Categories
Blog

Macbeth and Culture Transformation

Over the past week, I have been considering Joel Coen’s The Tragedy of Macbeth currently appearing on Apple TV. I have been reviewing the film and exploring my love of all things Shakespeare. Today, to end this series I want to talk about the remarkable performance by Kathryn Hunter as not one but all three of the weird sisters (3 witches) of the play.
In a New Yorker article, entitled “Weird Sisters? Make that the Twisted Sisters”, Henry Alford interviewed the actor and explored her preparation for the role. First a word about her performance which was nothing short of mesmerizing. Hunter contorted her body in the very first sisters’ scene where she prophesizes that Macbeth will become the Thane of Cawdor. It was basically acting with her body in addition to the dialogue. As the camera closes in on her you see not only her contortions but her dramatic voice. Of this scene, Alford wrote, “Hunter’s first scene in the movie has her squatting in the sand (no panty hose), where she alternately squawks, clutches a sailor’s severed thumb in her gnarled toes, and twists her right arm all the way behind her head. Imagine a litigious raven who has done a lot of yoga.”
Equally impressive was Hunter’s preparation for the role, which only lasted a slim few minutes in the entire movie. Alford wrote, “For her “weird sisters” research, Hunter studied people with multiple-personality disorder, and also crows, which are symbols of divination. She also consulted a modern-day witch. “I asked her to give me a simple spell to keep the company safe,” Hunter said. “Denzel told me he believes in the power of prophecy and the power of blessings, so, before going on set, I would do a ritual to keep him and the company safe.””
Finally, in the film, “Hunter also plays the Old Man outside Macbeth’s castle, which suggests that the witches have shape-shifted into an old codger. It’s the Old Man who, referencing first the darkness of the sky and then Duncan’s murder, says, “ ’Tis unnatural / Even like the deed that’s done.” Hunter was quoted by Alford, “It’s amazing that Shakespeare was so concerned with nature. He’s saying, When man is out of kilter, as it were, it’s reflected in nature. How prescient is that?”
I thought about Hunter’s performance and her innovative use of her body to communicate so well in the movie for my final exploration of transforming your compliance program. In a MIT Sloan Review article, entitled “Use Networks to Drive Culture Change”, authors Peter Gray, Rob Cross and Michael Arena posit that culture is difficult to change, “in part because it reflects people’s values — their deeply held beliefs about what is good, desirable, and appropriate. Relationships can complicate matters further. When colleagues are embedded in informal networks with others who share and reinforce their values, they often become entrenched rather than open to new attitudes and behaviors. But it doesn’t have to be like that. Those same networks can also help leaders identify and overcome obstacles to cultural change and discover unexpected allies.” Their approach has some innovations which every Chief Compliance Officer (CCO) should study to help in the culture transformation of your organization.
Deputy Attorney General Lisa Monaco, in her October speech, renewed the Department of Justice’s (DOJ) emphasis on corporate culture stating, “Now, I recognize the resources and the effort it takes to manage a large organization and to put in place the right culture. The Department of Justice has over 115,000 employees across dozens of countries and an operating budget equivalent to that of a Fortune 100 company. So, I know what it means to manage and be accountable for what happens in a complex organization. But corporate culture matters. A corporate culture that fails to hold individuals accountable, or fails to invest in compliance — or worse, that thumbs its nose at compliance — leads to bad results.” Clearly, she is signally a more focused DOJ interest in culture. This means you need to be ready to not only transform your culture but also document the transformation.
There are five steps which I have adapted for the compliance professional.

