Categories
Blog

Rethinking Training and Communications: Insights from Rethink Compliance’s 2025 Benchmarking Survey

In compliance, training, and communications are not simply program components; they are the lifeblood of an effective ethics and compliance (E&C) function. They inform, reinforce, and ultimately drive the behaviors we want to see across the enterprise. When done right, they help employees identify, prevent, and report misconduct. When done poorly, they are a wasted opportunity, ticking a box without changing behavior.

Rethink Compliance’s 2025 Training & Communications Benchmarking Survey provides a rich snapshot of where corporate compliance programs stand today and where they can improve. With over 220 respondents spanning industries from healthcare to technology, manufacturing to financial services, and more than 30% of them based outside North America, the findings offer a broad, representative view of the E&C landscape.

The study shows both encouraging progress and persistent gaps. Most organizations (83%) train all employees on core E&C responsibilities, but only 46.6% deliver risk-specific training tailored to job roles or exposure. Board training is becoming more common, with non-participation dropping from 35% in 2021 to 20% in 2025. Third-party training is also on the rise, from 37% in 2021 to 56% in 2025, especially in highly regulated sectors.

The format and length of training are shifting, too. Courses between 5 and 40 minutes remain most popular, but microlearning, generally defined as quick, 1–4 minute bursts of content, is gaining traction among the highest-performing programs. Engagement tools like real-life scenarios, quizzes, and humor are more widely used, and there is a growing emphasis on mobile compatibility and responsive design.

Analytics are also maturing. While completion rates remain the most-tracked metric (87%), more organizations are analyzing knowledge retention, cultural indicators, and employee feedback. The percentage of respondents finding training analytics “extremely valuable” has jumped from 16.8% in 2021 to 23% in 2025. However, resource constraints remain a significant governance challenge, with 60% of respondents citing limited budget as their biggest obstacle.

From this data, five key takeaways emerge for compliance professionals seeking to strengthen their training and communication strategies.

1. Targeting is the New Baseline

Broad training coverage is good; targeted training is better. The survey confirms that Achievers, who rate their programs as most effective, invest in risk-specific, role-based training. They tailor content to the realities of senior leaders, people managers, high-risk employees, and boards. This approach aligns with regulatory guidance, which emphasizes relevance as a key measure of program quality. If your compliance training treats everyone the same, you are missing an opportunity to drive behavior where the risk is greatest. Targeting also improves retention, as employees are more engaged when the content speaks directly to their work challenges. For example, anti-bribery training for a field sales team should look very different from privacy training for IT administrators. By segmenting your audience and designing accordingly, you not only meet enforcement expectations but also increase the likelihood that training will lead to action when it matters.

2. Onboarding is Prime Real Estate for Compliance Culture

The survey shows that 67% of organizations provide E&C training during onboarding, with another 28% doing so within the first six months. These early days are when the cultural tone is set, expectations are established, and new hires decide whether compliance is truly valued or just lip service. The same applies to third parties, whose actions can create as much liability as your employees’. With third-party training rising sharply to 56% adoption, the momentum is clear. By embedding compliance messaging and expectations into the onboarding journey for both employees and high-risk partners, you lay a foundation that can be reinforced over time. This early investment pays dividends: employees start their tenure with clarity on what is expected, and third parties understand from the outset that compliance is part of doing business with you. Miss this window, and you risk leaving both groups to learn norms through observation, a risky proposition if informal culture undermines formal policy.

3. Shorter, More Engaging Content Delivers More Impact

One of the strongest trends in the survey is the move toward concise, high-impact content. While 5–40 minute courses are still the norm, microlearning, short, focused modules lasting 1–4 minutes, is increasingly popular among high-performing programs. Achievers are also more likely to integrate real-life scenarios into training, which is not surprising given that regulators encourage the use of relatable examples. The reason is simple: employees have limited attention, and training competes with their daily responsibilities. Shorter formats, paired with interactive elements like quizzes or opinion polls, can be reinforced year-round through compliance communications. Instead of one long annual course, consider a blended approach: core concepts delivered upfront, with microlearning refreshers pushed throughout the year. This keeps compliance top of mind and allows you to respond to emerging risks quickly with targeted, bite-sized updates.

