Day: September 12, 2023

Categories
Riskology

Infortal on Global Risk Outlook: Part 2 – Dr. Ian Oxnevad on Latin America

“From a due diligence and geopolitical risk intelligence standpoint, Mexico and Latin America in general don’t get enough attention because a lot of people in the political world view Latin America as off to the sidelines from major events around the world but it’s anything but,” says Dr. Ian Oxnevad, returning guest on this installment of the Geopolitical Risk Series of Riskology. He and Tom discuss in this episode the risk landscape of Latin America, and how companies can navigate them.  

Dr. Ian Oxnevad is the Director of Geopolitical Risk Intelligence for Infortal Worldwide, with a background in political science and national security studies. He is also the host of The Riskology Podcast. 

 

You’ll hear Ian and Tom discuss:

  • The rise of authoritarianism, corruption and a greater presence of China in Latin America post-2020. Brazil in particular is China’s largest trading partner and they’re not trading with the US dollar but instead the Chinese yuan. Despite this, Brazil is unstable domestically.
  • The risks of nationalization and crime dynamics in Mexico, as well as similar risks in Central America. 
  • Venezuela’s inability in the foreseeable future to be any sort of trading partner for the US due to its lack of legitimacy. 
  • The potential of Cuba to become the financial stronghold of Latin America if it can achieve economic reform and attract investment. 
  • Chile’s pro-business laws make it attractive to business trade and it is the safest, but there are increasing pushes for authoritarianism. 

 

Resources

Infortal Worldwide | Email | Tel: 1.800.736.4999 | Podcast

Categories
Principled Podcast

Season 10 Episode 1 – How Does the US Department of Justice Evaluate Ethics and Compliance Programs?

What you’ll learn on this podcast episode

The US Department of Justice Criminal Division has been increasingly vocal about what makes organizations’ ethics and compliance programs effective. This input on program effectiveness takes the form of guidance to prosecutors about what questions to ask when companies negotiate to resolve DOJ investigations into corporate wrongdoing on favorable terms. What does this guidance on program effectiveness mean in practice for E&C professionals? In the season 10 premiere of LRN’s Principled Podcast, host Susan Divers speaks with John Michelich, who retired last November after 35 years as a federal prosecutor with the Department of Justice’s Criminal Division. Listen in as they explore how the DOJ evaluates E&C programs, as well as best practices for companies settling misconduct investigations. 

Guest: John Michelich

John Michelich – Grayscale

John Michelich is a retired career prosecutor, who has served at the state, federal, and international levels for 45 years. A native of Illinois, John received his undergraduate education at Illinois Wesleyan University and then attended Drake University Law School in Des Moines, Iowa. For 10 years, John served as Assistant State’s Attorney and First Assistant State’s Attorney in Springfield, Illinois, where he prosecuted all types of state criminal felony violations including armed robbery, aggravated sexual assault and capital murder.   

In 1988, John moved to Washington, DC where he began his 35-year career as a prosecutor with the US Department of Justice, Criminal Division. As a federal prosecutor, John has handled a wide variety of cases including child pornography and obscenity, narcotics distribution and all types of white-collar criminal cases. John served for 30 years as a prosecutor with the Fraud Section of the Criminal Division where he handled numerous cases including health care fraud, bank fraud, telemarketing fraud, commodities and securities fraud and violations of the Foreign Corrupt Practices Act. Because Washington DOJ lawyers are traveling prosecutors, John has handled grand jury proceedings or jury trials in more than two dozen federal districts nationwide from Guam and Hawaii to Puerto Rico, and California to New York. Over his long career, John has tried dozens of jury trials to verdict.  

In 1998, the Justice Department sent John on loan to the United Nations’ International Criminal Tribunal for the Former Yugoslavia, also known as the War Crimes Tribunal, in the Hague, Netherlands, where he handled investigations and Tribunal proceedings involving crimes against humanity and serious breaches of the Geneva Convention that occurred during the Yugoslavian civil war.   

For over 40 years, John has been an active instructor of Trial Advocacy and has appeared regularly on the faculty of the NITA Trial Practice course offered at Georgetown University Law Center. In addition, John has served as an Adjunct Professor at Georgetown, teaching Trial Practice courses to third-year law students. In his retirement, John is available as a legal consultant to trial lawyers to advise them in preparation for jury trials and to consult with corporate counsel concerning internal investigations and to advise them on how to approach the government when there are allegations of wrongdoing, especially foreign bribery. 

John is licensed to practice in the states of Illinois and Iowa, and several federal courts, and is a licensed Solicitor of the Senior Courts of England and Wales.   

