trend towards independence may extend beyond healthcare. Matt echoes this sentiment, highlighting the OIG’s strong endorsement of the independence of compliance officers. He believes this aligns with the emphasis on independence and autonomy that leading voices in the regulatory world have been advocating for. Join Tom Fox and Matt Kelly as they delve deeper into this topic in this episode of the Compliance into the Weeds podcast. 

Key Highlights:

  • The Importance of CCO Independence in Compliance Programs
  • The role of a healthcare CCO
  • Do you need a Law Degree to be a CCO in Healthcare Compliance
  • The Growing Significance of CCO Independence

Resources:

Matt’s blog post in Radical Compliance

Tom 

Instagram

Facebook

YouTube

Twitter

LinkedIn

Categories
31 Days to More Effective Compliance Programs

One Month to More Effective Compliance Through Culture: Day 11 – Psychological Safety in the Middle

Advancing ethical culture through psychological safety can be a powerful tool. But how can you determine the state of psychological safety in your organization? Once again using the article “Fostering Ethical Conduct Through Psychological Safety” as a starting point, “there are a number of things organizations can do to make it more likely that people will speak up when they observe unethical behaviors.” But one key is psychological safety, defined by co-author Edmondson as “a shared belief held by members of a team that the team is safe for interpersonal risk-taking” — or, put another way, that “we can say what we think” or “be ourselves around here.”

There is a non-siloed nature of psychological safety at the workplace. Ethics, risk management, legal and compliance functions, plus HR all share an interest in fostering such an environment. This mandates a cross-functional approach as an essential requirement of molding an organization’s culture to include psychological safety. The authors believe, “Managers throughout a company must become aware of the blind spots created by a psychologically unsafe environment, along with the associated risk of underreported misconduct.” They also caution that a formal program such as a reporting hotline “may capture only a fraction of the problematic behaviors that occur.” This leads the authors to posit that gauging psychological safety “may help companies determine whether misconduct is being reported and, in turn, enhance the effectiveness of their formal speak-up programs.”

The authors also confirmed a greater problem which is that “in a global context, psychological safety is not uniform across nations.” Survey respondents from “the Americas and Europe tended to score higher on psychological safety than respondents from Asia.” This suggests to the authors that “the potential effectiveness of tailoring interventions that promote speaking up in order to address the specific circumstances of different groups of employees.” Moreover, “global organizations that seek to build psychological safety must assess its various region-specific drivers and derailers to adjust their activities to specific seniorities and cultures.”

 Three key takeaways:

1. How can you determine the state of psychological safety in your organization?

2. Psychologically safety at the workplace is non-siloed.

3. Middle managers are critical.

Do you want to improve your culture? How can you assess your culture and develop a strategy to improve it going forward? In this free webinar on the new tool, The Culture Audit with Tom Fox and Sam Silverstein on Tuesday, November 28, 12 CT. For more information and registration, click here.

Categories
31 Days to More Effective Compliance Programs

One Month to a More Effective Compliance Program Through Culture: Day 9 – Fostering Culture with Psychological Safety

How can you improve corporate culture through speaking up? In an MIT Sloan Management Review, Summer edition, entitled “Fostering Ethical Conduct Through Psychological Safety” authors Antoine Ferrère, Chris Rider, Baiba Renerte, and Amy Edmondson asked such questions as “How do organizations encourage people to speak up about ethical breaches, whether inadvertent or deliberate?” and “Why do some employees choose to remain silent when others report misconduct?” Additionally, they “analyzed the perceptions of those who report misconduct against those of “silent bystanders” to help “better understand both the drivers and derailers of speaking up — and revealed insights into how leaders and compliance officers can encourage employees to make such reports.’”

The authors believe today, “it is more essential than ever that when misconduct happens or difficult problems arise, there is a strong ethical climate for surfacing information so leaders can respond quickly and appropriately. An environment in which employees feel comfortable reporting such issues is also vital to preventing future misconduct.”

The authors believe that a “healthy organizational culture is one in which speaking up and listening go hand in hand, reinforcing ethical standards. If concerns are expressed, changes can be made promptly.” This is important because it moves from the detect prong to the prevent prong, which is by far the most important and effective prong in any compliance regime. Further ideas or innovations, rather than simply reporting untoward actions, can make a company more efficient and more profitable. This means a company can receive far more benefits than monetary fines or penalty avoidance if psychological safety exists.

 Three key takeaways:

  1. How a speak-up culture improves your culture.
  2. What is the role of psychological safety in improving culture?
  3. What is the role of externals in your corporate culture?

Do you want to improve your culture? How can you assess your culture and develop a strategy to improve it going forward? In this free webinar on the new tool, The Culture Audit with Tom Fox and Sam Silverstein on Tuesday, November 28, 12 CT. For more information and registration, click here.

Categories
31 Days to More Effective Compliance Programs

One Month to a More Effective Compliance Program Through Culture: Day 6 – Attributes of a Toxic Culture

Corporate culture is finally being acknowledged as a key ingredient in a successful business, particularly one that operates ethically and in compliance. But what are some indicia of good culture and more importantly what are some indicia of a toxic culture? A recent article in the MIT Sloan Management Review provided some guidance. In Why Every Leader Needs to Worry About Toxic Culture, the authors posited that by pinpointing the elements of toxic culture in a company, its leaders focus on addressing the issues that lead employees to disengage and quit. These ideas have significant importance for the compliance function as it navigates corporate culture, both in assessing and improving it.

Moreover, the Chief Compliance Officer and corporate compliance function were identified in the 2023 3 Evaluation of Corporate Compliance Programs as the keepers of institutional justice and institutional fairness. This means recognizing and then preventing a toxic culture from spreading and infecting your entire organization squarely in the compliance wheelhouse. The article lays out key red flags for every CCO and compliance professional to look for in assessing culture. Finally, for any company with a toxic culture, the chances are much greater to be defrauded by its own employees or to defraud others through bribery and corruption by violating such laws as the Foreign Corrupt Practices Act (FCPA).

The authors identify behaviors that they call “the Toxic Five attributes”, being “disrespectful, noninclusive, unethical, cutthroat, and abusive – poison corporate culture in the eyes of employees. While organizational culture can disappoint employees in many ways, these five elements have by far the largest negative impact on how employees rate their corporate culture and have contributed most to employee attrition throughout the Great Resignation.” As a CCO or compliance professional you need to be on the watch for them and take steps to remedy them if you see or hear about them.

 Three key takeaways:

1. Are the attributes of a toxic culture present in your organization?

2. The 2020 Update to the Evaluation of Corporate Compliance Programs mandated the compliance lead this effort.

3. Does your organization have abusive behavior?

Check the free webinar on the new tool, The Culture Audit with Tom Fox and Sam Silverstein on Tuesday, November 28, 12 CT. For more information and registration, click here.