4. Data Analytics is a Strategic Advantage—If You Use It Well

Data is abundant in compliance training; insight is not. The survey shows progress, with more organizations finding analytics “extremely valuable” and using them to inform program improvements. Yet too many still stop at completion rates. The most effective programs go deeper into tracking knowledge retention, cultural indicators, engagement metrics, and device usage. Embedding survey questions into training can yield valuable cultural data without adding to survey fatigue. This is more than an administrative exercise; analytics can justify budget requests, demonstrate ROI to leadership, and identify which parts of your program need strengthening. For example, if analytics show that completion is high but post-training assessments reveal weak understanding in a critical risk area, you have the evidence required to redesign the content. Regulators increasingly expect to see not just that training occurred, but that it was effective. Using analytics strategically can turn your training program from a cost center into a business asset.

5. Governance, Resources, and Vendor Partnerships Define Success

Training quality and sustainability depend on governance. The survey found that 60% of organizations have a dedicated E&C training role or team, with Achievers far more likely to have such resources than Strivers. Without clear ownership, training competes with other priorities and suffers in quality. Budget constraints remain the top challenge, cited by 60% of respondents, making it critical to leverage every available efficiency from interdepartmental collaboration to smart vendor partnerships. On the vendor side, most organizations use a blend of in-house and external content, with customization playing an important role in effectiveness. Achievers report higher satisfaction with vendors, likely because they select partners who understand their industry risks and culture. The lesson here is that governance is not just about oversight; it’s about making strategic decisions on staffing, budgeting, and partnerships that elevate your training from adequate to excellent.

The 2025 Rethink Compliance Benchmarking Survey makes it clear: training and communications are evolving toward precision, efficiency, and measurable impact. The challenge for compliance leaders is to align governance, content, delivery, and analytics into a program that not only checks regulatory boxes but also changes behavior. Those who embrace targeting, onboarding, engagement, data, and strong governance will be best positioned to turn training into a true driver of ethical culture.

Categories
Trekking Through Compliance

Trekking Through Compliance: Episode 70 – Beaming Down Blind: Compliance Lessons on Third-Party Due Diligence from “The Mark of Gideon”

Few pop culture moments capture the risks of blind engagement as vividly as Star Trek: The Original Series’ “The Mark of Gideon.” In this episode, Captain Kirk beams down to what he believes is the planet Gideon for diplomatic talks—only to find himself aboard what appears to be an empty Enterprise. What follows is a masterclass in the dangers of walking into a deal without verifying the facts. For compliance professionals, Gideon’s deception is the perfect allegory for the hazards of onboarding a third party without a thorough vetting process. Let’s break down five key lessons.

Lesson 1: Verify the True Identity of Your Counterparty

Illustrated By: When Kirk believes he is beamed down to Gideon, he is actually inside a replica of the Enterprise. The Gideonites have created this fake environment to isolate him for their purposes.

Compliance Lesson. If you do not confirm the true identity of a third party, you may find yourself dealing with a façade. Shell companies, undisclosed beneficial owners, and entities with misleading corporate registrations are the corporate world’s “empty Enterprise.”

Lesson 2: Understand the Real Motives Behind the Partnership

Illustrated By: The Gideonites present their plan as a noble solution to their problem, but it’s built on deception and exploitation.

Compliance Lesson. Third parties sometimes have agendas that differ sharply from what they present. They may seek access to your brand to legitimize questionable practices, gain entry to restricted markets, or launder illicit funds.

Lesson 3: Never Rely Solely on What the Other Party Tells You

Illustrated By: Kirk repeatedly asks the Gideonites to explain what is happening, but their answers are vague, evasive, and occasionally contradictory. They hope his lack of information will keep him compliant long enough to serve their plan.

Compliance Lesson. Self-reported information from a potential third party should be viewed as one data point, not the whole picture. Misrepresentations are common, whether deliberate or due to internal ignorance.

Lesson 4: Assess the Operating Environment Before Engagement

Illustrated By: The Gideonites hide the actual conditions on their planet. Kirk learns later that Gideon is overcrowded to the point of people standing shoulder-to-shoulder, unable to move freely.

Compliance Lesson. Entering into a business relationship without assessing this environment is akin to beaming down blind.

Lesson 5: Build Exit Strategies Into the Relationship

Illustrated By: Once Kirk understands the Gideonites’ true intentions, he must escape the replica Enterprise to stop their plan.

Compliance Lesson. Some third-party relationships turn sour, and you need a plan to disengage without disrupting your operations. Include termination clauses tied to compliance breaches in your contracts.

Final ComplianceLog Reflections

In The Mark of Gideon, the Enterprise crew’s lack of verified intelligence before Kirk’s “beam down” mirrors what happens when companies rush into a third-party relationship to seize a perceived opportunity. The Gideonites knew how to manipulate the Federation’s diplomatic eagerness. Likewise, unscrupulous partners today exploit companies’ urgency to enter new markets or secure rare supply chains.