Host: Susan Divers

Headshot_Susan_Divers_S7E18_Principled_Podcast

Susan Divers is a senior advisor with LRN Corporation. In that capacity, Ms. Divers brings her 30+ years’ accomplishments and experience in the ethics and compliance area to LRN partners and colleagues. This expertise includes building state-of-the-art compliance programs infused with values, designing user-friendly means of engaging and informing employees, fostering an embedded culture of compliance and substantial subject matter expertise in anti-corruption, export controls, sanctions, and other key areas of compliance.

Prior to joining LRN, Mrs. Divers served as AECOM’s Assistant General for Global Ethics & Compliance and Chief Ethics & Compliance Officer. Under her leadership, AECOM’s ethics and compliance program garnered six external awards in recognition of its effectiveness and Mrs. Divers’ thought leadership in the ethics field. In 2011, Mrs. Divers received the AECOM CEO Award of Excellence, which recognized her work in advancing the company’s ethics and compliance program.

Mrs. Divers’ background includes more than thirty years’ experience practicing law in these areas. Before joining AECOM, she worked at SAIC and Lockheed Martin in the international compliance area. Prior to that, she was a partner with the DC office of Sonnenschein, Nath & Rosenthal. She also spent four years in London and is qualified as a Solicitor to the High Court of England and Wales, practicing in the international arena with the law firms of Theodore Goddard & Co. and Herbert Smith & Co. She also served as an attorney in the Office of the Legal Advisor at the Department of State and was a member of the U.S. delegation to the UN working on the first anti-corruption multilateral treaty initiative.

Mrs. Divers is a member of the DC Bar and a graduate of Trinity College, Washington D.C. and of the National Law Center of George Washington University. In 2011, 2012, 2013 and 2014 Ethisphere Magazine listed her as one the “Attorneys Who Matter” in the ethics & compliance area. She is a member of the Advisory Boards of the Rutgers University Center for Ethical Behavior and served as a member of the Board of Directors for the Institute for Practical Training from 2005-2008.

She resides in Northern Virginia and is a frequent speaker, writer and commentator on ethics and compliance topics. Mrs. Divers’ most recent publication is “Balancing Best Practices and Reality in Compliance,” published by Compliance Week in February 2015. In her spare time, she mentors veteran and university students and enjoys outdoor activities.

Categories
Daily Compliance News

Daily Compliance News: September 12, 2023 – The Paying Attention Edition

Welcome to the Daily Compliance News. Each day, Tom Fox, the Voice of Compliance brings to you compliance-related stories to start your day. Sit back, enjoy a cup of morning coffee, and listen in to the Daily Compliance News. All, from the Compliance Podcast Network. Each day we consider four stories from the business world, compliance, ethics, risk management, leadership, or general interest for the compliance professional.

  • EU’s massive money-laundering problem. (AML Intelligence)
  • Will doctors pay cuts lead to more corruption in China. (Bloomberg)
  • CFTC cracks down on De-Fi over crypto. (WSJ)
  • What is the secret to good management? (FT)
Categories
Blog

Profiles of Corrupt Payments

I recently had the opportunity to visit with Vince Walden, founder and CEO of KonaAI, for a podcast series on the uses of data driven compliance. KonaAI is the sponsor of those podcasts. This blog post series will flesh out the podcast show notes. Over the next five blog posts, we will discuss generative AI and ChatGPT in compliance, the profiles of corrupt payments, making the business case for data-driven compliance, what to ask for and how to ask for it, and some success stories. In Part 2, we will consider the profiles of a corrupt payment.

The episode highlighted research by MIT and KonaAI that examined $75 billion in payments from various companies to identify characteristics associated with high-risk payments. For businesses looking to identify and stop improper payments, the MIT and KonaAI research offered useful insights. Key attributes that were found to be associated with high-risk payments included payments made without purchase orders, payments flagged by anti-corruption keywords, and payments that significantly deviated from the norm. These attributes were often relevant in the data that humans tagged as high-risk.

One of the key takeaways from the research is the importance of investigating red flags in sales increases. A case study was presented in the episode, highlighting a suspicious sales increase in a Polish province. Contributions to a charitable organization came with increased sales, which raised questions about potential corruption or bribery. This case study emphasizes that compliance officers and risk professionals must monitor commissions, sales incentives, and margins to identify potential bribery and corruption issues.

Companies are encouraged to leverage data analysis tools like KonaAI to identify high-risk payments and prevent corporate corruption. These tools can help track and identify improper payments, providing transparency and easy access to financial accounting data for compliance professionals. By combining financial accounting data with data analysis capabilities, companies can gain insights into payment patterns and detect anomalies that may indicate potential corruption.

