Tag: CCO

Categories
Across the Board

Across the Board – Episode 3: Not Enough Time/Not Enough Depth

In this special 5-part podcast series, I am visiting with David Greenberg, Special Advisor at LRN. We take a deep dive into the LRN White Paper entitled, “What’s the Tone at the Very Top: Board and Compliance: The Role of Boards in Overseeing Corporate Ethics & Compliance”. In this podcast series we explore the white paper in depth and provide the Chief Compliance Officer and compliance practitioner with succinct and practical tips for educating, dealing with and reporting to a Board of Directors. In Episode 3, we consider many CECO’s concern that Boards do not dedicate sufficient time and priority to compliance nor go into sufficient depth into compliance programs and potential outcomes . Some of the highlights from the podcast include:

  • Why don’t Boards put in more time around E&C programs?
  • Why is compliance often the last item on the Board agenda and equally as often, left off for later?
  • CECOs want to be challenged by their Boards but often are not.
  • Does your Board have a compliance game plan?
  • Why don’t BODs go deeper into E&C programs? How would they do so?
  • Are Boards even asking the right questions?

Check out the LRN White Paper What’s the Tone at the Very Top: Board and Compliance: the Role of Boards in Overseeing Corporate Ethics & Complianceby clicking here.

Categories
Across the Board

Across the Board – Episode 5: The Road Ahead

Over this special 5-part podcast series, I have visited with David Greenberg, Special Advisor at LRN. We take a deep dive into the LRN White Paper entitled, “What’s the Tone at the Very Top: Board and Compliance: The Role of Boards in Overseeing Corporate Ethics & Compliance”. In this podcast series we explore the white paper in depth and provide the Chief Compliance Officer and compliance practitioner with succinct and practical tips for educating, dealing with and reporting to a Board of Directors. In this fifth and final episode, we look at the road ahead. The White Paper stated, “Over time, the gulf between CECOs and boards should be bridgeable. We believe the bridge should be built quickly. The sooner that CECOs have the board’s ear – and that directors are fully aware of what CECOs and the initiatives they lead can bring to the table –the stronger and more resilient their companies will be.
Some of the highlights from the podcast include:

  • What practical steps should be taken to engage the board more actively and effectively in ethics and compliance oversight?
  1. More time, higher priority, stronger signals from boards in ethics and compliance oversight.
  2. Boards need to question whether ethics and compliance are genuinely integral to business operations.
  3. Elevate the CECO and establish direct and confidential reporting lines?
  • What lays on the road ahead?

Check out the LRN White Paper What’s the Tone at the Very Top: Board and Compliance: the Role of Boards in Overseeing Corporate Ethics & Complianceby clicking here.

Categories
Across the Board

Across the Board – Episode 2: BOD Understanding and the Game Plan

In this special 5-part podcast series, I am visiting with David Greenberg, Special Advisor at LRN. We take a deep dive into the LRN White Paper entitled, “What’s the Tone at the Very Top: Board and Compliance: The Role of Boards in Overseeing Corporate Ethics & Compliance”. In this podcast series we explore the white paper in depth and provide the Chief Compliance Officer and compliance practitioner with succinct and practical tips for educating, dealing with and reporting to a Board of Directors. In Episode 2, we consider the average Board of Director’s knowledge of compliance and your game plan going forward. Some of the highlights from the podcast include:

  • Why don’t Boards have a better understanding of the compliance function within their organization?
  • Why do BOD’s have such little knowledge of the CECO role?
  • Why does the BOD tend to focus on what has passed rather forward looking?
  • Does your Board have a compliance game plan?
  • Why does a BOD need to develop a framework for discussing, evaluating, and measuring ethics and compliance?
  • Why should BODs relate ethics and compliance to their companies’ core strategy and be able to have a sufficient point of view to guide and oversee it?

Check out the LRN White Paper What’s the Tone at the Very Top: Board and Compliance: the Role of Boards in Overseeing Corporate Ethics & Complianceby clicking here.

Categories
Innovation in Compliance

Making Compliance Training Fun with Andrew Rawson


What if compliance training didn’t have to be boring? Joining us on this episode is Andrew Rawson, the Chief Learning Officer for Traliant, a compliance training company. Today we’re talking about the future of compliance training: how to make it truly effective, useful, and even fun.

