Categories
TechLaw10

TechLaw10: Eric Sinrod & Jonathan Armstrong on AI, ChatGPT & Legal Liability

In this edition of TechLaw10, Jonathan Armstrong talks to Attorney and Professor Eric Sinrod from his home in California. They look again at the legal issues surrounding AI, the rise of chatbot ChatGPT, and the legal and ethical issues it brings.

This film follows an earlier one that examined these issues: https://bit.ly/chatgptfilm. This time, Eric and Jonathan focus on liability for chatbot operators.

The topics include:

  • Can chatbots be liable for the things they do?
  • Should Section 230 of the US Communications Decency Act protect chatbots?
  • Can chatbots be liable for IP issues?
  • How is the UK Shetland Times case from 1996 relevant to today’s AI offerings?
  • Is ChatGPT right in its legal assessment of its liabilities?
  • What are the issues involved in scraping data to train AI?
  • What will the proposed new EU AI law do?
  • How will regulators handle AI complaints?

You can listen to earlier TechLaw10 audio podcasts with Eric and Jonathan at https://www.duanemorris.com/site/techlaw10.html

Connect with the Compliance Podcast Network at:

LinkedIn: https://www.linkedin.com/company/compliance-podcast-network/
Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/compliancepodcastnetwork/
YouTube: https://www.youtube.com/@CompliancePodcastNetwork
Twitter: https://twitter.com/tfoxlaw
Instagram: https://www.instagram.com/voiceofcompliance/
Website: https://compliancepodcastnetwork.net/

Categories
Daily Compliance News

Daily Compliance News: April 10, 2024 – The Not Ubiquitous Edition

Welcome to the Daily Compliance News. Each day, Tom Fox, the Voice of Compliance, brings you compliance-related stories to start your day. Sit back, enjoy a cup of morning coffee and listen to the Daily Compliance News. All from the Compliance Podcast Network.

Each day, we consider four stories from the business world: compliance, ethics, risk management, leadership, or general interest for the compliance professional.

In today’s edition of Daily Compliance News:

  • AI is not yet ubiquitous.  (WSJ)
  • Of corruption and Russian meddling. (FT)
  • The imprisoned Binance Director denies the AML charge. (BBC)
  • Yet another Boeing whistleblower allegation. (NYT)

For more information on the Ethico ROI Calculator and a free White Paper on the ROI of Compliance, click here.

Categories
Sunday Book Review

Sunday Book Review: April 7, 2024 AI for Business Books Edition

In the Sunday Book Review, I consider books that would interest the compliance professional, the business executive, or anyone who might be curious.

It could be books about business, compliance, history, leadership, current events, or anything else that might interest me.

In today’s edition of the Sunday Book Review, we look at some of the top books for the use of AI in business.

  • Trustworthy AI by Beena Ammanthan
  • Generative AI for Business Leaders by I. Almeida
  • The Business Case for AI by Kavita Ganesan
  • Artificial Intelligence Business by Przemek Chojecki

For more information on Ethico and a free White Paper on ROI for your compliance program, click here.

Categories
Daily Compliance News

Daily Compliance News: April 1, 2024 – The Ericsson Released Edition

Welcome to the Daily Compliance News. Each day, Tom Fox, the Voice of Compliance, brings you compliance-related stories to start your day. Sit back, enjoy a cup of morning coffee and listen in to the Daily Compliance News. All from the Compliance Podcast Network.

Each day, we consider four stories from the business world: compliance, ethics, risk management, leadership, or general interest for the compliance professional.

In today’s edition of Daily Compliance News:

For more information on the Ethico ROI Calculator and a free White Paper on the ROI of Compliance, click here.

Categories
TechLaw10

TechLaw10: Eric Sinrod & Jonathan Armstrong on AI, Social Misinformation & Influencers

In this edition of TechLaw10, Jonathan Armstrong talks to Attorney and Professor Eric Sinrod from his home in California. This time, the topics are a potpourri of three types: AI, social media, and influencers.