However, it is important to note that tradeoffs are involved in balancing different factors when identifying high-risk payments. Compliance officers and risk professionals must carefully consider the impact of their decisions on the business. The podcast episode highlighted the analogy of brakes on a car, emphasizing that the purpose of brakes is not to slow down but to enable the car to go fast and stop when necessary. Similarly, compliance efforts aim to facilitate business growth while ensuring ethical practices and preventing corruption.

The episode also discussed the challenges of identifying high-risk payments and preventing corporate corruption. One challenge is the need for collaboration among companies in an anonymous way to analyze the profiles of improper payments. The research conducted by MIT and KonaAI demonstrated the potential of such collaboration in identifying common risk triggers and profiles of high-risk payments. However, ensuring data privacy and confidentiality is crucial in such collaborative efforts.

In conclusion, identifying high-risk payments and preventing corporate corruption require a comprehensive approach that combines data analysis, collaboration, and a focus on business growth. The MIT and KonaAI research offers useful insights into the characteristics of high-risk payments. Compliance officers and risk professionals are urged to leverage data analysis tools and closely monitor payment patterns to detect and prevent improper payments. By balancing compliance efforts and business objectives, companies can mitigate corruption risks and foster a culture of transparency and integrity.

Examining data is like peering into a crystal ball that projects the inner workings of a business, but only if you know what to look for. One essential facet is sales performance. Even the tiniest irregularities can be a hint of greater issues at hand, such as improper payments. So, understanding and tracking sales data, be it a sudden sales surge in a particular area or an individual outperforming all expectations, is quite crucial.  Walden emphasized the importance of transparency in analyzing sales data. If figures shoot up in a specific region or uncannily exceptional sales are tied to a particular individual, Vince suggests investigating to find out more. The key here, he describes, is the ability to spot these oddities before they morph into a serious problem. Transparency in financial analysis, Vince implores us, can be a game-changer in tracking down and rectifying improper payments.

Third-party relationships can be as much a source of risk as any other part of a business. Keeping tabs on the financial activities of entities such as distributors, commission sales agents, and joint venture partners is therefore imperative. Monitoring these relationships to minimize the risks of improper payments. Walden suggests that the same strategies used to interpret company data for potential risks can also be utilized for third-party relationships. Compliance officers can pair financial analysis with tools like KonaAI to actively monitor anomalies or suspicious transactions. In this scenario, compliance officers can be armed with the right tools and data to monitor and, if required, mitigate any suspicious financial activities related to third-party relationships.

Extending data analysis to third parties is no longer nice; in today’s compliance and fraud-risk environment, it is a business necessity. Monitoring these outside relationships closely provides another layer of security and reduces the breeding ground for unethical activities like improper payments. By integrating financial data with tools like these, compliance officers can actively keep an eye out for anything unusual. This way, companies are not only ensuring that their internal affairs are in order but are also making sure that their external associations are clean and ethical. It’s an insight into how companies can use strategic data analysis to maintain regulatory compliance.

The bottom line is that compliance officers are the guardrails that keep a company on track. Their role is two-pronged – facilitate business growth and, at the same time, deter the business from veering off into unethical practices. Compliance officers ensure the company is always one step ahead in identifying and addressing compliance risks. A balance between growth enablement and ethical conduct is needed to steer the course towards success.

Finally, as compliance officers, you have the power to make a significant impact by preventing improper payments and preserving your organization’s reputation. By embracing the learnings from this podcast episode, you can confidently navigate the challenges of today’s complex business environment and ensure that your efforts contribute to a culture of transparency and ethical behavior. Together, we can create a stronger, more accountable business world.

Resources:

Connect with Vince Walden on LinkedIn

Check out KonaAI

Connect with Tom Fox on LinkedIn

Categories
31 Days to More Effective Compliance Programs

One Month to More Effective Written Standards: Day 6 – Operationalization of your Code of Conduct