The lesson? Due diligence is not a delay; it is a safeguard. The few extra weeks spent vetting a partner can prevent years of litigation, regulatory penalties, and reputational damage.

Resources:

⁠⁠Excruciatingly Detailed Plot Summary by Eric W. Weisstein⁠⁠

⁠⁠MissionLogPodcast.com⁠⁠

⁠⁠Memory Alpha

Categories
Blog

Third-Party Due Diligence: Five Lessons from Star Trek’s The Mark of Gideon

In the modern compliance landscape, third-party due diligence is not optional but essential. Regulators from the DOJ to the SFO have made it clear: if your business partner is involved in misconduct, you are on the hook if you did not take reasonable steps to know who you were dealing with.

Few pop culture moments capture the risks of blind engagement as vividly as Star Trek: The Original Series’ “The Mark of Gideon.” In this episode, Captain Kirk beams down to what he believes is the planet Gideon for diplomatic talks—only to find himself aboard what appears to be an empty Enterprise. What follows is a masterclass in the dangers of walking into a deal without verifying the facts. For compliance professionals, Gideon’s deception is the perfect allegory for the hazards of onboarding a third party without a thorough vetting process. Let’s break down five key lessons.

Lesson 1: Verify the True Identity of Your Counterparty

Illustrated By: When Kirk believes he is beamed down to Gideon, he is actually inside a replica of the Enterprise. The Gideonites have created this fake environment to isolate him for their purposes.

Compliance Lesson. If you do not confirm the true identity of a third party, you may find yourself dealing with a façade. Shell companies, undisclosed beneficial owners, and entities with misleading corporate registrations are the corporate world’s “empty Enterprise.”Always confirm a third party’s corporate existence and ownership through independent sources. This means checking official registries, using reliable due diligence databases, and, when needed, engaging investigative firms to trace beneficial ownership. Without these checks, you risk contracting with a front for illicit activity.

Lesson 2: Understand the Real Motives Behind the Partnership

Illustrated By: The Gideonites’ true purpose is not peaceful diplomacy; instead, they want to infect their overpopulated planet with a deadly virus carried by Kirk. They present their plan as a noble solution to their problem, but it’s built on deception and exploitation.

Compliance Lesson. Third parties sometimes have agendas that differ sharply from what they present. They may seek access to your brand to legitimize questionable practices, gain entry to restricted markets, or launder illicit funds. Beyond standard questionnaires, compliance teams should assess the commercial rationale for the relationship. Why do they want to work with you? Who else do they do business with? Are their financials consistent with the scale of the deal? If their motives don’t align with your values and compliance commitments, that is a red flag.

Lesson 3: Never Rely Solely on What the Other Party Tells You

Illustrated By: Kirk repeatedly asks the Gideonites to explain what is happening, but their answers are vague, evasive, and occasionally contradictory. They hope his lack of information will keep him compliant long enough to serve their plan.

Compliance Lesson. Self-reported information from a potential third party should be viewed as one data point, not the whole picture. Misrepresentations are common, whether deliberate or due to internal ignorance. Cross-verify all claims with independent checks, customer references, industry reputation research, litigation and sanctions screening, and on-site visits when possible. If the only source for a claim is the counterparty itself, your risk exposure rises dramatically.

Lesson 4: Assess the Operating Environment Before Engagement

Illustrated By: The Gideonites hide the actual conditions on their planet. Kirk learns later that Gideon is overcrowded to the point of people standing shoulder-to-shoulder, unable to move freely. Had this been disclosed, he would have understood the real risks before arriving.

Compliance Lesson. A third party’s operating environment, political stability, corruption levels, and regulatory enforcement directly affect your compliance risk. Entering into a business relationship without assessing this environment is akin to beaming down blind. Incorporate country risk analysis into your process. Use resources like Transparency International’s Corruption Perceptions Index, U.S. State Department human rights reports, and local legal counsel. An otherwise legitimate partner in a high-risk jurisdiction requires enhanced due diligence and monitoring.

Lesson 5: Build Exit Strategies Into the Relationship

Illustrated By: Once Kirk understands the Gideonites’ true intentions, he must escape the replica Enterprise to stop their plan. Without a clear route back to his crew, he risks being trapped indefinitely.