The importance of training
The last couple of years have seen the intersection of two seismic forces that have created tremendous demand for quality training. The first was the #MeToo movement, which has brought up the whole topic of compliance training around sexual harassment — so much so that it’s become a need to have instead of a nice to have, even in states where it isn’t required. The second was a change in regulations in different states across the country, now requiring more than 10 million people to be trained.
Effective compliance training
There is a difference between teaching people about the law and teaching them what to do. At Traliant, they wanted to train people how to behave. What do you do when you’re faced with a particular situation? That should be the focus.
The training is also intentionally more modern: well-designed interfaces, interactive videos, professional actors, point systems, getting senior management to record training segments for their peers  — all of which help make learning more engaging.
An important part of making training effective is making sure that people are encouraged to speak up, and that when they do, they’ll be protected. You might not be able to stop bad actors, but you can encourage witnesses to point out the behavior.
Moving away from check-the-box training
Much of compliance training is very check-the-box: a once-a-year thing that companies do to get it over with. But that’s not an effective approach. Traliant has gone from doing one-and-done sessions to creating a more holistic training approach. Examples are 15-20 minute courses for managers involved in investigations and two-minute training videos on dating in the workplace that they call “sparks” — because they’re meant to spark conversations.
Preventing Workplace Sexual Harassment: 4 Top Trends for 2019

  1.  The Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC) is keeping workplace harassment training front and center, remaining one of its top priorities.
  2. Harassment training continues to evolve, and we’re seeing a shift from helping companies avoid liability to helping people behave properly.
  3. Training is highly state-driven, given their different requirements. So Traliant has built a platform where people can access the training relevant to them, instead of a one-size-fits-all course.
  4. There is a focus on building respectful, inclusive work cultures that embrace compliance training not because they have to, but because they want to.

Resources
Andrew Rawson (LinkedIn)
Traliant (Website)
Preventing Workplace Sexual Harassment: 4 Top Trends for 2019

Categories
Compliance Into the Weeds Daily Compliance News

Compliance into the Weeds: Episode 118-Hotline Metrics

Compliance into the Weeds is the only weekly podcast which takes a deep dive into a compliance related topic, literally going into the weeds to more fully explore a subject. In this episode, Matt Kelly (the coolest guy in compliance) and I take a deep dive into recently released NAVEX Global 2019 Ethics & Compliance Hotline Benchmark Report. We consider the details from the report and ask the following question “are you using all the right intake channels to capture a true sense of misconduct and corporate culture at your organization?” Some of the highlights include:

Some of the highlights include:

  • What are the intake channels available to your organization?
  • If you are only tracking complaints through a formal system, you may well be missing a wider variety and rich source of information.
  • Moving your intake past simply what the law requires will give you a much better accounting of your organization’s culture.
  • How can you improve your intake?
  • Has closure time for reported increase or decrease?
  • What has been the continued impact of #MeToo?

For more reading check out Matt’s blog post “Hotline Metrics-are you missing any?”
To read the full NAVEX Global 2019 Ethics & Compliance Hotline Benchmark Report, click here.

Categories
This Week in FCPA

This Week in FCPA-Episode 147 – the Spring has Sprung edition

As the St. Patrick’s Day weekend is past and Spring has sprung all over Tom and Jay are back to take a look at some of this week’s top compliance and ethics stories which caught their collective eyes this week.