  1. Unearth the Subcultures. It turns out that culture is created not holistically but by corporate subgroups, which have their own cultures and cultural leaders. CCOs often think about the culture of their area of the organization and take action at that level, which across an organization culture is only partially influenced by holistic structures; it is also shaped and reinforced by subnetworks of employees who may spread across many different units. CCOs need to “see the diversity of values that exist in different cultural subnetworks can take much more precise action to support or change these subcultures.”
  2. Find Your Real Cultural Leaders. Here the key for compliance is that “Informal influencers deep inside the organization are critical — but often hidden — enablers of change. Enlisting their help is far more efficient than taking a top-down approach.” As the CCO you need to identify these real subunit leaders, get their buy in and then enlist them to lead your cultural transformation.
  3. Shine a Light on Hidden Tensions. There are always disagreements throughout an organization which can kill cultural changes, usually through the proverbial death by a thousand cuts. Analyzing network and cultural data can bring these tensions to light so leaders can manage them. A key one can be what the authors called, “toxic misalignments, where cultural influencers with very different values interacted in negative and dysfunctional ways”. Here the role of the CCO is to be a facilitator, to “appeal to a higher shared value can resolve a deadlock, but only after uncovering value misalignment and discovering who sits on which side.”
  4. Evoke Positive Emotions. I hope that you as a CCO have a positive outlook. Most CCOs I know are eternal optimists, even those who come from the General Counsel’s office. While a standard tactic to lead cultural change is rationality; i.e., explain and educate using “compelling logic, in hopes of persuading them to commit to new ways of working” the authors found their “research shows that culture spreads most effectively through network connections that have an emotional aspect.” As a CCO you should bring an energy and excitement level and then start “training first-level supervisors to become more skilled as “energizers.” They learned how to engage people in realistic possibilities that captured their imaginations and hearts, for example, and how to help others see how their efforts contributed to an ambitious plan. Nine months later, new data revealed far greater adoption of the new cultural values among individual contributors.”
  5. Give Adoption the Time It Needs. The authors found that the time to change culture can vary and “leaders may see slow or uneven adoption as new cultural ideas’ failure to spread, when in fact it may be a function of how tacit or complex the values are. And while networks play an important role in speed of adoption, faster isn’t always better.” The bottom line for the CCO is to give it time. But use the tools you have available to assess, monitor and improve your culture transformation program. Mid-course corrections are allowed. The authors concluded, “Combining network analysis with assessments of organizational culture provides leaders with a rich understanding of how new values take root.” This can provide to a CCO a more focused even “local” view of culture, where desired behaviors are communicated, modeled, observed, and adopted on the ground, not broadcast from on high. This in turn allows a CCO to drive cultural transformation in more targeted ways.

I hope you have enjoyed this short series drawing inspiration from Macbeth to discuss transformation of your compliance function as much as I have enjoyed watching the movie, researching the topic and writing about it.

