Categories
Innovation in Compliance

Innovation in Compliance – Exploring Client-Side Security and PCI DSS Compliance with Rui Ribeiro

Innovation comes in many areas, and compliance professionals must be ready for and embrace it. Join Tom Fox, the Voice of Compliance, as he visits with top innovative minds, thinkers, and creators in the award-winning Innovation in Compliance podcast. Host Tom Fox takes things differently in this episode by welcoming Rui Ribeiro, Co-Founder and CEO at Jscrambler, the podcast’s sponsor.

Rui discusses innovative measures in client-side security and PCI DSS compliance, his professional background, and the significance of the PCI DSS Version 4 update in enhancing client-side environments, mainly focusing on controlling third-party vendors to prevent unauthorized data access. The discussion outlines the strides taken in making transactions secure and offers insights into the broader implications of data privacy and compliance trends. Listeners will gain a comprehensive understanding of the intersection between technology and compliance in the context of data security alongside the evolving regulatory landscape.

Key highlights:

  • Exploring Client-Side Security and PCI DSS Compliance
  • The Importance of PCI DSS Version 4
  • Challenges and Solutions in Client-Side Security
  • Jscrambler’s Role and Customer Engagement
  • Future of Client-Side Security and Compliance

Resources:


Rui Ribeiro on LinkedIn

Jscrambler

Tom Fox

Instagram

Facebook

YouTube

Twitter

LinkedIn

Categories
Daily Compliance News

Daily Compliance News: November 12, 2024 – The Science of Corruption Edition

Welcome to the Daily Compliance News. Each day, Tom Fox, the Voice of Compliance, brings you compliance-related stories to start your day. Sit back, enjoy a cup of morning coffee, and listen in to the Daily Compliance News—all from the Compliance Podcast Network. Each day, we consider four stories from the business world: compliance, ethics, risk management, leadership, or general interest for the compliance professional.

  • What science reveals about corruption. (El Pais)
  • End of ESG and crypt initiatives at SEC. (WSJ)
  • FinCEN, corruption, and the real estate industry. (Reuters)
  • Would you trust Mattel to list your website?  (NYT)

For more information on the Ethico Toolkit for Middle Managers, available at no charge, click here.

Check out the full 3-book series, The Compliance Kids, on Amazon.com.

Categories
Blog

What Should a Chief Compliance Officer Report to the Board of Directors?

The Chief Compliance Officer (CCO) role is essential in building an organization that meets regulatory standards and upholds a robust ethical culture. But what should the CCO be reporting to the Board of Directors to ensure they understand the full scope of the company’s compliance landscape? This post will consider the essential elements of an effective Board report from the CCO. These elements will help foster transparency, trust, and accountability between the compliance function and the highest levels of corporate oversight.

  • Overview of Compliance Program Structure and Key Updates

An essential part of a CCO’s responsibility to the Board is to ensure they understand how the compliance function is structured and resourced. This includes an overview of the compliance team, its reporting lines, and any recent structural changes. The CCO should also emphasize that the compliance function has the independence, resources, and support to operate effectively.

For example, it is useful to discuss whether additional resources are needed—such as an increased budget, training for compliance staff, or investments in new technology to improve monitoring. Even more crucial is regularly informing the Board about fundamental personnel changes in the compliance team, including new hires or departures. This assures the Board that the compliance team is fully staffed and led by individuals with the experience and knowledge necessary to accomplish the organization’s compliance goals.

  • Risk Assessment and Emerging Compliance Risks

One of the CCO’s primary duties is to ensure that the Board is aware of the organization’s compliance risks. An annual or quarterly update on the status of these risks—mainly if there are high-priority or emerging risks—is critical. The CCO should discuss the results of any recent risk assessments, including:

  1. The top risks currently facing the organization.
  2. Risks associated with new business ventures or geographic expansion.
  3. Changes in geo-political or regulatory landscapes that may impact risk exposure.

