Tag: CCO

Categories
2 Gurus Talk Compliance

2 Gurus Talk Compliance: Episode 48 – The March Madness Edition

What happens when two top compliance commentators get together? They talk compliance, of course. Join Tom Fox and Kristy Grant-Hart in 2 Gurus Talk Compliance as they discuss the latest compliance issues in this week’s episode!

Stories this week include:

  • Severance, your ‘Innie” and work-life balance. (NYT)
  • Difference in work generations. (HR Exchange)
  • Treasury flags $200 transactions at the border. (WSJ)
  • Schwartz fires Paul Weiss. (Law360)
  • Huawei bribery scandal hits EU. (BBC)
  • EU Omnibus Package: 10 things you should know about the proposed changes to key sustainability legislation (White Case)
  • Half of Compliance Officers Have Anxiety; Their Org Chart Might Be the Culprit (CCI)
  • Compliance Programs and Leaks (Radical Compliance)
  • Job Seekers Hit Wall of Salary Deflation (WSJ)
  • Florida police horse nabs man after wild chase over drug deal | ‘Get that bad man! ‘ (Fox 35 Orlando)

 

Resources:

Kristy Grant-Hart on LinkedIn

Prove Your Worth

Tom

Instagram

Facebook

YouTube

Twitter

LinkedIn

Categories
Blog

Compliance and the Audit Committee in the Age of Trump

In my many years evangelizing the virtues of compliance, I have often discussed how the compliance profession thrives on predictability and clarity. However, the recent whirlwind of policy initiatives from the Trump administration presents corporate compliance professionals, particularly audit committees, with unprecedented oversight pressures and challenges. More than ever, audit committees must demonstrate agility, vigilance, and a robust commitment to compliance principles amidst rapid and unpredictable policy shifts.

Fortunately, our colleagues Michael W. Peregrine and Ashley Hoff from McDermott Will & Emery LLP have recently released a paper on this topic entitled Audit Committees Face Significant New Compliance Oversight Pressures. Every Chief Compliance Officer (CCO), Board member, and Audit or Compliance Committee member must read and study their paper as they list multiple lessons learned from this evolving landscape under this second Trump Administration. I have used the author’s thoughts as a framework that a corporate compliance function can use to work with an audit committee to navigate the chaos.

1. Embrace Agility in Compliance Management

The Trump administration’s “flood the zone“ strategy illustrates vividly that agility is no longer optional; it is now imperative for business. Compliance professionals must swiftly adapt to shifting regulatory priorities, ensuring their compliance programs can pivot quickly. Practically speaking, your compliance framework must include flexible risk assessment procedures that can be revised soon in response to policy developments. Audit committees and compliance officers should work closely to stay current on the latest regulatory shifts, adjusting their oversight activities in real time rather than waiting for settled interpretations.

2. Maintain Vigilance Despite Perceived Relaxations

The temptation for corporate leadership to interpret recent DOJ actions, such as the temporary pause on FCPA enforcement, as a relaxation of compliance standards is substantial. However, compliance professionals must actively resist this complacency. The DOJ’s statutory enforcement authority remains unchanged; fraud statutes persist irrespective of administrative fluctuations. Maintaining vigilance ensures that your organization does not inadvertently plant seeds of unethical conduct that might grow unchecked into serious compliance breaches, potentially coming to light once regulatory priorities shift again.

3. Audit Committees Must Stay Proactive and Informed

The decision by DOJ officials not to appear at historically significant events such as the ABA’s annual White Collar Conference underscores a critical lesson. Compliance professionals and audit committees can no longer rely solely on traditional avenues of regulatory communication. It is imperative that they proactively seek out and engage with information through multiple channels, such as DOJ memoranda, policy announcements, speeches from senior leaders, and robust legal analyses provided by external compliance experts. Staying informed is not passive; it demands intentional and constant effort.

4. Preserve a Strong Compliance Culture

One significant risk associated with the current regulatory environment is the potential erosion of the culture of doing business ethically and in compliance within organizations. Perceptions of decreased regulatory scrutiny can lead to a relaxation of internal controls and risk assessment standards. To counter this, audit committees and compliance officers must consistently reinforce their commitment to compliance values, emphasizing to executive leadership and employees that compliance expectations remain unwavering, regardless of the current administration’s stated priorities. Compliance training and clear communication are essential in reinforcing the importance of ethical behavior, particularly during periods of perceived leniency.

5. Prepare for Expanded Compliance Responsibilities

The extensive issuance of Executive Orders by the Trump administration has created new and varied compliance obligations spanning healthcare, immigration, DEI initiatives, and federal contracting requirements. Audit committees and compliance professionals must closely monitor these developments and adjust their oversight practices accordingly. This requires expanding the scope of your compliance programs, creating additional controls and training tailored to these evolving obligations, and ensuring adequate staffing and resources.