Categories
Blog

Macbeth and the ‘S’ Learning Curve for Compliance

Over the weekend I saw Joel Coen’s The Tragedy of Macbeth on Apple TV. To say it blew me away would be putting it mildly. I have been reviewing the film this week and exploring my love of all things Shakespeare in this week’s blog posts. Today, I want to consider Frances McDormand in her starring role as Lady Macbeth and how her experiences of life point to learning curves.
McDormand herself said that she was destined to play the role. Stephen Schaefer, writing in the Boston Herald, quoted her for the following, ““The first thing that got me hooked on being an actor the rest of my life was the sleepwalking scene from ‘The Tragedy,’” she said of Shakespeare’s guilt-ridden murderess Lady Macbeth, who can never wash the blood from her hands. “I did it when I was 14,” she said. “Then I’ve been pretty much practicing and rehearsing for it for 50 years. It had kind of a fated inevitability to it.””
While other versions of Macbeth, notably Roman Polanski’s 1972 version, used younger actors in the lead roles, here Director Coen focused on older versions of the Macbeths. Schaefer also focused on the experience of the actors, McDormand and Denzel Washington, playing the lead roles. Both actors understand about the drive to achieve the next success, which for Macbeth was to take over the Kingdom of Scotland. Schaefer also noted, “McDormand, 64, agreed. “You might think they don’t understand. But guess what? We understand because when we first talked about the film, Denzel and I (it was our own private conversation), both understood about each other: There’s always been a fight. We fought it as gracefully as possible. The fight’s never going to be over. “So we brought that to it. We still know how to fight. Maybe we were limping a little bit. Maybe it took us a little bit longer to get there, but the fight was still there.””
In a recent Harvard Business Review (HBR) article, entitled “Managing Your Organization as a Portfolio of Learning Curves”, author Whitney Johnson,  posited, “As people develop competence in a new domain of expertise, they move along an S Curve: Growth is slow and effortful at the outset, or launch point. It then progresses rapidly as people acquire new skills in a stretch known as the sweet spot. At the peak is mastery, when work becomes easier but the curve flattens. Understanding where your employees are on this S Curve of Learning will help you coach them appropriately, craft thoughtful succession plans, and build a team with diverse but complementary strengths.” I use the article as a starting point for the Chief Compliance Officer (CCO) to use it to aid in developing a strong compliance bench at your organization.
The ‘S’ learning curve has three components; (1) launch point, (2) sweet spot and (3) mastery. It was originally developed by Everett M. Rogers, “to show how new ideas and technologies spread.” However, Johnson also saw it as “the trajectory that people move along as they develop competence in a new domain of expertise.” She calls it the “S Curve of Learning;” where growth  is slow and effortful at the outset, which is the launch point. The initial phase is “followed by rapid upward progress as people acquire new skills and overcome setbacks: a stretch I think of as the sweet spot. At the peak is mastery—when work becomes easier, but the curve flattens because there is little left to learn. When that happens it’s time to jump to the bottom of a new S Curve, put in the effort, and experience the thrill of climbing again.”
Johnson applied this concept to three areas which are also important to the corporate compliance team; talent development, succession planning and building an “A Team’. Many have said that talent development, acquisition and retention will be one of the most critical corporate endeavors going into the 2020’s. This is even more true for the compliance function. Our discipline is at a cross-roads with many non-legal concepts becoming more important. Such skills as data analytics, behavioral psychology and others are replacing the need to be able to recite the text of the Foreign Corrupt Practices (FCPA). The S Curve in talent development gives CCOs and their compliance team members a “common language for discussions about personal growth and talent development—about people’s progress in their roles and their future with the organization. When one of your reports says, “I’m at the launch point,” you’ll know that person is struggling to gain traction. When someone says, “I’m in the sweet spot,” he or she has momentum and is feeling competent and confident. And when you hear an employee say, “I’m in mastery,” the message is clear—“I know I’m good at this, but I can’t keep doing it—I need a new challenge.””
Under succession planning, it is not enough to plan what is next for the organization or even your compliance team; you also need to consider what is next for the individual. Johnson wrote, “Doing this well involves anticipating which people might move on and when, identifying team members who might assume this role, and then thinking about those who could backfill that role.” In other words, you need think of it as a multi-dimensional chess game; not only thinking several moves ahead but also on X, Y and Z axes. Such an approach allows you to “see when the high-contribution sweet spot is about to yield to mastery, and shortly thereafter, boredom and stagnation. Keeping people who’ve reached the mastery stage in a role for too long carries risks. An employee can become complacent or a flight risk. And if, as an organization or team, most of your people are in the sweet spot, humming along, you may be courting the danger that your entire team could suddenly be in mastery, setting off a wave of departures. Counter these risks with succession planning for each individual.”
Now think about all of the above in building out your ‘A’ compliance team. Johnson advocates diversity in talent on the ‘S’ curve so that some team members are on the sweet spot and some in the others. She stated, “You want people who have a variety of aptitudes and ambitions, and you want a balanced portfolio of people at different stages of growth. People in mastery have deep experience, people at the launch point bring fresh perspectives, and those in the sweet spot have both the enthusiasm and competence to breathe life into a project. Although every team is different, many look like a bell curve, with most members in the sweet spot at any given time and a small percentage of people at the launch point and in mastery. When putting together a team, smart leaders make sure they have people on all major phases of the curve—what I call a matched team.”
Just as McDormand’s portrayal of Lady Macbeth is thought-provoking so is Johnson’s piece. If you are looking for a low-cost way to improve your compliance team, this approach gives you several ways to think through talent development, retention and advance.
Tomorrow, the sisters.