For instance, if the company is expanding operations in a high-risk country for bribery or data privacy, this development should be highlighted, along with any steps the compliance team is taking to mitigate the risk. The goal here is not to overwhelm the Board with excessive detail but rather to provide a clear view of where the most significant vulnerabilities lie and what strategies are in place to address them.

The Board should leave these discussions to understand the nature and scope of the company’s compliance risks and the level of oversight being applied to manage those risks. This will reassure them that the company is not only aware of potential threats but is proactively addressing them.

  • Status of Key Compliance Initiatives and Program Enhancements

Board members must see that the compliance program is not static but a dynamic, continuously improving function. The CCO should regularly report on ongoing compliance initiatives and any recent improvements to the program. This can include initiatives such as:

  1. Enhancing third-party risk processes.
  2. Implementing new training programs.
  3. Developing better monitoring and auditing capabilities.

These initiatives should align with the company’s strategic goals, and the CCO can emphasize how compliance supports and reinforces these objectives. For example, if the company has adopted a new code of conduct or revised anti-corruption policies, the CCO should detail how these updates are being rolled out, communicated, and embedded into the organization’s culture.

Additionally, metrics that measure the success of these initiatives are invaluable. For example, sharing compliance training completion rates, results from employee feedback surveys on compliance topics, or the reduction of hotline reports in specific areas can help the Board understand the program’s impact and areas that may need further attention.

  • Compliance Investigations and Response to Issues

Transparency about compliance investigations and their outcomes is fundamental to the Board’s oversight responsibilities. The CCO should provide a high-level overview of significant compliance incidents, particularly those that pose a financial, operational, or reputational risk to the company. This discussion should include:

  1. The nature of the issue or alleged violation.
  2. The investigative steps taken.
  3. Any corrective actions or disciplinary measures implemented.

The CCO should also clearly explain how these issues were detected—whether through internal audits, whistleblower reports, or monitoring activities—demonstrating that the compliance function effectively catches and addresses problems early. It’s important to note that the Board does not need the names of individuals involved or granular details. Instead, they should receive summaries on patterns, issues encountered, and root causes.

Discussions on trends emerging from investigations—such as recurring issues in specific geographies or business units—can provide the Board with valuable insights into potential vulnerabilities. This information also equips the Board to ask strategic questions about how the company’s compliance efforts address these trends, thus bolstering their understanding and oversight of the compliance program.

  • Compliance Program Metrics and KPIs

Measurable data points—such as Key Performance Indicators (KPIs)—are crucial to effective board reporting. Metrics help the Board understand how well the compliance program is performing and identify areas for potential improvement. Examples of relevant compliance metrics include:

  1. Training effectiveness rates across the organization.
  2. Number of hotline calls and resolution time.
  3. Frequency and outcomes of internal audits.
  4. Employee survey results on compliance culture and awareness.

It is helpful to present these metrics in a clear, accessible format, perhaps in the form of dashboards or visual aids, so the Board can quickly grasp the current state of the compliance program. By monitoring trends in these metrics over time, the Board can see the program’s evolution and any areas where additional focus or resources may be needed.

  • Status of the Compliance Culture and “Tone from the Top”

Building a culture of compliance starts at the top, and the Board plays a critical role in establishing this tone. The CCO should regularly report on the company’s compliance culture, noting any shifts or improvements. This could include:

  1. Results from employee surveys on attitudes towards compliance.
  2. Observations from site visits or engagement with various departments.
  3. Feedback from middle management on employee engagement with compliance.

If the company’s compliance culture has gaps, this is the ideal time to discuss closing steps. The CCO can use this section of the report to highlight the role of senior leaders and managers in reinforcing compliance messages. For instance, showcasing how top executives have engaged in recent compliance campaigns or have visibly supported compliance initiatives demonstrates a commitment to ethical conduct and can serve as a model for others.