6. Advocate for Adequate Compliance Resources

The turbulent regulatory landscape underscores the necessity for robustly funded and resourced compliance programs. Audit committees are critical in advocating for sufficient investment in compliance personnel, technology, and training. Now is not the time to diminish compliance budgets. It is an opportune moment to argue for greater investment, ensuring the compliance function is well-equipped to navigate ongoing volatility.

7. Educate, Train, and Communicate

Effective compliance education is paramount amid regulatory uncertainty. Ensure your workforce understands the current compliance requirements and the underlying rationale behind maintaining high compliance standards, even when immediate regulatory oversight may appear diminished. Addressing potential internal misperceptions head-on prevents employees from pushing ethical boundaries unnecessarily. Regular training sessions, town halls, compliance communications, and leadership messaging are vital to maintaining clear and consistent standards.

8. Uphold Accountability Through Caremark Standards

Despite administrative shifts, Delaware courts have shown no signs of loosening the stringent Caremark standards for director and officer oversight responsibilities. This underscores the critical importance of boards and audit committees in demonstrating robust compliance oversight. Compliance professionals must, therefore, continually remind board members of their fiduciary responsibilities and help them understand that maintaining rigorous compliance oversight is not just prudent—it’s legally essential.

Final Thoughts: The Compliance Imperative

The era ushered in by the second Trump administration has undeniably challenged compliance professionals and audit committees in unique ways, but it also presents an opportunity. By learning these lessons, embracing agility, maintaining vigilance, proactively seeking information, safeguarding compliance culture, expanding oversight responsibilities, advocating for resources, reinforcing education, and upholding accountability, compliance officers can effectively navigate regulatory turbulence and fortify their organizations against uncertainty.

The most successful compliance programs will view current challenges not as obstacles but as opportunities to deepen their organizational commitment to compliance, ethics, and integrity. As compliance professionals, our mission remains clear: to guide and protect our organizations through change, preserve trust, and ensure sustainability beyond any single administration’s tenure.

Categories
Compliance Tip of the Day

Compliance Tip of the Day – Corporate Leaks and Compliance

Welcome to “Compliance Tip of the Day,” the podcast where we bring you daily insights and practical advice on navigating the ever-evolving landscape of compliance and regulatory requirements. Whether you’re a seasoned compliance professional or just starting your journey, we aim to provide you with bite-sized, actionable tips to help you stay on top of your compliance game. Join us as we explore the latest industry trends, share best practices, and demystify complex compliance issues to keep your organization on the right side of the law. Tune in daily for your dose of compliance wisdom, and let’s make compliance a little less daunting, one tip at a time.

Today, we look at the implications of corporate leaks for a company’s culture and the role of a compliance function if they occur.

Categories
Creativity and Compliance

Creativity and Compliance – Adding Spice to Compliance Programs

Where does creativity fit into compliance? In more places than you think. Problem-solving, accountability, communication, and connection—they all take creativity. Join Tom Fox and Ronnie Feldman on Creativity and Compliance, part of the award-winning Compliance Podcast Network.

Ronnie’s company, Learnings and Entertainment, utilizes the entertainment devices people use to consume information in their everyday, non-work lives and apply it to important topics around compliance and ethics. It is not only about being funny. It is about changing the tone of your compliance communications and messaging to make your compliance program, policies, and resources more accessible.

In this episode of Creativity and Compliance, Tom Fox and Ronnie Feldman take up the challenge of adding spice to your compliance program and discuss the importance of adding creativity and ‘spice’ to corporate compliance programs. They explore how standard compliance elements like policies, training, and communications often fail to engage employees effectively. By integrating playful, positive, and humorous elements, companies can make their compliance programs more digestible and engaging, leading to better adherence and fewer issues. Examples include short videos, infographics, and interactive games to convey important messages. They emphasize the need for regular, engaging content that employees will look forward to, transforming the compliance department into a trusted, supportive resource.