Categories
Blog

Macbeth and Transformation of Your Compliance Leadership Team

Over the weekend I saw Joel Coen’s The Tragedy of Macbeth on Apple TV. To say it blew me away would be putting it mildly. I have been reviewing the film this week and exploring my love of all things Shakespeare in this week’s blog posts. Today, I want to consider Denzel Washington in his starring role as Macbeth.
Jourdain Searles, writing in okayplayer.com, said, Washington’s “acting style has always been theatrical, and he’s an obvious choice for any role that requires the ability to monologue while still keeping the audience engaged. Washington is definitely up to the task, making a meal out of every scene. And yet, his motivations in the film feel murky. Due to his age and visible exhaustion, it seems like Washington’s Macbeth would rather retire than vie for the Scottish throne. When his wife Lady Macbeth (Frances McDormand) urges him to seize the throne, it comes off more of a burden than a shining opportunity. Having the couple be older is an inspired choice, transforming the characters from youthful schemers to weary elders making their final grasps at greatness.” I noted this world-weariness, as well as the issue of succession. I want to use those twin concepts to introduce today’s subject of your compliance team leadership.
In a recent Harvard Business Review (HBR) article, entitled “Reinventing Your Leadership Team”, authors Paul Leinwand , Mahadeva Matt Mani, and Blair Sheppard, all with PwC,  posited that “in our increasingly complex world, what companies really need to do is build new forms of competitive advantage and transform themselves for the future. And that requires fundamental changes in their top leaders—not just in individuals’ capabilities but in the way they collectively steer the ship. Drawing on their research at 12 prominent global firms, the authors note the contradictory-seeming skills that leaders are expected to have—being both great visionaries and expert executors.” I use their article as a starting point for the Chief Compliance Officer (CCO) to put together a top-notch compliance leadership team.
As legally trained CCOs continue to become less relevant to a corporate compliance function and  with the new-found compliance framework focused largely on digitizing and digital analysis, what companies and their employees need from compliance leadership is evolving. CCOs must be able to reimagine a compliance function’s place in the world and transform the organization to live up to a more ambitious purpose. That will mean fundamental change not only in CCOs themselves but also in how they collectively manage and lead a corporate compliance function.
Within the broader context of corporate leadership, the authors stated, “Consider, for example, how the skills that leaders need for success have evolved—and the degree to which many executives are seen to struggle with these new demands. A recent survey conducted by Strategy&, PwC’s global strategy consulting business, highlighted the importance of balancing certain characteristics that on the surface look paradoxical. We used to accept, for instance, that leaders could be either great visionaries or great operators. No longer. Companies now need their top people to perform both roles—to be strategic executors, in other words. They’re also expected to be tech-savvy humanists, high-integrity politicians, humble heroes, globally minded localists, and traditioned innovators. Not only did large majorities of the survey respondents agree on the importance of those roles, but they also voiced alarming concern about leaders’ lack of proficiency in them. Addressing a company’s leadership gaps, however, is not merely a matter of building individual executives’ skills. Although that’s certainly desirable, the need to improve collective leadership is urgent.” That certainly holds true for the compliance function.
The authors identified four key components for leadership change, which I have adapted for the corporate compliance function.
Identifying the leadership roles needed to transform compliance for the future. For compliance to remain relevant, it will need distinct capabilities that allows it to deliver on its purpose, along with leaders who can envision its new place in the world and mobilize it to get there. What positions does your CCO need on their team to make that happen? Obviously, the basic legal skills of reading and writing are now only the basics. There must be digital talent, innovation talent, behavioral psychology talent, as well as communications. Moreover, all these roles will need to work collaboratively not simply with each other but with a much wider variety of internal and external stakeholders than ever.
Assembling the right people. Having the right roles is not enough as once you have identified the roles your compliance function needs, “you next have to think about who will best fill them. Which individuals should you bring together so that you have the necessary talent and diversity…to generate new ideas, challenge traditional thinking, and collaborate on meaningful change?” You will need team members who can not only see around corners but also respond to the ever-changing compliance landscape of today’s business as usual, through continually recalibrating the risks your organization faces.
Focusing your leadership team on driving your compliance transformation. Obviously as CCO, you and your compliance team “will need to advance the company’s agenda—and that means spending energy and time on the big priorities for the future, not just responding to the demands of the organization today. What structures and mechanisms will help you lead the company to its new destination?” How can compliance initiatives work to increase business efficiencies, drive greater employee engagement and move the need on overall company profitable? It is not simply business efficiencies you must master as you must build trust in your organization to create a true ‘speak-up culture’ so you can reap the benefits of this increased efficiency.
Taking ownership of your team’s behavior. At first blush this would seem like a natural for compliance. Afterall, compliance is all about taking ownership and transparency. However, the authors’ focus is a bit different, “Creating ownership around the vision isn’t enough. You must also create a shared purpose: Why does your team exist? What big issues is it here to solve? When defining their areas of responsibility, your people should believe that leading the company through its transformation is their most important task and that success will depend on the collaboration of team members rather than on the sum of individual units’ performance.” In other words, build on the trust you created by giving the credit out so that all will be invested in your compliance transformations.
No major corporate transformation can be successfully achieved by the compliance team alone. There must be engagement, buy-in and not simply acceptance but an embracing by the employees. The authors conclude that you should “Surround yourself with talented people who can balance seemingly paradoxical leadership behaviors and challenge one another to collectively accomplish big things. Most importantly, make sure your leadership team truly leads—setting aside the time and energy to define a bold agenda and launch the ambitious initiatives that your future relies on. Failing to do that will be a costly mistake. Succeed and you will have a powerful team that can position your firm to thrive in an increasingly complex world.”
Tomorrow, Frances McDormand and Lady Macbeth.