  • Resources and Budget: Ensuring Adequate Support

One of the most significant concerns the Board should be aware of is whether the compliance function is adequately resourced. The CCO should use this portion of the report to discuss additional needs, such as funding for new technology, more staff to support compliance efforts in high-risk regions or enhanced training programs.

If budget constraints have affected the compliance program, this is also the time to discuss those challenges with the Board. Clear communication about resource needs can help the Board advocate for the compliance function, ensuring it has the tools to mitigate risks effectively. Adequate funding and resources were mandated in the 2024 Evaluation of Corporate Compliance Programs, and CCOs need to explain to the Board their responsibility to ensure this mandate is met.

  • Regulatory Updates and External Trends

Keeping the Board informed of the latest regulatory developments is also crucial. This includes new or evolving laws that could impact the business, industry trends in compliance and enforcement actions against companies in similar sectors. For example, if a new data protection law exists in a region where the company operates, the CCO should outline how the compliance team is preparing to address it.

This part of the report ensures the Board is aware of potential compliance-related challenges on the horizon and provides context for any new initiatives or policy updates the compliance team may propose in response to regulatory changes.

  • The CCO’s Essential Role in Equipping the Board

The relationship between the CCO and the Board is one of the cornerstones of an effective compliance program. By providing a comprehensive, transparent, and strategic report, the CCO empowers the Board to fulfill its oversight responsibilities, making informed decisions that support and enhance the company’s commitment to compliance and ethical conduct.

An effective board report is about more than compliance updates; it is an opportunity to reinforce the importance of compliance, highlight the program’s successes, and communicate any challenges that lie ahead. By keeping these eight core elements in mind, CCOs can ensure their reports inform and engage the Board, fostering a culture of accountability that permeates the entire organization.

Categories
All Things Investigations

All Things Investigations – Anna Hamati on Key Lessons from the TD Bank AML Enforcement Action

Welcome to the Hughes Hubbard Anti-Corruption & Internal Investigations Practice Group’s podcast, All Things Investigation. In this episode, Anna Hamati, a Hughes Hubbard & Reed LLP lawyer, joins host Tom Fox to discuss the historic anti-money laundering (AML) enforcement action involving TD Bank.

Anna outlines her professional background in compliance and offers a deep dive into the top five takeaways from the extensive consent order related to the TD Bank case. These takeaways highlight key compliance failures, including inadequate resource allocation, insufficient testing and auditing, a weak culture of compliance, poor training programs, and failures in filing accurate and timely CTRs and SARs. The discussion provides critical insights and practical advice for compliance professionals seeking to improve their AML programs.

Anna underscores the importance of allocating sufficient resources to compliance functions, conducting proper testing and auditing, fostering a strong compliance culture from the top, providing comprehensive training, and ensuring the timely and accurate filing of CTRs and SARs. She illustrates the real-world implications of these compliance failures through detailed examples and offers practical guidance for banks and financial institutions to avoid similar pitfalls. This episode is a must-listen for anyone involved in AML and regulatory compliance.

Key highlights:

  • Overview of the TD Bank Case
  • Importance of Adequate Resources
  • Testing and Auditing
  • Culture of Compliance
  • Training Programs
  • Filing Timely and Accurate Reports

Resources:

Hughes Hubbard & Reed LLP Website

Anna Hamati

Categories
Compliance Tip of the Day

Compliance Tip of the Day – Lessons Learned From Telefónica Venezolana

Welcome to “Compliance Tip of the Day,” the podcast where we bring you daily insights and practical advice on navigating the ever-evolving landscape of compliance and regulatory requirements. Whether you’re a seasoned compliance professional or just starting your journey, we aim to provide bite-sized, actionable tips to help you stay on top of your compliance game. Join us as we explore the latest industry trends, share best practices, and demystify complex compliance issues to keep your organization on the right side of the law. Tune in daily for your dose of compliance wisdom, and let’s make compliance a little less daunting, one tip at a time.