Compliance Lesson. Some third-party relationships turn sour despite your best due diligence efforts. Whether due to leadership changes, shifts in political conditions, or the surfacing of previously hidden misconduct, you need a plan to disengage without disrupting your operations. Include termination clauses tied to compliance breaches in your contracts. Maintain operational flexibility so you can pivot to alternate suppliers or partners if needed. Regularly re-screen third parties to ensure ongoing compliance, not just a one-time check at onboarding.

Final ComplianceLog Reflections

In The Mark of Gideon, the Enterprise crew’s lack of verified intelligence before Kirk’s “beam down” mirrors what happens when companies rush into a third-party relationship to seize a perceived opportunity. The Gideonites knew how to manipulate the Federation’s diplomatic eagerness. Likewise, unscrupulous partners today exploit companies’ urgency to enter new markets or secure rare supply chains.

The lesson? Due diligence is not a delay; it is a safeguard. The few extra weeks spent vetting a partner can prevent years of litigation, regulatory penalties, and reputational damage.

“The Mark of Gideon” is not just a quirky Star Trek morality tale. It is a warning for every compliance professional. Without thorough third-party due diligence, you risk waking up in a corporate “replica Enterprise,” surrounded by partners whose true motives only become clear when it’s too late.

Your job as a compliance officer is to ensure the company doesn’t act blindly. By verifying identities, probing motives, cross-checking information, assessing environments, and building exit strategies, you safeguard your organization’s reputation and operational integrity. In short: trust, but verify, especially when the other side is as smooth-talking as the people of Gideon.

Resources:

⁠⁠Excruciatingly Detailed Plot Summary by Eric W. Weisstein⁠⁠

⁠⁠MissionLogPodcast.com⁠⁠

⁠⁠Memory Alpha

Categories
Sunday Book Review

Sunday Book Review: August 10, 2025, The More Books from The Ethicsverse Library Edition

In the Sunday Book Review, Tom Fox considers books that interest the compliance professional, the business executive, or anyone curious. It could be books about business, compliance, history, leadership, current events, or anything else that might interest Tom. Today, we continue to look at four more books from the EthicsVerse Library, all curated by Ethico.

Resources:

The Ethicsverse Library

The Sunday Book Review was recently honored as one of the Top 100 Book Podcasts.

Categories
Trekking Through Compliance

Trekking Through Compliance: Episode 69: Lessons from Let That Be Your Last Battlefield: Building Justice and Fairness into Corporate Culture

Few episodes capture the destructive power of bias, systemic injustice, and the refusal to see common humanity as vividly as Star Trek: The Original Series’ “Let That Be Your Last Battlefield.” From a compliance perspective, the episode provides an unflinching mirror: organizations that fail to ensure fairness in their systems—whether in investigations, promotions, whistleblower treatment, or discipline—risk breeding internal hostilities just as destructive as Cheron’s. Today, we unpack five key compliance lessons for embedding institutional justice and fairness into the corporate DNA.

Lesson 1: Bias—Even When Invisible to Some—Can Destroy Organizational Cohesion

Illustrated By: When Bele first encounters Lokai aboard the Enterprise, he describes him as “obviously inferior.”

Compliance Lesson. Bias often hides in plain sight to those not affected by it. In corporate settings, decision-makers may not recognize that promotion patterns, discipline rates, or resource allocations favor certain groups until a whistleblower, audit, or public scandal exposes it.

Lesson 2: Enforcement Must Be Fair, Consistent, and Transparent

Illustrated By: Bele claims the right to arrest Lokai for crimes committed on Cheron. Lokai, in turn, accuses Bele of genocide. Neither offers verifiable evidence; instead, both rely on their moral certainty.

Compliance Lesson. Internal enforcement that rests on vague accusations or uneven application destroys trust in compliance systems.

Lesson 3: Leaders Must Refuse to Be Drawn into Partisan Vendettas

Illustrated By: Kirk insists on the Enterprise’s code of conduct and rules of evidence.

Compliance Lessons. Senior leaders are often pressured, subtly or overtly, to “pick a side” in internal disputes.

Lesson 4: Systemic Injustice Can Persist Until It Consumes the Organization

Illustrated By: When Bele and Lokai finally return to Cheron, they find their planet in ruins, destroyed by centuries of hatred. Yet, even faced with the extinction of their people, they continue their pursuit, consumed by the need to destroy the other.

Compliance Lesson. Corporate cultures that allow systemic injustice, favoritism in promotions, discriminatory pay structures, retaliation against whistleblowers, risk not only reputational harm but the destruction of the organization’s ability to function cohesively. Over time, injustice becomes normalized, making reform nearly impossible without significant disruption.