Key highlights:

  • The Epiphany: Ingredients for Compliance
  • Adding Spice to Compliance Programs
  • Different Ways to Spice Up Compliance
  • Creative Approaches to Compliance Training
  • Engaging and Fun Compliance Strategies

Resources:

Ronnie

  • Learnings & Entertainments (Website)
  • Compliance Confessions – inspired by “Mean Tweets,” these 90-second commercials address misconceptions and excuses to promote speak-up culture and the E&C team as positive and helpful.
  • E&C Training Jams – a soulful singer banters with ethics & compliance, explaining policies, sharing examples, and debunking excuses. 
  • Tales from the Hotline – Real speak-up-themed stories about workplace behavior gone wrong.
  • Workplace Tonight Show! – E&C meets SNL Weekend Update, explaining corporate risk topics and why employees should care.
  • 60-Second Communication & Awareness Shorts – A variety of short, customizable music and multimedia, quick-hitter “commercials” promoting integrity, compliance, speaking up, and the E&C team as helpful advisors and coaches.
  • Custom Live & Digital Programing – Custom creative programming that balances the seriousness of the subject matter with a more engaging delivery. After all, you can’t bore people into learning.

Tom

Instagram

Facebook

YouTube

Twitter

LinkedIn

Creativity and Compliance was recently honored as one of the Top 35 Podcasts on Creativity by Feedspot.

Categories
Compliance Tip of the Day

Compliance Tip of the Day – Skills for Innovating in Compliance

Welcome to “Compliance Tip of the Day,” the podcast where we bring you daily insights and practical advice on navigating the ever-evolving landscape of compliance and regulatory requirements. Whether you’re a seasoned compliance professional or just starting your journey, we aim to provide bite-sized, actionable tips to help you stay on top of your compliance game. Join us as we explore the latest industry trends, share best practices, and demystify complex compliance issues to keep your organization on the right side of the law. Tune in daily for your dose of compliance wisdom, and let’s make compliance a little less daunting, one tip at a time.

Today, we look at what skills a compliance officer needs to employ to stay ahead of the innovation curve for their compliance program.

For more information on the Ethico Toolkit for Middle Managers, available at no charge, click here.

Categories
Blog

The Fall of the Alamo and Empowerment of the Compliance Professional

Ed. Note: We interrupt our series on how compliance professionals can up their game through GenAI with our annual tribute to the fall of the Alamo and compliance professionals. We’ll be back again tomorrow with more on upping your game.

Today is the anniversary of the most historic day of many in the history of the great state of Texas, the date of the fall of the Alamo. While March 2, Texas Independence Day, is when Texas declared its independence from Mexico, and April 21, San Jacinto Day, is when Texas won its independence from Mexico, probably both have more long-lasting significance. If there is one word that Texas is known for around the world, it is the Alamo. The Alamo was a crumbling Catholic mission in San Antonio where 189 men were held out for 13 days by the Mexican Army of General Santa Anna, which numbered approximately 5,000. But in 1836, Santa Anna unleashed his forces, which overran the mission and killed all the fighting men. Those who did not die in the attack were executed, and all the deceased bodies were unceremoniously burned. Proving he was not without chivalry, Santa Anna spared the lives of the Alamo’s women, children, and slaves. But for Texans across the globe, this is our day.

While Thermopylae will always go down as the greatest ‘Last Stand’ battle in history, the Alamo is in contention for Number 2. Like all such battles, sometimes the myth becomes the legend, and the legend becomes the reality. In Thermopylae, the myth is that 300 Spartans stood against the entire 10,000-man Persian Army. However, there was also a force of 700 Thespians (not actors, but citizens from the City-State of Thespi) and a contingent of 400 Thebans fighting alongside the 300 Spartans. Somehow, their sacrifices have been lost to history.

Likewise, the legend that lifts the battle of the Alamo to the land of myth is the line in the sand. The story goes that William Barrett Travis, on March 5, the day before the final attack, when it was clear that no reinforcements would arrive in time and everyone who stayed would perish, called all his men into the plaza of the compound. He then pulled out his saber and drew a line in the ground. He said that they were surrounded and would all likely die if they stayed. Any man who wanted to stay and die for Texas should cross the line and stand with him. Only one man, Moses Rose, declined to cross the line. The immediate survivors of the battle did not relate to this story after they were rescued, and this line in the sand tale did not appear until the 1880s.

But the thing about ‘last stand’ battles is that they generally turn out badly for the losers. Very badly. I thought about this when Chuck Duross, back when he was head of the Department of Justice’s (DOJ) Foreign Corrupt Practices Act (FCPA) unit, said at a conference that he viewed anti-corruption compliance practitioners as “The Alamo” in terms of the last line of defense in the prevention of compliance violations. I gingerly raised my hand and acknowledged his tribute to the great state of Texas but pointed out that all the defenders were slaughtered, so perhaps another analogy was appropriate. Everyone had a good laugh back then at the conference. But in reflecting on the history of my state and what the Alamo means to us all, I have wondered if my initial response was too facile.