Today, we consider 3 key takeaways from the Telefónica Venezolana FCPA enforcement action announced last week.

For more information on the Ethico Toolkit for Middle Managers, available at no charge, click here.

Check out the full 3-book series, The Compliance Kids, on Amazon.com.

Categories
Daily Compliance News

Daily Compliance News: November 11, 2024 – The Veteran’s Day Edition

Welcome to the Daily Compliance News. Each day, Tom Fox, the Voice of Compliance, brings you compliance-related stories to start your day. Sit back, enjoy a cup of morning coffee, and listen in to the Daily Compliance News—all from the Compliance Podcast Network. Each day, we consider four stories from the business world: compliance, ethics, risk management, leadership, or general interest for the compliance professional.

  • NetEase executives arrested for bribery and money laundering.  (gamesindustry.biz)
  • Hidden cost of textile and apparel non-compliance. (Homeland Security Today)
  • Handling a difficult employee with health issues. (NYT)
  • Telefónica Venezuela settles FCPA action. (WSJ)

For more information on the Ethico Toolkit for Middle Managers, available at no charge, click here.

Check out the full 3-book series, The Compliance Kids, on Amazon.com.

Categories
Riskology

Riskology by Infortal™: Episode 36 – Geopolitical Risk Management for CFOs

The Evolving Role of CFOs in Geopolitical Risk Management

CFOs, it’s time to rethink how you approach global risk!

Geopolitics isn’t just for diplomats – it’s seeping into the boardroom and impacting bottom lines, now more than ever.

Join Riskology by Infortal™ hosts Dr. Ian Oxnevad and Christopher Mason from Infortal Worldwide as they highlight the strategic importance of factoring in Geopolitical Risk analysis into CFO-led strategic planning and financial forecasting.

Geopolitical Risk & Chief Financial Officers (CFOs)

In the complex landscape of global business, geopolitical risks hold significant sway over corporate strategy, whether planned or not. Geopolitical risks encompass a wide range of factors, from inflation and economic policies to socio-political dynamics, all of which can disrupt market stability.

Traditionally, the evaluation and management of these risks may not have fallen directly within the purview of CFOs. However, as companies increasingly navigate volatile environments, CFOs find themselves uniquely positioned to incorporate geopolitical risk assessments into financial strategies to ensure longer-term sustainability.

CFOs are integral to a firm’s financial health and resilience. As global markets become more interconnected and unpredictable, CFOs must now factor in geopolitical variables that could significantly impact an organization’s operational continuity. Just think about the recent impact that economic warfare, i.e. sanctions, has had on the shipping industry.

Understanding these dynamics is essential for fostering robust financial planning and risk management.

The Impact of Geopolitical Risks on Financial Planning

Geopolitical instability can have far-reaching impacts on various financial aspects of a business, making it critical for CFOs to stay informed and proactive. The key to thriving amidst these uncertainties lies in strategic preparedness and robust scenario planning.

Scenario planning involves envisioning multiple future states and their potential impacts on the business.

By simulating different geopolitical scenarios, CFOs can proactively devise contingency measures to mitigate risks. For instance, understanding how a new trade embargo might affect supply chains allows financial leaders to identify cost-effective alternative suppliers or logistical routes, thereby minimizing disruption and preserving continuity in the event of a significant geopolitical shift.

This financial foresight also aids in maintaining compliance with international laws and regulations, safeguarding the firm from legal repercussions.

Leveraging Technology for Risk Monitoring

The evolution of technology has dramatically enhanced the capacity to monitor and mitigate geopolitical risks. Advanced risk dashboards and sophisticated risk management tools now offer unprecedented capabilities in risk detection and analysis.

Risk management systems can categorize risks, assign scores, and generate predictive analytics, giving CFOs actionable insights. This continuous monitoring is crucial, as it allows for timely adjustments to financial plans, ensuring that resources are allocated efficiently, and emergency funds are available when crisis strikes.