Lesson 5: Without a Shared Framework for Fairness, Conflict Has No Resolution

Illustrated By: Spock, ever the voice of logic, tries to point out that the two aliens are more alike than different. To them, justice is entirely defined by the defeat of the other.

Compliance Lesson. In corporations, the absence of a clear, visible framework for fairness, along with policies, expectations, and trusted reporting channels, leads to conflicts that devolve into zero-sum games.

Final ComplianceLog Reflections

Let That Be Your Last Battlefield ends on a tragic note: the two survivors beam down to a dead world, still locked in mutual hatred. It’s a cautionary tale for corporate life. Without institutional justice and fairness, even the most advanced organizations can collapse into destructive internal conflict.

Resources:

⁠⁠Excruciatingly Detailed Plot Summary by Eric W. Weisstein⁠⁠

⁠⁠MissionLogPodcast.com⁠⁠

⁠⁠Memory Alpha

Categories
Blog

Institutional Justice and Fairness: Five Compliance Lessons from Let That Be Your Last Battlefield

In the realm of corporate compliance, institutional justice and fairness are not mere aspirational slogans; they are operational imperatives. These principles govern how decisions are made, how investigations are conducted, how employees are treated, and how corporate culture sustains itself over time.

Few pop culture allegories capture the destructive power of bias, systemic injustice, and the refusal to see common humanity as vividly as Star Trek: The Original Series’ “Let That Be Your Last Battlefield.”

In the episode, the Enterprise rescues Bele and Lokai, two survivors from the planet Cheron, each half black and half white, split vertically, but on opposite sides. To them, this difference is not a curiosity but the basis for deep-seated hatred. Their mutual enmity has destroyed their planet, leaving only the two of them to perpetuate the feud.

From a compliance perspective, the episode provides an unflinching mirror: organizations that fail to ensure fairness in their systems—whether in investigations, promotions, whistleblower treatment, or discipline—risk breeding internal hostilities just as destructive as Cheron’s. Let’s unpack five key compliance lessons for embedding institutional justice and fairness into the corporate DNA.

Lesson 1: Bias—Even When Invisible to Some—Can Destroy Organizational Cohesion

Illustrated By: When Bele first encounters Lokai aboard the Enterprise, he describes him as “obviously inferior.” Captain Kirk and the crew, however, are baffled. To them, both aliens appear the same, half black, half white. The difference only matters to Bele because, in his mind, the “correct” coloration is black on the right side.

Compliance Lesson. Bias often hides in plain sight to those not affected by it. In corporate settings, decision-makers may not recognize that promotion patterns, discipline rates, or resource allocations favor certain groups until a whistleblower, audit, or public scandal exposes it.

What should you do now? Compliance departments must proactively identify and address these “invisible” biases. This means collecting and analyzing workforce data by role, pay, and demographics, conducting blind résumé reviews where appropriate, and building bias-awareness training into leadership development. A fair institution does not wait for bias to erode morale. It works to neutralize it before it becomes a fault line.

Lesson 2: Enforcement Must Be Fair, Consistent, and Transparent

Illustrated By: Bele claims the right to arrest Lokai for crimes committed on Cheron. When Kirk asks what those crimes are, Bele offers only vague accusations about theft and rebellion. Lokai, in turn, accuses Bele of genocide. Neither offers verifiable evidence; instead, both rely on their moral certainty.

Compliance Lesson. Internal enforcement that rests on vague accusations or uneven application destroys trust in compliance systems. If some employees are disciplined harshly for minor infractions while others escape consequences for major violations, especially if those others are high performers or senior executives, perceptions of injustice spread quickly.

What should you do now? Enforcement must be rule-based, not personality-based. Compliance should establish clear investigation protocols, document evidence, and apply sanctions proportionately and consistently. Transparency, within the limits of privacy and confidentiality, builds credibility. Employees are more likely to accept outcomes they disagree with if they understand the process was impartial.

Lesson 3: Leaders Must Refuse to Be Drawn into Partisan Vendettas

Illustrated By: Bele demands that Kirk turn Lokai over to him, citing his authority as a law enforcer from Cheron. Kirk, recognizing the apparent personal animosity, refuses to take sides without due process. He insists on the Enterprise’s code of conduct and rules of evidence.

Compliance Lessons. Senior leaders are often pressured, subtly or overtly, to “pick a side” in internal disputes. This may come from managers trying to protect their teams, high-value employees attempting to shield themselves from accountability, or executives wanting to “make a problem go away” by sacrificing someone quickly.