How can you work to operationalize your Code of Conduct as articulated in the DOJ 2023 Evaluation of Corporate Compliance Programs (ECCP)? The 2023 ECCP focuses not on whether a company has a paper compliance program but whether a company is actually doing compliance. A company does compliance by moving it into the functional business units as a part of an overall business process. That is what makes a compliance program effective at the business level. There are several different parts of the 2023 ECCP that touch upon your Code of Conduct.
The Code of Conduct design and implementation process enshrine your company’s values. Those are set by senior management and their input and support for any code project, whether initial draft or update, is critical. This gets to the heart of operationalization and demonstrates how a Code of Conduct can work to meet the DOJ requirements. As an early part of your design and drafting process, you should assemble a cross-functional team. This is important for several reasons. First, diversity in your team will help produce a more well-rounded final product. But having such team diversity will also assist in your benchmarking effort, coupled with those who are going to help you out looking at designs and maybe helping forge the design of the code. Finally, you can use a group to help in the drafting, redrafting and editing process. This diversity will help you to answer all of the DOJ questions from the 2019 Guidance in a manner consistent to support operationalization.
All of these requirements point to getting out and making your Code of Conduct a part of the very fabric of your organization. By using some or all of these strategies, you will have a good starting point. But it is more than simply rollout and training. There must be ongoing communications as well.

Three key takeaways:

  1. What has been the role of senior management in the creation or update of your Code of Conduct?
  2. How have you worked with employees outside the compliance function to lay the groundwork for fully operationalizing your Code of Conduct?
  3. How have you measured the effectiveness of your Code of Conduct training?

For more information, check out The Compliance Handbook, 4th edition, here.

Categories
Innovation in Compliance

Innovation in Compliance – Dr. Laura Purdy on Revolutionizing Healthcare: The Power and Potential of Telemedicine

Innovation comes in many areas and compliance professionals need to not only be ready for it but embrace it. One of those areas is telehealth and telemedicine. My guest in this episode is Dr. Laura Purdy, a true evangelist for both telehealth and telemedicine.

Telemedicine in the Army has become crucial in providing healthcare to remote and deployed soldiers. Dr. Laura Purdy, a family medicine physician with a military background, has been at the forefront of this innovation. Telemedicine allows doctors to provide care remotely, improving access to healthcare in rural areas with limited services. However, the insurance industry’s lack of understanding hinders acceptance of telemedicine. Dr. Purdy encourages patients to try telemedicine, especially cash pay services, for more control over their healthcare choices. Scaling up a telehealth company requires careful consideration of being cash pay or accepting insurance. Regulatory challenges in telehealth include physician licensing, state laws, legal standards, and controlled substances. The future of telemedicine involves seamless integration of virtual and in-person care. Dr. Purdy’s company, AfD Health System, aims to provide accessible care and educational content through Instagram and a developing website. Overall, telemedicine has the potential to revolutionize healthcare delivery, but it requires greater acceptance, understanding, and comprehensive regulation.

Key Highlights

·      Telemedicine in the Army

·      Telemedicine: Improving Access to Healthcare

·      Challenges in Telehealth Regulation

·      The Future of Telemedicine

·      AfD Health System

 Resources

Dr. Laura Purdy on LinkedIn

DrLauraPurdy.com

Tom Fox

Instagram

Facebook

YouTube

Twitter

LinkedIn

Categories
Blog

Geopolitical Risks and Business Opportunities: Part 2 – Latin America

I recently had the opportunity to visit with Dr. Ian Oxnevad, Director of Geopolitical Risk Intelligence at Infortal Worldwide. Global Risk Review, a podcast series that Infortal Worldwide sponsors was the reason for this visit. Dr. Oxnevad is a seasoned expert in geopolitical risk intelligence, with a Ph.D. in political science and a master’s degree in National Security Studies. Over this five-part blog post series, we will review Dr. Oxnevad’s views in each one of these regions. Part 2 reviews the business opportunities and risks in Latin America.

Dr. Ian Oxnevad is a highly regarded expert in global geopolitical risk, with special knowledge of Latin America. His extensive experience and understanding of the region’s shifting dynamics shape his perspective on Latin America’s geopolitical risks and business opportunities. Oxnevad identifies significant changes and instability in the region, including increased statism, corruption, and authoritarianism, as well as China’s growing influence, particularly in Brazil. He emphasizes the importance of due diligence and geopolitical risk intelligence, often overlooked by CEOs and political figures. He discusses the risks and potential opportunities for US businesses in Mexico, Venezuela, Cuba, Chile, and Ecuador.

Latin America is a region that is experiencing a rise in geopolitical risk and instability. With China increasing its presence in the region and concerns growing over corruption and authoritarianism, it is crucial for companies considering investment in Latin America to prioritize due diligence and geopolitical risk intelligence. Despite these challenges, the region is not on the sidelines of global events and offers potential business opportunities.

One of the popular strategies for US companies is nearshoring in Mexico. However, this approach comes with its own set of risks. Nationalization, political divisions, and crime are some of the factors that companies need to consider when investing in Mexico. It is important to conduct thorough research and analysis to understand the specific risks associated with each location within Latin America.