  1. What are some of the lessons for compliance professionals from the college admissions scandal? Bob Conlin and Carrie Penman lay them out in Navex’s Ethics and Compliance Matters. 
  2. How did the FCPA Corporate Enforcement Policy change for messaging apps? Nate Lankford and Dawn E. Murphy-Johnson spell it out for you in the FCPA Blog.
  3. What’s the difference between concurrent, consecutive and stacked? Sara Kropf explains it all her great blog, Grand Jury Target.
  4. Even the big dogs can be defrauded. Kristen Broughton reports on fraud which cost Google and Facebook over $100MM in the WSJ Risk and Compliance Journal.
  5. Training wheels will continue to be useful in the future. Ken Wielerstein explains in the Analysts Syndicate.
  6. The business response leads to better compliance through FinTech. Matthew Epstein and Robert Werner discuss in NYU’s Compliance and Enforcement Blog. Sonny Singh in Corporate Compliance Insights.
  7. Cyber breach disclosures are a mess. Matt Kelly reports in Radical Compliance.
  8. The Editor speaks on insider threats. Compliance Week Editor Dave Lefort discusses what he learned at Compliance Week West, in Compliance Week. (sub req’d)
  9. Jaclyn Jaeger looks inside the FBI Office of Integrity, in Compliance Week. (sub req’d)
  10. Following up on his blog post series on the MTS FCPA settlement, Tom moves to the audio format for a podcast series on the enforcement action.Check out the following: Part 1-background;Part 2-bribery schemes; Part 3– missed red flags; Part 4-the individual indictments; and Part 5-lessons learned. The podcast is available on multiple sites: the FCPA Compliance Report, iTunes, JDSupra, Panoplyand YouTube. The Compliance Podcast Network is now also on Spotifyand Corporate Compliance Insights.
  11. In Houston on Tuesday? Join Tom and Katie Smith at Convercent’s Roundtable Lunch. Registration and information are here. If you are not in Houston, then join Tom, Louis Sapirman and Katelyn Conlyn for a Convercent webinar on how to better engage with your employees. Registration and information for the webinar found here. Best of all, both events are FREE.
  12. Check out the latest edition of Popcorn and Compliancewhere Tom and Jay looked at Captain Marvel from the compliance perspective.
  13. Join Tom and AMI’s Jesse Caplan next week for a 5-part exploration of emerging issues in healthcare compliance and monitoring. The podcast will be available on multiple sites: the FCPA Compliance Report, iTunes, JDSupra, Panoply, YouTube, Spotify and Corporate Compliance Insights.

Tom Fox is the Compliance Evangelist and can be reached at tfox@tfoxlaw.com. Jay Rosen is       Mr. Monitor and can be reached at jrosen@affiliatedmonitors.com.
For more information on how an independent monitor can help improve your company’s ethics and compliance program, visit our sponsor Affiliated Monitors at www.affiliatedmonitors.com.

Categories
This Week in FCPA

This Week in FCPA-Episode 146 – Ides of March (formerly St. Patty’s Day) edition

On this Ides of March tAs the St. Patrick’s Day weekend is upon, and we are all Irish at least for a day, Tom and Jay are joined by our favorite Irishman (and the Coolest Guy in Compliance), Matt Kelly to take a look at some of this week’s top compliance and ethics stories which caught their collective eyes this week.

  1. Massive corruption scandal rocks college admissions across the country. Dana Goldstein and Jack Healy in the NYT. Douglas Belkin and Jennifer Levitz in the WSJ. Nick Anderson in the Washington Post.
  2. FARA, FARA, FARA. Katie Brenner in the NYT. Dan Packel in Law.com.
  3. Former KPMG national practice leader convicted in PCAOB scandal. Michael Rapaport reports in the Wall Street Journal.
  4. Will the US finally clamp down on shell companies? Matthew Stephenson is cautiously optimistic in the Global Anti-Corruption Blog. General David Petraeus and Sheldon Whitehouse explain why it’s a national security issue in an Op-Ed piece in the Washington Post.
  5. Head coaches behaving badly as LSU head basketball coach suspended indefinitely in NCAA recruiting scandal. Ross Dellenger reports in Sports Illustrated.
  6. DOJ quietly modifies Corporate FCPA Enforcement Policy. Clare Hudson and Adam Dobrik report in GIR. (sub req’d) DOJ policy of self-disclosure making headway. Mingqi Sun in the WSJ Risk and Compliance Journal.
  7. Did Oracle violate the FCPA? (Tech Central)
  8. 1MDB scandal back in the news as former Goldman Sachs banker Timothy Leissner and Roger Ng banned from banking industry for life. David Simpson reports in Law360. (sub req’d) Also-did Jho Low contribute to Trump campaign? Tom Wright and Bradley Hope in the Wall Street Journal.
  9. How can you engage a BOD on cyber risks? Deloitte’s Khalid Kark, Tonie Leatherberry and Debbie McCormack in the Harvard Law School Forum on Corporate Governance.
  10. Tom continues with fan fav podcast series this week, the Adventures in Compliance this week.Check out the following: Part 1-The Red Circle; Part 2-The Abbey Grange; Part 3– The Priory School; Part 4-The Six Napoleons; and Part 5-The Empty House. The podcast is available on multiple sites: the FCPA Compliance Report, iTunes, JDSupra, Panoply and YouTube. The Compliance Podcast Network is now also on Spotify. It is now on Corporate Compliance Insights.
  11. In a special guest segment, Matt Kelly reports on the highlights from Ethisphere’s Global Business Ethics Summit, which was held this past week in New York.
  12. Check out the latest edition of Popcorn and Compliance where Tom and Jay look at Captain Marvel. It posts Saturday, March 16 on the Compliance Podcast Network.