What should you do now? A compliance function must stand apart from internal politics. Its legitimacy rests on applying the same standards to all, regardless of power, popularity, or tenure. This requires independence, direct reporting lines to the board, and documented procedures that prevent political influence from steering outcomes.

Lesson 4: Systemic Injustice Can Persist Until It Consumes the Organization

Illustrated By: When Bele and Lokai finally return to Cheron, they find their planet in ruins, destroyed by centuries of hatred. Yet, even faced with the extinction of their people, they continue their pursuit, consumed by the need to destroy the other.

Compliance Lesson. Corporate cultures that allow systemic injustice, favoritism in promotions, discriminatory pay structures, retaliation against whistleblowers, risk not only reputational harm but the destruction of the organization’s ability to function cohesively. Over time, injustice becomes normalized, making reform nearly impossible without significant disruption.

What should you do now? Compliance must act early and decisively when patterns of inequity appear. This requires the courage to challenge entrenched practices and the authority to recommend systemic changes, whether in hiring pipelines, procurement policies, or leadership evaluations. Just as Cheron’s destruction was preventable had action been taken earlier, organizations that ignore inequity may find themselves fighting to save something already beyond repair.

Lesson 5: Without a Shared Framework for Fairness, Conflict Has No Resolution

Illustrated By: Spock, ever the voice of logic, tries to point out that the two aliens are more alike than different. Bele and Lokai, however, reject any suggestion of commonality because they lack a shared concept of fairness. To them, justice is entirely defined by the defeat of the other.

Compliance Lesson. In corporations, the absence of a clear, visible framework for fairness, along with policies, expectations, and trusted reporting channels, leads conflicts to devolve into zero-sum games. Each side seeks to “win” rather than to resolve issues constructively.

What should you do now? Compliance departments must provide that shared framework. Review, update if appropriate, and retrain on your

  • Code of Conduct.
  • Independent investigation procedures.
  • A commitment to non-retaliation.
  • Mechanisms for appeal and review.

When fairness is institutionalized, disputes have a pathway to resolution that doesn’t rely on destroying the other side.

The Enterprise Model: Compliance as the Guardian of Fairness

Captain Kirk’s approach in the episode offers a leadership model for compliance officers. He listens, gathers facts, refuses to be drawn into personal vendettas, applies established rules, and seeks to uphold the Enterprise’s standards above external political pressures.

That’s the role compliance must play in institutional justice:

  • Guardian of fairness, ensuring that rules apply equally to all.
  • Protector of process, resisting shortcuts for expediency.
  • Champion of independence, immune to political or personal influence.

When these principles are embedded in an organization, they do more than prevent misconduct; they create a culture where employees believe in the integrity of the system itself.

Final ComplianceLog Reflections

Let That Be Your Last Battlefield ends on a tragic note: the two survivors beam down to a dead world, still locked in mutual hatred. It’s a cautionary tale for corporate life. Without institutional justice and fairness, even the most advanced organizations can collapse into destructive internal conflict.

The compliance department’s mandate is clear: be the Enterprise, not Cheron. Build systems that see beyond superficial differences, enforce rules fairly, resist partisan pressures, confront systemic inequity, and provide a shared framework for fairness. In doing so, you give your organization something Bele and Lokai never had: a future worth fighting for together.

Resources:

⁠⁠Excruciatingly Detailed Plot Summary by Eric W. Weisstein⁠⁠

⁠⁠MissionLogPodcast.com⁠⁠

⁠⁠Memory Alpha

Categories
10 For 10

10 For 10: Top Compliance Stories For the Week Ending August 9, 2025

Welcome to 10 For 10, the podcast that brings you the week’s Top 10 compliance stories in one podcast each week. Tom Fox, the Voice of Compliance, brings to you, the compliance professional, the compliance stories you need to be aware of to end your busy week. Sit back, and in 10 minutes, hear about the stories every compliance professional should be aware of from the prior week. Every Saturday, 10 For 10 highlights the most important news, insights, and analysis for the compliance professional, all curated by the Voice of Compliance, Tom Fox. Get your weekly filling of compliance stories with 10 for 10, a podcast produced by the Compliance Podcast Network.