Importantly, you also need to make sure that you are looking beyond the tech solutions to make sure that you have a boots-on-the-ground understanding of the risk landscape. This may require periodic reviews or conducting more in-depth due diligence.

Differentiating Risks from Threats

A clear distinction between risks and threats is essential for effective financial planning.

It is important to proactively manage risks to avoid an mitigate threats. This requires conducting the right level of risk mitigation planning and conducting deep level due diligence when reviewing business partners, customers, suppliers and market areas.

The better you understand the risk profile of a scenario the more prepared you will be to head off emerging threats.

You need to monitor and manage the right risks according to your firm’s risk tolerance level before they escalate into threats. Once a threat emerges, such as geopolitical instability, a company may face significant cost increases.

Having a contingency plan in place can save your financial outlook.

Developing Comprehensive Contingency Plans

Contingency planning is a critical component of effective risk management, especially in the face of unpredictable geopolitical threats. These plans involve outlining specific steps and resources necessary to address various risk scenarios, from economic sanctions to political upheaval.

Undertaking contingency planning requires a deep analysis of potential risks and their financial implications. CFOs must work collaboratively with other stakeholders, including risk management teams, operational managers, and external consultants, to develop comprehensive strategies.

Specific actions might include setting aside financial reserves, diversifying investments, or establishing alternative operational sites. By establishing these plans ahead of time, organizations can react more swiftly and effectively, preserving financial stability.

Integration of Intelligence and Risk Officers

To efficiently navigate the complexities of geopolitical risks, integrating dedicated risk intelligence officers or even entire geopolitical risk management teams into the organizational structure is becoming more common. However, American companies still have a long way to go.

Establishing robust risk management frameworks that include regular intelligence updates and compliance checks can ensure that companies are not caught off-guard by emerging threats.

Leveraging CFOs’ Financial Acumen in Risk Scenarios

The unique position of CFOs allows them to understand and manage the financial ramifications of different risk scenarios comprehensively. This understanding is crucial not only for preparing for risks but also for managing them once they translate into threats.

By maintaining a proactive stance on risk management, CFOs can ensure their organizations remain resilient in the face of geopolitical uncertainty.

Resources:

Infortal Worldwide

Email

Dr. Ian Oxnevad on LinkedIn

Chris Mason on LinkedIn

Categories
Corruption, Crime and Compliance

SEC Settles FCPA Case with Moog, Inc. for Nearly $1.7 Million

The SEC notched another FCPA settlement, continuing its steady pursuit and resolution of FCPA cases. In the meantime, the Justice Department has been silent in the FCPA enforcement arena. In this episode of Corruption, Crime, and Compliance, Michael Volkov dives into the SEC’s recent FCPA settlement with Moog, a global manufacturer that faced severe bribery allegations within its Indian subsidiary. From navigating India’s complex tender processes to revealing corrupt practices and hefty penalties, Michael dissects Moog’s compliance failures and highlights the critical role of ethics in international business dealings.

Listen in as he discusses:

  • Moog, Inc. (“Moog”), a New York-based global manufacturer of motion controls systems for aerospace, defense, industrial, and medical markets, agreed to pay a civil penalty of $1.1 million and disgorge nearly $600,000 for a total of $1.7 million, to resolve FCPA charges arising out of bribes paid by its wholly owned Indian subsidiary, Moog Motion Controls Private Limited (Moog Motion Controls).
  • Moog India allegedly bribed officials from the South Central Railway (SCR) and Hindustan Aeronautics Limited (HAL) to influence tender processes and exclude competitors. These bribes were often disguised as “contractor services.”
  • From 2020 to 2022, Moog employees bribed various Indian officials to win business. They also used various schemes to make improper payments, including funneling them through third-party agents and distributors. These same Moog employees also offered cash bribes to Indian officials to cause public tenders in India to favor Moog’s products and exclude competitors.
  • The case highlights significant gaps in Moog’s internal controls, including improper invoice recording, inadequate oversight of third-party agents, and a lack of compliance training.
  • Moog self-reported the misconduct, terminated those involved, enhanced its compliance program, and strengthened accounting controls and auditing procedures for third-party interactions.