What happens to a Chief Compliance Officer (CCO) or compliance practitioner when they have to make a stand? Do they make the ultimate corporate sacrifice? Will they receive the equivalent of a corporate execution as the defenders of the Alamo received? This worrisome issue occurred even if the person’resigned to pursue other opportunities.’ Michael Scher has been a leading voice for the protection of compliance officers. In a post entitled Michael Scher Talks to the Feds, he said, “A compliance officer (CO) working in Asia asked for recognition and protection: “A CO will not stand up against the huge pressure to maintain compliance standards if he does not get sufficient protection under the law. Most COs working in overseas operations of U.S. companies are not U.S. citizens, but they are usually the first to find the violations. Since the FCPA deals with foreign corruption, how could the DOJ and SEC not protect these COs? “

The DOJ is now looking at the quality of your CCO and compliance function and how they are perceived, treated, and received in the corporate setting. In the 2024 Evaluation of Corporate Compliance Programs (2024 ECCP), the DOJ expanded its inquiry to evaluate the “sufficiency of the personnel and resources within the compliance function, in particular, whether those responsible for compliance have: (1) sufficient seniority within the organization; (2) sufficient resources, namely, staff to effectively undertake the requisite auditing, documentation, and analysis; and (3) sufficient autonomy from management, such as direct access to the board of directors or the board’s audit committee.”

Further, there were four specific areas of inquiry and evaluation: (1) Structure, (2) Experience and Qualifications, (3) Funding and Resources, and (4) Autonomy.

In the section entitled “Structure,” the evaluation made the following inquiries:

  • How does the compliance function compare with other strategic functions in the company in terms of stature, compensation levels, rank/title, reporting line, resources, and access to key decision-makers?
  • What has been the turnover rate for compliance and relevant control function personnel?
  • What role has compliance played in the company’s strategic and operational decisions? How has the company responded to specific instances where compliance raised concerns?
  • Have there been transactions or deals that were stopped, modified, or further scrutinized because of compliance concerns?

In the section entitled “Experience and Qualifications,” the 2024 ECCP made the following inquiries:

  • Do compliance and control personnel have the appropriate experience and qualifications for their roles and responsibilities?
  • Has the level of experience and qualifications in these roles changed over time?
  • Who reviews the performance of the compliance function, and what is the review process?

In the area of “Funding and Resources,” the 2024 ECCP asked:

  • Has there been sufficient staffing for compliance personnel to effectively audit, document, analyze, and act on the results of the compliance efforts?
  • Has the company allocated sufficient funds for this?
  • Have there been times when requests for resources by compliance and control functions have been denied, and if so, on what grounds?

Finally, in the area of “Autonomy,” the 2024 ECCP asked:

  • Do the compliance and relevant control functions have direct reporting lines to anyone on the board of directors and/or audit committee?
  • How often do they meet with directors?
  • Are members of the senior management present for these meetings?
  • How does the company ensure the independence of the compliance and control personnel?

These were all deeper and more robust, focusing on the CCO and compliance team from the DOJ. If your compliance team is run on a shoestring, you will likely be downgraded for your overall commitment to doing business in compliance with the FCPA. The same is true for promotions and other opportunities for advancement within an organization. Not many organizations have such a mature compliance function that a CCO is appointed to another senior-level position.

Upon further reflection, Duross was correct, and the Alamo reference was appropriate for compliance officers. It is because sometimes we must draw a line in the sand to management. And when we do, we have to cross that line to get on the right side of the issue, and the consequences be damned. The DOJ has clarified that they expect CCOs and compliance professionals to draw that line when they must do so, and when they do, companies must heed their warnings.

Categories
Compliance Into the Weeds

Compliance into the Weeds: Compliance – Who Are We?

The award-winning Compliance into the Weeds is the only weekly podcast that takes a deep dive into a compliance-related topic, literally going into the weeds to explore a subject more fully. Looking for some hard-hitting insights on compliance? Look no further than Compliance into the Weeds! In this Compliance into the Weeds episode, Tom Fox and Matt Kelly discuss a recent conference Matt attended that delved into compliance and the compliance profession in the Age of Trump II.

Their discussion highlighted insights from a recent compliance panel hosted by Suffolk University Law School, featuring experts from large tech companies, a multi-state credit union, and a partner from a private law firm. The consensus among these experts is that despite the change in administration, the fundamental responsibilities and importance of compliance remain largely unchanged for organizations. Compliance is now deeply embedded in business operations, key in managing vendor risk, ensuring data protection, and upholding ethical standards.