  • Trump is now the CEO of all US corps. (WSJ)
  • Even Peggy Noonan predicts AI chaos. (WSJ)
  • Musk given $30 bn to ‘stay focused’ by Tesla shareholders. (Bloomberg)
  • Netanyahu moves to fire his prosecutor. (Axios)
  • Credit Suisse’s purchase costs UBS another $33MM. (WSJ)
  • F1 leader pleads guilty to corruption in Singapore. (BBC)
  • Trump wants to punish banks. (WSJ)
  • When ABC becomes corrupted. (FT)
  • Uber picked business over customer safety. (NYT)
  • The 9th Circuit upholds the SEC gag rule. (Reuters)

You can check out the Daily Compliance News for four curated compliance and ethics-related stories each day, here.

Connect with Tom 

Instagram

Facebook

YouTube

Twitter

LinkedIn

You can purchase a copy of my new book, Upping Your Game, on Amazon.com

Categories
Daily Compliance News

Daily Compliance News: August 8, 2025, The Trump as CEO Edition

Welcome to the Daily Compliance News. Each day, Tom Fox, the Voice of Compliance, brings you compliance-related stories to start your day. Sit back, enjoy a cup of morning coffee, and listen in to the Daily Compliance News. All, from the Compliance Podcast Network. Each day, we consider four stories from the business world, compliance, ethics, risk management, leadership, or general interest for the compliance professional.

Top stories include:

  • Trump is now the CEO of all US corps. (WSJ)
  • Even Peggy Noonan predicts AI chaos. (WSJ)
  • Trump tells Intel to fire CEO. Are you next? (WSJ)
  • Trump creates a broken industrial policy. (WSJ)

You can donate to flood relief for victims of the Kerr County flooding by going to the Hill Country Flood Relief here.

Categories
Blog

Unmasking Deception: Five Investigative Lessons from Star Trek’s “Whom Gods Destroy”

Today, let’s take a journey to one of Star Trek: The Original Series’ most intense psychological dramas: “Whom Gods Destroy.” On its surface, this episode is a tale of madness, manipulation, and peril. But for the vigilant compliance professional, it’s a trove of investigative lessons on dealing with deception, managing risk, and safeguarding your organization in an unpredictable world.

In “Whom Gods Destroy,” Captain Kirk and Mr. Spock arrive at the maximum-security facility on Elba II to deliver a new medicine. They quickly fall prey to the cunning Garth of Izar, a former starship fleet captain now criminally insane. Garth seizes control of the asylum using his shapeshifting ability and manipulates everyone around him with a series of deceptions, impersonations, and psychological games. For Kirk and Spock, survival means uncovering the truth in a maze of misdirection.

Let’s beam down to Elba II, a remote asylum for the galaxy’s most dangerous criminally insane, to examine what this wild ride can teach us about effective corporate investigations.

1. Never Accept Surface Appearances—Verify, Then Trust

Illustrated By: Kirk and Spock are greeted by what appears to be the asylum’s director, Governor Cory. He acts normally and reassures them that all is well. Only later do they discover that Garth, using his ability to alter his appearance, is impersonating Cory and is, in fact, in control of the facility.

Compliance Lesson. In investigations, never accept things at face value. Documents can be forged, credentials fabricated, and even trusted individuals may act under duress or with hidden motives. Just as Garth’s impersonation deceived Kirk, compliance investigators must independently verify facts, corroborate stories, and challenge what seems obvious. Assume nothing—always test the evidence.

What should you do now? Establish robust protocols for evidence verification. Don’t simply trust, but verify, using multiple sources, forensic tools, and independent witness interviews. Always be alert to the possibility that someone may be playing a role.

2. Psychological Manipulation: Beware the Power of Charisma

Illustrated By: Garth, in his guise as both himself and others, uses his charisma and manipulation to sow confusion and loyalty among the other inmates. He persuades them to join his rebellion through promises, threats, and appeals to their egos.

Compliance Lesson. In many investigations, the most dangerous individuals are those who wield psychological influence. Charismatic leaders, managers, or employees can persuade others to cover up wrongdoing, falsify records, or sabotage investigative efforts. Investigators must be wary of undue influence and remember that even the most likable or persuasive people may have something to hide.

What should you do now?  Train your investigative team to recognize and resist psychological manipulation. Always seek independent corroboration and never let charm or status cloud your objectivity.

3. The Importance of Access Controls and Segregation of Duties

Illustrated By: Garth gains control over the asylum’s security systems, disabling communications and trapping Kirk and Spock. By centralizing control, he can manipulate everyone in the facility and thwart any rescue attempt.