The topics include:

  • The legal issues involved in new AI-assisted Beatles material
  • The suspension of Bard in the EU & the conflicts between GDPR & AI
  • A new French law looking at influencers & so-called influvoleurs
  • A revised YouTube policy on misinformation
  • Whether the Boris Johnson report shows a decline in integrity in politics
  • Some of the legal issues with social media
  • The investigation into Rio Ferdinand’s Instagram promotion of Qatar

You can listen to earlier TechLaw10 audio podcasts with Eric and Jonathan at https://www.duanemorris.com/site/techlaw10.html

Connect with the Compliance Podcast Network at:

LinkedIn: https://www.linkedin.com/company/compliance-podcast-network/
Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/compliancepodcastnetwork/
YouTube: https://www.youtube.com/@CompliancePodcastNetwork
Twitter: https://twitter.com/tfoxlaw
Instagram: https://www.instagram.com/voiceofcompliance/
Website: https://compliancepodcastnetwork.net/

Categories
Compliance Into the Weeds

Compliance into The Weeds: AI Washing and Compliance

The award winning, Compliance into the Weeds is the only weekly podcast that takes a deep dive into a compliance-related topic, literally going into the weeds to more fully explore a subject. Looking for some hard-hitting insights on compliance?

Look no further than Compliance into the Weeds! In this episode, Tom and Matt take a deep dive into the recent SEC enforcement actions involving AI washing and what it all may mean for the compliance professional.

The evolving landscape of Artificial Intelligence (AI) has brought on a new paradigm of risk management in AI disclosures. This has caught the attention of regulatory bodies like the SEC, thereby necessitating a heightened focus on transparency and the implementation of comprehensive risk strategies.

Tom advocates for the integration of AI risk reporting into the overall risk management strategy, emphasizing the need for governance and the right risk control measures. His views are shaped by his understanding of the potential repercussions of misleading AI disclosures and the significance of transparency in warding off enforcement actions from regulatory bodies.

Matt echoes a similar sentiment, underscoring the importance of recognizing and managing AI risks. His perspective is influenced by the unique challenges that AI poses, calling for strategically tailored governance and risk management practices to navigate the complexities of AI technology.

Key Highlights:

  • AI Misrepresentation Enforcement by SEC
  • Transparency in AI Risk Reporting for Compliance
  • Integrating AI Risk into Overall Risk Management
  • Collaborative Roles for Effective AI Governance
  • A theory of unified risk management
  • What does all this mean for compliance and the compliance professional?

Resources:

Matt on Radical Compliance

Tom 

Instagram

Facebook

YouTube

Twitter

LinkedIn

Categories
Fox on Podcasting

Fox on Podcasting: Gordon Firemark on iTunes Changes and AI in Podcasting

Sometimes, you just have to go meta. After having recorded, produced, hosted, and guested on over 5,000 podcasts, Tom Fox decided it was time for a podcast about what else—podcasting.

In this podcast series, Tom will visit podcast hosts to learn about their love of podcasting, what they have achieved through podcasting, and why you need to consider starting your podcast. Fun, witty, and chatty, with a dash of joie de vivre, this series will be entertaining and educational.

Join Tom Fox as he explores the world of podcasting, and get ready to be inspired to start your podcast.

In this episode, Tom visits Gordon Firemark, the podcast lawyer, to discuss the changes in iTunes measurements and the use of AI in compliance.

Gordon Firemark is a highly skilled entertainment lawyer with expertise in the podcasting, filmmaking, theater, and television industries. He sees artificial intelligence (AI) as a valuable tool in content creation, specifically in streamlining processes and generating ideas for podcast episodes.

However, he does not advocate for relying solely on AI, emphasizing the need for human creativity and oversight. Firemark also acknowledges the legal complexities of AI-generated content, such as copyright protection and infringement issues.

His extensive legal background has shaped his viewpoint because he is aware of AI’s potential and consequences, particularly in tasks like legal research or content creation, where he thinks AI should complement rather than replace human capabilities.

Key Highlights:

  • AI Chat GPT for Podcast Content Creation
  • AI Regulations: California’s Proactive Stance and Challenges
  • iTunes Changes
  • Enhancing Accessibility Through Captions
  • Empowering Creatives with Legal Knowledge Courses

Resources:

Gordon Firemark on LinkedIn

Law Offices of Gordon Firemark

Entertainment Law Update

Tom

Instagram

Facebook

YouTube

Twitter

LinkedIn

Categories
TechLaw10

TechLaw 10: Will the US Approach to Self-Regulation of AI Work?