Matt emphasizes that compliance capabilities are vital when dealing with other companies, whether they are customers or vendors. The conversation explores the convergence of vendor risk management and ethics & compliance programs and examines how organizations can sustain their integrity and manage emerging risks. Matt and Tom touch on the potential impact of new regulations, the importance of internal stakeholders in the compliance process, and the necessity of maintaining a robust risk management framework in an ever-changing regulatory environment. This episode provides valuable insights for compliance officers navigating the complexities of the modern corporate landscape.

 

Key highlights:

  • Compliance in the Trump Administration
  • Vendor Risk Management
  • Impact of Tariffs on Compliance
  • Who Are We as a Company?
  • Managing Regulatory Uncertainty

Resources:

Matt in Radical Compliance

Tom

Instagram

Facebook

YouTube

Twitter

LinkedIn

Compliance into the Weeds was recently honored as one of the Top 25 Regulatory Compliance Podcast.

Categories
Blog

AI Game-Changing Compliance: Part 4, AI Can Improve Whistleblower Response

Whistleblower programs have long been a cornerstone of corporate compliance, providing employees and stakeholders with a crucial mechanism to report misconduct, fraud, and ethical violations. However, whistleblower response programs in many organizations remain burdened by slow triage processes, an overwhelming volume of reports, and inconsistent follow-ups. The result? Potentially high-risk cases get lost in the shuffle, and employees lose confidence in the system, sometimes opting to go straight to regulators instead of utilizing internal reporting channels. AI-powered tools allow compliance teams to cut through the noise, identify patterns of misconduct, and proactively address risks before they escalate into regulatory or reputational disasters.

Lessons Learned for Compliance Professionals

Integrating cutting-edge technology with traditional investigative methods has ushered in a new era of efficiency and precision in addressing internal concerns. By harnessing advanced analytics, organizations can speed up case prioritization while maintaining essential human oversight. The following five lessons provide strategic insights into how AI can be optimally deployed to enhance whistleblower response times and streamline investigations.

1. Leveraging AI to Augment Strategic Decision-Making Capabilities

When discussing AI in whistleblower response and investigations, it’s imperative to understand that these advanced tools are a force multiplier for human expertise. AI systems can rapidly sift through vast volumes of data and flag anomalies and surface patterns that might otherwise go unnoticed. However, as any seasoned compliance professional will attest, context is king. While highly valuable, AI-generated alerts must be interpreted within the nuances of organizational culture, legal frameworks, and human behavior. This is where human judgment becomes indispensable.

Consider a scenario in which an AI system identifies a cluster of complaints that could suggest systemic misconduct. The tool might rank these cases by urgency, yet the final decision on how to proceed rests on experienced eyes that can assess subtle cues and contextual factors. This hybrid approach ensures that the investigative process is both swift and accurate. Human oversight can identify when an AI might be overzealous or missing context-specific insights, thus better calibrating the technology to suit the organization’s compliance needs.

2. Expedited, Transparent, and Data-Driven Whistleblower Response Frameworks

Various laws and regulatory requirements mandate that organizations react swiftly to whistleblower reports. With AI-driven systems, compliance teams can dramatically reduce the lag between submitting a report and initiating an investigation. Traditional manual processes might delay the evaluation, leading to enhanced regulatory scrutiny, fines, or significant reputational harm. AI-powered platforms can immediately triage the report, cross-reference it with existing data, and prioritize cases based on risk and historical patterns. This level of responsiveness not only meets the high expectations of regulators but also reinforces internal trust in the organization’s commitment to ethical conduct.

Transparency is another key facet. AI systems can log every step of the investigative process, creating an audit trail that is accessible for internal reviews and regulatory inspections alike. Such transparency is invaluable, demonstrating that the organization is serious about addressing compliance concerns in real-time. When employees see that their reports are acted upon swiftly and openly, it cultivates an environment of trust and accountability.

3. Leveraging Diverse Data Sets  

One of the most critical lessons for compliance professionals leveraging AI in whistleblower investigations is the need for diversity in the data used to train these systems. AI is only as unbiased as the information it learns from. When processing sensitive whistleblower reports, any embedded bias can lead to unfair prioritization, potentially skewing investigations and undermining trust in the system.

Your AI tool should be continuously refined with diverse datasets representing various employee backgrounds, complaint types, and contextual factors. This practice ensures that the algorithms can handle the varied nature of whistleblower reports without favoring or penalizing any group or type of complaint. Compliance professionals should work closely with data scientists to conduct regular audits of AI outputs, ensuring the system’s decisions remain equitable and legally sound.

4. Fortifying Employee Confidence Within the Whistleblower Ecosystem

Building a robust and responsive whistleblower system is not about the technology. Rather, it is about fostering trust among employees. AI-driven systems can significantly enhance transparency and timeliness, but without employee buy-in, even the most sophisticated platform will fall short. When employees trust their concerns will be addressed promptly and fairly, they’re more likely to report issues internally rather than taking their concerns to external regulators, which can be more damaging to the organization’s reputation and finances.