Resources:

Michael Volkov on LinkedIn | X (Twitter)

The Volkov Law Group

Categories
Adventures in Compliance

Adventures in Compliance – Leadership Lessons from Sherlock Holmes in The Illustrious Client

In this new season of Adventures in Compliance, host Tom Fox takes a deep dive into the Sherlock Holmes collection The Case-Book of Sherlock Holmes by Arthur Conan Doyle. It is the final set of twelve Sherlock Holmes short stories by Arthur Conan Doyle, first published in the Strand Magazine between October 1921 and April 1927. In this episode, we consider the story, The Adventure of the Illustrious Client, and the leadership lessons from the compliance professional that can be found in the story.

In this episode, we delve into the Sherlock Holmes story ‘The Illustrious Client,’ where Holmes and Watson aid Sir James Damery in rescuing General de Merville’s daughter, Violet, from the clutches of the dangerous Baron Gruner. The story unfolds with Holmes’s meticulous strategy to expose the Baron’s true nature, culminating in dramatic action and revealing leadership lessons for compliance professionals. Key leadership lessons include persistence in pursuing justice, strategic collaboration, deep contextual knowledge, risk mitigation, integrity and courage, adaptable tactics, and leveraging transparency to combat deception. These insights showcase how ethical behavior and accountability can be fostered in an organization.

Highlights include:

  • Holmes’ Strategy and Allies
  • Leadership Lessons from Holmes
  • Strategic Collaboration
  • Risk Awareness and Mitigation
  • Leveraging Transparency

Resources:

The New Annotated Sherlock Holmes

Sherlock Holmes FAQ by Dave Thompson

For more information on the Ethico Toolkit for Middle Managers, available at no charge, click here.

Check out the full 3-book series, The Compliance Kids, on Amazon.com.

For an audio/video version of the Compliance Kids book, Speaking Up is AWESOME, contact Tom Fox.

Connect with Tom Fox:

Instagram

Facebook

YouTube

Twitter

LinkedIn

Categories
FCPA Compliance Report

FCPA Compliance Report – Episode 732 – Understanding Anti-Boycott Compliance with Alexander Cotoia

Welcome to the award-winning FCPA Compliance Report, the longest-running podcast in compliance. In this edition, Tom Fox welcomes back Alexander Cotoia to discuss the intricate and profoundly impactful topic of anti-boycott compliance related to U.S. companies involved in international trade.

They delve into the specifics of the EAR’s anti-boycott provisions, a framework designed to prohibit U.S. companies from participating in or supporting foreign-imposed boycotts not endorsed by the U.S. government. The conversation highlights the strict reporting requirements enforced by BIS and IRS to ensure transparency and adherence to U.S. trade compliance interests. Alexander explains the details of Quantum Corporation’s recent settlement over violations, emphasizing the importance of active reporting to maintain U.S. trade relationships. The discussion also touches on potential compliance challenges, particularly regarding China and Taiwan. Tune in for best practices in anti-boycott compliance and learn how to navigate this complex regulatory landscape.

Highlights in this episode:

  • Understanding Anti-Boycott Law
  • Deep Dive into EAR’s Anti-Boycott Provisions
  • Enforcement and Compliance
  • Case Study: Quantum Corporation
  • Best Practices for Compliance
  • Global Implications and Future Concerns

 Resources:

Alexander Cotoia on LinkedIn

Volkov Law Group

Alexander Cotoia’s article on BIS – Quantum Corp Enforcement Action

Tom Fox

Instagram

Facebook

YouTube

Twitter

LinkedIn

For more information on the Ethico Toolkit for Middle Managers, available at no charge, click here.