In this edition of TechLaw10, Jonathan Armstrong talks to Attorney and Professor Eric Sinrod from his home in California. They discuss the announcement that the US will trial a self-regulatory approach to AI. Will this work? How does it differ from the approaches taken in the EU and the UK?

The topics include:

  • What are the 4 main prongs of the White House agreement?
  • Progress with the EU AI Act
  • The UK White Paper on AI Regulation
  • Recent AI enforcement activity, including the temporary suspensions of ChatGPT & Bard & the suspension of ReplikaAI
  • The issues with watermarking AI content
  • The formation of the New York State Bar Association Task Force on AI

You can listen to earlier TechLaw10 audio podcasts with Eric and Jonathan at https://www.duanemorris.com/site/techlaw10.html

Connect with the Compliance Podcast Network at:

LinkedIn: https://www.linkedin.com/company/compliance-podcast-network/
Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/compliancepodcastnetwork/
YouTube: https://www.youtube.com/@CompliancePodcastNetwork
Twitter: https://twitter.com/tfoxlaw
Instagram: https://www.instagram.com/voiceofcompliance/
Website: https://compliancepodcastnetwork.net/

Categories
From the Editor's Desk

From The Editor’s Desk: March and April, 2024 in Compliance Week

Welcome to From the Editor’s Desk, a podcast where co-hosts Tom Fox and Kyle Brasseur, EIC at Compliance Week, unpack some of the top stories that have appeared in Compliance Week over the past month, look at the top compliance stories upcoming for the next month, talk about some sports, and generally try to solve the world’s problems.

Tom Fox and Kyle Brasseur are back. Compliance Week 2024, a major event in the world of regulatory compliance is generating a significant buzz, especially among compliance professionals. This event promises to cover a wide array of relevant topics, from the role of women in compliance and AI to insights into fraud detection and career development.

Tom is particularly interested in the breadth of topics that Compliance Week will cover and the opportunity for professionals to learn from past compliance failures and incorporate these lessons into their programs. Similarly, Kyle shares an eagerness for the discussions that the conference will spark, specifically touching on current hot-button issues like court rulings, SEC climate rules, and DOJ speeches.

The variety of subjects the event will cover, reflecting the diversity of Brasseur’s experiences and interests within the compliance sphere, fuels his anticipation.

Highlights Include:

  • Constitutionality Concerns of Treasury’s Ownership Requirements
  • Empowering Compliance Officers in AI Risk Mitigation
  • Empowering Compliance Professionals through Future Trends
  • Enhancing Compliance Skills Beyond Basic Knowledge
  • Baseball Innovations Attracting Increased Fan Engagement
  • March Madness
  • Compliance Week 2024

Resources:

Kyle Brasseur on LinkedIn

Compliance Week

I hope you can join me at Compliance Week 2024. For information on the event, click here.

Compliance Week is offering a $200 discount on the registration price as an extra benefit to podcast listeners.

Enter the discount code TFOX2024: $200 off.

Categories
Blog

DAG Monaco at ABA White Collar Conference: Self-Disclosure, Wanted Posters and AI

There were recently two significant speeches by Department of Justice (DOJ) officials at the American Bar Association National Institute on White Collar Crime. The first was by Deputy Attorney General Lisa Monaco. The second was by Acting Assistant Attorney General Nicole Argentieri. They both had important remarks for the compliance professional. Over the next few blog posts, I will look at both speeches and what they might indicate for compliance and enforcing the Foreign Corrupt Practices Act. Today is the speech by DAG Lisa Monaco.

Self-Disclosure Initiatives

Monaco emphasized the importance of timely self-disclosure for companies to receive benefits under the Corporate Enforcement Policy. This tracks speeches made by DOJ officials over the past 18 months and the most significant enforcement actions over the past 15 months, ABB, Albemarle, SAP, and Gunvor. Monaco restated the incentives in place, “ I want to be clear: no matter how good a company’s cooperation, a resolution will always be more favorable with voluntary self-disclosure. We’ve structured our Voluntary Self Disclosure (VSD) programs to encourage companies to take responsibility for misconduct within their organizations. And we’ve conditioned benefits on the company’s willingness to step up and own up—requiring it to disgorge profits, upgrade compliance systems, and cooperate in investigations of culpable employees.”