Dr. Oxnevad emphasized the importance of paying attention to Latin America regarding geopolitical risks and business opportunities. He pointed out that many CEOs and people in the political world view Latin America as being off the sidelines of major events worldwide, but this is far from the truth. Latin America is a dynamic region that requires careful consideration and attention.

Despite its challenges, Cuba can become a financial hub in Latin America. Its strategic location and favorable weather make it an attractive destination for businesses. However, significant reforms, regional ties, and US investment would be necessary to realize this potential. Cuba was historically a financial center in the Americas under Spanish rule. If it were to liberalize and attract investment, it could play a similar role in Latin America as the UAE does in Africa.

Additionally, simply looking at a map of the Caribbean Sea and the Atlantic Ocean reveals that Cuba is the best entry point for the northern Latin American continent from a transportation perspective. Cuba’s potential as a gateway to northeastern Latin America, particularly in shipping and transshipping, makes it an attractive business prospect. Finally, the Obama Administration’s initiative to open Cuba to US commerce, which the Trump Administration scuttled, shows an active consumer base for US goods, products, and services. When President Obama visited Cuba, over 2000 US business executives traveled to meet and assess the business opportunities.

Venezuela, on the other hand, presents a different set of challenges. The Venezuelan regime is hostile towards the US, and China has increased its presence there. This makes a significant opening for US businesses unlikely. Moreover, even if there is an opening, the pervasive corruption problem will make it difficult to do business with Venezuela. The national energy concern, PdVSA, is generally recognized as one of the most corrupt energy-related state-owned enterprises globally. Navigating doing business with PdVSA will be difficult and closely watched by US authorities.

Conversely, despite not being directly connected to the energy industry, Cuba has a better chance of opening up. The existing regime in Cuba relies on Raul Castro for legitimacy, and there is a greater likelihood of liberalization due to political reasons.

When considering business opportunities in Latin America, it is essential to assess the geopolitical risks associated with each country. Chile, for example, is considered safer than Ecuador due to its more pro-business body of law. However, Chile is internally divided, and there are pushes to increase authoritarianism. Ecuador, on the other hand, appears more unstable, with recent electoral violence. Conducting thorough screenings and assessments of each country’s legal framework, corruption levels, labor relations, and criminal risks is crucial for making informed decisions.

In conclusion, Latin America presents both geopolitical risks and business opportunities. Companies must conduct due diligence and gather geopolitical risk intelligence to navigate the challenges and tradeoffs. Latin America should be noticed, as it is a region actively involved in global events. By carefully considering the impact of geopolitical risks and making informed decisions, businesses can tap into the potential that Latin America has to offer.

Please join us tomorrow when we explore Geopolitical Risks and Business Opportunities in Russia and Ukraine.

You can check Dr. Oxnevad in the full five-part Riskology by Infortal podcast series here.

Categories
Data Driven Compliance

The Uses of Data Driven Compliance: Part 2 – Profiles of a Corrupt Payment

Welcome to Data Driven Compliance. In this podcast, we discuss how to use data to improve and enhance the effectiveness of your compliance program, creating greater business efficiency and leading to a higher return on investment for your compliance regime. Join host Tom Fox as he explores how data will drive your compliance program to the next level. This podcast is sponsored by Kona AI.

I recently had the opportunity to visit with Vince Walden, founder and CEO of KonaAI, for a podcast series on the uses of data driven compliance. Over these five podcasts, we will discuss generative AI and ChatGPT in compliance, the profiles of corrupt payments, making the business case for data-driven compliance, what to ask for and how to ask for it, and some success stories. In Part 2, we explore the profiles of corrupt payments.

Vince Walden is an expert in identifying high-risk payments and preventing corporate corruption. His belief in the ability of data analysis and collaboration to find patterns and warning signs shapes his viewpoint on these issues. He shares his experience from a research project where companies collaborated anonymously to analyze the profiles of improper payments, using risk-scoring transactions and applying anti-corruption tests to identify high-risk attributes. Vince emphasizes the importance of transparency and access to data to proactively investigate suspicious activities, serving as a guardrail to prevent potential corruption. Join Tom Fox and Vince Walden as they delve deeper into this topic on this Data Driven Compliance podcast episode.

Key Highlights:

  • Attributes of High-Risk Payments Analysis
  • Uncovering Suspicious Sales Spikes in Poland
  • Detecting Improper Payments with Data Analysis

Resources:

Connect with Vince Walden on LinkedIn

Check out Kona AI

Connect with Tom Fox on LinkedIn