AI’s role in this equation is pivotal. By automating the initial stages of case triage and providing real-time updates on the status of investigations, AI ensures that whistleblower reports are not lost in bureaucratic limbo. This immediacy reinforces the message that the organization is committed to addressing issues as they arise. The transparency AI systems offer—through comprehensive audit trails and clear reporting metrics—provides employees with tangible evidence that their voices are heard.

5. Elevating Stakeholder Confidence 

While the initial investment in AI-driven whistleblower systems may seem steep, the long-term benefits, especially cost savings, are substantial. One of the key lessons for compliance professionals is that the deployment of AI is not merely a technological upgrade; it is a strategic decision that can transform the financial landscape of compliance operations. AI streamlines the investigative process by reducing the time to sift through and prioritize whistleblower reports, cutting down on labor-intensive tasks that often drive up costs.

By automating routine processes, organizations can reallocate human resources to more complex issues that require nuanced judgment. This speeds up the response time and minimizes the risk of costly errors or oversights that could lead to regulatory fines and legal liabilities. The efficiency gains from AI-driven investigations often translate into fewer disruptions and lower operational costs. For example, when a potential compliance issue is flagged and resolved promptly, the organization avoids the cascading expenses associated with prolonged investigations, legal battles, and reputational damage.

In addition, the transparency and accuracy provided by AI systems can serve as a form of risk mitigation. Detailed audit trails and systematic data analysis ensure that every step of the investigative process is documented, providing a solid defense in the event of regulatory scrutiny. This comprehensive documentation can be a lifesaver during audits, saving time and legal fees. Ultimately, while the upfront costs of AI implementation should be weighed, the return on investment is clear: faster, more efficient investigations lead to lower compliance costs, a stronger legal standing, and a healthier corporate reputation. In today’s high-stakes regulatory environment, AI is not just a tool—it’s a long-term financial strategy that benefits the organization’s bottom line and integrity.

The Future is Here: How AI Enhances Whistleblower Response and Investigations

In “Artificial Intelligence and Whistleblowing: Can A.I. be Useful for Whistleblowing Processes?” Kalliopi Zouvia detailed the evolving relationship between whistleblower protection and artificial intelligence. She reviews the emerging role of AI in strengthening mechanisms for detecting, reporting, and investigating unethical practices, making it a vital read for corporate compliance professionals seeking to harness technology in upholding ethical standards.

She reviews key milestones, including Council of Europe recommendations and, more recently, the EU’s Whistleblower Directive (Directive 2019/1937), which sets a standardized baseline for protecting individuals across the EU. For corporate compliance officers, understanding these regulatory benchmarks is essential for designing internal policies that comply with legal mandates and foster a culture of transparency and accountability. Central to the discussion is the three-tier reporting model outlined by the Directive, which offers multiple channels for whistleblowers to report concerns—internally, externally, to competent authorities, or, ultimately, publicly via the media. Confidentiality and, where possible, anonymity remain crucial elements, ensuring that the identity of the reporting individual is safeguarded against unnecessary disclosure. While providing flexibility, this model also imposes significant operational challenges on organizations tasked with responding swiftly and effectively to such reports.

A major focus of the article is the potential of artificial intelligence to enhance each stage of the whistleblowing process. AI-driven reporting systems, such as chatbots, are highlighted as powerful tools that can guide individuals through the reporting process, reducing the likelihood of incomplete submissions and providing simple instructions about reporting requirements. Real-time translation services powered by AI can break down language barriers, broadening access to reporting channels across diverse cultural and ethnic groups, a critical factor for multinational corporations committed to global ethical standards.

Beyond the initial report submission, AI shows promise in streamlining the vetting and investigative processes. Automated data extraction and advanced analytics can sift through vast amounts of information to isolate relevant details, significantly reducing the manual burden on compliance teams. This technology speeds up the preliminary review of allegations and helps identify patterns or red flags that may show deeper systemic issues. Such efficiencies are valuable considering increasing report volumes, as evidenced by European and American whistleblowing statistics trends.

AI-driven whistleblower response programs are no longer futuristic concepts but essential tools for modern compliance teams. By integrating AI into whistleblower programs, companies can prioritize high-risk cases, accelerate investigations, enhance transparency, and protect whistleblowers from retaliation. As regulatory bodies continue emphasizing whistleblower protections, organizations that fail to modernize their response programs risk falling behind in compliance maturity and exposing themselves to legal and reputational risks.