Monaco also pointed to two separate US Attorney’s Offices, which have initiated their own self-disclosure programs. She stated, “At least two U.S. Attorney’s Offices — led by the Southern District of New York and recently the Northern District of California — are piloting initiatives that are, in essence, voluntary self-disclosure programs for individuals. Both offer non-prosecution agreements to certain categories of at-fault individuals who self-disclose wrongdoing and cooperate against other, more culpable targets. We look forward to evaluating the results of these pilots and determining what’s to come later this year.”

 DOJ Whistleblower Program-Modern Day Wanted Posters

The next area is a new DOJ whistleblower initiative. The money line from her talk was, “Going back to the days of “Wanted” posters across the Old West, law enforcement has long offered rewards to coax tipsters out of the woodwork.” She added, “Today, we’re announcing a program to update how DOJ uses monetary rewards to strengthen our corporate enforcement efforts.” How will the DOJ incentivize this program? The short answer is money.

The DOJ has recognized that paying bounties is a surefire method to attract whistleblowers. She pointed to the examples of Dodd-Frank whistleblower programs at the SEC and the CFTC. She said, “Those agencies have received thousands of tips, paid out many hundreds of millions of dollars, and disgorged billions in ill-gotten gains from corporate bad actors.” There are other similar programs at different agencies and departments, such as the IRS and FinCen, as well as through qui tam actions. “These programs have proven indispensable — but they resemble a patchwork quilt that doesn’t cover the whole bed. They don’t address the full range of corporate and financial misconduct that the Department prosecutes.”

The DOJ will offer payments under four parameters:

  • Only after all victims have been properly compensated;
  • Only to those who submit truthful information not already known to the government;
  • Only to those not involved in the criminal activity itself and
  • Only in cases without an existing financial disclosure incentive — including qui tam or another federal whistleblower program.

Monaco also offered the types of areas the DOJ wants to focus its whistleblower initiative around:

  • Criminal abuses of the U.S. financial system;
  • Foreign corruption cases outside the jurisdiction of the SEC, including FCPA violations by non-issuers and violations of the recently enacted Foreign Extortion Prevention Act,
  • Domestic corruption cases, especially involving illegal corporate payments to government officials.

The DOJ will engage in a 90-day “Policy Sprint” to develop and implement a pilot program, with a formal start date later this year. But the premise should be simple: ” If an individual helps DOJ discover significant corporate or financial misconduct—otherwise unknown to us—then the individual could qualify to receive a portion of the resulting forfeiture.”

Monaco ended with a message for whistleblowers and corporations: “With these announcements, our message to whistleblowers is clear: the Department of Justice wants to hear from you. And to those considering voluntary self-disclosure, our message is equally clear: knock on our door before we knock on yours. “

Justice AI

Recognizing that “all new technologies are a double-edged sword—but AI may be the sharpest blade yet,” Monaco announced that the DOJ would seek sentencing enhancements to increase penalties for criminals whose conduct uses or includes AI. She stated, “Where AI is deliberately misused to make a white-collar crime significantly more serious, our prosecutors will seek stiffer sentences—for individual and corporate defendants alike.”

She went on to add that “compliance officers should take note. When our prosecutors assess a company’s compliance program — as they do in all corporate resolutions — they consider how well the program mitigates its most significant risks. And for a growing number of businesses, that now includes the risk of misusing AI.” To assist compliance professionals with this new area of responsibility, she said that “assessment of disruptive technology risks — including risks associated with AI — into its guidance on Evaluation of Corporate Compliance Programs.”

Cliff Notes

For those old enough to know what Cliff Notes were, Monaco ended with the following:

First, we’re continuing to execute our core strategy: invest the most significant resources in the most serious cases, hold individuals accountable, and pursue tough penalties for repeat offenders.

Second, we’re using carrots and sticks to encourage companies to step up, own up, and report misconduct to the government. With a first-in-the-door strategy, we’re making it clear that neither companies nor individuals can afford to sit on evidence of wrongdoing.

Third, we’re designing our whistleblower rewards program as part of our broader effort to fill gaps and innovate in this space. Stay tuned.

And finally, we’re applying DOJ tools to new, disruptive technologies — like addressing the rise of AI through our existing sentencing guidelines and corporate enforcement programs.

Join me tomorrow as I look at Nicole Argentieri’s speech.