Categories
This Week in FCPA

Episode 286 – the Georgia Finally Beats Alabama


The college football season has ended with UGA finally defeating UA. Tom and Jay turn their full attention to the NFL playoffs now and also look at some of the week’s top compliance and ethics stories this week in the Georgia Finally Beats Alabama edition.

Stories

1.     Carnival and Princess Cruise Lines violated DPA yet again. Matt Kelly in Radical Compliance. DOJ Press Release.
2.     Prioritizing items from the Strategy on Countering Corruption. Worth McMurray in the FCPA Blog.
3.     DOJ to look at short sellers. Jaclyn Jaeger in Compliance Week (sub req’d).
4.     Proposed framework for CCO liability analysis. Mengqi Sun in WSJ Risk & Compliance Journal.
5.     Manipulation on timing of FCPA enforcement action? Matthew Stephenson debunks a new article in GAB.
6.     ComTech comes to financial institution compliance. Christian Wunderly in the FCPA Blog.
7.     Phil Tetlock and Superforecasting come to risk management. Jim DeLoach in CCI.
8.     Ethics and FCPA predictions for 2022. Mike Volkov with a double dose of Carnac the Magnificent. Ethics here. FCPA here.
9.     Banks develop climate risk consortium. Aaron Nicodemus in Compliance Week(sub req’d)
10.  Liability of local representatives under GDPR. Kelly Hagedorn and Matthew Worby in Compliance and Enforcement.

Podcasts 

11.  Tom and Matt Kelly conclude a 2-part podcast series on issues they are following in 2022.  On Compliance into the Weeds, Part 1 and Part 2.
12.  In January on The Compliance Life, I visit with Valerie Charles, partner at StoneTurn. Val has one of the most interesting journeys in compliance. In Part 1, she discussed her academic background and early professional career. In Part 2, she discusses her move to ComTech.
13.  The Compliance Podcast Network welcomes Professor Karen Woody and her new podcast, Classroom Insider. In this most unique pod, Karen interviews some of her student to tell the history of insider trading. In Episode 4, Colin Manchester discusses the evolution of the disclose or abstain rule.
14.  Mikhail Reider-Gordon returns in Lies, Spies & Corporate Crimes: The Wirecard Saga, with Season 2, Episode 3 Shell Games.
15.  Check out 31 Days to a More Effective Compliance Program returns, which runs for the month of January, from January 1 to January 31. Available on the Compliance Podcast NetworkMegaphoneiTunes, and all other top podcast platforms.
Tom Fox is the Voice of Compliance and can be reached at tfox@tfoxlaw.com. Jay Rosen is Mr. Monitor and can be reached at jrosen@affiliatedmonitors.com.

Categories
Compliance Into the Weeds

Issue and Trends for 2022, Part 2


Compliance into the Weeds is the only weekly podcast which takes a deep dive into a compliance related topic, literally going into the weeds to more fully explore a subject. This week, Matt and Tom conclude a special two-part podcast series of several topics they will be following in 2022. Today in our concluding Part 2, we consider

  • The time of reckoning is coming for SPACs funded in 2021 as their 18 month-deadline is fast approaching. Is the SEC looking at SPACs as an alternative form of IPO? What will the regulatory landscape look like going forward?
  • CCO pay. Will it go up after several years of remaining flat? How did the Great Resignation impact compliance, if at all? What skills sets might a CCO need into 2025 and beyond?
  • The SEC investigation into Facebook. Are a company’s public statements about having an ethical culture mere puffery or are they actionable for failing to live up to their public statements. Also, what does the Francis Haugen testimony mean for whistleblowers going forward.
  • The SEC investigation into Activision’s toxic workplace and culture of misogyny. Are these new areas the SEC will be looking at in addition to its traditional role of financial reporting watchdog.

Resources
Matt in Radical Compliance

Categories
Sunday Book Review

January 9, 2022 the Leadership edition


In today’s edition of Sunday Book Review:

Categories
The ESG Report

Compliance Must Carve Out Role in Company ESG Efforts with Aaron Nicodemus

 
Aaron Nicodemus has been a reporter for over 30 years in the US and South Africa, having written for various notable publications including Bloomberg. He has been a writer/reporter at Compliance Week for the last 18 months. He is Tom Fox’s guest this week on the ESG Report. They discuss his recent article about the intersection of ESG and compliance, entitled “Compliance Must Carve Out Role in Company ESG Efforts.”
 