The call to action for compliance professionals is clear: Embrace AI-driven whistleblower programs now or risk facing regulatory scrutiny later. The technology is available, the benefits are measurable, and the time to act is now.

Categories
Great Women in Compliance

Great Women in Compliance – Insight from a Great Gentleman in Compliance with Andrew McBride

In today’s episode, Lisa speaks with a Great Gentleman in Compliance, Andrew McBride, the CEO and founder of Integrity Bridge.

Andrew shares his journey in compliance, from private practice to becoming Chief Compliance Officer at Albemarle to starting Integrity Bridge.

At Albemarle, Andrew built a new ethics and compliance program against the backdrop of an FCPA investigation. The work of Andrew and his team and their cooperation with the US Department of Justice led to a 45% penalty reduction decrease. The program was also awarded Compliance Week’s “Program of the Year” award.

He highlights the importance of having a multifunctional approach to building compliance programs, working closely with various departments such as sales, procurement, and finance. He also emphasizes how ethics and compliance teams are best positioned to succeed if they have different backgrounds and skill sets.

Andrew shares his experience building Integrity Bridge, a consultancy focused on helping companies design and implement holistic compliance programs to proactively use technology and address constantly evolving risks.

Categories
Blog

AI Game-Changing Compliance: Part 3 – Decentralized Compliance with Blockchain Technology

Last week, I looked at five things a Chief Compliance Officer (CCO) or compliance professional could do at little or no cost to ‘Up Their (Compliance) Game.’ I want to continue this theme this week but want to tackle it differently. I will look at five innovations for compliance professionals around Artificial Intelligence (AI). AI has moved from an emerging trend to a fundamental component of modern corporate compliance programs. Today, I want to examine how blockchain can be a game-changer for compliance.

Today, organizations leverage blockchain to enhance transparency, ensure data integrity, and strengthen regulatory adherence. While compliance professionals have historically relied on centralized data repositories and traditional audit methods, blockchain offers a decentralized, tamper-proof alternative that reshapes compliance monitoring. This innovation is crucial in industries where data security, fraud prevention, and ethical sourcing are non-negotiable.

Regulators are increasingly scrutinizing how businesses manage their compliance data, with expectations rising for real-time reporting, immutable record keeping, and enhanced due diligence. Blockchain provides a solution by creating an unalterable digital ledger, enabling compliance teams to verify transactions, track supply chains, and show adherence to environmental, social, and governance (ESG) standards with unprecedented accuracy. Below, we explore how companies across industries utilize blockchain for decentralized compliance, lessons learned for compliance professionals, and important points for corporate leadership.

How Blockchain Enhances Compliance

One of blockchain’s most compelling benefits is its ability to create immutable audit trails. This immutability makes blockchain so revolutionary for compliance. It is not a technological novelty; it has profound implications for all manner of financial reporting, regulatory compliance, and corporate governance. Corporate leaders and compliance professionals must recognize that the traditional data management methods and audit trails are no longer sufficient in an era where every error, manipulation, or fraudulent activity can have dramatic financial and reputational consequences.

The immutable nature of blockchain means that every transaction or piece of data recorded on the chain is permanently etched into the ledger. Unlike traditional databases, which can be subject to human error or deliberate tampering, blockchain uses cryptographic principles to ensure that records remain unchanged once verified. This creates an audit trail that is transparent and verifiable in real-time. For compliance officers, this is a game changer. It fundamentally changes from periodic, retrospective audits to continuous, real-time oversight—a fundamental transformation in how businesses manage risk and adhere to regulatory standards.

The implications are enormous for industries subject to stringent compliance requirements, such as finance, healthcare, and manufacturing. Regulations like the Sarbanes-Oxley Act (SOX), the General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR), and various anti-money laundering (AML) directives demand precise, accurate record-keeping and transparent reporting. Blockchain tamper-proof ledger directly addresses these demands. By integrating blockchain into their compliance frameworks, companies can automatically enforce rules and ensure that all required records are accurate, complete, and accessible to auditors and regulators. This level of reliability reduces the risk of non-compliance and streamlines the entire audit process, saving time and reducing costs.

The decentralization inherent in blockchain technology provides additional layers of security and transparency. A central database may be vulnerable to cyber-attacks or internal manipulation in traditional systems. Blockchain distributes data across a network of nodes. Each node holds a copy of the ledger, meaning tampering with one record would require altering the entire network—a near-impossible feat with current technology. This distributed nature reinforces trust among stakeholders, ensuring that every participant—from internal auditors to external regulatory bodies—can rely on the integrity of the data. For compliance professionals, this translates to a robust, reliable system that minimizes human error and operational risk.