Tom Fox is the Compliance Evangelist and can be reached at tfox@tfoxlaw.com. Jay Rosen is       Mr. Monitor and can be reached at jrosen@affiliatedmonitors.com.
For more information on how an independent monitor can help improve your company’s ethics and compliance program, visit our sponsor Affiliated Monitors at www.affiliatedmonitors.com.

Categories
Blog

Day 21 of 30 Days to a Better Compliance Program, the Compliance Oversight Committee

Key Takeaways 

  1. Determine an appropriate committee membership.
  2. The committee is there to act as an extra set of eyes for the CCO, not to substitute its judgment.
  3. Determine the scope of items and issues to be reviewed by the committee.

For more information, check out my book Doing Compliance: Design, Create and Implement an Effective Anti-Corruption Compliance Program, which is available by clicking here. The Compliance Oversight Committee provides a second set of eyes for the CCO and compliance department.    ]]>

Categories
Blog

Day 20 of 30 Days to a Better Compliance Program, the Board of Directors’ Compliance Committee

Key Takeaways

  1. This committee exists to provide oversight and assist the CCO, not to substitute its judgment for that of the CCO.
  2. This committee should work to hold the CCO accountable to hit appropriate metrics.
  3. This committee is ideal for leading the efforts around strategic planning.

For more information, check out my book Doing Compliance: Design, Create and Implement an Effective Anti-Corruption Compliance Program, which is available by clicking here.  ]]>

Categories
Blog

Day 19 of 30 Days to a Better Compliance Program, Compliance Expertise on the Board

Office of Inspector General (OIG) has called for greater compliance expertise at the Board level. The OIG said that a Board can raise its level of substantive expertise with respect to regulatory and compliance matters by adding to the Board, a compliance member. The presence of a such a compliance professional with subject matter expertise on the Board sends a strong message about the organization’s commitment to compliance, provides a valuable resource to other Board members, and helps the Board better fulfill its oversight obligations. Mike Volkov looked at it from both a practical and business perspective and has stated, “I have witnessed firsthand that companies that have a board member with compliance expertise usually have a more aggressive and effective compliance program. In this situation, a Chief Compliance Officer has to answer to the board for the company’s compliance program, while receiving the resources and support to accomplish compliance tasks.” Roy Snell sees it through the prism of the compliance profession and has said, “If you ask most companies if they have compliance expertise on their Board… most would say yes. When asked who the compliance expert is they typically point to a lawyer, auditor, risk manager, or an ethicists. None of these professions are automatically compliance experts. All lawyers have different specialties.” He goes on to state that what regulators want to see is specific compliance expertise at the Board level. He noted, “the government is looking for is not generic compliance expertise. They are looking for compliance program management expertise. Hui Chen, the DOJ Compliance Counsel, has continually talked about the need for companies to operationalize their compliance programs. She intones businesses must work to literally burn compliance into the fabric and DNA of their organization. Having a Board member with specific compliance expertise, heading a Board level Compliance Committee can provide a level of oversight and commitment to achieving this goal. It will not be long before the DOJ and SEC begin to require this step in any FCPA enforcement action resolution. This means that when your company is evaluated by Chen, under the factors set out in Prong Three of the FCPA Pilot Program, to retrospectively determine if your company had a best practices compliance program in place at the time of any violation, you need to have not only the structure of the Board level Compliance Committee but also the specific subject matter expertise on the Board and on that committee.

Key Takeaways

  1. Boards must have compliance expertise.
  2. Government regulators and shareholder groups have both called for greater compliance expertise at the Board.
  3. Compliance expertise at the Board works up and down as such expertise can be a resource to both the CCO and compliance department.

For more information, check out my book Doing Compliance: Design, Create and Implement an Effective Anti-Corruption Compliance Program, which is available by clicking here. Both government regulators and shareholder groups have both called for greater compliance expertise at the Board.]]>