 
Inside the Mind of the CCO Survey
“Every year for the past three years Compliance Week has conducted an Inside the Mind of the CCO survey,” Aaron tells Tom. This year the focus was on ESG since it has been a hot topic, and they wanted to gauge what ESG initiatives looked like across industries and organizations. “Almost all of the compliance officers who took the survey felt that compliance should be involved in ESG initiatives at their company,” Aaron reveals. CCOs believe that compliance is best positioned to lead ESG since it intersects with so many of their core functions. “Putting [compliance] in charge of the ESG initiatives would help make sure that [the company] meets all the regulations that they should, and also that they are reporting on data that is both accurate and informative,” he comments. Now that the SEC is poised to issue new mandates regarding climate change disclosures, compliance will most likely have to be front and center for ESG going forward. “When regulators get involved that tends to push compliance to the fore,” Aaron remarks.
 
Key Findings
Tom and Aaron discuss some key findings outlined in the article. These include:

  • The actual role of CCOs in ESG – 73% of CCOs have an active role in ESG, either as advisor, primary overseer, or advocate. 
  • Where they see their role – 23% of CCOs feel they should have more oversight over ESG than they currently have. Most persons surveyed feel that compliance should have a prominent role in ESG.
  • Whether compliance should lead all 3 aspects of ESG – Most CCOs see governance as their core function, while environmental and social concerns are secondary roles. 
  • Compliance is the conscience of the company.
  • Stakeholders are demanding more information on ESG to influence their investment decisions.

 
Growth of ESG
Tom sees ESG as the fastest moving corporate initiative. He asks Aaron if the survey confirms this view. “It’s been a gradual process that has come to a head in Europe and in the UK,” Aaron responds. Similar climate change disclosure mandates are likely to happen in the US in 2022. Companies have been pursuing sustainability and D&I initiatives for several years. “ESG collects up some of those things in a tight little bundle, and you can really pursue a lot of issues under the ESG umbrella,” he continues. He sees ESG accelerating over the next few years, starting with climate change. 
 
Resources
Aaron Nicodemus on LinkedIn | Twitter | Email
Compliance Week: Compliance Must Carve Out Role in Company ESG Efforts
 

Categories
The Compliance Life

Wendy Badger-What is Bravery?

The Compliance Life details the journey to and in the role of a Chief Compliance Officer. How does one come to sit in the CCO chair? What are some of the skills a CCO needs to success navigate the compliance waters in any company? What are some of the top challenges CCOs have faced and how did they meet them? These questions and many others will be explored in this new podcast series. Over four episodes each month on The Compliance Life, I visit with one current or former CCO to explore their journey to the CCO chair. This month, my guest is Wendy Badger, CCO at Tennant Company.

In this concluding episode, Wendy reflected on leaving her CCO position immediately preceding the pandemic and the time she had for reflection about that decision and what she learned about herself. She talked about her new role a Tennant and some key lessons learned she has been able to put into places such as the criticality of cross-functional collaboration, why technology should not be seen as the “cure all” to compliance woes and how to both layer and leverage data.

Resources

 Wendy Badger LinkedIn Profiler

Categories
Coffee and Regs

What’s Next for Cybersecurity in 2022?

Categories
Innovation in Compliance

Gold in the Compliance Hills: Part 1, ROI on Compliance Purchase Decisions


Welcome to a special five-part podcast series on how to unlock the gold in your program, hosted by Tom Fox with guests Gio and Nick Gallo from ComplianceLine. One of the ongoing issues in compliance is how to demonstrate the Return on Investment (ROI) in your compliance program. One way to do so is by demonstrating the extended value of compliance literally across your entire company. When overlaid with an ESG component, you can begin to see the gold in your compliance hills. In addition to showing how you can unlock the gold in your own compliance hills, Gio and Nick walk you through how demonstrate ROI for your internal budgeting process which can provide to you the financial resource to strengthen and improve your compliance program.
Join us for the full 5 episodes and learn to see your compliance program in an entirely new light. In this Part 1, we consider how compliance can be seen as a corporate ROI multiplier by looking at the impact of compliance across your entire organization.
Some of the highlights of this episode include:

  • The financial principles in unlocking the ROI of compliance.
  • Why the alignment of compliance with other disciplines in your organization is not only critical but a key to unlocking compliance gold.
  • Compliance budgeting is not simply about a cost center mentality. It requires a different type of discussion.
  • Frameworks for improving your thinking about compliance.
  • Building a complex and transparent case to OPEN the discussion about your assumptions rather than only including unobjectionable assumptions.

Resources
Gio Gallo on LinkedIn
Nick Gallo on LinkedIn
ComplianceLine