Another significant advantage of blockchain is its capacity to support continuous compliance monitoring. Instead of waiting for end-of-quarter reviews or annual audits, companies can now access real-time data. Regulators, for example, could be granted access to a live, immutable ledger that provides instantaneous insights into financial transactions, supply chain movements, or any other regulated activity. This proactive approach means potential issues can be identified and addressed before they escalate into full-blown compliance breaches. The result is a more agile, responsive compliance system that can adapt to changes in the regulatory landscape almost as soon as they occur.

Blockchain also facilitates automated compliance through smart contracts and self-executing digital agreements where the contract terms are written into code. These contracts can be programmed to enforce compliance rules automatically. For example, a smart contract might automatically trigger a compliance review if a transaction exceeds a predetermined threshold, or it could enforce that certain conditions are met before a transaction is finalized. This automation reduces the administrative burden on compliance teams and ensures that rules are applied consistently without the variability introduced by manual processes. For corporate leaders, this means fewer errors, faster processing times, and a more secure regulatory environment.

The Future is Now in AI-Blockchain as a Compliance Imperative

A prime example of blockchain’s efficacy in this arena is illustrated by the World Bank’s Blockchain-Based Financial Transparency Initiative. This initiative leverages blockchain to fortify transparency in government contracts and aid disbursements. Utilizing blockchain’s inherent qualities, the World Bank can ensure that funds are allocated and tracked in real-time, significantly reducing the risk of mismanagement. Every disbursement, every contractual change, and every transaction is logged on the blockchain, creating a tamper-proof audit trail that meets stringent anti-corruption and financial accountability standards. For organizations engaged in high-stakes financial operations, mainly those subject to intense regulatory scrutiny, such an initiative serves as both a preventive measure against corruption and a robust tool for regulatory compliance.

Using blockchain in anti-corruption strategies extends far beyond the realm of government aid. In regions where corruption is endemic, companies can employ blockchain to monitor financial flows and contractual obligations with unprecedented precision. The technology is a powerful deterrent against illicit behavior because it leaves no room for the discreet manipulation of records. The decentralized ledger enhances internal controls and fosters a culture of transparency that is difficult to subvert. With blockchain, every stakeholder—from auditors and compliance officers to regulators and investors—can access a clear, real-time snapshot of all transactions. This visibility is crucial for building trust and ensuring that every participant in the financial ecosystem adheres to ethical and legal standards.

For compliance teams, blockchain’s real-time monitoring capability is a game changer. Instead of relying on periodic audits that may only uncover discrepancies after the fact, organizations can continuously track financial activities as they occur. This proactive monitoring helps identify suspicious activities almost instantly, enabling swift remedial action before potential violations escalate. By automating routine compliance processes through smart contracts, blockchain minimizes human intervention, reducing the risks associated with manual errors or intentional tampering.

In summary, blockchain’s ability to improve anti-corruption and fraud prevention significantly advances corporate compliance. Its decentralized nature ensures that every transaction is transparent, verifiable, and resistant to tampering—a feature especially valuable in high-risk environments. The World Bank’s initiative is a compelling example of how blockchain can be harnessed to enforce rigorous financial transparency and accountability standards. For companies worldwide, embracing blockchain technology is not merely an option but an essential step toward fostering a secure, compliant, and ethical operational framework in an increasingly complex regulatory environment.

The benefits of blockchain also extend to fostering greater trust between companies and their regulators. By providing a transparent, real-time audit trail, blockchain diminishes the adversarial nature of regulatory inspections. Instead of a scenario where regulators must rely on a company’s internal reports, they have direct access to an independent, tamper-proof ledger. This shared transparency builds confidence in the integrity of the data and encourages a more collaborative relationship between businesses and regulatory authorities. In today’s highly scrutinized regulatory environment, such trust is invaluable.

Blockchain technology is revolutionizing corporate compliance by providing a secure, immutable record-keeping system that directly addresses many of the challenges associated with traditional audit and reporting practices. Its decentralized, tamper-proof ledger ensures data integrity and supports continuous, real-time monitoring and automated compliance through smart contracts. These capabilities help reduce fraud, human error, and the overall cost of compliance while enhancing transparency and trust among stakeholders.

The message for compliance professionals and corporate leaders is clear: embracing blockchain is no longer optional but a strategic imperative. As regulatory frameworks become more demanding and the risks associated with non-compliance increase, blockchain offers a powerful tool to meet and exceed these challenges. It empowers organizations to move away from outdated manual processes and toward a more efficient, proactive compliance model. In doing so, companies safeguard their operations and build a foundation of trust and reliability that can drive long-term success in an increasingly complex regulatory landscape.