Compliance Lesson: A key safeguard against fraud and misconduct is the principle of segregation of duties and strict access controls. If one individual or a small group can manipulate systems without oversight, your organization is vulnerable to abuse. Garth’s control of Elba II mirrors what can happen in a business when there are weak internal controls: a single rogue actor can wreak havoc before anyone notices.

What should you do now? Regularly review and test your access controls and segregation of duties. Ensure that no single person has unchecked power and regularly audit system logs to detect unusual activity. Prevent the “Garth scenario” by building multiple layers of oversight.

4. Recognize Red Flags and Act on Them Swiftly

Illustrated By: Despite several warning signs, unusual behavior from the “director,” cryptic comments from the staff, and security lapses, Kirk and Spock hesitate before taking decisive action. Only after the deception becomes undeniable do they shift into crisis mode.

Compliance Lesson. Every investigation reveals red flags. The question is: will your team recognize them early and act decisively? All too often, subtle signals, changes in behavior, delayed responses, or gaps in documentation are ignored until the situation escalates. In “Whom Gods Destroy,” the cost of delay is nearly fatal.

What should you do now? Create a culture where red flags are escalated and investigated immediately. Encourage open reporting and ensure investigators are empowered to follow up on their instincts. Quick action can prevent a minor issue from becoming a crisis.

5. Collaboration Is the Key to Outwitting Deception

Illustrated By: Ultimately, Kirk and Spock overcome Garth’s deceptions through close teamwork, communication, and the use of a prearranged security code that only the honest Kirk would know. Spock’s skepticism and methodical approach are essential to cutting through the confusion and revealing the truth.

Compliance Lesson. Investigations should never be a solo endeavor. Collaboration, clear communication, and checks and balances are essential to unmasking sophisticated schemes. Like Spock and Kirk, compliance teams must establish protocols—such as “safe words,” confirmation codes, or independent review processes—to prevent impersonation, collusion, or false confessions.

What should you do now? Build cross-functional investigative teams with diverse skill sets. Foster a culture of transparency, and ensure all findings are independently reviewed and validated. Teamwork and process discipline are your best defenses against deception.

Final ComplianceLog Reflections

“Whom Gods Destroy” may be set in a galaxy far away, but its lessons are as relevant to the compliance investigator as they are to any starship captain. In a world where deception can take many forms, such as charisma, forged documents, technological manipulation, or even trusted colleagues, your best defense is disciplined skepticism, rigorous process, and a commitment to the truth above all else.

In corporate investigations, the price of being deceived is high, but the rewards of vigilance, skepticism, and teamwork are higher. So, as you face your own “Elba II,” remember the lessons of Kirk and Spock: Trust the process, trust your team, and always keep your eyes open for the masks that others might wear.

Resources:

⁠⁠Excruciatingly Detailed Plot Summary by Eric W. Weisstein⁠⁠

⁠⁠MissionLogPodcast.com⁠⁠

⁠⁠Memory Alpha

Categories
Creativity and Compliance

Creativity and Compliance – Reinventing Compliance with Creativity: The Acteon I-Care Code

Where does creativity fit into compliance? In more places than you think. Problem-solving, accountability, communication, and connection—they all take creativity. Join Tom Fox and Ronnie Feldman on the award-winning Creativity and Compliance. Ronnie’s company, Learning and Entertainment, leverages the entertainment devices people use to consume information in their daily lives and applies this approach to important topics such as compliance and ethics. It is not only about being funny. It involves adjusting the tone of your compliance communications and messaging to make your compliance program, policies, and resources more accessible.

Today, Ronnie takes a solo turn as host to Diana Whitney and Jason Blue, both from Acteon, to discuss their innovative approach to revamping their compliance program. With a new ownership structure emphasizing compliance, they created the I-Care Code. Through a creative rebranding effort featuring mascots Connie Compliance and Easy Breezy, the I-Care Code encompasses key values of integrity, compliance, accountability, respect, and ethics. By leveraging videos, interactive sessions, and a global roadshow, they successfully boosted employee engagement and speak-up cases, demonstrating the power of creativity in compliance.

Key highlights:

  • The Need for a New Compliance Approach
  • Introducing the I-Care Code
  • Creating Engaging Compliance Characters
  • Launching the I-Care Code: Roadshow and Global Engagement
  • Success Stories and Metrics
  • Advice for Implementing Creative Compliance

Resources:

Ronnie

Tom

Instagram

Facebook

YouTube

Twitter

LinkedIn

Creativity and Compliance was recently honored as one of the Top 35 Podcasts on Creativity by Feedspot.